:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從“形與體之辯”到“體與理之辯”--中國古典哲學思想範式之嬗變歷程
書刊名:中國社會科學
作者:貢華南
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(4)
頁次:128-148+208
主題關鍵詞:形與體之辯體與理之辯
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1677
  • 點閱點閱:4
隨著"形"到"形而上"的演化,先秦哲學確立的"形"范式遂逐漸轉換為"體"范式。魏晉之際,新形名家再度崛起,高揚"形(名)"。作為對此的回應,其他思想家則分別從儒家、道家立場出發,以"體"來撥正"形"。王弼將"形"與"體"劃分為兩個層次,"形"為實存之"然","體"為"所以然",從而使"形"徹底被貶抑,"形體之辯"最終自覺確立起"體"范式的主導地位。宋儒一方面以"未嘗無"、"見在底"與"合當底"統一來詮釋與規定"體",繼續推進相應思考;另一方面,將"理"提升至"所以然"與"所當然"的統一,進而以"理"規定"體"。作為"所當然"的"體"被用于摹寫"人",但不能用來描述"物","體"的描述功能被擠壓而受限。由此,"理"壓倒"體"而被確立為新的思想范式。從"形與體之辯"到"體與理之辯","形"、"體"、"理"三范式的自覺嬗變,呈現了中國古典哲學思想脈絡的完整性與系統性。
Following the shift from"form"(形)to"metaphysics"(形而上,or what is above forms),the"form"paradigm established in the pre-Qin era evolved into the paradigm of"body(體)."The juncture of the Wei and Jin dynasties saw a resurgence of new philosophers of"form and name"(形名)who exalted form(name).In response to these ideas,others thinkers,starting from Confucianism and Daoism,used"body"to correct"form."Wang Bi divided form and body into two levels:"form"was what it was,while body was"reason"or what made it so."Form"was thus rendered totally insignificant;ultimately,"body"consciously took the leadership in the"argument of body and reason."Song Neo-Confucians used the integration of"possible existence"(未嘗無),"existence"(見在底),and"what should exist"(合當底)to interpret and define"body"to develop the corresponding thinking.At the same time,they elevated"reason"(理)into the union of"what is so"and"what should be so."The"body,"as the reasonable state or"what should be so,"could be used to describe people but not things,thus curtailing its descriptive function.In this way,"reason"suppressed"body"and was set up as a new intellectual paradigm.From the"argument of form and body"to the"argument of body and reason,"the conscious evolution of the three paradigms of"form,""body,"and"reason"exhibits the holistic and systematic nature of the development of Chinese philosophy.
期刊論文
1.貢華南(2009)。從無形、形名到形而上--"形而上"道路之生成。學術月刊,2009(6),52-61。  延伸查詢new window
2.貢華南(2009)。心(畫)與目(畫)--中西繪畫中的視覺及其位置。現代哲學,2009(1),104-115。  延伸查詢new window
3.貢華南(20160300)。中國早期思想史中的感官與認知。中國社會科學,2016(3),42-61+205。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.貢華南(2014)。理、天理與理會。復旦學報,2014(6),11-16。  延伸查詢new window
5.貢華南(2014)。體、本體與體道。社會科學,2014(7),111-119。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.鄧以蟄(1998)。鄧以蟄全集。安徽教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭曉東(2006)。識仁與定性:工夫論視域下的程明道哲學研究。復旦大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.程顥、程頤(2004)。二程集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.蒙培元(1989)。理學範疇系統。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.湯一介(2000)。郭象與魏晉玄學。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.朱熹(1983)。四書章句集注。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.郭象、成玄英、莊子(2011)。莊子注疏。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.譚戒甫(1996)。公孫龍子形名發微。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.范文瀾(1958)。文心雕龍注。人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.余敦康(2004)。魏晉玄學史。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.裴松之(1982)。三國志。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.(1974)。晉書。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.魏文帝(1973)。隋書.經籍志名家類.士操。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉邵(2014)。人物志。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.王天海、王韌(2014)。意林校譯。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.沈錫麟(2014)。群書治要。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.朱熹、黎靖德、王星賢(1994)。朱子語類。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.牟宗三(1999)。心體與性體。上海古籍出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.張載、章錫琛(1978)。張載集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.老子、王弼、樓宇烈(2011)。老子道德經注。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.湯用彤(2005)。魏晉玄學論稿。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.Kuhn, Thomas S.、金吾倫、胡新和(2003)。科學革命的結構。北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE