:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:父職參與意願、參與行為、參與感受及其相關因素之研究
作者:杜宜展 引用關係
作者(外文):Yi-Chan Tu
校院名稱:國立臺南大學
系所名稱:國民教育研究所(83~93.7.31)
指導教授:劉信雄
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2004
主題關鍵詞:參與意願參與感受參與行為父職paternalinvolvement behaviorinvolvement perceptioninvolvement intention
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(5) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:81
本研究旨在探討父職參與意願、參與行為、參與感受及其相關因素,主要目的有:(一)探討家庭類型、父親個人因素、父職參與意願、父職參與行為及父職參與感受之關係;(二)探討父親個人背景變項與父職參與行為之關係;(三)探討家庭類型與父職參與意願、父職參與行為之關係;(四)探討父親個人因素與父職參與意願、父職參與行為之關係。(五)探討家庭類型、父親個人因素與父職參與意願、父職參與行為之關係。(六)探討父職參與意願、父職參與行為與父職參與感受之關係。(七)歸納研究結果,爲現今父職參與的困境,提供解決之道,以促進父職參與意願及父職參與行為並提昇父職參與感受,且提出將來進一步研究之建議。
爲達上述目的,本研究兼採文獻探討、時間日誌研究、調查研究、觀察研究等方法來蒐集資料,依文獻探討及先前研究結果,以自編之「父職參與個人因素量表」、「父職參與意願量表」、「父職參與行為量表」、「父職參與感受量表」,調查嘉義縣市、台南縣市、高雄市共計535位就讀幼稚園或托兒所幼兒的父親;資料蒐集後以皮爾遜積差相關、單因子變異數分析、t檢定考驗、逐步廻歸分析、典型相關分析等統計方法進行資料處理。除調查研究外,並以嘉義縣市、台南縣市、高雄市40位就讀幼稚園或托兒所幼兒的母親為對象,進行觀察研究與記錄,以佐證調查研究之結果。
依上述研究目的及實證研究結果,本研究主要結論為:
一、家庭類型、父親個人因素、父職參與意願、父職參與行為、父職參與感受之間有明顯關係。
二、父親個人背景變項中,以父親年齡、社經地位、女兒年齡、兒子年齡、每週工作時數、為父齡及請保姆照顧小孩,會影響父職參與行為。
三、家庭類型與父職參與意願之間並無明顯關係。
四、家庭類型與父職參與行為之間有部分關係。
五、父親個人因素之「父職技巧」、「角色認同」及「性別態度」可以有效預測父職參與意願。
六、父親個人因素之「父職技巧」、「性別態度」及「幼年經驗」可以有效預測父職參與行為。
七、家庭類型、父親個人因素可以有效預測父職參與意願、父職參與行為。
八、父職參與意願可以有效預測父職參與感受。
根據上述研究結論,本研究提出建議如下:
一、對父親們的建議
(一)重視孩子在幼年時所感受到正向的父職經驗。
(二)積極從事父職參與接近行為。
(三)父親年齡並非實踐父職參與行為的絆腳石。
(四)社經地位不應成為逃避父職參與行為的藉口。
(五)重視年齡較大孩子的互動需求。
(六)請他人協助照顧孩子無法取代父職參與行為。
(七)積極學習父職技巧。
(八)認同父職角色且建立兩性平權的性別態度。
二、對企業界的建議
(一)給予具父親身分之員工適當的工作時數。
三、對學校教育的建議
(一)舉辦父職參與成長團體。
(二)從小建立父職參與的觀念與做法。
四、未來研究上的建議
(一)研究對象方面:增加不同地區之研究樣本。
(二)研究變項方面:探究母親因素、兒童因素、婚姻關係、機構因素、社會環境因素對於父職參與之影響。
(三)研究工具方面:編製父職參與行為程度量表。
(四)研究方法方面:採田野研究或徑路分析來探究影響父職參與行為之因素。
(五)研究議題方面:採橫段及縱貫研究來探究特殊家庭之父職參與行為。
The purpose of this study were
1. to detect the relationship among family types, fathers’ individual factors, paternal involvement intention, involvement behavior, and involvement perception.
2. to explore the relationship between the variables of individual background and involvement behavior.
3. to explore the relationship among family types, paternal involvement intention, involvement behavior.
4. to explore the relationship among fathers’ individual factors, paternal involvement intention, involvement behavior.
5. to explore the relationship among family types, fathers’ individual factors, paternal involvement intention, involvement behavior.
6. to explore the relationship among paternal involvement intention, involvement behavior, and involvement perception.
7. to summarize the results of this study, in order to provide suggestions for fathers, company, school and future researches.
According to literature search and pilot-study, an “ Paternal Involvement Scale” was made, and 535 samples were surveyed using this scale. The data were statistically analyzed by Pearson’s product-moment correlation, one-way ANOVA, t-test, stepwise regression analysis and canonical correlation analysis. Forty samples were also surveyed by the method of observation.
The conclusions of this study are as follows:
1.There were significant correlations between family types, fathers’ individual factors, paternal involvement intention, involvement behavior, and involvement perception.
2. The variables of individual background, such as “fathers’ ages”, “social economic status”, “daughters’ ages”, “sons’ ages”, “work hours”, “fatherhood ages”, “ baby-sister assist take care children”, can influence paternal involvement behavior.
3. The relation between family types and paternal involvement intention is none related.
4. There were partly correlations between family types and paternal involvement behavior.
5. In the variables of fathers’ individual factors, such as “paternal skills”, “role identity”, “gender attitude”, can predict the paternal involvement intention.
6. In the variables of fathers’ individual factors, such as “paternal skills”, “gender attitude”, “early childhood experience”, can predict the paternal involvement behavior.
7. Family types and fathers’ individual factors can predict paternal involvement intention, involvement behavior.
8. Paternal involvement intention can predict involvement perception.
The conclusions were drawn based on previous findings, some suggestions were proposed for fathers, company, school and future research.
壹、中文部分

王以仁(民89)。主觀與客觀之間:期盼父職與母職參與的調查性研究。應用心理研究,7,29-30。new window
王舒芸、余漢儀(民86)。奶爸難為—雙薪家庭之父職角色初探。婦女與兩性學刊,8,115-149。new window
王叢桂(民89)。促進參與父職因素的探討。應用心理研究,6,131-171。new window
李正傑(民89)。已婚男性的父職經驗與父職教育方案需求:以三代同堂的雙新家庭為例。載於國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所、中華民國家庭教育學會舉辦之「家庭教育課程規劃與方案國際研討會議論文集」(頁201-233)嘉義。
李淑娟(民93)。父育理論之建構與驗證∼父親心理社會發展、父育知覺、父職參與及相關因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系博士論文,未出版。new window
呂寶靜(民91)。性別與家庭照顧:一個女性主義的觀點。載於王雅各(主編),性屬關係(上):性別與社會、建構。台北:心理。new window
杜宜展(民91,12月)。影響父職參與因素之探究。載於輔仁大學兒童與家庭學系、中華家政學會舉辦之「兒童與家庭學術研討會∼趨勢、未來與創新」論文集(頁291-304),台北。
杜宜展(民92)。童書中的父職參與情形之探究。載於丁玟瑛(主編),兒童文學的翻譯與文化傳遞∼第七屆兒童文學與兒童語言學術研討會論文集(頁293-323)。台北:富春。
杜宜展(民93a)。父職參與之探究∼以身心障礙兒童家庭為例。兒童發展與教育,創刊號,31-48。
杜宜展(民93b,5月)。學前幼兒家庭父職參與行為初探。載於中台技術學院舉辦之「當代兒童與家庭教育新趨勢學術研討會」論文集(頁98-121),台中。

吳明燁(民86)。父母角色與工作角色的衝突:親職假政策初探。載於謝秀芬(主編),爭議年代中家庭福利與家庭政策論文集。台北:東吳大學。
林生傳(民89)。教育社會學。台北:巨流。
邱珍琬(民93)。大學生眼中的父親形象∼以一次焦點團體討論為例。教育與社會研究,6,69-108。new window
邱皓政(民92)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北:五南。
馬惠芬(民92)。男性眼光中父職參與、父職自我效能與親子關係滿意度之自我評估研究∼新竹科學園區周邊幼兒園所調查資料之分析。輔仁大學生活應用科學系碩士論文,未出版。
洪蘭(譯)(民90)。J. R. Harris著。教養的迷失∼父母的教養能不能決定孩子的人格發展?台北:商周。
莫藜藜、王行(民86)。變遷社會中已婚男性家庭性別與觀念之省思。載於謝秀芬(主編),爭議年代中家庭福利與家庭政策論文集。台北:東吳大學。
張月芬(民91)。從社會變遷中談兩性角色及其家庭教育。載於中華民國家庭教育學會(主編),變遷社會中的家庭教育(頁107-
128),台北:師大書苑。
黃怡瑾(民91)。雙薪家庭中男性參與親職主觀經驗之探究。台南師範學院學報,35,313-337。new window
葉重新(民90)。教育研究法。台北:心理。
賴爾柔、黃馨慧(民85)。已婚男性參與家務分工之研究。婦女與兩性研究通訊,41,10-18。
劉秀娟編著(民88)。兩性教育。台北:揚智。
魏秀珍(民91)。父職研究在台灣:近十年文獻回顧分析。載於中華民國家庭教育學會(主編),變遷社會中的家庭教育(頁229-
260),台北:師大書苑。

貳、英文部分

Allen, S. M., & Hawkins, A. J.(1999). Maternal gatekeeping:Mothers’ belief and behaviors that inhibit great father involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 199-212.
Baruch, G. K., & Barnett, R . C.(1986). Consequences of fathers’ participation in family work.:Parents’ role strain and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 983-992.
Beitel, A., & Parke, R. D. (1998). Maternal and paternal attitudes as determinants of father involvement. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 268-288.
Belsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting: A process model. Child Development, 55, 83-96.
Bronstein, P.(1988). Marital and parenting roles in transition:An overview. In P. Bronstein & C. P. Cowan(Eds.),Fatherhood today:Men’s changing role in the family(pp. 3-10). New York:John Wiley and Sons.
Cabrera, N. J.,Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bradley, R. H., Hofferth, S. & Lamb, M. E(2000). Fatherhood in the twenty-first century. Child Development, 71, 127-136.
Crouter, A. C., Perry-Jenkins, M., Huston, T., & McHale, S. M. (1987). Processes underlying father involvement in dual-earner and single-earner families. Developmental Psychology, 23, 431-440.
Dollahite, D. C., Hawkins, A. J., & Brotherson, S. E. (1997).Fatherwork: A conceptual ethic of fathering as generative work. In A. J. Hawkins & D. C. Dollahite (Eds.), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives (pp.17-35). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Doherty, W. J., Kouneski, E. F., & Erickson, M. F.(1998). Responsible fathering:An overview and conceptual framework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 277-292.

Elder, G. H.(1998).The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69, 112-125.
Fox, G. T., & Bruce, G. (2001). Conditional fatherhood: Identity theory and paternal investment theory as alternative sources of explanation of fathering. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 394-403.
Garbarino, J. (2000). The soul of fatherhood. Marriage and Family Review, 29,(2/3), 11-21.
Gerson, K. (1997). The social construction fatherhood. In T. Arendell (Ed.), Contemporary parenting (pp. 119-153). California: Sage.
Greenberger, E., & O’Neil, R. (1990). Parents’ concerns about their child’s development:Implications for fathers’ and mothers’ well-being and attitudes toward work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 621-635.
Hawkins, A. J., & Belsky, J. (1989). The role of father involvement in personality change in men across the transition to parenthood. Family Relations, 38, 378-384.
Hawkins, A. J., Christiansen, S. L., Sargent, K. P., & Hill, E. J. ( 1995). Rethinking fathers'' involvement in child care: A developmental perspective. In W Marsiglio (Ed.), Fatherhood: Contemporary theory, research, and social policy (pp. 41-56). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Hofferth, S. L. (2003). Race/ethnic differences in father involvement in two-parent families: Culture, context, or economy? Journal of Family Issues, 24, 185-216.
Hofferth, S. L., Pleck, J., Stueve, J. L., Bianchi, S., & Sayer, L. (2002). The demography of fathers: What fathers do. In C. S. Tamis-
Lemonda & N. Cabrera (Eds.), Handbook of father involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 63-90).Mahwah: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.

Ihinger-Tallman, M., Parley, K., & Buehler, C. (1995). Developing a middle-range theory of father involvement postdivorce. In W Marsiglio (Ed.), Fatherhood: Contemporary theory, research, and social policy (pp. 57-77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ishii-Kuntz, M., & Coltrane, S. (1992). Predicting the sharing of household labor: Are parenting and housework distinct ? Sociological Perspectives, 35, 629-647.
Jump, T. L., Hass, L. (1987). Fathers in transition: Dual-career father participating in child-care. In M. Kimmel(Ed.), Changing men:New directions on men and masculinity (pp.98-114). Beverly Hills,CA:Sage.
Lamb, M. E. (1975). Father: Forgotten contributions to child develop-
ment. Human Development, 18, 245-266.
Lamb, M. E., Pleck, J. H., Charnov, E. L., & Levin, J. A. (1985). Paternal behavior in humans. American Zoologist, 25, 883-894.
Lamb, M. E.(1987).The father’s role:Cross-cultural perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Lamb, M. E., Pleck, J. H., Charnov, E. L., & Levin, J. A. (1987). A biosocial perspective paternal behavior and involvement. In J. B. Lancaster, J. Altmann, A.S.Rossi, & L. R. Sherrod, (Eds.), Parenting across the life span:Biosocial dimensions.(pp. 111-142). Hawwthorne, New York: Aldine Publishing Co.
Lamb, M. E. (Ed.). (1997). The role of the father in child development (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Lamb, M, E. (2000). The history of research on father involvement:An overview.Marriage and Family Review, 29, 23-42.
Lamb, M. E., & Tamis-Lemonda, C. S. (2003). The role of the father: An introduction. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.). The role of the father in child development (4th ed., pp. 1-31 ). New York:Wiley.

LaRossa, R. (1997). The modernization of fatherhood: A social and political history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lavee, Y, & Dollahite, D. C. (1991). The linkage between theory and research in family science. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 361-373.
Levinson, D, J. (1986). A conception of adult development. American Psychologist, 41, 3-13.
Leslie, L. A., Anderson, E. A., & Branson, M. P. (1991). Responsibility for children :The role of gender and employment. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 197-210.
MacDonald, K., & Parke, R. D. (1986). Parent-child physical play:The effects of sex and age of children and parents. Sex Roles, 7-8, 367-379.
Marsiglio, W. (1995). Young nonresident biological fathers. Marriage and Family Review, 20(3/4), 325-348.
Marsiglio, W. (1995b). Fathers diverse life course patterns and roles: Theory and social interventions. In W. Marsiglio (Ed.), Fatherhood: Contemporary theory research, and social policy (pp. 78-101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Marsiglio, W., Amato, P., Day, R., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Scholarship on fatherhood in the 1990s and beyond: Past impressions, future prospects. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62 , 1173-1191.
McBride, B. A. (1989). Interaction, accessibility, and responsibility:A view of father involvement and how to encourage it. Young Children, 44 ,13-19.
McBride, B. A., & Mills, G. (1993). A comparison of mother and father involvement with their preschool age children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 457-477.
McBride, B. A., & Sachoppe, S. J., & Rane, T R. (2002). Child characteristics,parenting stress, and parental involvement:Father versus mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 998-1012.

Minton, C., & Parley, K. (1996). Fathers'' parenting role identity and father involvement: A comparison of nondivorced and divorced, nonresident fathers. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 26-45.
Neville, B., & Parke , R. D. (1997). Waiting for paternity:Interpersonal and contextual implications of the timing of fatherhood. Sex Roles, 37, 45-49.
Parke, R, D. (1995). Father and families. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting:Vol. 3. Status and social conditions of parenting(2nd ed., pp.27-73).Hillsadale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Parke, R. D. (1996). Fatherhood. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
Parke, R, D. (2000).Father involvement:A developmental psychological perspective. Marriage and Family Review, 29(2/3), 43-58.
Peterson, R. R., & Gerson, K. (1992). Determinants of responsibility for child care arrangements among dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 527-536.
Pleck, J. H. (1997). Paternal involvement:Levels,sources and conseque-
nces. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child develop-
ment(3rd ed., pp. 66-103). New York:Wiley.
Pleck, J. H., & Masciadrelli, B. P. (2003). Paternal involvement by U.S. residential fathers:Levels, sources, and consequences. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.). The role of the father in child development (4th ed., pp. 222-271). New York: Wiley.
Pleck, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1997). Fatherhood ideals in the United States: Historical dimensions. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (3rd ed., pp. 33-48). New York: Wiley
Random House Webster''s College Dictionary(1992). New York:Random House.
Rane, T. R., & McBride, B. A. (2000). Identity theory as a guide to understanding fathers’ involvement with their children Journal of Family Issues, 21(3), 347-366.

Russell, G. (1986). Primary caretakers and role sharing fathers. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The father’s role: Applied perspectives(pp. 29-60). New York:Wiley.
Sanderson, S., & Sanders-Thompson, V. L. T. (2002). Factors associated with perceived paternal involvement in childrearing. Sex Roles, 46, 99-111.
Shulman, S., & Collins, W. E. (1993). Father-adolescent relationships. New Directions for Child Development, 62 , 1-5.
Snarey, J. (1993). How father care for the next generation: A four-
decade study. Cambrage, MA:Harvard University Press.
Snarey, J., Son, L., Kuehne, V. S., Hauser, S., & Vaillant, G. (1993).The role of parenting in men’s psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of early adulthood infertility and midlife generativity. Developmental Psychology, 23, 593-603.
Snarey, J. (1997). Forward:The next generation of work on fathering.In A. J. Hawkins & D. C. Dollahite(Eds.), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives. (pp. ix-x).Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping, or complementary concepts? Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 16-35.
Tinsley, B. R., & Parke, R. D. (1988). The role of grandfathers in the context of the family. In P. Bronstein & C. P. Cowan(Eds.), Fatherhood today: Men’s changing role in the family.(pp. 236-
250).New York:Wiley.
Volling, B. L., & Belsky, J. (1991). Multiple determinants of father involvement during infancy in dual-earner and single-earner families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 461-474.
Wilcox, W. B. (2002). Religion, convention, and paternal involvement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 780-792.
Yeung, W. J., Sandberg, J., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Hofferth, S. L. (2001). Children’s time with fathers in intact families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(1), 136-154.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE