:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小課後照顧班公私協力治理議題之探討
書刊名:教育行政論壇
作者:陳盈宏
作者(外文):Chen, Ying-hong
出版日期:2017
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁96-115
主題關鍵詞:公私協力協力治理課後照顧Public-private partnershipCollaborative governanceAfter-school care
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:161
  • 點閱點閱:39
本研究以桃園市國民小學課後照顧班為研究個案,進行公私協力治理之個案研究;本研究所採取的研究方法為文件分析及焦點團體訪談;根據研究發現,學校及民間組織皆認同課後照顧班的確有助促進國小學生健康成長及使家長安心就業,所以,學校及民間組織皆願意協力推動課後照顧班;再者,學校及民間組織在課後照顧資源的互補作用及持續累積的成功協力經驗,也進一步強化學校及民間組織共同推動課後照顧班的協力動機;此外,在學校及民間組織的協力過程,可透過持續性的真誠性溝通及具彈性的課後照顧方案制度設計,並加上教育主管機關及校長的促進型領導,皆可有助於學校及民間組織化解彼此衝突、建立共識及累積彼此的信任資本;最後,本研究提出可供教育主管機關調整課後照顧政策的參考建議。
This study takes the after-school program at elementary schools in Taoyuan City as the case to make a study of public-private partnership. The study adopts the method of document analysis and focus group interview to collect data. The study reveals schools and NGOs agree the after school care indeed contributes to improve students' all-round development, and reduce parents' burden. Further, the complementary of after school care resources and the accumulating experience in collaborative governance between schools and NGOs strengthen the consideration of promoting after school care with public-private partnership. In addition, during the process of collaboration, it could resolve the conflicts between schools and NGOs, reach a consensus and establish trust, though the persistent sincere communication, flexible after school care program and educational authorities' and principals' facilitative leadership. Based on the conclusion, some further suggestions are made for the educational authorities' information to adjust the policy direction of the after-school care.
期刊論文
1.Noble, G.、Jones, R.(2006)。The Role of Boundary-Spanning Managers in the Establishment of Public-Private Partnerships。Public Administration,84(4),891-917。  new window
2.張源泉(20121200)。德國高等教育治理之改革動向。教育研究集刊,58(4),91-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張奕華、劉文章(20120800)。教育正義的實踐觀點與個案分析。教育資料與研究,106,1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.曾冠球(20110100)。協力治理觀點下公共管理者的挑戰與能力建立。文官制度季刊,3(1),27-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳嘉彌(20051000)。課後照顧方案之評鑑。研習資訊,22(5),16-21。  延伸查詢new window
6.Agranoff, R.(2006)。Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers。Public Administration Review,66(1),56-65。  new window
7.詹志禹、吳璧純(20151000)。偏鄉教育創新發展。教育研究月刊,258,28-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳盈宏(20150900)。從協力治理觀點探討國立大學自主治理試辦方案之執行。教育研究與發展期刊,11(3),31-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.何俊青(20141100)。臺灣課後照顧的研究現況:期刊與學位論文的內容分析。南台人文社會學報,12,27-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.孫扶志、林惠齡(20100600)。國小低年級學童參與學校課後照顧班家長滿意度之研究--以臺中縣為例。幼兒教育研究,2,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Hatcher, R.(2014)。Local authorities and the school system: The new authority-wide partnerships。Educational Management Administration & Leadership,42(3),355-371。  new window
12.Hogan, A.(2016)。NAPLAN and the role of edu-business: New governance, new privatisations and new partnerships in Australian education policy。Australian Educational Researcher,43(1),93-110。  new window
13.Williamson, B.(2014)。Mediating education policy: Making up the anti-politics of third-sector participation in public education。British Journal of Educational Studies,62(1),37-55。  new window
14.Scott, T. A.、Thomas, C. W.(2017)。Unpacking the collaborative toolbox: why and when do public managers choose collaborative governance strategies。Policy Studies Journal,45(1),191-214。  new window
15.朱鎮明(20051200)。政策網絡中協力關係的成效:理論性的探討。公共行政學報,17,113-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陳敦源、張世杰(20100700)。公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭。文官制度季刊,2(3),17-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.李柏諭(20050900)。公私協力與社區治理的理論與實務:我國社區大學與政府經驗。公共行政學報,16,59-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Ansell, Chris、Gash, Alison(2008)。Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,18(4),543-571。  new window
學位論文
1.尉靜庵(2016)。花蓮縣身心障礙學生課後照顧之研究--以太陽國小為例(碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.李燕如(2015)。國小級任教師兼任課後照顧教師之工作壓力、工作倦怠與幸福感之研究(碩士論文)。萬能科技大學,桃園市。  延伸查詢new window
3.林佳怡(2012)。國民小學課後照顧經營之個案研究(碩士論文)。逢甲大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
4.張家鈞(2010)。國小身心障礙學生課後照顧服務專班現況與所遇困境之研究--以臺北縣三鶯區為例(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳貞錦(2016)。新北市國小課後照顧之實施現況與任課教師滿意度--以板橋區為例(碩士論文)。中華大學,新竹縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳恆鈞(2012)。治理互賴理論與實務。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Pierre, J.、Peters, B. G.(2000)。Governance, politics and the state。London:Macmillan Press。  new window
3.Donahue, J. D.、Zeckhauser, R. J.(2012)。Collaborative governance: private roles for public goals in turbulent times。Princeton, N.J.:Princeton University Press。  new window
4.Agranoff, Robert、McGuire, Michael(2003)。Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments。Georgetown University Press。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2015)。教育部宣示擴大推動偏鄉教育創新發展,http://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&sms=169B8E91BB75571F&s=60E511BECFA1EFCD。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2016)。兒童課後照顧服務班之實際招收人數,https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_Statistics_DetailData.aspx?sn=o7b87A7uTd%2fgJScHhlujYA%3d%3d&d=m9ww9odNZAz2Rc5Ooj%2fwIQ%3d%3d。  new window
3.(20170112)。教學資源與學習平臺簽約典禮暨記者會,http://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspxn=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=1B45227912120B1A, 。  延伸查詢new window
4.駐美國代表處教育組(2015)。美國聯邦機構合作提升科學、技術、工程和數學(STEM)課後教育機會,http://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=72&content_no=3991。  延伸查詢new window
5.駐瑞典代表處教育組(2016)。瑞典政府立法並撥款補助全義務教育學生課後輔導措施,http://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=106&content_no=5582。  延伸查詢new window
6.Smith, A.(2016)。Inside a student wellness after-school program,http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/12/14/inside-a-student-wellness-after-school-program.html。  new window
7.Teach For America。2015 Annual Report,https://www.teachforamerica.org/about-us/annual-report。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE