臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣近十年教育領導碩博士論文分析：女性主義的觀點
書刊名：婦女與兩性學刊
作者：潘慧玲 引用關係／梁文蓁／陳宜宣
作者(外文)：Pan, Hui-ling／Liang, Wen-chen／Chen, Yi-hsuan
出版日期：2000
卷期：11
頁次：頁151-190
主題關鍵詞：教育領導；女性領導；校長領導；女性主義觀點；Educational leadership；Women leadership；Principalship；Feminist perspectives
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(27) 博士論文(12) 專書(0) 專書論文(3)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:27
  • 共同引用共同引用:184
  • 點閱點閱:121
　　　　　本文旨在以女性主義觀點檢視國內近十年來教育領導碩博士學位論文研究。文中先探討女性主義觀點與教育領導研究，其次進行學位論文分析，主要由三個面向切入：(1)論文中呈現的是誰的聲音？女性的聲音否妥適地出現？如果沒有，是以何種方式(如排除、假置入或異化)被消音或扭曲？(2)在考量性別因素時，係以何種立場進行探究？是以女性為主體，重視女性特殊經驗的陳述，抑或從歷史、文化、脈絡下探討性別的建構，從而檢視社會建構的傳統角色如何轉譯(translate)至工作場域中？(3)研究是否具有實踐的政治意圖，冀求從結構面、政治面、人際面促發社會變革？整個的論析涉及了方法論、知識論與政治的議題。在分析國內教育領導研究後，發現絕大多數的研究籠罩於實證主義典範下，量化方法的使用佔最大宗。與此密切相關的是，研究者對於性別的關注，多以男性觀點為中心，故在75篇論文中，有42篇未能者量性別變項；在另外29篇的論文中，研究設計雖納入性別變項，唯仍以男性觀點闡釋性別的影響；而即使在四篇以女性為焦點的論文中，較具女性觀點者僅有兩篇。此現象顯示我們在教育領導研究中，可何適切地處理婦女經驗，尚有極大的成長空間。
　　　　　The purpose of this paper is to analyze Taiwan’s educational leadership master’s theses and doctoral dissertations in these recent ten years using feminist perspectives. Feminist perspectives and educational leadership research is the first part introduced. Then the analysis of the theses is presented, mainly focusing on three aspects: (1)Whose voice is present in the text? (2)How gender is analyzed? (3)Is research viewed as praxis? After analyzing studies of educational leadership in Taiwan, it was found that influenced by positivist paradigm, most researchers used questionnaire surveys. In addition, androcentric perspective has dominated the authors’ viewpoints. Out of the 75 theses, 42 were ignorant of the gender factor. In the other 29 theses, sex/gender was only built in as a demographic variable to examine sex/gender differences. Among the four theses with women as subjects, only two embrace some kind of female perspectives. The findings indicate that there are still plenty of rooms for investigating women’s experiences in educational leadership studies.
期刊論文
1.Dunlap, D. M.、Goldman, P.(1991)。Rethinking power in schools。Educational Administration Quarterly，27(1)，5-29。  new window
2.Rosener, J. B.(1990)。Ways women lead。Harvard Business Review，1990(Nov./Dec.)，119-125。  new window
3.伍振鷟、陳伯璋(19851010)。我國近四十年來教育研究之初步檢討。中國論壇，21(1)=241，230-243。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉啟政(19930600)。學術研究本土化的「本土化」。本土心理學研究，1，184-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃光國(19950800)。心理學本土化運動中的世界觀:論「以牛刀切頭髮」。本土心理學研究，4，380-413。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Leithwood, Kenneth A.(1994)。Leadership for School Restructuring。Educational Administration Quarterly，30(4)，498-518。  new window
7.楊國樞(19930600)。我們為什麼要建立中國人的本土心理學？。本土心理學研究，1，6-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.潘慧玲(1999)。Belenky等人的女性知識論。性別與教育論壇，臺灣師範大學教育系主辦 (會議日期: 1999/11/26)。臺北：臺灣師範大學教育系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Porter, A. W. S.(1986)。School climate and teacher's perceptions of power strategies(博士論文)。University of North Dakota。  new window
圖書
1.林宴夙、徐荷、Helgesen, S.(1995)。女人的領導風格。臺北：允晨。  延伸查詢new window
2.Acker, S.(1994)。Gendered education: Sociological reflections on women, teaching and feminism。Open University Press。  new window
3.Bass, B. M.(1990)。Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial applications。New York：The Free Press。  new window
4.Belenky, M.、Clinchy, B.、Golderberg, N.、Tarule, J.(1986)。Knowledge, difference and power: Essay's inspired by "Women's ways of knowing"。New York：Basic Books。  new window
5.Drake, T. L.、Roe, W. H.(1999)。The principalship。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice Hall。  new window
6.Etzioni, Amitai(1964)。Modem organizations。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
7.Goldring, E. B.、Rallis, S. F.(1994)。Principals of dynamic schools: Taking charge of change。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin Press。  new window
8.Helgesen, S.(1990)。The female advantage: Women's ways of leading。New York：Doubleday。  new window
9.Hersey, P.、Blanchard, K. H.(1977)。Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources。Paramus, New Jersey：Prentice-Hall。  new window
10.Loden, M.(1985)。Feminine leadership, or how to succeed in business without being one of the boys。New York：Time Books。  new window
11.Popkewitz, T. S.(1984)。Paradigm and ideology in educational research: The social functions of the intellectual。London：The Falmer Press。  new window
12.Sergiovanni, T.(1991)。The principalship。New York：Allyn & Bacon。  new window
13.Shakeshaft, C.(1989)。Women in educational administration。Sage。  new window
14.Tong, R.(1989)。Feminist thought。Westview Press。  new window
15.Griffiths, Daniel E.(1959)。Administrative theory: Current problems in education。New York：Appleton-Century-Crofts。  new window
16.Abbott, Pamela、Wallace, Claire(1997)。An introduction to sociology: Feminist perspectives。Routledge。  new window
17.Lather, Patti(1991)。Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Post-Modern。New York：Routledge。  new window
18.Noddings, Nel(1992)。The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative Approach to Education。New York：Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
19.Halpin, A. W.(1966)。Theory and research in administration。New York, NY：The Macmillan Company。  new window
20.Noddings, Nel(1984)。Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education。University of California Press。  new window
21.Simon, H. A.(1960)。The New Science of Management Decision。New York, NY：Harper & Row。  new window
22.Deal, Terrence E.、Peterson, Kent D.(1994)。The leadership paradox: Balancing logic and artistry in Schools。Jossey-Bass。  new window
23.Weiner, Gaby(1994)。Feminisms in Education: An Introduction。Open University Press。  new window
24.Fiedler, Fred E.(1967)。A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness。New York：McGraw-Hill。  new window
25.Gilligan, Carol(1982)。In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development。Harvard University Press。  new window
26.Abbott, Pamela、Wallace, Claire、俞智敏、陳光達、陳素梅、張君玫(1995)。女性主義觀點的社會學。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
27.Yukl, Gary A.(1989)。Leadership in Organizations。Prentice-Hall Inc.。  new window
28.Burns, James MacGregor(1978)。Leadership。Harper & Row。  new window
圖書論文
1.Collins, P. H.(1991)。Learning from the outsider within。Beyond methodology。Bloomington, IN：Indiana University Press。  new window
2.Gosetti, P. P.、Rusch, E.(1995)。Reexamining educational leadership: Challenging assumptions。Women leading in education。Albany, NY：State University of New York Press。  new window
3.Noddings, N.(1990)。Feminist critiques in the professions。Review of research in education。Washington, DC：AERA。  new window
4.Riehl, C.、Lee, V. E.(1996)。Gender, organization, and leadership。International handbook of educational leadership and administration。Boston：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
5.Reinharz, S.(1985)。Feminist distrust: Problems of context and content in sociological work。The self in social inquiry: Researching methods。CA：Sage。  new window
6.Schmuck, P. A.(1996)。Women's place in educational administration: Past, present, and future。International handbook of educational leadership and administration。Boston：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
7.Smith, D. M.(1997)。Women and leadership。Leadership: Theory and practice。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
8.Thiele, B.(1987)。Vanishing acts in social and political thought: Tricks of the trade。Feminist challenges: Social and political theory。Boston：Northeastern University Press。  new window
9.Truman, C.(1994)。Feminist challenges to traditional research: Have they gone far enough?。Re-thinking social research。England：Avebury。  new window
10.Harding, Sandra(1987)。Introduction: Is There A Feminist Method?。Feminism and Methodology: Social science issues。Bloomington, IN：Indiana University Press。  new window
11.Blackmore, J.(1989)。Educational leadership: A feminist critique and reconstruction。Critical perspectives in educational leadership。New York。  new window
12.French, J. R. P.、Raven, B.(1959)。The Bases of Social Power。Studies in Social Power。Ann Arbor：University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research。  new window
13.畢恆達(1996)。詮釋學與質性研究。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：618（臺灣：602，外國：16） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1385896 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67193643
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上