:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學習適應量表信度效度與常模之賡續研究
書刊名:初等教育學報
作者:李坤崇 引用關係
出版日期:1994
卷期:7
頁次:頁139-170
主題關鍵詞:學習適應量表
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:76
  • 點閱點閱:84
本研究旨在重新驗証「學習適應量表」的信度和效度、以及重新建立常模,牌使此量表更適用於國中和國小學生。 「學習適應量表」分為學習方法、學習習慣、學習態度、學習環境和身心適應等五個分量表。形式採Likert式四點量表,全量表共60題。重新驗証量表之隔兩週和隔四週重測信度係數平均值為.7990和.7279;Cronbachα係數平均值為.7441。以「激勵的學習略量表」、「學習態度測驗」、「教師評定問卷」和學業成績為效標來重新驗證同時效度;以地區差異、學校類別差異、年級差異、性別差異、學校類型差共、家庭社經地位差異、內在相關和驗證性因素分析來重新考驗建構效度。隨機抽取1,940名國小四年級至國中三年級學生為標準化樣本,重新建立不同年級學生的百分等級常模和T分數常模。
The purpose of this research were to retest the reliability,validity and to reconstruct the norm of Learning Adjustment Inventory (LAI) for the fourth ti ninth grade students in the elementary and junior high schools of Taiwan. The LAI consists of 60 items which were classified in to 5 subscales,including learning methods,learning habits,learning attitudes,learning environments and physical-mental adjustments. This inventory took the form of the Likert-type four point scales. The average test-retest reliability coefficient over a period of two weeks and a period of fourth week were .7990 and .7279,respectively. the average Counbachαcoefficient for the subtests were .7440. Correlation with Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnarie,Learning Attitudes Test,Teacher-rating Questionnaire and academic achievement were tested for elementary school and junior high school students’ reponse. For the discussion of construct validity,comparisions of different in areas,school types,sex,grades,school sizes and social economic status were provided. An multi-trait multi-method matrix was presented and six confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. Generally,the construct validity was accepted. The Separate Norm with Percentile and T score of each grades were also provided by a sample of 1,940 students.
期刊論文
1.Anastasi, A.(1985)。Interpreting results from multicore batteries。Journal of Counseling and Development,64,84-86。  new window
2.Bentler, P. M.、Bonett, D. G.(1980)。Significance Tests and Goodness-of-Fit in Analysis of Covariance Structures。Psychological Bulletin,88(3),588-606。  new window
3.Keith, T. Z.、Benson, M. J.(1992)。Effects of manipulability influences on high school grades across five ethnic groups。Journal of education Research,88(2),85+93。  new window
4.陳英豪、林正文、李坤崇(1989)。國小學生學習適應量表編製報告。測驗年刊,36,1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Cohen, J.(1982)。Set correlation as a general multivariate data-analytic method。Multivariate Behavior Research,17,301-341。  new window
6.李坤崇(1994)。國中學生學習適應及其相關因素之研究。臺南師院學報,27,75-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Marsh, Herbert W.、Balla, John R.、McDonald, Roderick P.(1988)。Goodness-of-fit Indexes in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: The Effect of Sample Size。Psychological Bulletin,103(3),391-410。  new window
8.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94。  new window
學位論文
1.程炳林(1991)。國民中小學生激勵的學習策略之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王文科(1987)。認知發展理論與教育:皮亞傑理論的應用。台北:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳英豪、汪榮才、李坤崇(1991)。國中國小學生學習適應及其相關因素之比較研究。臺南:國立台南師範學院初等教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
3.賴保禎(1969)。學習態度測驗指導手冊。臺北市:中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Cohen, Jacob(1988)。Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences。Routledge。  new window
5.陳英豪、林正文、李坤崇(1988)。國小學生學習適應之評量研究。台南:國立台南師院學院初等教育系。  延伸查詢new window
6.Anastasi, A.(1988)。Psychological testing。NY:MacMillan Publishing Company。  new window
7.Dacey, J.、Travers, J.(1991)。Human Development: Across the lifespan。Boston:Wm C. Brown。  new window
8.Kaluger, G.、Kaluger, M. F.(1986)。Human Development: The span of life。Ohio:Merrill Publishing。  new window
9.陳英豪、林正文、李坤崇(1991)。學習適應量表指導手冊。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural Equations with Latent Variables。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
11.陳英豪、吳裕益(1991)。測驗與評量。高雄:復文。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE