:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Vygotsky對認知發展的觀點及其教學應用
書刊名:弘光學報
作者:潘世尊 引用關係
作者(外文):Pan, Thie-tzuen
出版日期:2004
卷期:43
頁次:頁131-146
主題關鍵詞:認知發展鷹架問題解決VygotskyCognitive developmentScaffoldingProblem solving
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:122
  • 點閱點閱:38
期刊論文
1.Lerman, S.(1996)。Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: A challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm?。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,27(2),133-150。  new window
2.吳振賢(19971000)。評《維果茨基的心理學》[Alex, Kozulin «Vygotsky's Psychology--A Biography of Ideas»]。教育研究,57,69-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Bauersfeld, H.(1992)。Classroom cultures from a social constructivist's perspective。Educational Studies in Mathematics,23,467-481。  new window
4.Belmont, J. M.(1989)。Cognition strategies and strategic learning: The socio-instructional approach。American Psychologist,44(2),142-148。  new window
5.Howe, A. C.(1996)。Development of science concepts within Vygotskian framework。Science Education,80(1),35-51。  new window
6.Perkins, D. N.(1991)。Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage。Educational Technology,31(5),18-25。  new window
7.Watts, M.、Bentley, D.(1991)。Constructivism in the curriculum: Can we close the gap between the strong theoretical version and the weak version of theory-in-practice?。The Curriculum Journal,2(2),171-182。  new window
8.潘世尊(20020300)。教學上的鷹架要怎麼搭。屏東師院學報,16,263-293。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.O'Loughlin, M.(1992)。Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(8),791-820。  new window
10.潘世尊(20001200)。Rogers人本教育理論與建構主義教學模式二之發展:國小數學教學的行動研究。應用心理研究,8,209-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.江文慈(19921000)。斐哥斯基「近側發展區」之基本概念及其在教學上的應用。現代教育,28,145-156。  延伸查詢new window
12.朱則剛(19960600)。建構主義知識論對教學與教學研究的意義。教育研究,49,39-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Cobb, P.、Yackel, E.、Wood, T.、Nicholas, J.、Wheatley, G.、Trigatti, B.、Perlwitz, M.(1992)。A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,23(1),2-33。  new window
14.Nussbaum, Joseph(1989)。Classroom conceptual change: Philosophical perspectives。International Journal of Science Education,11(5),530-540。  new window
15.郭重吉(19960600)。建構論:科學哲學的省思。教育研究月刊,49,16-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.許良榮(19931200)。談建構主義之理論觀點與教學的爭論。國教輔導,33(2)=298,7-12。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.甯自強(1992)。兒童的「整數詞」意義。第八屆科學教育年會。高雄:國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.甯自強(1993)。國小低年級兒童數概念發展研究(1)--「數概念」類型研究 (計畫編號:NSC-82-0111-023-001)。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李長燦(2003)。發展對話與反省社群的國小數學教學模式之研究--Vygotsky「可能發展區」概念的探討與實踐(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.許家驊(2001)。國小三年級數學多階段動態評量之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.羅宇詩(2001)。鷹架理論在水的化學教學網站上的應用研究(碩士論文)。靜宜大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.潘世尊(1997)。Rogers人本教育理論與建構主義的整合教學模式在國小一年級數學科應用之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學院,台中市。  延伸查詢new window
5.莊麗娟(1999)。系統化多元評量模式之發展研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Von Glasersfeld, E.(1995)。Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning。London:The Falmer Press。  new window
2.Vygotsky, L. S.、蔡敏玲、陳正乾(1997)。社會中的心智:高層次心理過程的發展。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Berk, Laura E.、Winsler, Adam、谷瑞勉(1999)。鷹架兒童的學習:維高斯基與幼兒教育。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Driscoll, M. P.(1994)。Psychology of learning for instruction。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
5.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Gredler, Margaret E.、吳幸宜(1994)。學習理論與教學應用。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Barbara, T.(1994)。Investing mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry(ED381350)。  new window
2.Ernest, P.(1993)。The philosophy of mathematics education(ED 381351)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Scribner, S.(1985)。Vygotsky's use of history。Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Wertsch, J. V.(1985)。Editor's notes。Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives。NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Wertsch, J. V.、Rogoff, B.(1984)。Editor's Notes。Children's learning in the "Zone of Proximal Development": New directions for child development, No. 25。Francisco, CA:Jossey Bass Inc.。  new window
4.Wertsch, J. V.、Stone, C. A.(1985)。The concept of internalization in Vygotsky's account of the genesis of higher mental functions。Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives。NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Brown, A. L.、Ferrara, R. A.(1985)。Diagnosing zones of proximal development。Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Lee, B.(1985)。Intellectual origins of Vygotsky's semiotic analysis。Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Cobb, P.、Wood, T.、Yackel, E.(1993)。Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice。Contexts for learning: sociolcultural dynamics in children's development。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Wertsch, J. V.(1984)。The Zone of Proximal Development: Some Conceptual Issues。Children’s Learning in the "Zone of Proximal Development"。San Francisco, CA:Jossey Bass。  new window
9.Vygotsky, L. S.(1981)。The genesis of higher mental functions。The concept of activity in Soviet psychology。M. E. Sharpe。  new window
10.Cole, M.(1985)。The zone of proximal development: where culture and cognition create each other。Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE