王佳煌(2005)。都市社會學。台北:三民。
任軍鋒(2003)。後工業、後物質、政黨-以北歐五國政治文化變為為中心,歐洲研究,6,45-62。
江岷欽、劉坤億(1999)。企業型政府:理念、實務、省思,台北:智勝文化。
何東波(2002)。後工業之高雄發展城市管理,第九屆海峽兩岸城市變遷與展望研討會論文集,台灣台南,3-1-1-15。
李長晏(2004)。全球化治理:地方政府跨區域合作分析,研考雙月刊,28(5),55-65。李長晏(2005)。組建地方策略性夥伴關係之合作機制,中國地方自治,58(4),4-32。
杜素豪(2003)。全球化經濟發展中的相對環境價值觀:城鄉與就業身份之分析。全球衝擊與鄉村調適研討會,台灣台北。
杜素豪(2004)。環境保護與經濟成長關係的認知分析。農業與經濟,32,71-105。杜偉(2003)。日本後現代社會的價值觀與道德觀,當代青年研究,6,26- 29。
呂育誠(2005)。地方治理意涵及其制度建立策略之研究-兼論我國縣市推動地方治理的問題與前景,公共行政學報,14,1-38。林建元(2002)。都市計畫的新典範。台北:詹式。
林錫銓(2001)功能性區域計劃之體制研究-區域治理之有機調適模式,規劃學報,28,25-45。吳明隆(2007)。SPSS操作與應用-變異數分析實務。台北:五南。
吳魯平(2002)。西方發達國家青年價值結構的轉型及其社會經濟根源-英格萊哈特的後現代化理論。中國青年政治學院學報,21(2),14-21。
周聖平(2001)。台灣民眾之物質/後物質主義價值:社經、地區與政治態度差異,台北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
周志龍(2003)。全球化、台灣國土再結構與制度。台北:詹式。周穗明(1998)。後物質主義價值觀和全球環境主義,當代世界與社會主義,3,71-76。
周穗明(1999)。後現代的選擇-西方興起後物質主義價值觀,馬克思主義與現實,1,55-57。
周穗明(2002)。西方綠色思潮與後物質主義價值觀,岭南學刊,5,99-102。
邱皓政(2004)。社會與行為研究的量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南。
胡連生(2006)。從物質主義到後物質主義-近代西方社會價值理念的轉向,當代世界與社會主義,2,41-44。
俞可平(2000)。治理與善治。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
孫本初、鍾京佑(2006)。從地方政府到地方治理:網絡治理之分析,中國地方自治,59(4),33-54。
孫柏瑛(2004)。當代地方治理—面對21世紀的挑戰。北京:中國人民大學。
孫清山譯(2004)。都市社會學。台北:五南。
陳正和(2003)。第二次人口轉型,後物質主義文化,與生活品質的思考:以新莊地區為例,求知、生活與信仰—新莊居民之生活需求與期望,輔仁大學研究發展處學術研究組專題計劃報告,未出版。
陳正和(2004)。影響民眾支持廢除死刑的相關社會因素的探討-社會人口轉型因素, 社會情境因素,與社會條件因素的個別,統合,與中介作用,哲學與文化,31(5),61-102。陳志瑋(2004)。行政課責與地方治理能力的提升,政策研究學報,4,23-46。陳國龍(2006)。淺談物質主義傾向及其衡量,生產力研究,8,16-18。
許立一(2004)。地方治理與公民參與的實踐:政治後現代性危機的反思與解決,公共行政學報,10,63-94。葉俊榮(2004)。政府再造與區域治理,研考雙月刊,28(5),13- 24。
葉肅科(1993)。芝加哥學派。台北:遠流。
楊重信(2001),台灣民眾之基本價值:社經背景與城鄉之差異,第八屆海峽兩岸城市發展研討會論文集,212-238,台灣台北。
楊重信、周聖平(2001)。台灣民眾之物質/後物質主義價值:社經與地區差異,中華民國區域科學學會/住宅學會 2001 年聯合年會及論文研討會,未出版,台灣台北。
廖坤榮、陳雅芬(2003)。後物質主義之地方開發政策-台南縣濱南工業區開發案探討,中國行政評論,12(4),43-76。蕭新煌(2002)。台灣社會文化典範的轉移-台灣大轉型的歷史和宏觀紀錄。台北:立緒文化。
蕭新煌、尹寶珊(2004)。後物質主義的浮現?香港與台北的比較,香港社會政治的延續與變遷,劉兆佳、王家英、尹寶珊合編,243-273,香港:香港中文大學亞太研究所。
蕭新煌(2004)。台灣的非政府組織、民主轉型與民主治理。台灣民主季刊,1(1),65-84。羅啟宏(1992)。台灣省鄉鎮發展類型之研究,台灣經濟月刊,190,41-68。
Abney, G., & Lauth, T. P. (1985). Interest group influence in city policy-making: the view of administrators. The Western Political Quarterly, 38(1), 148-161.
Abramson, P. R., Ellis, S., & Inglehart, R. (1997). Research in context: measuring value change. Political Behavior, 19(1), 41-59.
Alderson, A. S., & Beckfield, J. (2004). Power and position in the world city system. The American Journal of Sociology, 109(4), 811-851.
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nation. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bakvis, H. (1987). In pursuit of postbourgeois man- postmaterialism and intergenerational change in Canada. Comparative Political Studies, 20(3), 357-389.
Bartos, O. J. (1996). Postmodernism, postindustrialism, and the future. The Sociological Quarterly, 37(2), 307-325.
Belk, R.W. (1985). Materialism: trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 265-280.
Betz, H. (1990). Value change and postmaterialist politics- the case of West Germany. Comparative Political Studies, 23(2), 239-256.
Brym, R. J., Veugelers, J. W. P., & Simpson, J. (2004). Postmaterialism in unresponsive political system: the Canadian case. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 41(3), 291-317.
Commission on Global Governance (1995). Our Global Neighborhood, Oxford University Press.
Calista, D. J. (1984). Postmaterialism and value convergence- value priorities of Japanese compared with their perceptions of American value. Comparative Political Studies, 16(4), 529-555.
Charnock, D., & Ellis, P. (2004). Postmaterialism and postmodernization in Australian electoral politics. Electoral Studies, 23, 45-72.
Curry, P., & O’Connell M. F. (2000) .Post-materialist values and political preference: some unlikely findings from Northern Ireland. European Journal of Political Research, 37, 19-30.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Halton, E.R. (1978). Reflections on materialism, University of Chicago Magazine, 70(3), 6-15.
Dalton, R. J., & Ong, N.-N. (2003). Civil society andsocial capital in Vietnam. Modernization and Social Change in Vietnam. (Forthcoming)
Davis, D. W. (2000). Individual level examination of postmaterialism in the U.S.: political tolerance, racial attitudes, environmentalism, and participatory norms. Political Research Quarterly, 53(3), 455-475.
Dear, M., & Flusty, S. (1998). Postmodern urbanism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(1), 50-72.
Dekker, K., & van Kempen, R. (2004). Urban governance with in the big city-ideals and practice in Den Haag, the Netherlands. Cities, 21(2), 109-117.
Douglass, M. (2000). Mega-urban regions and world city formation: globalization, the economic crisis and urban policy issue in Pacific Asia. Urban Studies, 37(12), 2315-2335.
Duch, R. M., & Taylor, M. A. (1993). Postmaterialism and the economic condition. American Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 747-779.
Duch, R. M., & Taylor, M. A. (1994). A reply to abramson and Inglehart’s “education, security, and postmaterialism”. American Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 815-824.
Dunlap, R. E., & Liere, K. D. V. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: a review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(2), 181-197.
Erickson, O., & Laycock, D. (2002). Postmaterialism versus the welfare state? Party Politics, 8(3), 301-325.
Ferdinand, B. (1985). In an environment of insecurity- postmaterialism in the European community, 1970-1980. Comparative Political Studies, 17(4), 453-484.
Gigson, J. L., & Duch, R. M. (1994). Postmaterialism and the emerging Soviet democracy. Political Research Quarterly, 47(1), 5-39.
Gottlieb, A. (1983). Materialsm, postmaterialism, and public views on public views on socioeconomic policy- the case of Israel. Comparative Political Studies, 16(3), 307-335.
Graaf, N. D. D. (1996). Why are the young more postmaterialist? a cross-national analysis of individual and contextual influences on postmaterial values. Comparative Political Studies, 28(4), 608-635.
Grafstein, R. (2002). The political economy of postmaterialism: material explanations of changing values. Economics and Politics, 14(2), 163-190.
Hall, P. (1997). Modelling the post-industrial city. Futures, 29(4/5), 311-322
Harpham, T., & Boateng, K.A. (1997). Urban governance in relation to the operation of urban service in developing countries. Habitat International, 21(1), 65-77.
Hayes, B. C., McAllister, I., & Studlar, D. T. (2000). Gender, postmaterialism, and feminism in comparative perspective. International Political Science Review, 21(4), 425-439.
Hoefer, R. (1988). Postmaterialism at work in social welfare policy: the Swedish case. Social Service Review, 62(3), 383-395.
Holt, D. (1995). How consumers consume: a typology of consumption practices, Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1-16.
Inglehart, R. (1971). The silent revolution in Europe: intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. The American Political Science Review, 65(4), 991-1017.
Inglehart, R. (1981). Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity. The American Political Science Review, 75(4), 880-900.
Inglehart, R. (1985). New perspectives on value change- response to Lafferty and Knutsen, Savage, and Boltken and Jagodzinski. Comparative Political Studies, 17(4), 485-532.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R., & Abramson, P. R. (1994). Economic security and value change. The American Political Science Review, 88(2), 336-354.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic, and political change in 43 Societies, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (2000). Globalization and postmodern value. The Washington Quarterly, 23(1), 215-228.
Inglehart, R., & Abramson, P., R. (1999). Measuring postmaterialism. The American Political Science Review, 93(3), 665-667.
Kearns, A. J. (1992). Active citizenship and urban governance. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 17(1), 20-34.
Leach, R., & Percy-Smith, J. (2001). Local Governance In Britain. New York: Palgrave.
Lafferty, W. M., & Kunutsen, O. (1984). Leftist and rightist ideology in a social democratic state: an analysis of Norway in the midst of the coservative resurgence. British Journal of Political Science, 14(3), 345-367.
Lafferty, W. M. (1985). Postmaterialism in a social democratic state- an analysis of the distinctness and congruity of the Inglehart value syndrome in Norway. Comparative Political Studies, 17(4), 411-430.
Lindström, M. (2007). Materialist and post-materialist values and cannabis amorking among young adults: a population- base study in southern Sweden. Preventive Medicine, 44, 363-368.
Marks, G. N. (1997). The formation of materialist and postmaterialist value. Social Science Research, 26, 52-68.
Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and personality New York: Harper and Row.
McLarney, C., & Chung, E. (1999). Post-materialism’s “silent revolution” in consumer research. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 17(6), 288-297.
Moaddel, M. ed. (2007). Values and perceptions of the Islamic and Middle Eastern publics. New York: Palgrave
Ohlander, J., Batalova, J., & Treas, J. (2005). Explaining educational influences on attitudes toward homosexual relations. Social Science Research, 34, 781-799.
Opp, K. (1990). Postmaterialism, collective action, and political protest. American Journal of Political Science, 34(1), 212-235.
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. J. (2000). Governance, Politics, and the State. London: Macmillan.
Prefontaine, L., Ricard, L., Sicotte, H., Turcotte, D., and Dawes, S. (2000). New modelsof collaboration for public service delivery. (working paper)
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). Understanding governance- policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Philadelphia: Open University press.
Richins, M. L. & Dawson, S. (1992). A Consumer values orientation for materialism and It’s measurement: scale development and validation, Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 303-316.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Dalton, R. J., & Doh Chull Shin, D. C. (2006). Citizens, democracy, and markets around the Pacific Rim. USA: Oxford University Press.
Savage, J. (1985). Postmaterialism of the left and right- politicial conflict in postindustrial society. Comparative Political Studies, 17(4), 431-451.
Simpson, F. & Chapman, M. (1999). Comparison of urban governance and planning policy- East looking West. Cities, 16(5), 353-364.
Stewart, K. (2003). Designing good urban governance indicators: The importance of citizen participation and its evaluation in greater Vancouver. Cities, 23(3), 196-204.
Trump, T. M. (1991). Value formation and postmaterialism- Inglehart’s theory of value change reconsidered. Comparative Political Studies, 24(3), 365-390.
Walks, R. A. (2001).The social ecology of the post-Fordist/global city? economic restructuring and social-spatial polarisation in the Toronto urban region, Urban Studies, 38(3), 407-447.
Wernet, C. A., Elman, C., & Pendleton, B. F. (2005). The postmodern individual: structural determinants of attitudes. Comparative Sociology, 4, 340-364.
Williams, G. (1999). Institutional capacity and metropolitan governance: the greater Toronto area. Cities, 16(3), 171-180.
Williams, G. (1999). Metropolitan governance and strategic planning: a review of experience in Manchester, Melbourne and Toronto. Progress in Planning, 52, 1-100.
Wilson, M. S. (2005). A social-value analysis of postmaterialism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(2), 209-224.