:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:就近入學與學習經濟視域融合之研究--試論十二年國教之新國教觀
作者:何宗懿
作者(外文):Tsung-I, Ho
校院名稱:國立臺中教育大學
系所名稱:教育學系
指導教授:楊思偉
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2014
主題關鍵詞:十二年國教就近入學學習經濟地理鄰近性視域融合高達美The National Twelve-year Basic Education Systemnearby school enrollmentLearning Economygeographical proximitythe fusion of horizonsGeorg-Hans Gadamer
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:42
十二年國教中的就近入學教育理念與丹麥Aalborg大學IKE(Information, Knowledge, Economy)中心依據丹麥經濟型態研究發展的學習經濟理論,在地理鄰近性的本質上有共通性。本研究以高達美哲學詮釋學的視域融合為方法論,詮釋學循環為方法,將上述兩者(就近入學教育理念與學習經濟理論)視為兩個視域,前者為問題視域,後者為回答視域,並且就問題視域提出本論文的研究問題:「在就近入學教育理念中,地理鄰近性的意義與價值為何?」企圖提出經過詮釋學循環的視域融合過程,以學習經濟理論主張的核心論點─「創新是一個互動學習的過程」,而地理鄰近性有利於促進互動學習,以及相關的社會因素,例如,內隱知識的學習、信任、合作、社會資本的累積等等,作為以就近入學教育理念發揮學習經濟內涵的新視域。筆者再依據新視域的內涵,以第一屆十二年國教學生家長身分,提出「人才願景」─具互動學習能力的合作人才,作為十二年國教以就近入學為主軸之新國教觀。本論文且進一步依據人才願景的理念提出的建議為,以「最佳互動學習區」的概念替代「適性學習社區」,賦予免試就學區意涵。
There is a common ground, i.e. the essence of geographical proximity, between the policy of nearby school enrollment in the National Twelve-year Basic Education System and the Learning Economy developed by the IKE (Information, Knowledge, Economy) Center in Aalborg University, Denmark, based on the model of Denmark’s economic development. The two above entities are seen as two horizons. Therefore, this research uses the fusion of horizons, established by Georg-Hans Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics, as methodology and hermeneutical circle as method. Since the Learning Economy emphasizes a prominent notion, i.e. “Innovation is an interactive learning process”, it can bring some heuristic ideas for the former. As a result, in the fused new horizon, this article concludes that the shared new vision of the quality of students in the Basic Education System could be “cooperation by the competence of interactive learning”. At the end of this dissertation, one suggestion is made. A new perception is formulated for the defined district of nearby school enrollment in the National Twelve-year Basic Education System, i.e. “Optimal Interactive Learning Region”. The abbreviation of the new term is “OIL-region” which is symbolized that the human resources are like OIL for the development of Taiwan, especially for the developemtn of economy in Taiwan.
中文部分:

丁亮(2009)。伽達默爾理解與解釋的辯證的客觀性,青島農業大學學報(社會科學報),21(4),72-81。

中廣新聞網(2012年5月7日)。「諾貝爾大師:上網玩遊戲 浪費時間」。取自http://www.bcc.com.tw/news/newsprint.asp?cde=1770090

中國時報(2013年12月6日)。「產學落差大 張忠謀:台灣要更多技職教育」。取自http://life.chinatimes.com/LifeContent/1401/20131206000814.html

主計處(2013)。國民所得及經濟成長之國民所得之常用資料。中華民國統計資訊網。2013年2月24日引自www.stat.gov.tw。

朱榮英(2008)論文本視域與問題視域的實踐整合─當前馬克思主義文本學研究應注意的問題。河南大學學報(社會科學版),48(4), 28-34。

何衛平(2002)。高達瑪。台北市:生智。

宋明君(2012)。馬爾地夫上的馬爾薩斯。台灣教育評論月刊,1(5),61-65。

宋修德、蘇景進(2010)。高中職社區化之學生就近入學成效及其影響因素。教育政策論壇,13(4),1-32。new window

李坤崇、林杏足、陳國偉、陳清誥、汪大久、邱玉蟾、莊雅慈(2003)。高中職社區化推動方案「就學社區規劃小組」之研究。教育部委託專案報告。臺南市:國立成功大學教育研究所。

林志忠(2012)。面對小學少子女化現象之相關政策的反省。台灣教育評論月刊,1(5),15-19。

林振春(1997)。社區與學校結合的模式與作法。教育資料與研究,15,23-25。

邱玉蟾(2002)。高中職社區化之推動與發展。教育資料集刊,27,127-151。new window

邱玉蟾(2003)。高中職社區化的關鍵性議題。教育研究月刊,107,36-47。new window

林海清(2012)。少子女化的教育省思----小校整併問題探討。台灣教育評論月刊,1(5),22-24。

吳永裕(1997)。創造學校與社區雙蒙其利的互動關係。教育資料與研究,15,9-11。new window

吳忠泰(2009)。少子化對我國中等教育的衝擊--「少子化衝擊」vs. 「中等教育的轉機」。中等教育,60(1),20-25。new window

洪漢鼎(2002)。詮釋學史。臺北市:桂冠新知。new window

馬豔、楊小勇、龔曉鶯(2003)。知識經濟。台北市:揚智文化。

陳榮華(1998)。高達美《真理與方法》中的完整性先前概念與真理概念。文史哲學報,49,59-78。new window

陳榮華(2011)。高達美詮釋學:《真理與方法》導讀。台北:三民書局。

曾素秋(2012)。少子女化、尼特族與教師專業發展。台灣教育評論月刊,1(5),34-37。

彭啟福(2005)。哲學詮釋學中的”問題意識”。安徽師範大學學報(人文社會科學報),33(4),424-428。

黃芳玫(2001)。九年國民義務教育之回顧與其教育面、經濟面之影響。臺灣經濟預測與政策,31(2),p 91-118。new window

教育部(2012)。普通高中新生就近入學率-按學校所在縣市別分。取自http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=8168

教育部(2013)。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫(核定本)。台北:教育部。取自http://12basic.edu.tw/Detail.php?LevelNo=8

教育部中等教育司(1968)。教育部實施九年國民教育籌備工作報告。台北:教育部。

湯志民(2003)。高中職社區化及未來推展芻議。教育研究月刊,107,90-103。new window

張世賢、陳恆鈞(2001)。公共政策:政府與市場的觀點。台北:商鼎文化。

張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏(1994)。經濟學:理論與實際。台北:雙葉書廊公司。

經濟日報(2013年5月24日)。「參與區域經濟整合的兩原則、三步驟」。引自http://udn.com/NEWS/OPINION/OPI1/7918417.shtml#ixzz2UAbUQzam

經濟日報(2013年12月24日)。「價值創造是高科技產業轉型的基礎」。引自http://udn.com/NEWS/OPINION/OPI1/8380127.shtml

楊忠斌、曾雅瑛(2007)。台灣人口變遷的教育哲學省思。教育資料與研究雙月刊,74,23-36。new window

楊國樑、劉瀚榆(2005)。知識經濟理論與實證。台北:五南圖書公司。

戴淑芬(2012)。積極面對少子化,宜檢討學校用地開發與再利用。台灣教育評論月刊,1(5),20-21。

蔡銘津(2008)。少子化趨勢對教育體系的衝擊與因應。研習資訊,23(5),101-109。

蔡銘津(2012)。少子女化的教育政策走向與應變。台灣教育評論月刊,1(5),1-7。

劉世雄(2012)。台灣面臨少子女化社會應有的教育政策與教師作為。台灣教育評論月刊,1(5),31-33。

鄭毓霖(2004)。少子化現象在教育上的因應之道--『日本經驗』。臺灣教育,630,14-20。

聯合報(2013年5月25日)。「塗鴉表達安全感 學生畫馬桶」。取自 http://mag.udn.com/mag/edu/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=457420

聯合報(2013年5月27日)。「47萬尼特族 台灣沉重負擔」、「勞動力閒置 國家隱藏的負債」、「拒學 人際退縮 尼特的徵兆」、「社會的夢魘 尼特現象 恐衍生不婚不生」。取自http://vision.udn.com/storypage.jsp?f_MAIN_ID=10&f_ART_ID=854&pno=4

薛承泰(2009)。少子化與高中教育的挑戰。中等教育,60(1),8-19。

翻譯部分:

Gadamer, H.-G. (1993)。真理與方法:哲學詮釋學的基本特徵(初版)。(洪漢鼎譯)。台北市:時報文化。(原著出版於1960)

Gadamer, H.-G. (1995)。真理與方法:補充和索引(初版)。(洪漢鼎、夏鎮平譯)。台北市:時報文化。(原著出版於1985)

Palmer, R. (2006)。”哲學詮釋學的實用性”,(孫麗君譯)。安徽師範大學學報(人文社會科學報),34,259-265。(原著出版於2006)

Palmer, R. (2008)。”理解的普遍過程:高達美詮釋學中的七個關鍵字”,(何佳瑞譯)。哲學與文化,35(2),121-144。(原著出版於2008)new window

Senge, P. (2007)。第五項修練:學習型組織的藝術與實務。(郭進隆、齊若蘭譯)。台北市:天下文化。(原著出版於1990)

Schumpeter, J. A. (2005)。經濟發展理論。(何畏、易家祥譯)。臺北市:左岸。(原著出版於1911)

英文部分:

Ackoff, R. L. (1989). “From data to wisdom”, Journal of Applied System Analysis, Vol. 16, pp. 3-9.

Amin, A. and Cohendet, P. (2004). Architectures of knowledge: Firms, capabilities, and communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Archibugi, D., and Lundvall, B-Å.,, (2001). (Eds.) Europe in the globalizing learning economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Arocena, R., and Sutz, J. (2000). “Interactive learning spaces and development policies in Latin America”, DRUID Woking Paper, No. 00-13. Retrieved from http://www3.druid.dk/wp/20000013.pdf

Arrow, K. J. (1962). “The economic implications of learning by doing”, Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173.

Arrow, K. J. (1971). “Political and economic evaluation of social effects and externalities”, in Intrilligator, M. (ed.), Frontiers of Quantitative Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Arrow, K. J. (1994). “Methodological individualism and social knowledge”, American Economic Review, 89(3), 1-9.

Asheim, B. T., Isaken, I., Nauwelaers, C., and Tödtling, F. (2003). (eds.) Regional innovation policy for small-medium enterprises. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Asheim, B. T., and Coenen, L. (2005). “Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters”, Research Policy, 34, 1173-1190.

Asheim, B. T., and Coenen, L. (2006). “Contextualising regional innovation systems in a globalisaing learning economy: On knowledge bases and institutional frameworks”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 163-173.

Asheim, B. T. (2011). “The changing role of learning regions in the globalizing knowledge economy: A theoretical re-examination,” Regional Studies, 46(8), 993-1004. Doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.607805

Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., and Tamura, R. (1990). “Human capital, fertility, and economics”, Journal of Political Economy, 97, S12-S37.

Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books

Boschma, R. (2004). “Rethinking regional innovation policy: The making and breaking of regional history,” in Fuchs, G. & Shapira, P. (eds) Rethinking regional innovation and change: Path dependency or regional breakthroughs? Dordrecht: Kluwer Internaitonal Publishers.

Borrás, S., Fagerberg, J., and Edquist, C. (2011). “Introduction to special issue on learning, innovation systems and policy in honour of Bengt-Åke Lundvall” in Science and Public Policy, 38(9), 666–668.

Brown, P., Lauder, H., and Ashton, D. (2008). ‘Education, globalisation and the future of the knowledge economy’, European Educational Research Journal 7(2), 131-156.

Cappellin, R. (2003). “Territorial knowledge management: towards a metrics of cognitive dimension of agglomeration economies”, Internaitional Journal of Technology Management, 26(2/3/4), 303-325.

Cappellin, R. (2007). “The territorial dimension of the knowledge economy: Collective learning, spatial changes, and regional and urban policies”, in The American Behavioral Scientist, 50(7), 891-921.

Carter, A. (1994). “Production workers, meta investment and the pace of change”, paper prepared for the meetings of the International J. A. Schumpeter Society, Munster, August, 1994.

Chirstensen, J. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (2004). (Eds.) Product innovation, interactive learning, and economic performance. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Commision of the European Communities (2000) A memorandum on lifelong learning. Retrieved from http://www.bologna-berlin2003.de/pdf/MemorandumEng.pdf

Cooke, P., Boekholt, P. and Tödtling, F. (2000). The Governance of Innovation in Europe: Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness, London: Pinter Publishers.

Cowan, R., David, P. A., and Foray, D. (2000). “The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 211-253.

Dalum, B.; Johnson, B. and Lundvall, B.Å. (1992) “Public policy in the learning economy”, in Lundvall, B.Å. (ed.) (1992) National Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter Publishers.

Dasgupta, P. and David, P. A. (1994). “Toward a new economics of science”, Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521.

David, P. A., and Foray, D. (1995). “Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base”, STI Review: OECD-Science, Technology, Industry, 16(Fall), 13-68.

Douglas, M. (1987). How institutions think. London: Routledge.

Drucker, P. (1969). The age of discontinuity. New York: Harper & Row.

Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capital society. New York: Harper Business.

The Economist (2013/4/27) Youth unemployment generation jobless. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/international/21576657-around-world-almost-300m-15-24-year-olds-are-not-working-what-has-caused

Edquist, C. (1997). (ed.) Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter Publishers.

Edquist, C. (2001). The Systems of innovation approach and innovation policy: An account of the state of the art. Lead paper presented at the DRUID Conference, Aalborg, June 12-15, 2001, under theme F: ‘National Systems of Innovation, Institutions and Public Policies’ http://www.tema.liu.se/tema-t/sirp/chaed.htm

Edquist, C. and Johnson, B. (1997). “Institutions and organisations in systems of innovation”, in C. Edquist (ed.) Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organisations. London and Washington: Pinter/Cassell.

Elam, M. (1993). Innovation as the craft of combination. Sweden: Linkping University.

Eraut, M., Alderton, J., Cole, G. and Senker, P. (1998). “Development of knowledge and skills in employment”, Research Report, 5, Brighton: University of Sussex, Institute of Education.

Ernst, D., and Lundvall, B-Å., (1997). Information technology in The learning economy - Challenges for developing countries, DRUID Working Paper No. 97-12. Retrieved from http://www3.druid.dk/wp/19970012.pdf

Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000), “The Dynamics of innovation: From naitonal systems and ‘mode 2’ to a triple helix of university-industry-governement relations’, Introduction to the special ‘triple helix’ issue, Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.

Eurofound (2012), NEETs – Young people not in employment, education or training: Characteristics,costs and policy responses in Europe, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Faris, R (2001) “The Way Forward: Building a Learning Nation” Discussion paper on a conceptual framework for learning communities for the Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation. Retrieved from http://members.shaw.ca/rfaris/docs/BUILDING%20A%20LEARNING%20NATION.pdf

Fisher, M. (2000). Innovation, knowledge creation, and systems of innovation, Paper presented at the 40th European Congress of the Regional Science Association, Barcelona, Spain, August 29-September 1, 2000. Retrieved from http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa00/pdf-ersa/pdf/43.pdf

Fagerberg, J. and Verspagen, B. (2009) “Innovation studies—The emerging structure of a new scientific field”, Research Policy, 38, pp. 218-233. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.ige.unicamp.br/pub/CT010/aula%201/Fagerberg.pdf

Florida, R. (1995). “Toward the learning region”, Futures, 27, 527-536.

Foray, D. (2000). The economics of knowledge. Cambridge, Massachussets: The MIT-Press.

Foray, D. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (1996). “The Knowledge-based economy: From the economics of knowledge to the learning economy” in Foray, D. and B.-Å. Lundvall (eds.), Employment and growth in the knowledge-based economy, OECD Documents, Paris.

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.

Freeman, C. (1995). “The ‘national system of innovation’ in historical perspective,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5-14.

Freeman, C. and Perez, C. (1988). “Structural Crisis of Adjustment: Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour” m Dosi, G., et al. (ed.) Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers.

Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.

Gamagni, R. (1995). “Global network and local milieu: towards a theory of economic space”, in Conti, S., Malecki, E., & Oinas, P. (eds). The industrial enterprise and its environment: Spacial perspectives. Avebury: Aldershot.

Gadamer, H.-G. (1976) Philosophical hermeneutics. Translated by Linge, D. E. Berkeley: Uniersity of California Press.

Gadamer, H.-G. (1989) Truth and method. Translation revised by Weinsheimer, J. and Marshall, D. G. London: Continuum.

Gelsing, L. (1992). ‘Innovation and the development of industrial networks’ in Lundvall, B.-Å. (ed.) (1992), National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.

Godin, B. (2006). The knowledge-based economy: Conceptual framework or buzzword? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 17-30.

Gordon, I.R. and McCann, P. (2000). ‘Industrial clusters: Complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks?’, Urban studies, 37(3), 513-532.

Gregersen, B. and Johnson, B. (1997). “Learning economies, innovation systems and european integration”, Regional Studies, 31 (5), 479-90.

Guile, D. (2003). ‘From “credentialism” to the “practice of learning”: Reconceptualising learning for the knowledge economy’, Policy Futures in Education, 1(1), 83-105.

Guile, D. (2010). The Learning challenge of the knowledge economy. Rotterdam: Sense Publication.

Gustavsen, B., Nyhan, B. and Ennals, R. (2007). Learning together for local innovation: promoting learning region. Cedefop Reference series 68. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Gutman, J. (1982) "A means-ends chain model based on consumer categorization processes." Journal of Mariieting 46 (2), 60-72.

Helliwell, J., Layard, R., and Sachs, J. (2012). World happiness report. New York: Earth Institute, Columbia University.

Hodgson, G. M. (2001) Economics and utopia: Why the learning economy is not the end of history. London: Routledge.

James, L., Guile, D., and Unwin, L. (2011). From learning for the knowledge-based economy to learning for growth: re-examining clusters, innovation and qualifications, published by the Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies at: http://www.llakes.org

Jeannerat, H. and Kebir, L. (2010). “Economic systems of knowledge and regions: A typology based on the analysis of producer-consumer relations”, Paper to be presented at the Summer Conference 2010 on "Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Technology" at Imperial College London Business School, June 16 - 18, 2010, retrieved from http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php?id=501478&cf=43

Jensen, M.B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007), ‘Forms of knolwedge and modes of innovation’, Research Policy, 36(5), 680-693.

Johnson, B. (2010). “Institutional learning” in B-Å, Lundvall (ed.), National systems of innovation: toward A theory of innovation and interactive learning(pp. 23-46). London, New York: Pinter Publishers.

Johnson, B. (2011). “From user-producer relations to the learning economy”, Science and Public Policy, 38(9), 703-711.

Johnson, B., Edquist, C., and Lundvall, B-Å. (2003). “Economic development and naitonal system of innovation approach”, in First Globelics Conference, Rio de Janeiro. Retrieved from http://smartech.gatech.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1853/43154/BengtAkeLundvall_2.pdf?sequence=1

Johnson, B., Lorenz, E. and Lundvall, B-Å. (2002). “Why all this about codified and tacit knowledge?”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2), 245-262.

Johnson, B., and Lundvall, B-Å. (2000). Promoting innovation systems as a response to the globalizing learning economy, Retrieved from http://www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/ds2000-106.pdf

Klein, S. J. and Rosenberg, N. (1986). “An overview of innovation” in Landau, R. and Rosenberg, N. (eds.) The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology for economic growth. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Kuznets, S. (1979). “Growth and structural shifts,” in Walter Galenson (ed.), Economic growth and structural shange in Taiwan (pp. 15-131). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Lam, J. T.-S. (2007) “Fusion of horizons: Implications for a hermeneutical learning community approach of implementing liberal studies in Hong Kong” in Eduational Journal《教育學報》,35(1), 39-61. Retrieved from http://hkier.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/journal/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ej_v35n1_39-61.pdf

Lam, A. (2000). “Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: an integrated framework”, Organisation Studies, 21(3), 487-513.

Lam, A., and Lundvall, B-Å. (2007). “The Learning organization and national systems of competence building and innovation”, in Lorenz, N., and Lundvall, B-Å. (eds) How europe’s economies learn: Coordinating competing models (pp. 110-139). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lazonick, W. (1993). “Learning and the dynamics of international competitive advantage,” in Thomson, R. (ed.) Learning and technological change (pp. 172-197). New York: Macmillan.

Lazaric, N. and Lorenz, E. (1997), “Trust and organizational learning during inter-firm cooperation”, in Lazaric, N. and Lorenz, E. (eds.), The economics of trust and learning. London: Elgar Publication.

Linge, D. E. (1977), “Introduction”, in Linge, D. E. (trl.) Philosophical hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

List, F. (1841). The naitonal system of political economy. London: Longmane.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (1985). Product innovation and user-producer interaction. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

Lundvall, B-Å. (1988). “Innovation as an interactive process—from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation” in G. Dosi, et al. (eds.), Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter Publishers.

Lundvall, B-Å. (1992). (Ed.) National innovation systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.

Lundvall, B-Å., (1996). The social dimension of The learning economy, DRUID Working Paper No. 96-1. Retrieved from http://www3.druid.dk/wp/19960001.pdf

Lundvall, B-Å. (1997): “Development strategies in the learning economy” paper submitted at STEPI’s 10th Anniversary Conference in Seoul, May 26-29, 1997.

Lundvall, B-Å., (1998a). “Why study naitonal systems and naitonal styles of innovation?” in Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(4), 407-421.

Lundvall, B-Å., (1998b). “The learning economy—implications for the knowledge base of health and education systems”, paper presented at the High-level Seminar on Production , Mediation and Use of Knowledge in the Education and Health Sectors organized by The Centre for Educaitonal Research and Innovation/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 14 and 15 May 1998. Retrieved from http://www.business.aau.dk/~esa/evolution/docmaster/druidstuff/druidthemeC/papers/health.pdf

Lundvall, B-Å. (2000). From the economics of knowledge to the learning economy, Retrieved from http://www.globelicsacademy.net/2007/papers/From%20the%20Economics%20of%20Knowledge%20to%20the%20Learning%20Economy.pdf

Lundvall, B-Å. (2002). Innovation, growth and social cohesion: The Danish model. Cheltenham: Elgar Publishers.

Lundvall, B-Å. (2005). “Interactive learning, social capital and economic performance”, Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy Washington January 10-11, 2005, Conference organized by EC, OECD and NSF-US. Retrieved from http://advancingknowledge.com/drafts/Lundvall-Washington%20paper.doc

Lundvall, B-Å. (2006). Interactive learning, social capital and economic performance, in Kahin, B., and Foray, D. (Eds.) Advancing knowledge and the knowledge economy (pp. 63-74). USA: MIT Press.

Lundvall, B-Å. (2007a). National innovation systems—Analytical concept and development tool, in Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95-119.

Lundvall, B-Å. (2007b). Innovation system research and policy: Where it came from and where it might go. Paper presented at CAS workshop on Innovation in Firms, Oslo, Norway. Retrieved from http://www.cas.uio.no/research/0708innovation/Lundvall_041207.pdf

Lundvall B-Å. (2008). “Innovation and creativity—the crisis as opportunity for change”, Retrieved from http://create2009.europa.eu/fileadmin/Content/Downloads/PDF/Ambassadors/Lundvall_myopinion.pdf

Lundvall, B-Å. (2009a). “Innovation and competence building in the learning economy-implication for innovation policy,” Working Paper Series, Department of Business Studies, No. 2, Retrieved from http://www.business.aau.dk/wp/09-02.pdf

Lundvall, B-Å. (2009b). “The Danish model and the globalizing learning economy—Lessons for developing countries,” UNU-WIDER Research Paper No. 2009/18., Retrieved from http://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/research-papers/2009/en_GB/rp2009-18/_files/81160277016772813/default/RP2009-18.pdf

Lundvall, B-Å. (2009c). The Danish Model and the Globalizing Learning Economy—Lessons for Developing Countries, UNU-WIDER Research Paper. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/RP2009-18.pdf

Lundvall, B-Å. (2010). “Scope, style and theme of research on knowledge and learning societies”, in Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(1), 18-23. Retrieved from http://www.bi.no/pages/121927/Bal%20in%20Journal%20of%20the%20Knowledge%20Economy.pdf

Lundvall, B.-Å. and Borrás, S.(1997). The globalizing learning economy: Implications for innovation policy. Brussels: DG XII.

Lundvall, B-Å., and Johnson, B., (1994). “The learning economy”, Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23-42.

Lundvall, B-Å., Johnson, B., Anderson, E. S., and Dalum, B. (2002). “Naitonal systems of production, innovation and competence building”, in Research Policy, 31, 213-231.

Lundvall, B-Å., and Lorenz, E. (2007). “Modes of innovation and knowledge taxonomies in the learning economy,” Paper presented at CAS workshop on Innovation in Firms, Oslo, Norway. Retrieved from http://www.cas.uio.no/research/0708innovation/CASworkshop_LundvallLorenz.pdf

Lundvall, B-Å., and Lorenz, E. (2009). “Education in the learning economy,” Retrieved from http://s3.amazonaws.com/zanran_storage/www.business.aau.dk/ContentPages/17690306.pdf

Lundvall, B-Å., and Maskell, P. (2000). “Nation states and economic development – From national systems of production to national systems of knowledge creation and learning”, in Gertler, M. et al. (eds.) Geographical Handbook. Oxford: Oxford Universty Press.

Lundvall, B.-Å. and Nielsen, P.(1999). 'Competition and transformation in the learning economy – illustrated by the Danish Case', Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 88, 67–90. Retrieved from http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/rei_0154-3229_1999_num_88_1_1745

Lundvall, B-Å., and Nielsen, P. (2005). “Innovation, organizational learning and job creation”, in European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, 18(1), 79-97.

Lundvall, B-Å., and Nielsen, P. (2007). “Knowledge management and innovation performance”, International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 207-223.

Lund Vinding, A. (2006). “Absorptive capacity and innovative performance: A human capital approach”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4-5), 507-517. Retrieved from http://www.mendeley.com/research/absorptive-capacity-and-innovative-performance-a-human-capital-approach/

Lynch , K. and Baker, J. (2005) “Equality in Education: the importance of equality of condition”, Theory and Research in Education, 3(2), 131-164. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14778785053298

Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Madsen, P. (2006). “How Can It Possibly Fly? The paradox of a dynamic labour market in a Scandinavian welfare state”, in Campbell, J., Hall, J., and Pedersen, O., National identity and the varieties of capitalism –The Danish experience. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.

Marshall, A. (1890). The principles of economics. Retrieved from http://www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marP.html

Marshall, A. (1923). Industry and Trade. London: Macmillan.

Marx, K. (1859). A contribution to the critique of the political economy. Retrieved from http://www.archive.org/stream/acontributiontot00marxuoft#page/n5/mode/2up

Maskell, P. (1998). “Successful low-tech industries in high-tech environments: the case of Danish furniture industry”, in European Urban and Regional Studies, 5, 99-118.

Maskell, P., Eskeliene, H., Hannibalsson, I., Malmberg, A., and Vatne, E. (1998). Competitiveness, localised learning and regional development: Specialisation and prosperity in small open economies. London: Routledge Publisher.

Metcalfe, S. (1995). “The Economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives”, in Stoneman, P. (ed.), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Molander, B. (1992). “Tacit knowledge and silenced knowledge: fundamental problems and controversies”, in Goranzon, B. and Florin, M. (eds.) Skill and education: reflection and experience. London: Springer-Verlag.

Mowery, D. and Oxley, J. (1995). “Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of naitonal innovation systems”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 67-93.

Nelson, R. (1993). National innovative systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nonaka, K. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

North, D. (1996). “Organizations, institutions and market competition”, Working Paper, St. Louis: Washington University. Retrieved from http://129.3.20.41/eps/eh/papers/9612/9612005.pdf

Nyholm, J. (1995). Information technology, organizational changes and productivity in Danish manufacturing, Paper prepared for Conference on the Effects of Advanced Technologies, Washington D. C. May 1-2, 1995

OECD (1996). The knowedge-based economy. Paris: OECD.

OECD(1997). The naitonal innovation system. Paris: OECD Publication. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/56/2101733.pdf

OECD (2000). Knowledge management in the learning society. Paris: OECD Publication.

OECD (2001a). Cities and regions in the new learning economy. Paris: OECD Publication.

OECD. (2001b). The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. Paris: OECD Publiscation.

Pasinetti, L. (1981). Structureal change and economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1994), “The nature and economic importance of national innovation systems”,STI Review, 14, 9-32, OECD, Paris.

Pavitt, K. (1984). "Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory", Research Policy, 13, 343–373.

Peters, M. A. (2010). “Three forms of the knowledge economy: learning, creativity, and openess”, in British Journal of Educational Studies, 58(1), 67-88.

Piazza, R. (2010). “The learning region between pedagogy and economy”, in European Journal of Education, 45(3), 402-418.

Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Punie, Y., and Cabrera, M. (2005). The future of ICT and learning in the knowledge society - Report on a Joint DG JRC-DG EAC Workshop held in Seville, 20-21 October 2005. Seville: European Commission Directorate-General Joint Research Centre.

Putman, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton Uniersity Press.

Reynolds, T. J. and Gutman, J. (1988), Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation, Journal of Advertising Research, 28, 11-31.

Rich, A. 1979. On lies, secrets, and silences. New York: W.W. Norton.

Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rothwell, R. (1977). “The characteristics of successful innovators and technically progressive firms”, R&D Management, 7, 191-206.

Scitovsky, T. (1992). The joyless economy: the psychology of human satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Smith, D. (1988). The everyday world as problematic: a feminist sociology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Spender, D. (1981). Men’s studies modified. New York: Athene Series, Pergammon Press.

Stanley, L. (1991). Feminist praxis: research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. London: Routledge Pulication.

Souza Leão, and Mello (2007). “The means-end approach to understanding customer values of a on-line newspaper”, Brazil Administrative Review, 4(1), 1-20. Retiveved from http://www.anpad.org.br/bar

The State of Queensland(Department of Education and the Arts) (2005) Developing lifelong learners in the middle years of schooling. Retrieved from http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/verve/_resources/lifelonglearn_midyears.pdf

Tsirogianni, S., and Andreouli, E. (2011) “Beyond social cohesion: The role of ‘fusion of horizons’ in inter-group solidarities” in Papers on Social Representations, 20, 5.1-5.25. Retrieved from http://www.psych.lse.ac.uk/psr/PSR2011/20_05.pdf

Tunzelmann, von N., and Acha, N. (2005). Innovation in low tech industries, in Fagerberg, D., Mowary, D., & Nelson, R., (eds.) The Oxford handbook in innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

The United Nation (2012). World happiness report. Retrieved from http://www.earth.columbia.edu/sitefiles/file/Sachs%20Writing/2012/World%20Happiness%20Report.pdf

Veblen, T. (1918). The instinct of workmanship: and the state of industrial arts. Retrieved from http://archive.org/details/instinctofworkma00vebl

Veludo-de-Oliveira, T., Ikeda, A., and Campomar, M. (2006) “Discussing laddering application by the means-end chain theory” The Qualitative Report, 11, 626-642. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR11-4/veludo.pdf

von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

von Hippel, E. and Tyre, M. (1995). "How "learning by doing" is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment," Research Policy, 24(1), 1-12.

Whitley, R. (1996). “The social construction of economic actors: institutions and types of firm in Europe and other market economies”, in Whitely, R. (ed.), The changing European Firm, London: Routledge.

Wikipedia (2012). The Economy of Denmark. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Denmark

Wittman, A., and Crews, T. (2012). Engaged learning economies: Aligning civic engagement and economic development in community-campus partnerships. Boston: Campus Compact. Retrived from http://www.compact.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Engaged-Learning-Economies-White-Paper-20121.pdf

Woolcock, M. (1998). “Social capital and economic development: Towards a theoretical synthesis and policy framework”, Theory and Society, 27(2), 151-207.

Yarnit, M. (2000). Towns, cities, and regions in the leanring age: A survey of learning communities, London: UK Local Government Association.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE