臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：食品安全治理中科學基礎與民主參與的平衡
書刊名：政大法學評論
作者：倪貴榮／王郁霖／蔡嘉晏
作者(外文)：Ni, Kuei-jung／Wang, Yu-lin／Tsai, Chia-yen
出版日期：2018
卷期：155
頁次：頁131-218
主題關鍵詞：科學證據；科學中立；食品民主；透明化；公眾參與；Scientific evidence；Scientific neutrality；Food democracy；Transparency；Public participation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1651
  • 點閱點閱:49
期刊論文
1.倪貴榮、吳慈珮(20100100)。由WTO貿易規範檢視美國牛肉（具BSE風險）的進口管制。月旦法學，176，147-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.倪貴榮(20130600)。食品安全與風險治理--評析含「萊克多巴胺」美畜產品之管制。月旦法學，217，108-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王郁霖(20181000)。論食品輸入政策中風險評估之程序建構與審查必要：以嚴格檢視原則之脈絡為例。月旦醫事法報告，24，149-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.倪貴榮(20151100)。美國抗生素動物用藥之管制--政策與法律觀點。月旦法學，246，172-185。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Bernstein, David E.(2015)。What to Do About Federal Agency Science: 
Some Doubts About Regulatory Daubert。Geo. Mason L. Rev.，22，549-574。  new window
6.Van den Bossche, Peter(2008)。NGO Involvement in the WTO: A Comparative Perspective。J. Int'l Eco. L.，11，717-749。  new window
7.Bohanes, Jan(2002)。Risk Regulation in WTO Law: A Procedure-Based Approach to the Precautionary Principle。Colum. J. Transnat'l L.，40，323-390。  new window
8.Cooter, Robert(2011)。Maturing into Normal Science: The Effect of Empirical Legal Studies on Law and Economics。U. Ill. L. Rev.，2011，1475-1483。  new window
9.Eggen, Jean Macchiaroli(1994)。Toxic Torts, Causation, and Scientific Evidence After Daubert。U. Pitt. L. Rev.，55。  new window
10.Edinger, Wieke Huizing(2014)。Food, Safety and the Behavioural Factor of Risk。Eur. J. Risk Reg.，5，491-504。  new window
11.Doremus, Holly(2008)。Scientific and Political Integrity in Environmental Policy。Texas Law Review，86(7)，1601-1654。  new window
12.EFSA(2009)。Guidance of the Scientific Committee on Transparency in the Scientific Aspects of Risk Assessments Carried out by EFSA. Part 2: General Principles。EFSA J.，7(5)，1-2。  new window
13.EFSA(2006)。Transparency in Risk Assessment Carried Out by EFSA: Guidance Document on Procedural Aspects。EFSA JOURNAL，4(5)，1-3。  new window
14.Eliason, Antonia(2009)。Science Versus Law in WTO Jurisprudence: The (Mis)Interpretation of the Scientific Process and the (In)sufficiency of Scientific Evidence in EC-Biotech。N. Y. U. J. Int'l L. & POL.，41，341-392。  new window
15.Funtowicz, Silvio O.、Ravet, Jerome R.(1994)。Uncertainty, Complexity and Post-Normal Science。Envtl. Toxicology & Chemistry，13，1881-1885。  new window
16.Fuller, Steve(1988)。Playing Without a Full Deck: Scientific Realism and the Cognitive Limits of Legal Theory。Yale L.J.，97，549-580。  new window
17.Fowler, Sharon P.、Williams, Ken、Resendez, Roy G.(2008)。Fueling the Obesity Epidemic? Artificially Sweetened Beverage Use and Long-term Weight Gain。Obesity，16，1894-1900。  new window
18.Finardi, Corrado(2012)。Food Safety Issues: From Enlightened Elitism towards Deliberative Democracy? An Overview of EFSA's "Public Consultation" Instrument。FOOD POL'Y，37，427-438。  new window
19.Hamilton, Neil(2004)。Food Democracy and the Future of American Values。Drake J. Agric. L.，9，9-28。  new window
20.Gilsenan, Mary B.(2016)。Special Issue: Open Risk Assessment: Data。EFSA J.，14(S1)。  new window
21.Giannelli, Paul C.(1980)。The Admissibility of Novel Scientific Evidence: Frye v. United States, A Half-Century Later。COLUM. L. Rev.，80，1197-1250。  new window
22.James, Bruce L.(1992)。Fryed Expert Witnesses: The 5th Circuit Takes Charge of Scientific Testimony。Rev. Litig.，12。  new window
23.Jacobs, Michael S.(1993)。Testing the Assumptions Underlying the Debate About Scientific Evidence: A Closer Look at Juror "Incompetence" and Scientific "Objectivity"。Conn. L. Rev.，25。  new window
24.Howse, Robert(2000)。Democracy, Science and Free Trade: Risk Regulation on Trial at the World Trade Organization。Mich. L. Rev.，98，2329-2357。  new window
25.Hoffmann, Sandra、Harder, William(2010)。Food Safety and Risk Governance in Globalized Markets。Health Matrix，20，5-54。  new window
26.Hassanein, Neva(2003)。Practicing Food Democracy: A Pragmatic Politics of Transformation。J. RURAL STUD.，19，77-86。  new window
27.Kelly, Claire R.(2006)。The Dangers of Daubert Creep in the Regulatory Realm。Journal of Law and Policy，14，165-209。  new window
28.Jasanoff, Sheila(2003)。Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science。Minerva，41，223-244。  new window
29.Jasanoff, Sheila(2000)。Between Risk and Precaution--Reassessing the Future of GM Crops。J. Risk Res.，3，277-282。  new window
30.Jasanoff, Sheila(1996)。The Dilemma of Environmental Democracy。ISSUES IN Sci. & Tech.，13，63-70。  new window
31.Lang, Tim(2003)。Food Industrialisation and Food Power: Implications for Food Governance。Gatekeeper Series，114。  new window
32.Nelson, Kristen C.、Andow, David A.、Banker, Michael J.(2009)。Developing Oversight Approaches to Nanobiotechnology: The Lessons of History: Problem Formulation and Option Assessment (PFOA) Linking Governance and Environmental Risk Assessment for Technologies: A Methodology for Problem Analysis of Nanotechnologies and Genetically Engineered Organisms。J.L. Med. & Ethics，37，732-748。  new window
33.Tijhuis, M. J.、De Jong, N.、Pohjola, M. V.(2012)。State of the Art in Risk-Benefit Analysis: Food and Nutrition。Food & Chemical Toxicology，50，5-25。  new window
34.Meazell, Emily Hammond(2011)。Super Deference, the Science Obsession, and Judicial Review as Translation of Agency Science。Michigan Law Review，109，733-784。  new window
35.McGarity, Thomas O.(2004)。Our Science is Sound Science and Their Science is Junk Science: Science-Based Strategies for Avoiding Accountability and Responsibility for Risk-Producing Products and Activities。U. Kan. L. Rev.，52。  new window
36.Peeples, Lloyd C. III(1997)。Exculpatory Polygraphs in the Courtroom: How the Truth May Not Set You Free。CUMB. L. Rev.，28。  new window
37.Ni, Kuei-Jung(2013)。Does Science Speak Clearly and Fairly in Trade and Food Safety Disputes? The Search for an Optimal Response of WTO Adjudication to Problematic International Standard-Making。Food & Drug L.J.，68，97-114。  new window
38.Renting, Henk、Schermer, Markus、Rossi, Adanella(2012)。Building Food Democracy: Exploring Civic Food Networks and Newly Emerging Forms of Food Citizenship。International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture & Food，19(3)，289-307。  new window
39.Raul, Alan Charles、Dwyer, Julie Zampa(2003)。"Regulatory Daubert": A Proposal to Enhance Judicial Review of Agency Science by Incorporating Daubert Principles into Administrative Law。Law and Contemporary Problems，66(4)，7-44。  new window
40.Walker, Vern R.(1991)。The Siren Songs of Science: Toward a Taxonomy of Scientific Uncertainty for Decisionmakers。Connecticut Law Review，23，567-626。  new window
41.Wagner, Wendy E.(2005)。Importing Daubert to Administrative Agencies Through the Information Quality Act。J.L. & Pol.，12，589-617。  new window
42.Vogel, David(2003)。The Hare and the Tortoise Revisited: The New Politics of Consumer and Environmental Regulation in Europe。Brit. J. Pol. Sci.，33，557-580。  new window
43.Verloo, Didier、Meyvis, Tom、Smith, Anthony(2016)。Open Risk Assessment: Methods and Expertise。EFSA J.，14(S1)。  new window
44.Shermer, Michael(2007)。The Really Hard Science。Sci. Am.，297，44-46。  new window
45.Yang, Qing(2010)。Gain Weight by 'Going Diet?' Artificial Sweeteners and the Neurobiology of Sugar Cravings。Yale J. Biology & Med.，83，101-108。  new window
46.Winickoff, David、Jasanoff, Sheila、Busch, Lawrence、Grove-White, Robin、Wynne, Brian(2005)。Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, Risk, and Democracy in World Trade Law。YALE J. INT'L L.，30，81-123。  new window
47.Walker, Vern R.(2003)。The Myth of Science as a "Neutral Arbiter" for Triggering Precautions。B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev.，26，197-228。  new window
48.Walker, Vern R.(1992)。The Concept of Baseline Risk in Tort Litigation。KY. L. J.，80，631-690。  new window
49.陳東升(20060300)。審議民主的限制--臺灣公民會議的經驗。臺灣民主季刊，3(1)，77-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.林昱梅(20151100)。論食品安全管理法制中之預防原則：以歐盟與臺灣為中心。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，44(特刊)，1037-1162。new window  延伸查詢new window
51.黃東益、施佳良、傅凱若(20070900)。地方公共審議說理過程初探：2005年宜蘭社大公民會議個案研究。公共行政學報，24，71-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
52.洪德欽(20151100)。歐盟食品安全制度對臺灣食安改革的啟示。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，44(特刊)，1163-1236。new window  延伸查詢new window
53.李明穎(20141200)。科學民主化下科技議題的風險治理：探討國光石化廠開發案的科技官僚風險溝通、公眾風險感知與公眾動員。思與言，52(4)，111-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
54.Faigman, David L.(2013)。The Daubert Revolution and the Birth of Modernity: Managing Scientific Evidence in the Age of Science。University of California Davis Law Review，46(3)，893-930。  new window
研究報告
1.蘇嘉瑞、施明智、黃子彬、楊文育(2015)。健全我國食品安全管理機制之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.邱靖鈜(2006)。公民會議在台灣的運作與評估(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Masson-Matthee, Marielle D.(2007)。The Codex Alimentarius Commission and Its Standards。T.M.C. Asser Press。  new window
2.Loether, Herman J.、Mctavish, Donald G.(1993)。Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: An Introduction。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
3.Alemanno, Alberto、Gabbi, Simone(2014)。Foundations of EU Food Law and Policy: Ten Years of the European Food Safety Authority。Ashgate。  new window
4.Davidson, Donald(1984)。Inquiries into truth and interpretation。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Gastil, John、Levine, Peter、國家教育研究院(2012)。審議民主指南：21世紀公民參與的有效策略。  延伸查詢new window
6.謝銘洋(2011)。智慧財產權法。  延伸查詢new window
7.Cairney, Paul(2016)。The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making。Berlin：Springer。  new window
8.Booth, Sue、Coveney, John(2015)。FOOD DEMOCRACY。Berlin：Springer。  new window
9.Birnie, Patricia(2009)。International Law & The Environment。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Davis, James A.(1985)。The Logic of Causal Order。California：Sage。  new window
11.Codex Alimentarius Com'm(2015)。Procedural Manual。Rome：Food & Agriculture Org.。  new window
12.Carmines, Edward G.、Zeller, Richard A.、Sullivan, John L.(1979)。Reliability and Validity Assessment。Sage。  new window
13.Davis, Margaret(2002)。Asking the Law Question: The Dissolution of Legal Theory。Sydney：Law Book Company。  new window
14.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(2006)。Food Safety Risk Analysis: A Guide for National Food Safety Authorities。Rome：WHO/FAO。  new window
15.Glickman, Theodore S.、Gough, Michael(2004)。Reading in Risk。Washington, D.C.：National Endowment for the Arts。  new window
16.Ghiselli, Edwin E.(1981)。Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences。New York：W. H. Freeman。  new window
17.Kuhn, Thomas S.(1996)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
18.Peel, Jacqueline(2010)。Science and Risk Regulation in International Law。Cambridge University Press。  new window
19.O'Rourke, Raymond(2005)。European Food Law。London：Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
20.O'Hear, Anthony(1989)。Introduction to the Philosophy of Science。Wotton-under-Edge：Clarendon Press。  new window
21.Putnam, Hilary(1978)。Meaning AND THE Moral Sciences。London：Routledge & K. Paul。  new window
22.Popper, Karl(1980)。The Logic of Scientific Discovery。London：Hutchinson。  new window
23.倪貴榮(2016)。食品安全與國際貿易：貿易自由化與健康風險治理之平衡。臺北：元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
24.吳庚(2012)。行政法之理論與實用。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.李惠宗(2010)。行政法要義。  延伸查詢new window
26.National Research Council(1983)。Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process。National Academies Press。  new window
其他
1.Esserman, Susan，Howse, Robert(2005)。The Creative Evolution of World Trade。  new window
圖書論文
1.倪貴榮、楊佩錡(2011)。評析歐盟荷爾蒙牛肉新管制政策與WTO體系之互動。歐洲聯盟經貿政策之新頁。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Dreyer, Marion、Renn, Ortwin(2014)。EFSA Stakeholder and Public Involvement Policy and Practice: A Risk Governance Perspective。Foundation of EU Food Law and Policy: Ten Years of the European Food Safety Authority。London：Ashgate Publishing。  new window
3.Kaye, David A.、Freedman, David A.(2000)。Reference Guide on Statistics。Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence。Washington, D.C.：The National Academics Press。  new window
4.Klüver, Lars(1995)。Consensus Conferences at the Danish Board of Technology。Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe。London：NMSI Trading Ltd。  new window
5.Pintado, Citlali(2014)。A Taxonomy of EFSA's Scientific Outputs。Foundations of EU Food Law & Policy: Ten Years of the European Food Safety Authority。London：Ashgate Publishing。  new window
6.Wynne, Brian(1996)。May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide。Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology。California：Sage。  new window
7.洪德欽(2011)。歐盟食品安全局風險評估體系之研究。歐盟與美國生物科技政策。中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：522（臺灣：511，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2178223 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67977650
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上