:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政黨趨同之研究─國民黨與民進黨的比較分析
作者:石振國
作者(外文):CHEN-KUO SHIH
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學法教分處
系所名稱:政治學研究所
指導教授:林水波
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2003
主題關鍵詞:政黨趨同政黨組織政黨政策主張卡特爾政黨政策趨同國民黨民進黨party convergenceparty organizationparty policy claimcartel partypolicy convergenceKuomintang (KMT)Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:252
政黨趨同指政黨在互動過程中朝著日益相似的趨勢發展的現象,本文在將政黨視為組織的基礎上,分別由功能、政策主張、組織結構與動態過程三個主要面向,透過對卡特爾政黨理論、政策趨同理論、以及組織理論中新制度論的整合與轉化,用以分析國內國民黨與民進黨兩黨在互動過程中的變遷趨勢。透過理論上與實務上的分析,我們發現國民黨與民進黨在功能面向上,除國家補助制度的建立外,並未完全符合卡特爾政黨理論所提出的命題;在政策主張面向上,除分配性政策外,也沒有明顯的政策主張趨同狀況,在民進黨執政後,兩黨出現離心競爭的狀態,使兩黨的政策主張更加趨異;在組織面向上,兩黨組織結構有朝著選舉-專業化政黨同型的趨勢,但在運作過程上兩黨則有相當大的差異,在提名制度方面,兩黨則具有高度的相似性。本文最後試圖對政黨趨同現象加以評價,認為政黨趨同在功能、政策、組織三方面均可能對民主政治產生不良的影響。
Party convergence means the tendency of parties to grow more alike in their process of interaction. On the perspective of treating party as an organization, the author develops a new analysis framework adapted from the cartel party theory, policy convergence theory and new institutionalism in organizational theory. Among others the main case study is the application of the framework to analyze the interactional process of Kuomintang (KMT) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) from functional, policy claim and organizational dimensions. The author finds that the claims of cartel party theory are valid here only for the introduction of state subsides to political parties on functional dimension, and the convergence of policy claim is not apparent except for the field of distributive policy. Also finds is that the trend appears divergent because the competitive style becomes more and more centrifugal to both parties in policy claim dimension especially after DPP taking the regime. The organizational structures of both parties are isomorphism as electoral-professional party, their operational processes are divergent, and candidates selection (nomination) systems are more alike in organizational dimension. In the last chapter the author evaluates the phenomenon of party convergence, and concludes that the impact it will have may be harmful to democracy in each dimension.
中文部份
王婉芬,1994。制度學派與組織制度化的探討,台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
王崑義,2001。全球化與台灣:陳水扁時代的主權、人權與安全。台北:創世。
王智盛,2000。2000年總統大選民進黨中國政策之研究。台北:台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
王業立,2001。比較選舉制度。台北:五南。new window
王業立、黃豪聖,2000。「選舉制度與政黨轉型:一個新制度論的分析架構」,收錄於林繼文主編,政治制度,台北:中研院社科所。
王德玲、蔣雪芬譯,大前研一著,2001。看不見的新大陸─知識經濟的四大策略。台北:天下。
丘昌泰,1995。公共政策:當代政策科學理論之研究。台北:巨流。
石振國,1995。由組織理論研析政黨式微現象。台北:台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
任德厚,1993。政治學,台北:作者自刊。
朱雲漢等,2001。「低度階級性投票背後的政治意涵:台灣與香港兩地的比較」,「政黨輪替後之台灣政治」學術研討會論文,2001年12月16日,台北。
朱鎮明,2001。新公共管理之政治哲學研究─台灣經驗檢證。台北:政治大學公共行政研究所博士論文。
江宜樺,1998。自由主義、民族主義與國家認同。台北:揚智。new window
江岷欽,1993。組織分析。台北:五南。
行政院研考會,1998。各國行政革新策略及措施比較分析。台北:行政院研考會。
余坤東,2000。「組織變革活動系絡與變革成效之探討」,收於行政管理論文選輯第十四輯,台北:銓敘部。new window
吳玉山,1998。「三黨大陸政策的趨同:選民偏好的常態分配與選票極大化策略」,理論與政策,第十二卷,第三期,頁5-21。new window
吳玉山,2001。「制度、非正式制度與結構對政治穩定的影響」,中國政治學會九十年年會暨學術研討會論文,2001年1月6日,台北。new window
吳育仁,2000。「勞動關係新思維:英國第三條路的政治經濟哲學」,理論與政策,卷14,期4:91-112。new window
吳思華,2000。策略九說:策略思考的本質(三版)。台北:臉譜。new window
吳重禮,2002。「民意調查應用於提名制度的爭議:以1998年第四屆立法委員選舉民主進步黨初選民調為例」,選舉研究,卷9,期1:81-111。new window
吳惠林、馬凱,1999。「省思擴大內外需方案」,經濟前瞻,期63:102-106。
呂秋遠,2000。「政黨理念與政治現實的碰撞:國民黨與民進黨財經政策之比較」,問題與研究,卷39,期11:1-29。new window
呂振興,1996。台灣地區行政革新經驗之深層解釋。台北:國立政治大學公共行政研究碩士論文。
李任初,1992。新自由主義─宏觀經濟的蛻變。台北:商務。
李柏光、林猛譯,Dahl著,1999。論民主(On Democracy)。台北:聯經。
李炳南,1992。憲政改革與國是會議。台北:永然。
李惠宗,1998。「我國政黨補助法之商榷」,月旦法學雜誌,32期,頁89-98。
李雲漢等,1993。世界各國主要政黨內部運作之研究(第二輯)。台北:正中。
周啟東,1996。「民進黨財務左支右絀亮紅燈」,中央月刊,卷29,期11:81-82。
明居正,1998。「向心競爭與中華民國政黨政治之發展」,理論與政策,第十二卷,第二期,頁142-155。new window
明居正,2001。「今年立委選舉後我國政黨體系變遷的初探」,政黨政治與選舉競爭學術研討會。
明居正、高朗主編,2001。憲政體制新走向,台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
林水波(主編),1999。組織理論。台北:智勝文化。
林水波,1999。制度設計。台北:智勝文化。
林水波,1999甲。政府再造。台北:智勝文化。
林水波,1999乙。公共政策新論。台北:智勝文化。
林水波,2001。「政黨選舉合作的政治分析」,立法院院聞,卷二九,期十二:34-55.
林水波,2001甲。「員工疏離組織的成因與管理:正當性觀」,公務人員月刊,期六二:24-30.
林水波,2002。憲法政治學。台北:元照。
林水波,2002甲。棄保政治學。台北:元照。
林水波,2003。「選舉實力指數與妥適提名原則」,未發表論文。new window
林水波,2003甲。「透視政治反芻現象」,未發表論文。
林水波、任可怡,1996。「台灣公營事業團體協商機制:特質描繪與解釋依據,」中國行政評論,卷五,期三,頁31-62。new window
林水波、何鴻榮,2003。「我國黨政關係健全化的發展」,立法院院聞,卷31,期1:37-67。
林水波、李長晏,2003。「標竿學習與地方治理能力」,發表於第二屆地方發展策略研討會,2003年4月26日,宜蘭。
林水波、張世賢,1989。公共政策。台北:五南。
林萬億,2000。「社會抗爭、政治權力資源與社會福利政策的發展:一九八0年代以來的台灣經驗」,收錄於蕭新煌、林國明主編,台灣的社會福利運動,頁71-135,台北:巨流。new window
林慧萍,1995。探討台灣選民的議題取向投票─民國八十二年縣市長選舉分析。台北:國立政治大學政研所碩士論文。
林錫銓,1999。「政府組織對應外在體制性環境之策略」,收於林水波主編,組織理論。台北:智勝。
南方朔,2001。除魔與昇華。台北:時報。
柳金財,2000。「民進黨關於台灣前途主張的歷史發展演變」,中國事務季刊,第二期,頁98-114。
范雲,1994。民主進步黨地方黨部的組織與動員網絡的分析。台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
若林正丈,1994。台灣:分裂國家與民主化。台北:月旦。
徐永明,2000。「宋楚瑜現象:菁英分裂、選票動員與政黨重組」,理論與政策,第十四卷,第二期,頁93─118。new window
徐永明、陳鴻章,2002。「老狗學把戲:立委選舉政黨提名的有效性」,東吳政治學報,期15:87-121。new window
徐銘謙,2001。民主進步黨中國政策決策研究(1986.9.28-2001.5.20)。台北:台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
馬立引,1988。國民黨政府與台灣政治發展。台北:台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
張玉法,1990。中國現代史(上)(下)。台北:東華。
張慧英,2000。李登輝:1988-2000執政十二年。台北:天下遠見。
曹俊漢,1992。「塑造中國國民黨為公共政策政黨芻議」,民主基金會政黨政治與民主憲政學術研討會論文。
梁欽堯,1990。政治發展與政黨轉型:中國國民黨民主化之研究。台北:台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
盛杏湲,2002。「統獨議題與台灣選民的投票行為:一九九0年代的分析」,選舉研究,第9卷,第1期:41-80。new window
莊雅仲,2002。「集體行動、社會福利與文化認同」,台灣社會研究季刊,期47:249-277。new window
許甘霖,2000。「放任與壓制之外─政治化薪資形構初探」,台灣社會研究季刊,期38:1-58。new window
許國賢,1997。倫理政治論:一個民主時代的反思。台北:揚智。
連戰,2000。連戰的主張。台北:天下遠見。
郭正亮,1988。國民黨政權在台灣的轉化(1945-88)。台北:國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
郭正亮,1994。「民進黨在十字路口:從人頭黨員問題論民進黨的發展路線」,反對運動檢討會議論文,83年1月10日。
郭正亮,1998。民進黨轉型之痛。台北:天下遠見。
郭建中,1992。「政治經濟學與台灣政經發展經驗」,中山學術論叢,期10:89-107。
陳文俊,2002。藍與綠─台灣選民的政治意識型態。選舉與民主化研究學術研討會論文,2002年10月19日,台北。new window
陳水源,2000。台灣歷史的軌跡。台北:晨星。
陳宜中,1999。「英國工黨與第三條路」,當代,第一四0期,頁80─87。
陳東升,1991。「制度學派理論對正式組織的解析」,社會科學論叢,期40,頁111-133。
陳東升,1992。「組織間關係的理論探討」,社會科學論叢,期41,頁31-61。
陳陸輝,1994。「中國國民黨黃復興黨部的輔選效果分析」,選舉研究,卷1,期2:53-96。new window
陳陸輝,2000。「台灣選民政黨認同的持續與變遷」,選舉研究,卷7,期2:109-141。new window
陳敦源,1999。民主與官僚。台北:韋伯。
陳朝建,1996。以現代立憲主義論台灣民間社會的制憲運動(1986-1995)。台北:國立台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
傅立葉,2000。「老年年金、政黨競爭與選舉」,收錄於蕭新煌、林國明主編,台灣的社會福利運動,頁231-257,台北:巨流。new window
曾建元,1997。「九0年代國民黨主導下台灣憲政改革之研究」,憲政時代,卷22,期3:97-110。
湯德宗,1998。「論九七修憲後的權力分力─憲改工程的另類選擇」,國立台灣大學法學論叢,卷27,期2:135-178。new window
黃東益,2002。「城市外交與政策學習:台北、香港「雙城論壇」的個案探討」,戰略與國際研究季刊,卷4,期3:102-125。
黃東益,2003。「公共商議與地方政策參與─四種民主商議機制探討」,發表於第二屆地方發展策略研討會,2003年4月26日,宜蘭。
黃偉峰,2002。「左派、右派、或是第三條路?英國主要政黨意識型態之區隔,1979-1997」,理論與政策,卷16,期1:1-25。new window
黃清賢,1996。台灣解嚴後的政黨競爭─以空間理論分析,台北:政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所碩士論文。
黃德福,1992。民主進步黨與台灣地區政治民主化,台北:時英。new window
黃德福,2001。「少數政府與責任政治:台灣半總統制之下的政黨競爭」,收錄於明居正、高朗主編,憲政體制新走向,台北:新台灣人基金會。new window
黃錦堂,1995。地方自治法治化問題之研究。台北:月旦。new window
楊麗君、王嘉源譯,J. K. Galbraith著,1992。自滿年代(The Culture of Contentment)。台北:時報。
詹火生,1995。「政府在社會政策中的角色與功能─中美兩國之比較」,收錄於鄭麗嬌主編,中西社會福利政策與制度,頁1-31,台北:中研院歐美所。
雷競璇譯,Maurice Duverger著,1991。政黨概論(Political Parties)。香港:青文。
廖揆祥,1994。「歐美生態運動發展的困境」,新使者,期21,頁24-29。
趙永茂,1992。「政治精英與法治不彰之關係─台灣基層民選政治精英之分析」,台大政治科學論叢,期四:131-148。new window
齊光裕,1998。中華民國的憲政發展─民國三十八年以來的憲法變遷。台北:揚智。
劉義周,1986。「美國政黨的式微」,思與言,卷23,期6,頁611-620。
歐陽晟,1994。台灣民主轉型期政黨競爭型態的社會基礎(1986-1992)。台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
蔡錦昌,1994。韋伯社會科學方法論釋義。台北:唐山。new window
鄭武國譯,Anthony Giddens著,1999。第三條路─社會民主的更新。台北:聯經。
鄭梓,1996。「戰後台灣行政體系的接收與重建─以行政長官公署為中心之分析」,收錄于張炎憲、李筱峰主編,台灣史論文精選,頁233-272,台北:玉山社。new window
蕭全政,1998。「評『論九七修憲後的權力分力─憲改工程的另類選擇』」,國立台灣大學法學論叢,卷27,期2:179-182。new window
賴祐民,1997。聯合內閣的理論與實際─台灣個案研究。台北:國立台灣大學三民主義研究所碩士論文。
薩孟武,1986。政治學,台北:三民。
蘇永欽主編,2001。政黨重組:台灣民主政治的再出發?台北:新台灣人文教基金會。
顧忠華,1994。韋伯學說新探。台北:唐山。new window
英文部份
Adams, J. 2001 “A Theory of Spatial Competition with Biased Voters: Party Policies Viewed Temporally and Comparatively,” British Journal of Political Science , Vol.31, No.1:121-158.
Aldrich, 1979 Organizations and Environments. N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Almond, G.A. & Powell, G.B. 1978 Comparative Politics Boston:Little & Brown.
Ashford, D. E. 1978 “The Structural Analysis of Policy or Institutional Really Do Matter?” in Ashford(ed),Comparing Public Policies: New Concepts and Method, C.A.: Sage.
Baradat, L. P. 1993 Political Ideologies: Their Origins and Impact N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Barber, B. R. 1984 Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Ages. C.A.: California Univ. Press.
Bartolini, S. & P. Mair 1990 “Policy Competition, Spatial Distance and Electoral Instability.” West European Politics, V.13, No.4:1-16.
Bartolini, S. 2001 “The Historical Macro-Constellation of Political Parties Rise, Consolidation and Decline,” 發表於「政黨輪替後之台灣政治」學術研討會,2001年12月16日,台北。
Bennett, C. J. & Michael Howlett 1992 “The Lessons of Learning : Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change,” Policy Science,25:275-294.
Bennett, C. J. 1988 “Regulating the Computer: comparing policy instruments in European and the United States,”, European Journal of Political Research, 16:437-466.
Bennett, C. J. 1991 “What is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?” British Journal of Political Science , Vol.21, No.1:215-233.
Bennett, C. J. 1992 Regulating Privacy: data protection and public policy in European and the United States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bennett, C. J. 1997 “Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability,” Governance, Vol.10, No.3:213-233.
Bobbio, N. 1996 Left and Right. Cambridge: Polity.
Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. 1997 Reframing Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brinkerhoff D. W.& Crosby, B. J. 2002 Managing Policy Reform. Connecticut: Kumarian.
Budge, I Robertson, D. & Hearl, D. (eds.) 1987 Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analysis of Post-War Election Programms in 19 Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Budge, I. 2000 “Experts Judgementes of Party Policy Positions: Uses and Limitations in Political Research,” European Journal of Political Research, Vol.31,No.1:
Budge, I. 2001 “Validating Party Policy Placements,” British Journal of Political Research, Vol.31,No.1:210-223.
Burrell, G. & Morgan, G. 1987 Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann.
Byrd, P. 1987 "Great Britain: Parties in a Changing Party System," in Ware (ed.) Political Parties. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Caiden, G. E. 1991 Administrative Reform Comes of Age. N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter.
Cameron, K.S & Zammuto, R.F.. 1988 "Matching Managerial Strategies to Conditions of Decline," in Cameron, Sutton, and Whetten (eds.), Readings in Organizational Decline. Mass: Ballinger.
Carroll, G.R. & Delacroix, J. 1988 "Organizational Mortality in the Newspaper Industries of Argentina and Ireland: An Ecological Approach," in Cameron, Sutton, and Whetten (eds.), Readings in Organizational Decline. Mass. : Ballinger.
Carroll, G.R. 1985 "Concentration and Specialization: Dynamics of Niche Width in Populations of Organizations," American Journal of Sociology, Vol.90 No.6:1262-1283。
Castles, F. G. & Mair, P. 1984 “Left-Right Political Scales: Some ‘Expert’ Judgements,” European Journal of Political Research, 12:73-88.
Chen, Huey-Tsyh 1990 Theory-Driven Evaluations.C.A.:Sage.
Cook, C. 1984 A Short History of Liberal Party: 1900-1984 London: MacMillan.
Crotty, W. & Jacobson, G.C. 1980 American Parties in Decline. Boston: Little Brown.
DeLeon, P. 1978 “Public Policy Termination: An End and a Beginning,” Policy Analysis, Vol.4, No.3:369-392.
DiMaggio, P.J. & W.W. Powell. 1983 "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organization Fields," American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.
DiMaggio, P.J. & W.W. Powell. 1991 "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Paul J. DiMaggio. & Walter.W. Powell(eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.
Dittrich, K. 1983 “Testing the Catch-all Thesis: Some Difficulties and Possibilities,” in Daalder & Mair (eds) West European Party Systems: Continuity and Change. London: Sage.
Dolowitz D. et al. 2000 Policy Transfer and British Social Policy: Learning from the USA? Buckingham: Open University Press.
Dolowitz D.& Marsh D. 1996 “Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature,” Political Studies, No.44, pp.343-57.
Downs, A. 1957 An Economic Theory of Democracy. NY: Harper and Row.
Dunn, W. 1994 Public Policy Analysis: An Int roduction. N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Duverger , M. 1967 Political Parties. translated by Barbara and North. London: Lowe and Brydone.
Eldersveld, S.1964 Political Parties: A Behavioral Analysis. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Enelow J. M. & Melvin J. Hinich 1984 The Spatial Theory of Voting : An Introduction. NY: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Epstein, L. D. 1993 Political Parties in Western Democracies. London: Transaction Publishers.
Evans M. & Davies J. 1999 “Understanding Policy Transfer: A Multi-Level, Multi-Disciplinary Perspective,” Public Administration, Vol. 77, No. 2, p.361-385.
Everson, D. H. 1982 "The Decline of Political Parties," in The Communication Revolution in Politics. G. Benjamin (ed.), NY: Academy of Political Science.
Feick, J.1992 “Comparing Comparative Policy Studies: A Path Towards Integration?” Journal of Public Policy, 12:257-285.
Feldman, E. J. 1978 “Comparative Public Policy: Field of Method?” Comparative。Politics,Vol.10, No.2:287-305.
Finalayson, A. 1999 “Third Way Theory,” Th Political Quarterly. Vol.70, No.1:271-279.
Garner, R. 2000 Environmental Politics. London: MacMillan.
Gibson et al, 1983 "Assessing Party Organizational Strength," American Journal of Political Science, 27: 193-222.
Grabow, K. “The Re-Emergence of the Cadre Party?” Party Politics, V.7, No.1:23-43.
Hannan, M.T. & Freeman, J.H. 1988 "Structural Inertia and Organizational Change," in Cameron, Sutton, and Whetten (eds.) Readings in Organizational Decline .Mass: Ballinger.
Hopkin, J. & Caterina Paolucci 1999 "The Business Firm Model of Party Organization: Cases From Spain and Italy," European Journal of Political Research, 35: 307-339.
Hopkin, J. & Caterina Paolucci 1999 "The Business Firm Model of Party Organization: Cases From Spain and Italy," European Journal of Political Research, 35: 307-339.
Hrebenar, R. & Scott, R.K. 1979 Parties in Crisis: Party Politics in America. NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Hsieh, John Fuh-Sheng & Niou, E 1996 “Salient Issues in Taiwan’s Electoral Politics.” Electoral Studies, Vol.15, No.2:219-235.
Jepperson, R.C. 1991 "Institutions, Institutional Effects and New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis," in DiMaggio and Powell (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago Univ. Press.
Katz, R. & Mair P. (eds.) 1992 Party Organizations: A Handbook on Party Organizations in Western Democracies,1960-90. London: Sage.
Katz, R. & Mair P. 1995 “Cadre, catch-all or cartel? A rejoinder.” Party Politics, Yol.2 No.2:525-546.
Katz, R. & Mair P. 1995 “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party,” Party Politics,Vol.2, No.1:5-28.
Katz, R. S. 1990 "Party as Linkage: A vestigial function?" European Journal of Political Research, 18: 143-161.
Katz, R. S. 1990 "Party as Linkage: A vestigial function?" European Journal of Political Research, 18: 143-161.
Katz, R. S. 2001 “The Problem of Candidate Selection and Models of Party Democracy,” Party Politics, V.7, No.3:277-296.
Kimberly, R. H. & R. H. Miles 1980 The Organizational Life Cycles: Issues in the Creation, Transformation, and Decline of Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kingdon, J. W. 1995 Agenda, Alternatives. and Public Policy. N.Y: Harper Collins.
Kirchheimer, O. 1966 "The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems," in LaPalombara and Weiner (eds.), Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton Univ. Press.
Kirchheimer, O. 1966 "The Transformation of the Western European。Party Systems," in LaPalombara and Weiner (eds.), Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton Univ. Press.
Kitschelt, H. 1989 “The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited,” Political Studies, Vol.37,No.3:400-421.
Kitschelt, H. 1994 The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kitschelt, H. 1999 Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Kitschelt, H. 2000 Citizens, politicians, and cartellization: Political representation and state failure in post-industrial democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37: 149-179.
Koole, R. 1996 “Cadre, catch-all or cartel? A comment on the notion of the cartel party.” Party Politics,2:507-523.
Laver M. & W. Ben Hunt 1992 Policy and Party Competition NY: Routledge.
Lawler, E. & Galbraith, J. 1994 "Avoiding the Corporate Dinosaur Syndrome," Organizational Dynamics, Autumn: 5-17.
Lawson, K. & Merkl, P. 1988 When Parties Fail. N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Lawson, K. 1980 Political Parties and Linkage: A Comparative Perspective. Yale Univ. Press.
Lijahart, A. 1968 “Typologies of Democratic Systems,” Comparative Political Studies,Vol.1, No.1:3-44.
Lin, Chia-Lung 1999 “Election-Driven Party Transformation: A Genetic and Institutional Explanation of the DPP’s Organizational Nature,” presented in “International Conference on the Transformation of Political Parties. 1999.9.7-8.Taipei.
Lipset, S. M. & Rokkan, S. 1967 Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.
Lorange, P. & Nelson, R.J. 1987 "How to Recognize and Avoid Organizational Decline," Sloan Management Review, Vol.28, No.1: 41-48.
Lowi, T. J. 1972 “Four Syatems of Policy, Politics andChoice,” Public Administration Review, 33:298-310
Lowi, T. J. 1978 “Public Policy and Bureaucracy in the United States and France,” in Ashford(ed),Comparing Public Policies: New Concepts and Method, C.A.: Sage.
MacIvor, H. 1996 “Do Canadian Political Parties Form a Cartel? “Canadian Journal of Political Science, 29: 317-333.
Mair, P. 1989 “Continuity, Change and the Vulnerability of Party,” West European Politics, Vol.12, No.4:169-188.
Mair, Peter 1987 The Changing Irish Party System. London: Frances Printer.
Mair, Peter 1997 Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon.
March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. 1989 Rediscovering Institutions. N.Y.: Free Press.
March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. 1995 Democratic Governance. N.Y.: Free Press.
McCool, D. C.1995 Public Policy Theories, Models, and Concepts: An Anthology. N.J.: Prentice Hall.
McKelvey, B. 1982 Organizational Systematics. C.A:California Univ. Press.
McSweeney, D. & Zvesper, J. 1991 American Political Parties. N.Y.: Routledge.
Oliver, C. 1991 “Strategic Responses to Institutional Process,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.16, No.1:145-179
Panebianco, A. 1988 Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Pederson, M. 1983 “Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility in European Party Systems” in Daalder & Mair (eds) West European Party Systems: Continuity and Change. London: Sage.
Pelling, H. 1985 A Short History of the Labour Party. London: MacMillian.
Perrow, C. 1986 Complex Organizations. NY: Random House.
Peters, B. G. 1998 Comparative Politics :Theory and Methods. London: MacMillian.
Pfeffer, J. & Salanzick, G. 1978 The External Control of Organizations. NY: Harper and Row.
Pfeffer, J. 1982 Organizations and Organization Theory. London: Pitman.
Pfeffer, J. 1992 Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Univ. Press.
Pfeffer, J. 1997 New Directions for Organization Theory.: Problems and Prospects. NY: Oxford Univ. Press.
Pierre J. L. Svasand and A. Widfeldt 2000 “State subsidies to political parties: Confronting rhetoric with reality.” West European Politics, Vol.23 No.3:1-24.
Piven, F. 1991 Labour Parties in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Polity.
Pollitt, C. 2001 “Convergence: The Useful Myth?” Public Administration, Vol.79,No.4:933-947.
Pomper, G. M. 1977 "The Decline of the Party in American Elections," Political Science Quarterly, 92: 21-41.
Price, D.E. 1984 Bringing Back the Parties. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
Ranny, A. 1982 Governing: An Introduction to Political Science. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Roberts,K. M. & Wibbels, E. 1999 “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic , Institutional, and Structural Explanations,” American Political Science Review, Vol.93, No.3:575-590.
Rose, R. 1980 Do Parties Make a Difference? London: MacMillan.
Rose, R. 1991 “What is Lesson-Drawing?” Journal of Public Policy,Vol.11,No.1:3-30.
Rose, R. 1993 Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning across Time and Space. N.J.: Chatham.
Sabato, L.J. 1988 The Party''s Just Begun. Ill: Scott Goresman.
Sartori G. 1984 Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. CA: Sage.
Sartori, G. 1976 Parties and Party System: A Framework for Analysis. Oxford Univ. Press.
Schattschneider, E. E. 1942 Party Government. N.Y.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Schlesinger, J.A. 1984 "On the Theory of Party Organization," Journal of Politics, 46: 369-400.
Schneider, A. L. &Ingram Helen 1997 Policy Design for Democracy. Kansas: Univ. Press of Kansas.
Schonfeld, W.R. 1983 "Political Parties: The Functional Approach and the Structural Alternative," Comparative Politics, 15(4): 477-499.
Scott, W. R. 1987 “The Adolescence of Institutional Theory,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.32 No.4:493-511.
Scott, W. R. 1991 "Unpacking Institutional Arguments," in DiMaggio & Powell (ed.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis Chicago Univ. Press.
Scott, W. R. 1992 Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Scott, W. R. 1995 Institutions and Organizations. C.A.: Sage.
Seeliger, R. 1996” Conceptualizing and Researching Policy Convergence,” Policy Studies Journal, Vol.24, No.2:287-306.
Selznick, P. 1949 TVA and the Grass Roots. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Shapiro I. & Donald P. Green 1994 Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Politics Science. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
Singh, J. & Lumsden, C.J. 1990 "Theory and Research in Organizational Ecology," Annual Review of Sociology, 16: 161-195.
Skogstad, G. 2000 “Globalization and Public Policy: Situating Canadian Analyses.” Canadian Journal of Political Science Vol.33 No.4:805-828.
Smith, G. 1987 "Iron Law of Oligarchy," in Vernon Bogdanor (ed.) The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Institutions.
Smith,G. 1989 “Core Persistence: System Change and the ‘People’s Party’,” West European Politics, Vol.12, No.4:157-168.
Sorauf, F. J. & P. A. Beck 1988 Party Politics in America. Boston: Scott Foresman and Company.
Stepan, A. 1988 Rethinking。Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone. Princeton Univ. Press.
Stepan, A. 2001 Arguing Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Stokes, D. E. 1967 “Spatial Models of Party Competition,” in Angus Campbell et al.(eds.) Elections and the Political Order. NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Stone, D. 1999 “Learning Lessons and Transferring Policy across Time, Space and Disciplines,” Politics, Vol.19, No.1:51-59.
Suchamn, M. C. 1995 “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic。and Institutional Approaches,” Academy of Management Review, 20(3):571-610.
Sundberg, J. 1987 "Exploring the Basis of Declining Party Membership in Denmark: A Scandinavian Comparison," Scandinavian Political Sutdies, 10(1): 17-38.
Sundquist, J.L. 1982 "Party Decay and the Capacity to Govern," in Joel Fleishman (ed.) The Future of American Political Parties, N.Y.: Prentice-Hall.
Sundquist, J.L. 1983 Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington: Brookings.
Sztompka, P 1999 TrustL A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Togeby, L. 1992 "The Nature of Declining Party Membership in Denmark :Causes and Consequences," Scandinavian Political Studies, 15(1): 1-19.
Von Beyme, Klaus 1996 "Party Leadership and: Change in Party System: Towards a Postmodern Party State," Government and Opposition, 31(2):135-159.
Ware, A. 1979 The Logic of Party Democracy. London: Macmillan.
Ware, A. 1996 Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Wattenberg, M.P. 1991 The Rise of Candidate Centered Politics. Harvard Univ. Press.
Wattenberg, M.P. 1994 The Decline of American Political Parties: 1952-1992. Harvard Univ. Press.
Wilson, J. Q. 1989 Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It, N.Y. :Basic Books
Wolinetz, S. B. 1979 “The Transformation of Western European Party Systems Revisited.” West European Politics, Vol.2 No.1:4-28.
Wolinetz, S. B. 1991 “Party System Change: The Catch-all Thesis Revisited.” West European Politics, Vol.14 No.1:113-128.
Wu, Chung-Li 2001 “The Transformation of the Kuomintang’s Candidate Selection System,” Party Politics, V.7, No.1:103-118.
Zielinski, J. 2002 “Translating Social Cleavages into Party Systems,” World Ploitics, Vol.54, No.2:184-211.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE