臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：中小學教師權能量表編製之研究
書刊名：朝陽學報
作者：鍾任琴 引用關係／黃增榮 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chung, Jen-chin／Huang, Tzeng-rong
出版日期：2000
卷期：5
頁次：頁345-372
主題關鍵詞：教師權能；Teacher empowerment
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(7) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:53
  • 點閱點閱:237
　　　　　本研究根據「教師權能」之文獻分析，將之歸納為四個向度：（一）專業成長權、（二）教學自主權、（三）參與決策權、（四）專業地位與影響力，依此編製「中小學教師權能量表」以進行研究。經專家意見調查後，修訂量表初稿並進行預試，再根據頁試結果分析本量表之信度、效度，所得結果下： 一、 量表各向度與總量表之內在關係佳、結構良好：其相關程度分別為.8113、.8354、.8820、.8940。 二、 量表各向度之因素分析結果良好：以主成份分析各因素，以eigen value大於1為選入因素參考標準，其因素負荷量從.6057至.8844，每題之因素負荷量均大於.4500，顯示本量表各項目適合性良好。 三、 量表各題目與各向度、總量表之內在相關分析結果良好：各題目與各向度之相關係數為.5605至.8106；各題目與總量表之相關係數為.3011至.7392，均達.01顯著水準。 四、 量表之信度佳：各向度與總量表的內部一致性高，Cronbach α為.8049至.9181；總量表為.9265。 五、 量表的驗證性分析結果證實本研究之測量模式建構合適。綜而言之，本研究量表為一信度、效度俱佳之測驗工具，適合為建立我國中小學教師權能評量指標之參考。
　　　　　Based on a review of the literature, this study divides teacher empowerment into four dimensions: 1) professional development; 2) teaching autonomy; 3) decision making; 4) professional status and influence. Based on this analysis, a "Teacher Empowerment Scale" was devised for field research. After a survey of several authorities in the field, the scale was devised for field research. After a survey of several authorities in the field, the scale was revised and used in preliminary testing. Analysis of the testing gave the following results for the scales' reliability and validity: 1. Internal relations between scales for each dimension and the overall scale were good, and the structure was excellent, with r=.8113, .8354, .8820, .8940. 2. Analysis of factors in each dimention was also good; after analysis for significance, an eigen value greater than 1 was established as the standard for selection. Loading for each factor ranged from .6057 to .8844, and for each item was greater than .4500, indicating that the relevance of the Scale was also good. 3. Analysis of scale items and dimentions in the overall scale shows good results; correlation coefficients of scale items and individual scales range from .5605 to .8106. Correlation coefficients of scale items and the overall scale range from .3011 to .7932, and all have a clear significance of .01. 4. Scale reliability was good: there was high correlation between each dimension and the overall scale; the Cronbach α was .8049 to .9181, while for the overall scale it was .9265. 5. Verification analysis proves that this study's measuring methodology is structurally appropriate. In summary, the scale developed in this study is a measuring instrument with good validity and reliability; and is an appropriate reference for eseablishing standards to evaluate primary and middle school teacher empowerment.
期刊論文
1.Rice, E. M.、Schneider, G. T.(1994)。A decade of teacher empowerment: An empirical analysis of teacher involvement in decision making, 1980-1991。Journal of Educational Administration，32(1)，43-58。  new window
2.Imber, M.、Neidt, W. A.、Reyes, P.(1990)。Factors contributing to teacher satisfaction with participative decision making。Journal of Research and Development in Education，23(4)，216-225。  new window
3.Wise, A. E.(1990)。Six steps to teacher professionalism。Educational Leader-ship，47(7)，57-60。  new window
4.Lightfoot, S. L.(1986)。On goodness in schools: Themes of empowerment。Peabody Journal of Education，63(3)，9-28。  new window
5.薛化元(19890900)。教育權的理論與爭議。國家政策季刊，3，50-57。  延伸查詢new window
6.Heller, G. S.(1993)。Teacher empowerment-sharing the challenge: A guide to implementation and success。NASSP Bulletin，77(550)，94-103。  new window
7.董保城(19951200)。論教師法「教師輔導與管教」。政大法學評論，54，117-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.董保城(19960500)。師生權利與義務。教育資料與研究，10，29-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Barksdale-Ladd, M. A.(1994)。Teacher empowerment and literacy instruction in three professional development schools。Journal of Teacher Education，45(2)，104-111。  new window
10.Maeroff, G. I.(1988)。A blueprint for empowering teachers。Phi Delta Kappan，69(71)，472-477。  new window
11.Schneider, G. T.(1984)。Teacher involvement in decision making: Zones of acceptance, decision conditions, and job satisfaction。Journal of Teacher Research and Development in Education，18(1)，25-32。  new window
12.Short, P. M.、Greer, J. T.、Melvin, W. M.(1994)。Creating empowered schools: Lessons in change。Journal of Educational Administration，32(4)，38-62。  new window
13.沈姍姍(19960100)。專業主義、教師權力與教育行政體制關係：教師權力消長的動態研究。新竹師院學報，9，103-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science，16(1)，74-94。  new window
會議論文
1.Martin, O. L.(1990)。Instructional leadership behaviors that empower teacher effectiveness。The Annual Meeting of Mid-South Educational Research Association。New Orleans, LA。  new window
2.Short, P. M.、Rinehart, J. S.(1992)。Teacher empowerment and School Climate。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。  new window
研究報告
1.Boles, K. C.(1990)。School restructuring: A case study in teacher empowerment。Nashville, TN：National Center for Educational Leadership。  new window
圖書
1.薛化元(1990)。教師地位與權利義務-以台灣中小學教師為中心。臺北：國家政策研究資料中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(1995)。中華民國教育報告書：邁向二十一世紀的教育遠景。台北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.鍾任琴(1998)。中小學教師權能及其相關變項之研究。台北：五南公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural Equations with Latent Variables。New York：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
6.Jöreskog, Karl G.、Sörbom, Dag(1989)。LISREL 7 User's Reference Guide。Scientific Software International, Inc.。  new window
7.謝瑞智(1992)。教育法學。文笙。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Klecker, B. J.，Loadman, W. E.(1996)。Dimensions of teacher empowerment: Identifying new roles for classroom teachers in restructuring schools(ED405304)。  new window
2.Gamoran, A.，Porter, A. C.(1994)。Teacher empowerment: Can it help teaching and learning?，Washington, DC：Office of Educational Research and Improvement。(ED 372031)。  new window
3.Hixson, J.(1990)。Restructuring schools: Exploring school-based management and empowerment issues. A National Perspective，Oak Broox：North Central Regional Educational Lab。(ED 369157)。  new window
4.Klecker, B.，Loadman, W. E.(1996)。Exploring the relationship between teacher empowerment and teacher job satisfaction(ED400254)。  new window
5.Short, P. M.，Johnson, P. E.(1993)。Exploring the links among teacher empowerment, leader power, and conflict(No.372044)。  new window
其他
1.周百鳴(19960616)。國民教育權的理論基礎-以受教育的權利為中心，台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2000)。大學教育政策白皮書草案--分區座談會參考資料，台北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：373（臺灣：359，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67448388
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上