參考資料
一、中文部分
丁志仁（民88）。新課程對教師施教以及教師進修、培育的影響。載於中
華民國教材研究發展學會編印，邁向課程新紀元--九年一貫課程研討
會論文集（下），頁324-333。台北：教研學會出版。
王文科（民77）。課程論。台北：五南。
王前龍（民84）。國民小學「道德」課程決定之研究。國立台灣師範大學
教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
王麗雲、潘慧玲（民89）。教師章權益能的概念與實施策略。國立台灣師
範大學，教育研究輯刊，44輯，頁173-200。
司琦（民78）。課程導論。台北：五南。
牟中原、陳伯璋（民84）。學校改革理念。教改通訊，11，頁5-10。
行政院教育改革審議委員會總諮議報告書（民85），教育部網站，90年11
月23日http://www.sinica.edu.tw/info/edu-reform/farea2/tsy-
all_abs.html
李子建、黃顯華（民85）。課程：範式、取向和設計。台北：五南。
李宗薇（民86）。教育研究客觀性的現象學分析。國立台北師範學院學
報，第10期，頁1-22。
李振賢（民87）。邁向新世紀的教育政策--專訪教育部林清江部長。教師
天地，95，頁4-7。
李鴻亮、王前龍、范信賢（民90）。台灣地區國民中小學「學校本位課
程」現況之研究。論文發表於國立台灣師範大學主辦「新世紀課程改
革」學術研討會。
余安邦（民88）。夢中情人--九年一貫課程。教育資料與研究，第26期，頁19-21。
林佩璇（民88）。學校本位課程發展的個案研究─台北縣鄉土教學活動的課程發展。國立台灣師範大學博士論文，未出版。
林佩璇（民90）。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學教育
學研究所主編，質的研究方法，頁199-220。高雄：麗文。
林清江（民83）。社會變遷與教育改革的關係。教改通訊，第三期，頁5-
7。
林清江（民86）。教育改革的前景。成人教育，35（1），頁2-5。
林清江（民87a）。我教育發展動向之評析。訓育研究，37（3），頁1-
6。
林清江（民87b）。邁向新世紀的教育政策。87.09.24刊於中央日報。林清江（民87c）。當前教育改革方向。訓育研究，37（4），頁1-7。
林殿傑（民88）。九年一貫課程之政策規劃與因應策略。載於中華民國教
材研究發展學會編印，邁向課程新紀元--九年一貫課程研討會論文集
（下），頁394-419。台北：教研學會出版。
林維能（民88）。自我成長的再思：從Carol Gilligon的關懷倫理來思考
教師對成熟個體的期待。台灣師範大學教育系教育專題講座演講稿，
未出版。
林霓岑（民89）。國民小學教師設計統整課程之研究。國立台灣師範大學
教育系碩士論文。未出版。
吳清山（民78）。課程決定的理論探討。國立政治大學教育與心理研究，第12期，頁199-229。
周淑卿（民89）。面對統整課程與教學的教師文化。載於中華民國課程與教學學會主編，課程統整與教學，頁231-252。台北：楊智。
周麗玉（民87）。課程變臉與整容之道。台北教育通訊，33期，頁4-5。
洪詠善（民89）。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要決策過程之研究。
國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
唐小兵譯（民79）。後現代主義與文化理論（Fredric Jameson 教授講
座）。台北：當代叢書。
高希均（民89）。「知識經濟」不是一條好走的路─讓知識人扮演積極的
角色。聯合報，民89年9月25日民意論壇。
高新建（民80）。國小教師課程決定之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究
所碩士論文。未出版。
高新建（民88a）。學校本位課程發展的立論基礎與理想情境。論文發表
於台北市立師院舉辦『八十七學年度教育學術研討會』，載於研討會
論文輯，頁305-339。
高新建（民88b）。邁向成功的學校本位課程發展。論文發表於台北市立
師範學院，『課程統整與教學』學術研討會。
高新建（民88c）。學校本位課程發展的成功因素：綜合分析。論文發表
於國立高雄師範大學舉辦『新世紀中小學課程革新與創新教學』學術
研討會中，論文輯頁15-23。
教育部（民87）。國民教育階段課程總綱綱要 (草案)。台北：教育部。
郭守芬（民88）。吳京面臨之教育改革課題與因應政策。國立花蓮師範學
院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
陳伯璋（民88a）。九年一貫新課程綱要修訂的背景與內涵。教育研究資訊，7（1）， 頁1-13。
陳伯璋（民88b）。九年一貫課程的理念與理論分析。載於中華民國教材研究發展學會編印。邁向課程新紀元─九年一貫課程研討會論文集
（上），頁10-18。台北：教研學會出版。
張明輝（民90a）。新世紀教育改革的挑戰與展望。教育部網站，90年2月
5日http://web.cc.edu.tw/''minfei.html
張明輝（民90b）。九O年代中小學學校教育革新之策略與展望。教育部網站，90年2月5日http://web.cc.edu.tw/''minfei.html
張嘉育（民88）。學校本位課程發展。台北：師大書苑。
黃光雄、蔡清田（民88）。課程設計─理論與實際。台北：五南。
黃炳煌（民75）。課程理論之基礎。台北：文景。
黃炳煌（民77）。技職教育課程發展模式之研究。教育部技職司委託專題
研究。
黃炳煌（民88）。邁向二十一世紀的台灣社會科課程改革。載於中華民國
教材研究發展學會編印，邁向課程新紀元--九年一貫課程研討會論文
集（下），頁173-195。台北：教研學會出版。
黃政傑（民74）。課程改革。台北：漢文。
黃政傑（民79）。課程。載於黃光雄主編，教育概論 。台北：師大書
苑。
黃政傑（民80）。課程設計。台北：東華。
黃政傑（民88）。永續的課程改革經營。發表於「新世紀中小學課程改革
與創新教學」學術研討會。國立高雄師範大學舉辦。
游家政、吳家瑩（民87）。台灣國民教育課程綱要的研訂構想。論文發表
於「海峽兩岸小學教育學術研討會」。上海。
游家政（民88）。九年一貫課程的學習領域。載於中華民國教材研究發展學會編印，邁向課程新紀元--九年一貫課程研討會論文集（下），頁
99-122。台北：教研學會出版。
游家政（民90）。國民教育課程綱要的內涵及其對教師的衝激。教育部網
站，90年 2月5日， http://web.cc.ntn.edu.tw
游淑燕（民82）。國民小學教師課程決定權取向及其參與意願之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版。
葉興華（民89）。我國國小推行課程統整之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論論文。未出版。
楊深坑（民89）。迎接廿一世紀新專業主義之建構。論文發表於國立台灣
師範大學教育系主辦，「新世紀的教育願景」研討會。
楊益風（民88）。九年一貫課程與教學革新。載於中華民國教材研究發展
學會編印，邁向課程新紀元--九年一貫課程研討會論文集（下），頁
347-367。台北：教研學會出版。
甄曉蘭（民85）。從典範的轉移再思質的研究崛起的意義。國立嘉義師範
大學學報，第10期，頁119-146。
甄曉蘭（民86）。變遷社會中課程改革的迷思。論文發表於1997海峽兩岸小學教育學術研討會。嘉義：國立嘉義師範學院。
甄曉蘭（民87）。知識論對課程發展的影響─以台灣國小課程改革為例。
論文發表於一九九八海峽兩岸小學教育學術研討會。
甄曉蘭（民88）。九年一貫課程－改革的理想與挑戰。台灣教育，581，頁2-8。
甄曉蘭（民90）。從課程組織的觀點檢討課程統整的設計與實施。課程與教學季刊，4（1），頁1-20。
甄曉蘭、簡良平（民90）。學校本位課程發展之權力重整批判分析。論文發表於民國九十年10月20、21日中正大學舉辦之「課程與教學」論
壇。
蔡清田（民88a）。推動學校本位課程發展，進行學校課程總體營造。論文發表於國立高雄師範大學舉辦『新世紀中小學課程革新與創新教
學』學術研討會中， 論文輯頁25-33。
蔡清田（民88b）。九年一貫課程評鑑的行動途徑。載於中華民國教材研
究發展學會編印，邁向課程新紀元--九年一貫課程研討會論文集
（下），頁453-469。台北：教研學會出版。
歐用生（民78）。課程與教學：概念理論與實際。台北：文景。
歐用生（民80）。課程發展的基本原理。高雄：復文。
歐用生（民88a）。新世紀的學校。台北：’揚智。
歐用生（民88b）。落實學校本位的課程發展。論文發表於國立高雄師範大學舉辦『新世紀中小學課程革新與創新教學』學術研討會中，論文
輯頁405-409。
歐用生（民88c）。九年一貫課程之「潛在課程」評析。載於中華民國教
材研究發展學會編印，邁向課程新紀元--九年一貫課程研討會論文集
（上），頁19-33。台北：教研學會出版。
歐用生（民88d）。從「課程統整」的概念評九年一貫課程。教育研究資
訊，7(1），頁22-32。
簡良平（民89）。知識形式的劃分與課程組織。課程與教學季刊，3（2），頁75-94。
簡良平（民89）。學校自主發展課程─課程籌畫的議題。論文發表於中華
民國課程與教學學會89年年會。
簡良平、甄曉蘭（民90）。學校自主發展課程相關因素分析。教育研究集刊，46，頁53-80。
二、英文部分
Anderson, S. E. (1997). Understanding teacher change:
revisiting the concerns based adoption model. Curriculum
Inquiry, 27(3),pp.331-367.
Apple, M. W.(1993). Official knowledge: Democratic education
in a conservative age. N. Y.: Routledge.
Apple, M. W.(2000). Markets, standards, and inequality in
education: can critical pedagogies interrupt rightist
policies？論文發表於南華大學主辦，第三屆台灣教育社會學論
壇，2000.5月.27-28日。
Atkin, E. (1986). The deliberative process: An analysis from
three perspectives. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 1
(4),pp.265-293.
Bassey, M.(1998). Action research for improving educational
practice. In Halsall, R.(ed), Teacher research and school
improvement., pp.93-108. Buckingham：Open University Press.
Beane, J. M.（1997）. Curriculum integration. N.Y.：Teacher
College Press.
Berstein, B.(1971). On the classification and framing of
educational knowledge. In Young, M. F. D. (ed), Knowledge
and control, pp. 46-67. London：Collier-Macmillan.
Beyer, L. E. and Apple, M.(eds)(1988). The curriculum:
problems, politics, and possibilities. Albany: State
University of New York.
Beyer, L. E. and Apple, M.(1998). Values and politics in the
curriculum. Beyer, L. E. and Apple, M.(eds), The
curriculum: problems, politics, and possibilities. (2nd),
pp.3-20. Albany: State University of New York.
Beyer, L. E.(1991). Curriculum deliberation. In Lewy, A.(ed),
The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, pp.304-306.
N.Y.: Pergamon Press.
Brady, L.(1985). The supportiveness of the principal in school-
based curriculum development. Journal of Curriculum
Studies, 17(1),pp.95-97.
Campbell-Evans, G.(1993). A values perspective on school-based
management. In C.Dimmock(ed).School-based management and
school effectiveness. London:Routledge.
Chimwenje, D. D.(1990). Curriculum planing and decision making
process in secondary schools in Malawi.. Doctor diseration
in Massachusetts University.
Chapman, J. D. (ed), School-based decision-making and
management, pp.183-198. London: The Falmer Press.
Clandinin, D. J.(1986). Classroom practice: Teacher images in
action. London: The Falmer Press.
Clandinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as
curriculum maker. In Jackson, P.W.(ed), Handbook of
research on curriculum, pp.363-401.N.Y.:Macmillan.
Connelly, F. A. & Dienes, B.(1982). The teacher''s role in
curriculum planning. In Leithwood, K. A.(ed), Studies in
curriculum decision-making, pp. 183-198. Canada:OISE Press.
Connelly, F. M., Kormos, J. and Enns, R. J.(1982). Commercial
and locally developed curriculum materials, in Leithwood,
K. A.(ed), Studies in curriculum decision-making, pp.110-
131.Canada:OISE Press.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research
design: choosing among five traditions. California: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation.
In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds), Handbook of
qualitative research, pp.500-515. California: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1998).(eds) Handbook of
qualitative research. California: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. (2000). The art and politics of interpretation.
In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds), Handbook of
qualitative research.（2nd）California: Sage.
Dillon, J. T. (1994). The questions of deliberation. In J.T.
Dillon (ed) , Deliberation in education and society, pp.3-
24. Norwood : Ablex.
Doll, W. E. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum.
N.Y.: Teachers College Press.
Doll, R. C. (1996). Curriculum improvement : decision-making
and process (9th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Eisner, E. W. (1985). The educational imagination─on the
design and evaluation of school programs. N.Y.: Macmillan
Publishing Company.
Eisner, E. W. (1988). The ecology of school improvement.
Educational Leadership ,5,pp.24-29.
Eisner, E. W. (1999). Educational reform and the ecology of
schooling. In Ornstein, A.C. & Behar-horenstein, L. S.
(eds.), Contemporary issues in curriculum. Boston: Allyn
and Bacon.
Featherstone, M.(1991). Consumer culture & Postmodernism.
London: Sage.
Featherstone, M.(1995). Undoing culture: globalization,
postmoderism, and identity. London: Sage Publications.
Fontana, A. and Frey, J. (2000). Interviewing─the art of
science. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln , Y. S.(eds.),
Handbook of qualitative research(2nd). California: SAGE.
Foster, R. (1991). Patterns of curriculum decision-making: A
study of decision-making process about teacher education
programs. The Pennsylvania State University, Unpublished.
Frazier, C. M. (1987). Federal, state, and local
responsibility. In Goodlad, J. I. (ed), The ecology of
school renewal, pp.99-117. Chicago: The National Society
for the Study of Education.
Fullan, M. G. (1992).Successful school improvement. Buckingham:
Open University Press.
Fullan and Miles, (1992). Getting reform right: What works and
what doesn''t. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 744-752.
Fullan, M. G. (1999). Turning systemic thinking on its head. In
Ornstein, A. C. & Behar, L. S. (eds), Contemporary issues
in curriculum (2th). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Gay, G. (1991). Curriculum development. In Lewy,A.(ed), The
International Encyclopedia Of Curricullum,pp.293-302.
N.Y.: Pergamon Press.
Goodlad, J. I.(1975). The dynamics of educational change:
Toward responsive schools. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Book Co..
Goodlad, J.I. et al.(1979). Curriculum inquiry. N.Y.: McGraw-
Hill.Goodlad, J. I. (1987). Structure, process, and an
agenda. In Goodlad, J. I.(ed), The ecology of school
renewal, pp.1-19. Chicago: The National Society for the
Study of Education.
Goodlad, J. I. & Su, Z.（1989）.Organization of the curriculum.
In Jackson, P. W.(ed), Handbook of research on curriculum,
pp.327-344. London: SAGE Publications.
Goodlad, J. I. (1991). Curriculum making as a sociopolitical
process. In Klein, M. F. (ed),The politics of curriculum
decision-making─issues in centralizing the curriculum.,
pp.9-23. N. Y. : State University of New York.
Gredler, M. E. (1997). Learning and instruction─theory into
practice. London：Prentice-Hall International Limited.
Green, J.（1998）. Teacher professionalism, teacher development
and school improvement. In Halsall, R.(ed), Teacher
research and school improvement, pp.200-210. Buckingham：
Open University Press.
Greene, M.(1986). Philosophy and teaching. In M. C. Wittrock
(ed), Handbook of research on teaching. NY: Macmillan.
Gregory, T. B.(1990). Discussion on ethics. In Guba, E. G.
(ed), The paradigm dialog, pp. 165-166. London: SAGE
Publications.
Guba, E. C. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In The
paradigm dialog. London： Sage.
Habermas, Jurgen(1969). Toward a rational society─student
protest, science, and politics. Translated by Shapiro J.,
Jeremy J. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Translated
by Shapiro J., Jeremy . London：H.E.B.
Hannay, L. M. & Seller, W.(1991). The curriculum leadership
role in facilitating curriculum deliberation. Journal of
Curriculum and Supervision, 6(4),340-357.
Hargreaves, A.(1992). Cultures of teaching：A focus for change.
In Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, .G., R.(eds), Understanding
eacher development. N.Y.：Teachers College Press.
Hargreaves, A.（1994）. Changing teachers, changing times:
teachers'' work and culture in the postmodern age. London:
Cassell.
Hargreaves, A.（1997）From reform to renewal: a new deal for a
new age. In Hargreaves, A. & Evans, R.(ed), Beyond
educational reform, pp.105-125. Buckingham: Open University
Press.
Hargreaves, A. , Earl, L. and Ryan, J. (1996). Schooling for
change: Reinventing education for early adolescents.
London: The Falmer Press.
Hargreaves, A. & Goodson, I.(1996). Teachers'' professional
lives: aspirations and actualities, in Goodson, I.&
Hargreaves, A.(eds), Teachers'' professional lives. London：
Falmer Press.
Hargreaves, D.H. & Hopkins, D.(1991). The empowered school:
The management and practices of development planning.
London: Cassell.
Hargreaves, A. and Fullan, M.(1998). What''s worth fighting for
out there. N.Y.: Teachers College Press.
Harrison, M.（1981）.School-based curriculum decision-making: A
personal viewpoint. Curriculum Perspective, 2(1),47-52.
Hawthorne, R. D.(1990). Analyzing school-based collaborative
curriculum decision making. Journal of Curriculum and
Supervision, 5(3),pp.279-286.
Heckmam, P. (1987). Understanding school culture. In Goodlad,
J. I.(ed), The ecology of school renewal, pp.63-78.
Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
Henderson, J. G. & Hawthorne, R. D.(1995). Transformative
curriculum leadership. Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-
Hall,Inc.
Henderson, J.G. & Hawthorne, R.D. ( 2000) . Transformative
curriculum Leadership.（2nd） New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,
Inc..
Hill, Byrne G.(1980). Some political influences on the
curriculum. In Kelly, A. V.(ed), Curriculum context, pp.
133-149. N. Y.: Harper & Row, Publishers.
Hirst, P. H.(1974). Knowledge and curriculum. London: R. K. P.
Holt, M.(1994). Deliberation in the school. In J.T.
Dillon (ed) : Deliberation in education and society,
pp.211-238. Norwood : Ablex.
Hopely, D. L.（1991）Faculty and administrative perceptions
concerning curriculum decision making at rural Arizona
Community Colleges. Northern Arizona University.
Hopkins, D. , Ainscow, M. and West, M.(1994). School
improvement in an era of change. N.Y.: Cassell.
House, E. R. (1990). An ethics of qualitative field studies. In
Guba, E. G. (ed), The paradigm dialog, pp. 158-164.
London: SAGE Publications.
Huberman, A. M. and Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and
analysis methods. In Dezin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S.( eds),
Handbook of qualitative research, pp. 428-444.Lonndon: SAGE
Publications.
Husen, T. (1999). Research paradigm in education. In Keeves, J.
P. & Lakomski, G. (eds), Issues in education. Amsterdam:
Pergman.
Janesick, V. J.(1998). The dance of qualitative research
design. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S.(eds), Strategies
of qualitative inquiry, pp. 35-55.California: Sage.
Kain, D. L. (1996). Recipes and dialogue? A middle school team
conceptualizes “curricular integration” . Journal of
Curriculum and Supervision, 11(2), pp.163-187.
Kelly, A. V. (1986). Knowledge and curriculum planning. London:
Harper & Row, Publishers.
Kelly, A. V.(1989). The curriculum: Theory and practice（3rd）.
London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
Kelly, A. V.(1999). The curriculum: Theory and practice（4rd）.
London:Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
Kelly, A., West, M. and Dee, L. (2001). Staff involvement in
the design of a key skills curriculum model: a case-study.
The Curriculum Journal, 12(2), pp.179-190.
Kerr, D. H.(1987). Authority and responsibility in public
schooling. In Goodlad, J. I.(ed), The ecology of school
renewal, pp.20-38. Chicago: The National Society for the
Study of Education.
Klein, M. F. (1991). A conceptual framework for curriculum
decision- making. In The politics of curriculum decision-
making─issues in centralizing the curriculum., pp. 24-41.
N. Y.: State University of New York Press.
Kliebard, H. M.（1989）. Problems of definition in curriculum.
Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5(1), pp.1-5.
Kuhn, T.(1970). The structure of scientific revolution.
Chicago：University of Chicago Press.
Lather, P. A.(1990). Reinscribing otherwise — the play of
values in the practices of human sciences. In Cuba, E. C.
(ed), The paradigm dialog. SAGE: Publication, Inc..
Lawton, D.(1996). Beyond the national curriculum-teacher
professionalism、empowerment. London：Hodder & Stoughton.
LeCompte, M. D., Preissle, J. and Tesch, R.(1993). Origins of
qualitative research. In Evolution of education
ethnography. San Diago: Academic Press, Inc..
Lee, J. Chi-Kin and Dimmock, C. (1999). Curriculum leadership
and management in secondary schools: a Hong Kong case
study. School Leadership & Management, 19(4),pp.455-482.
Leithwood, K. A.(ed)(1982). Studies in curriculum decision-
making. Canada:OISE Press.
Leithwood, K. A （1982）. Implementing curriculum innovation,
in Leithwood, K. A.(ed), Studies in curriculum decision-
making, pp.245-267. Canada: OISE Press.
Liethwood, K. A. (1992). The principle’s role in teacher
development. In Fullan, M. & Hargreaves, A. (eds), Teacher
development and educational change, pp.86-103. London:
The Falmer Press.
Leithwood, K. A. & Montgomery, D. J.(1982). University-based
change agents, in Leithwood, K. A.(ed), Studies in
curriculum decision-making, pp. 96-109.Canada: OISE Press.
Lieberman, A. & Rosenholtz, S. (1987). The road to school
improvement: barriers and bridge. In Goodlad, J. I.(ed),
The ecology of school renewal, pp.79-98.. Chicago: The
National Society for the Study of Education.
Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G.(1985). Naturalistic inquiry.
London: SAGE Publications.
Little, J. (1990). The persistence of privacy: autonomy and
initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers’
College Record,91(4),pp.509-536.
Little, J. W. (1992). Teacher development and educational
policy. In Fullan, M. & Hargreaves, A. (eds), Teacher
development and educational change, pp.170-193. London:
The Falmer Press.
Looney, A.(2001). Curriculum as policy: some implications of
contemporary policy studies for the analysis of curriculum
policy, with particular reference to post-primary
curriculum policy in the Republic of Ireland. The
Curriculum Journal, 12(2), pp.149-162.
Marsh, C. J. (1990). Managing for total school improvement. In
Chapman, J. D. (ed), School-based decision-making and
management. London: The Falmer Press.
Marsh, C. et al.(1990). Reconceptualizing school-based
curriculum development. London: The Falmer Press.
Mckenzie, P. N. (1990). Information needs for decision-making
at school level. In Chapman, J. D. (ed), School-based
decision-making and management. London: The Falmer Press.
Miles, M., Ekholm, M. and Vandenberghe, R. ( 1987). Lasting
school improvement : Exploring the process of
stitutionalization. Leuven, Belgium: ACCO.
Mulder, M. (1994). Deliberation in curriculum conferences. In
J.T. Dillon(ed), Deliberation in education and
society,pp.157-210. Norwood: Ablex.
Melton, A. D. (1991). Shared decision making: tool for
curriculum implementation and problem solving. University
of South Carolina, Unpublished.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education.
London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Miller, W. L. and Crabtree, B. F. (1999). Doing qualitative
research. Sage: Oaks.
Mulder, M. (1994). Deliberation in curriculum conferences. In
J.T. Dillon(ed), Deliberation in education and
society,pp.157-210. Norwood: Ablex.
Oberg, A. A. (1991). Curriculum decision. In Lewy, A.(ed), The
International Encyclopedia of Curricullum,pp.302-303.
N.Y.: Pergamon Press.
OECD（1979）. School-based curriculum development. Paris: OECD.
Oliva, P. F.(1988). Developing the curriculum. N.Y.：
HarperCollins.
Ornstein, A. C. (2000). Philosophy as a basis for curriculum
decision. In Ornstein, A. C.and Behar-Horenstein L. S.
(eds), Contemporary issues in curriculum(2ed), pp.13-19.
Boston：Allyn and Bacon.
Orpwood, G. W. F. (1985). The reflective deliberator: a case
study of curriculum policy making. Journal of Curriculum
Studies, 17(3),pp.293-304.
Paris, D. C.(1995). Ideology and educational reform--themes and
theories in public Education. Boulder：Westview Press.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research
methods（2d）. London: Sage.
Phillips, Denis C.(1990). Postpositivstic science: Myths and
realities. In Egon G. Guba(ed), The paradigm dialog, pp.31-
45. London: SAGE .
Phillips, Denis C.(1998). Epistemology, politics, and
curriculum construction. In Carr, O.(ed), Education,
knowledge, and truth--beyond the postmodern impasse.
London: Routledge.
Posner, G. F.(1998). Models of curriculum planning. In Beyer,
L. E. and Apple, M.(eds), The curriculum: problems,
politics, and possibilities, pp.79-100.Albany: State
University of New York.
Popkewitz, T. S.(2000). Curriculum as a problem of knowledge,
governing, and the social administration of the soul. In
Franklin, B. M.(ed), Curriculum and consequence ,
pp.75-102. N.Y.: Teachers College Press.
Regan, E. M.& Winter, C. F.(1982). The influence of
consultants., in Leithwood, K. A.(ed), Studies in
curriculum decision-making, pp.68-86. Canada: OISE Press.
Reid, William A.(1979). Practical reasoning and curriculum
theory: In search for a new paradigm. Curriculum Inquiry, 9
(3),pp.187-207.
Reid, W. A.(1988). The institutional context of curriculum
deliberation. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4
(1),3-16.
Reid, W. A. (1994). A deliberative perspective on curriculum.
In J.T. Dillon (ed) : Deliberation in education and
society. pp.25-36. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization─social theory and global
culture. London: Sage.
Roby, T. W. (1985). Habits impeding deliberation. Journal of
Curriculum Studies,17(1),pp.17-35.
Roseholtz, S. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: the social
organization of school. N.Y.: Longman.
Ross, E. W.(1993). Institutional constraints on curriculum
deliberation. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8
(2),95-111.
Ross, J. A.（1982）. The influence of the principal, in
Leithwood, K. A.(ed), Studies in curriculum decision-
making.,pp.54-67.Canada:OISE Press.
Saber, N.(1983). Toward school-based curriculum development:
training school curriculum co-ordinators. Journal of
Curriculum Studies,15(4),pp.431-434.
Saber, N.(1985). School-based curriculum development:
reflections from an international seminar. Journal of
Curriculum Studies,17(4),pp.452- 54.
Sarason, S. B.(1982). The culture of the school and the problem
of change, (2ed). Boston, Mass.: Ally and Bacon.
Sarason, S. B.(1990). The predictable failure of education
reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Saylor, J.G. & Alexander, W. M.（1974）. Planning curriculum
for schools. N.Y.：Macmillan Publishing Company.
Schrag, F. (1989). Conceptions of knowledge. In Jackson, P. W.
(ed), Handbook of Research on curriculum, pp.268-301.
Schön, D.(1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple
Smith.Schwab, Joseph J.(1978a). The practical: A language
for curriculum. In I. Westbury & Neil J. Wilkof (eds),
Science, curriculum, and liberal education ,pp.287-321.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schwab, Joseph J.(1978b). The practical: Translation into
curriculum. In Ian Westbury & Neil J. Wilkof (eds),
Science, curriculum, and liberal education , pp.365-383.
Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Schwab, Joseph J.(1983). The practical 4: Something for
curriculum professors to do. Curriculum Inquiry,13
(3),pp.239-265.
Sears, J. T. (2000). Challenges for educators: lesbian, gay,
and bisexual families. In Ornstein, A.and Behar-Horenstein
L. S. (eds), Contemporary issues in Curriculum(2nd),
pp.362-381. Boston：Allyn and Bacon.
Seddon, T. , Angus, L. and Poole, M. E. (1990). Pressures on
the move to school-based dcision-making and management.. In
Chapman, J. D.(ed), School-based decision making and
management. London: The Falmer Press.
Shkedi, A.(1996). Schoool-based workshops for teacher
participation in curriculum development. Journal of
Curriculum Studies, 28(6),pp.699-711.
Silva, D.Y. , Gimbert, B. , and Nolan, J.(2000). Sliding the
doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher
leadership. Teacher College Record, 102(4), Aug. pp: 779-
804.
Sirotnik, K. A. (1987). Evaluation in the ecology of schooling:
the process of school renewal. In Goodlad, J. I.(ed), The
ecology of school renewal, pp.41-59. Chicago: The National
Society for the Study of Education.
Skilbeck, M.(1976). School-based curriculum development. In
Open University Course 203, Unit 26, Open University Press,
Milton Keynes.
Skilbeck, M.（ed）(1984). Evaluating the curriculum in the
Eighties. London：Hodder.
Smith, L. M. (1990). Ethics, field studies, and the paradigm
crisis. In Guba, E. G. (ed), The paradigm dialog, pp. 139-
157. London: SAGE Publications.
Stake, R. E. (1988). Case study methods in educational
research: Seeking sweet water. In R. M. Jaeger（ed）,
complementary methods for research in education, pp.253-
278. Washington, DC: American Educational Research
Association.
Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In Dezin, N. K. and Lincoln,
Y. S. (eds), The handbook Of qualitative research, pp.435-
454. Sage Publication, Inc..
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research
and development. London:Hodder.
Stoll, L. (1992). Teacher growth in the effective school. In
Fullan, M. & Hargreaves, A. (eds), Teacher development and
educational change, pp.104-122. London: The Falmer Press.
Tyler, R. W. (1991). The process of curriculum development. In
Lewy, A.(ed), The International Encyclopedia of
Curricullum,pp.291-293. N.Y.: Pergamon Press.
Van den Berg, R. , Sleegers, P. , Geijdel, F., and
Vandenberghe, R.(2000). Implementation of an innovation：
meeting the concerns of teachers. Studies in Educational
Evaluation, 26,pp.331-350.
Walker, D.F.(1990). Fundamentals of curriculum. San Diego:
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Westbury, Ian(1994). Deliberation and the improvement of
schooling. In J.T. Dillon (ed) : Deliberation in education
and society,pp.37-66. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Whitty, G. , Power, S. and Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and
choice in education─the school, the state and the market.
Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wideen, M. F. (1992). School-based teacher development. In
Fullan, M. & Hargreaves, A.(eds), Teacher development and
educational change, pp.123-155. London: The Falmer Press.
Wiles, J. & Bondie, J.(1984). Curriculum development：A guide
to practice.Columbus：A Bell & Howell Company.
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: design and methods.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Young, M. F. D. (1971). An Approach to curriculum as socially
organized knowledge. In Young, M. F. D.(ed), Knowledge and
Control. London: Collier-Macmillan.