:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:心智圖法教學方案對生活科技學習成就之影響
作者:李光展
作者(外文):Lee, Kwang-Chan
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:科技應用與人力資源發展學系
指導教授:李隆盛
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2014
主題關鍵詞:小組討論心智圖法近側發展區學習成就group discussionlearning achievementmind-mappingzone of proximal development(ZPD)
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:33
如何透過適切的教學策略來提升學生的學習成就一直是相當重要的教育議題。本研究以維高斯基(Lev Vygotsky)提出的近側發展區理論為基礎,探究心智圖法對生活科技學習成就的影響。研究設計採不等組前後測之準實驗,以課桌模型設計與製作為教學主題,進行12週的教學實驗。研究對象是桃園市某國中一年級兩個班級共58人(男生29人、女生29人),其中一班為實驗組(男生14人、女生15人)、另一班為控制組(男生15人、女生14人)。實驗組的教學策略是小組討論法搭配心智圖法,控制組僅使用小組討論法,兩組皆為相同的教師與教材。在量化程序方面,實施學習成就測驗後測、作品評量與團隊合作態度量表前後測,並採用描述性統計、共變數分析以及t考驗等統計分析方法;在質性分析方面,從學生的作品與小組訪談內容,探究兩組學習成就的差異及其原因。研究結果發現:(1)小組討論法搭配心智圖法之教學策略未能顯著提升生活科技學習成就測驗分數;(2)小組討論法搭配心智圖法之教學策略未能顯著增進實作技能表現;(3)小組討論法搭配心智圖法之教學策略有助於實驗組學生的團隊合作態度而且受到多數學生的肯定。
The utilization of appropriate teaching strategies capable of enhancing students' learning achievement has long been an important issue in the field of education. This study employed Lev Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development as a base from which to explore the influence of mind mapping on learning achievement in living technology. A quasi-experimental approach with pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design was adopted. The topic in this 12 week teaching experiment was the design and manufacturing of models of classroom tables. The subjects in this study were two classes of first-year junior high school students (29 male, 29 female) from Taoyuan City, Taiwan. One class was an experimental group (14 males, 15 females) in which the teaching strategy incorporated mind mapping with group discussion and the other class was a control group (15 males, 14 females) using only group discussion. The same instructor and teaching materials were used in both classes. Quantitative analysis included post-test of the learning achievement, performance assessment of the final models presented by the students, and pretest-posttest of the teamwork inventory. Statistical approaches were performed by using descriptive statistics, ANCOVA, and t-tests. Qualitative analysis involved using the students’ work and the content of their group discussions to investigate the differences in their learning achievement. The results of this study are as follows: (1) No significant differences in test scores were observed between the two groups; (2) No significant differences in hands-on skills were observed between the two groups; (3) The use of group discussion in conjunction with mind mapping was shown to improve teamwork and received positive endorsements from many of the students in the experimental group.
一、中文部分
王明傑、陳玉鈴(譯)(2002)。 Robert E. Slavin 著。教育心理學:理論與實務。臺北市:學富文化。
吳佳珈(2013)。電腦化心智圖融入童詩寫作教學對國小四年級學生寫作成就之影響。教育研究論壇,4(2),183-205new window
吳明隆(2009)。SPSS 操作與應用-問卷統計分析實務(第二版)。臺北市:五南。
吳明隆(2011)。論文寫作與量化研究。臺北市:五南。.
吳英長(1996)。討論教學法。載於黃光雄(主編),教學理論(頁270-293)。高雄市:復文。
吳慧珠、李長燦(2003)。Vygotsky社會認知發展理論與教學應用。載於張新仁(主編),學習與教學新趨勢(頁105-158)。臺北市:心理。
李文石(2005)。運用概念構圖輔以小組討論在高中力學學習之研究。國立彰化師範大學物理學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
李長燦(2002)。發展對話與反省社群的國小數學教學模式之研究─Vygotsky「可能發展區」概念的探討與實踐。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版:高雄市。new window
李春芳(2004)。教學技術。載於黃政傑(主編),教學原理(頁185-254)。 臺北市:師大書苑。
沈冠君(2004)。國小資優生心智繪圖教學之成效研究-以社會學習領域為例。資優教育研究,4(2),65-104
沈翠蓮(2001)。教學原理與設計。臺北市:五南。
林妙真、張佩芬(2013)。工程及科技教育認證制度下的學生核心能力與評估:大學教師、系主任、院長的觀點。教育科學研究期刊,58(4),37-68。new window
林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市:臺灣東華。
林慧珊(2012)。心智圖教學對五年級學童創造力與語文學習態度之影響。教育研究論壇,4(1),219-251。new window
林寶山(2003)。實用教學原理。臺北市:心理。
洪駿命(2013)。基於心智圖之數位說故事專題學習模式對學習動機、問題解決與學習成就之影響。國立臺南大學數位學習科技學系博士論文,未出版,臺南市。new window
胡雅茹(2010)。心智圖超簡單。臺中市:晨星。
孫易新(2013)。台灣心智圖法學位論文研究之分析。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
孫易新(2014)。心智圖法理論與應用。臺北市:商周。
徐昊杲、邱佳椿(2002a)。技職教育研究教戰手冊-SPSS基礎篇。臺北市:師大書苑。
徐昊杲、邱佳椿(2002b)。技職教育研究教戰手冊-SPSS進階篇。臺北市:師大書苑。
常雅珍(2005)。全腦開發記憶策略與實務。臺北市:心理。
常雅珍(2010)。心智繪圖應用於大學「教育研究法」課程之實例--以某校幼保系大三學生上課為案例。長庚科技學刊,13,65-83。
常雅珍(2012)。心智繪圖暨多元化記憶策略融入大學「課後托育與實務」課程之研究。長庚科技學刊,16,125-140
張文哲(譯)(2005)。Robert E. Slavin著。教育心理學:理論與實際。臺北市:臺灣培生教育。
張紹勳(2001)。研究方法。臺中市:倉海。
張惠媚(2013)。心智圖融入自然與生活科技學習領域教學對國小三年級低成就學童學習成就影響之研究。教育研究論壇,4(2),113-132。new window
張新仁(1999)。討論的技巧。載於黃光雄(主編),教學原理(頁313-326)。臺北市:師大書苑。
郭生玉(2004)。教育測驗與評量。臺北市:精華。
郭俊賢、陳淑惠(譯)(1999)。L. CampbellCampbell, D. Dickinson著。多元智慧的教與學。臺北市:遠流。
陳宥儒(譯)(2008)。Robert J. Sternberg, Wendy M. Williams著。教育心理學:教與學的理論與實踐。臺北市:禾楓。
陳詠卉(2013)。整合「關鍵字學習法」、「栓釘法」與「心智圖法」之英文字彙記憶術對於英語為外語大學生字彙學習效果之研究。淡江大學英文學系博士論文,未出版,新北市。new window
陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際(第六版)。臺北市:心理。new window
黃一泓、王貞雯(2011)。以心智圖做為筆記工具對國小五年級學生在數學科的學習成就之研究。教育科學期刊,10(2),91-114。new window
黃俊能(2006)。研究室內透過心智圖活動提高研究互動。元智大學資訊工程學系碩士論文,未出版,桃園市。
詹秀雯、張芳全(2014)。影響國中生學習成就因素之研究。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,28(1),49-76。new window
歐陽鍾玲(1982)。 心智圖在地理學上的應用。地理教育,8,63-70。new window
蔡文山(2007)。心智圖教學方案對國小五年級學生創造力、學習成就、學習動機之影響:以自然與生活科技領域為例。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所博士論文,未出版,嘉義市。new window
蔡承志(譯)(2010)。Tony Buzan著。超高效心智圖學習法。臺北市:商周。
鄭媛文(2013)。同儕教導學習策略對學生學習成就與情意態度影響之後設分析。教育理論與實踐學刊,28,217-242。new window
穆玲鈴(2010)。運用心智圖法提升國小學童表達溝通與分享能力之行動研究:以低年級小組討論與上台報告為例。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
蕭雲菁(譯)(2006)。William Reed著。心智圖筆記術。臺中市:晨星。
錢昭君、張世彗(2010)。心智圖法寫作教學方案對國小學生創造力及寫作表現之影響。特殊教育學報,32,79-99。new window
簡妙娟(2003)。合作學習理論與教學應用。載於張新仁(主編),學習與教學新趨勢(頁403-463)。臺北市:心理。
簡俐珊、吳麗媛(2011)。增進幼兒繪本故事閱讀理解之探究-心智繪圖教學之應用。教育理論與實踐學刊,23,53-87。new window
二、外文部分
Abi‐El‐Mona, I., &; Adb‐El‐Khalick, F. (2008). The influence of mind mapping on eighth graders’ science achievement. School Science and mathematics, 108(7), 298-312.
Bahar, M. (1999). Investigation of biology students cognitive structure through word association tests, mind maps and structural communication grids. Dissertation Abstracts International, 70(25), (UMI No. U124870)
Bamberger, Y. M., &; Cahill, C. S. (2013). Teaching Design in Middle-School: Instructors’ Concerns and Scaffolding Strategies. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 171-185.
Bennett, D. C. (1984). The effects of the 'mind mapping' technique on learning. Unpublished master's thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Brennan, M. K. (2006). Mind mapping, graphic organizers and student writing. Masters Abstracts International, 45(01), (MAI No. MR17867)
Budd, J. W. (2004). Mind maps as classroom exercises. The Journal of Economic Education, 35(1), 35-46.
Buzen, T., &; Buzen, B. (1993). The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain's untapped potential. New York: Plume.
Bybee, R. (2015). Scientific literacy. Encyclopedia of Science Education, 944-947.
Cockburn, E. (2011). Can children create mind maps as planning tools for writing? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham, U. K.
Costello, D. J. (2008). Assessing mind maps as an aide to career planning. Dissertation Abstracts International, 69(08), (UMI No. 3327687)
Costello, J. D. (2008). Assessing mind maps as an aide to career planning. Unpublished dotoral dissertation, Northcentral University, Arizona.
Cunningham, M P W. (2006). The application of mind maps, as a teaching and learning strategy, in a senior primary school class. Dissertation Abstracts International, 70(48), (UMI No. U235188)
D'Antoni, A. V., Zipp, G. P., Olson, V. G., &; Cahill, T. F. (2010). Does the mind map learning strategy facilitate information retrieval and critical thinking in medical students?. BMC medical education, 10(1), 10-61.
D'Antoni, V. A. (2009). Relationship between the mind map learning strategy and critical thinking in medical students. Unpublished dotoral dissertation, Seton Hall University, Ann Arbor, New Jersey.
DeVellis, F. R. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dhindsa, H. S., &; Anderson, O. R. (2011). Constructivist-visual mind map teaching approach and the quality of students’ cognitive structures. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 186-200.
Farrand, P., Hussain, F., &; Hennessy, E. (2002). The efficacy of the 'mind map' study technique. Medical education, 36(5), 426-431.
Gredler, M. E. (2012). Understanding Vygotsky for the classroom: is it too late?. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 113-131.
Gundry, L. K., &; Kickul, J. R. (1996). Flights of imagination: Fostering creativity through experiential learning. Simulation &; Gaming, 27(3), 334-349.
Huang, T. F. (2008). A Practical Research on the Application of Mind Mapping in Investigation Teaching. Dissertation Abstracts International, 71(67), (UMI No. H236865)
Kaiser, F. H. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111-117.
Karpov, Y. V., &; Haywood, H. C. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky's concept of mediation. American Psychologist, 53(1), 27-36.
Leaf, C. M. (1990). Mind-mapping: A therapeutic technique for closed-head injury. Masters Abstracts International, 29(01), 108(MAI No. Masters Abstracts International, 45(01), (MAI No. MR17867)
Leaf, C. M. (1997). The mind-mapping approach: A model and framework for geodesic learning. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(01), 22A. (UMI No. 0598734)
Mento, A. J., Martinelli, P., &; Jones, R. M. (1999). Mind mapping in executive education: applications and outcomes. Journal of Management Development, 18(4), 390-416.
Pollard, L. E. (2010). Meeting the demands of professional education: A study of mind mapping in a professional doctoral physical therapy education program. Unpublished dotoral dissertation, Capella University, Minnesota.
Shuttleworth, J. (2005). Study skill use, motivation and the efficacy of the "mind map" technique. Dissertation Abstracts International, 70(45), (UMI No. U220039)
Siyepu, S. (2013). The zone of proximal development in the learning of mathematics. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 1-13.
Van Blankenstein, F. M., Dolmans, D. H., Van der Vleuten, C. P., &; Schmidt, H. G. (2013). Relevant prior knowledge moderates the effect of elaboration during small group discussion on academic achievement. Instructional Science, 41(4), 729-744.
Warren, J. (2012). Mobile mind mapping: Using mobile technology to enhance rational emotive behavior therapy. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 34(1), 72-81.
Williams, M. H. (1998). The effects of a brain-based learning strategy, mind mapping, on achievement of adults in a training environment with consideration to learning styles and brain hemisphericity. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(05), 1525A. (UMI No. 9934688)
Willis, C. L., &; Miertschin, S. L. (2006). Mind maps as active learning tools. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(4), 266-272.
Zonzi, A., Barkham, M., Hardy, G. E., Llewelyn, S. P., Stiles, W. B., &; Leiman, M. (2014). Zone of proximal development (ZPD) as an ability to play in psychotherapy: A theory‐building case study of very brief therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 87(4), 447-464.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE