參考文獻
一、中文部分
王珮玲（2001）。你知道孩子的氣質嗎。臺北市：遠流。
王俊明、黃堅厚、張景媛（1997）。國中學生語句完成測驗編製報告。測驗年刊，
44（1），121-142。
方吉正（2000）。認知學徒制在國小數學解題教學成效之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育系，高雄市。
方吉正、張新仁（2000）。認知學徒制在國小數學解題教學成效之研究。課程與教學季刊，3（4），49-72。
危芷芬（譯）（2004）。心理測驗（原作者A. Anastasi &; S. Urbina）。臺北市：雙葉。
李長燦（2003）。發展對話與反省社群數學教學模式之研究―以Vygotsky「可能
發展區」概念的探討與實踐（未出版博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育系，
高雄市。
吳琪玉（2005）。探討我國八年級學生在TIMSS 1999與TIMSS 2003數學與科學
之表現（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所，臺北市。
吳明隆（1996）。國民中小學學生社會心理變因與數學焦慮及數學信念關係之研究。高雄師大教育學刊，12，287-328。
吳明隆、葛建志（2006）。國民小學學生數學歸因信念、數學態度、數學焦慮與
數學科成就之相關研究。高雄師大學報，21，1-18。
吳明隆、蘇耕役（1995）。國民小學學生控制信念、重要他人態度知覺與數學態
度及數學科成就關係之研究。初等教育學刊，4，181-210。
余民寧、韓珮華（2009）。教學方式對數學學習興趣與數學科成就之影響：以TIMSS2003臺灣資料為例。測驗學刊，56（1），19-48。
邱美虹（2005）。TIMSS 2003臺灣國中二年級學生的科學成就及其相關因素之探
討。科學教育月刊，282，2-40。
邱皓政（2004）。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析。臺北市：五南。
林奕宏、張景媛（2001）。多元智能與問題解決整合型教學模式對國小學生數學學習表現之影響。教育心理學報，33（1），1-30。
林素微、洪碧霞（2010）。數學連結能力評量設計。載於洪碧霞（主編）：呼應能
力指標的教學與評量設計（頁159-175）。臺北市：心理。
林素微、謝堅（2010）。數學連結能力教學設計。載於洪碧霞（主編）：呼應能力
指標的教學與評量設計（頁131-141）。臺北市：心理。
林碧珍、蔡文煥（2005）。TIMSS 2003臺灣國小四年級學生的數學科成就及其相關因素之探討。科學教育月刊，285，2-38。
柳賢、陳英娥（1994）。臺灣地區國一學生數學焦慮及其相關因素之研究。高雄師大學報，5，137-158。
洪碧霞、陳沅、林宜樺（2010）。學生學習能力的培育與評量。載於洪碧霞（主
編）：呼應能力指標的教學與評量設計（頁1-13）。臺北市：心理。
高雄市創造力學習中心（2013）。高雄市創意運動會數學領域試題。取自2013
年8月9日http://creativity.kh.edu.tw/activity_detail.asp?no=1
徐新逸（1996）。情境學習在數學教育上的應用。教學科技與媒體，29，13-22。陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵（2005）。多變量分析方法統計軟體應用。臺
北市：五南。
陳昇飛（2004）。理論與實務的對話―建構主義在數學教育的再思。臺中師院學報，18（2），71-87。陳靜姿（2006）。數學學習氣質評量效度議題之探討（未出版博士論文）。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所，臺南市。
陳靜姿、洪碧霞（2010）。不同數學學習氣質學生情意和成長特徵之探討。教育心理學報，42（1），77-98。
陳靜姿、洪碧霞、林娟如、吳裕益（2008）。數學學習氣質評量分類規準效度議題之探討。測驗學刊，55（2），377-406。
黃俊傑（2008）。國小高年級學生的自我調整學習因素及其學習策略教學效果之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育系，高雄市。
黃思華、劉遠楨、顏莞廷（2010）。互動式電子白板融入創新合作學習模式對國
小數學科學習成效與動機之影響。課程與教學季刊，14（1），115-140。
黃珮茹、林烘煜（2011）。陰柔特質男性態度量表之發展。測驗學刊，58（1），87-117。
黃堅厚（1986）。從語句完成反應看臺北地區國中學生心態。教育心理學報，19，21-36。
教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域。臺北市：教育部。教育部提升國民素養專案辦公室（2012）。教育部提升國民素養專案計畫報告書。
取自2014年1月1日
http://literacytw.naer.edu.tw/data/cht/20131104/20131104juhon7.pdf
張芳全（2006）。影響數學科成就因素探討：以臺灣在TIMSS 2003年的樣本為例。課程與教學季刊，9（3），151-168。張芳全（2010，11月）。數學信念與數學科成就的關係在SEM檢定：中、日、韓參與TIMSS 2003樣本的交叉驗證。發表於臺南大學「第九屆教育經營與管理學術研討會」，臺南市。
張殷榮（2001）。我國國中學生在國際測驗調查中科學學習成就影響因素之探討。科學教育月刊，244，5-10。
張新仁、許桂英（2004）。國小數學領域採合作學習之教學成效。教育學刊，23，111-136。
郭秀緞（2006）。以認知負荷理論探討數學問題設計與後設認知策略教學對國小
高年級學生數學解題之影響（未出版博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育系，
高雄市。
陸昱任、譚克平 (2006，12月)。論數學素養之意涵。發表於中華民國第二十二
屆科學教育學術研討會，臺北市。
程炳林、林清山（1999）。國中生學習行動控制模式之驗證及行動控制變項與學習適應的關係。教育心理學報，31（1），1-35。
臺灣PISA國家研究中心（2012）。臺灣pisa國家研究中心。取自2013年11月15日http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/
潘世尊（2003）。建構主義學習理論與教學應用。載於張新仁（主編）：學習與教學新趨勢（頁307-343）。臺北市：心理。
鄭毓信（1998）。建構主義與數學教育。數學傳播，22（3），36-49。
劉玉玲、薛岳（2013）。國中生數學學業自我概念及數學學習策略與數學學習成
就之研究-自我提升模式觀點。課程與教學季刊，16（1），179-208。
劉秋木（1989）。國小數學科教學研究。臺北市：五南。魏麗敏（1988）。國小學生數學焦慮數學態度與數學科成就之關係暨數學學習團體諮商之效果研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所，臺北市。簡妙娟（2003）。合作學習理論與教學應用。載於張新仁（主編）：學習與教學新趨勢（頁403-463）。臺北市：心理。
二、英文部分
Barab, S. A., &; Plucker, J. A. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 165–182. doi:10.1207/S15326985E
P3703_3
Beyers, J. (2011). Student dispositions with respect to mathematics: What current
literature says. In D. J. Braher &; W. R. Speer (Eds.), Motivation and
disposition: Pathways to learning mathematics(pp. 69-79). Reston, VA:
NCTM.
Boaler, J. (2002). Exploring the nature of mathematical activity: Using theory research and ‘working hypotheses’ to broaden conceptions of mathematics knowing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51, 3–21. doi:10.1023/A: 10224
68022549
Bradford, D. A., &; James, C. (1999). The development and validation of math affect trait questionnaire for the investigation of affect during mathematical problem solving. (ERIC Document No. ED363454)
Bradford, J. D., Brown, A. L., &; Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Education at Researcher, 28, 4-12.
Cai, J., &; Merlino, F. J. (2011). Metaphors: A powerful means for assessing students’
mathematical disposition. In D. J. Braher &; W. R. Speer (Eds.), Motivation and
disposition: Pathways to learning mathematics(pp. 147-156). Reston, VA:
NCTM.
Cobb, P., &; Yackel, E. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Damon, W. (1991). Reconciling the literacies of generations. In S. Graubard (Ed.), Literacy: An overview by fourteen experts( pp.33-53). New York, NY: Farrar, Straus &; Giroux.
De Corte, E. (1995). Fostering cognitive growth: A perspective from research on mathematics learning and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 30(1), 37-46.
De Corte, E. (2004). Mainstreams and perspectives in research on learning mathematics from instruction. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(2), 279-310. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00172.x.
De Corte, E., Greer, B., &; Verschaffel, L. (1996). Mathematics teaching and learning.
In D. C. Berliner &; R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 491-549). New York, NY: Simon &; Schuster.
De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., &; Masui, C. (2004). The CLIA-model: A framework
for designing powerful learning environments for thinking and problem solving.
European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 365-384.
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset:the new psychology of success. New York, NY:Ballantine
Books.
Gee, J. P. (1988). The legacies of literacy: From Plato to Freire through Harvey Graff. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 195-212.
Gerson, H., Hyer, C., &; Walter, J. (2011). Mark’s development of productive disposition and motivation. In D. J. Braher &; W. R. Speer (Eds.), Motivation and disposition: Pathways to learning mathematics(pp. 185-199). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Graham, R. (2005). Trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS) 2003. Education Journal, 85, 25–28.
Greeno, M. S. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 170–218.
Gresalfi, J. G. (1991). Taking up opportunities to learn:constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 327–369. doi:10.1080/10508400903013470
Heckhausen, H., &; Kuhl, J. (1985). From wish to action: The dead ends and short-cuts on the long way to action. In M. Fresa &; J. Sabini (Eds.), Goal-directed behavior:Psychological theory and research on action( pp. 133-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Henry, J. W., &; Stone, W. (1994). A structural equation model of end-user satisfaction with a computer-based medical information system. Information Resources Management Journal, 7(3), 21–33.
Johnson, D. W., &; Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone:Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston, MA: Allyn &; Bacon.
Katz, L. G. (1987). Early Education: What should young children be doing? In S. L. Kagan &; E. F. Zigler (Eds.), Early schooling: The National debate (pp. 151-167). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Katz, L. G. (1993). Dispotion as educational goals. ERIC Digest. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. (ERIC Document No. ED363454)
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., &; Findell, B. (Eds.) .(2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Kimberly, W. D. (1996). Cooperative learning: A new direction. Education, 1, 39–42.
Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29–63.
Lave, J., &; Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Camdridge University Press.
Ma, X. (2000). A longitudinal assessment of antecedent course work in mathematics and subsequent mathematical attainment. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(1), 16–28. doi:10.1080/00220670009598739
Ma, X., &; Kishor, N. (1997). Attitude toward self, social factors, and achievement in mathematics:A meta-analysis review. Educational Psychology Review, 9, 89–120. doi:10.1023/A:1024785812050
Ma, X., &; Xu, J. (2004). Determining the casual ordering between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. American Journal of Education, 110(3), 257–290.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., &; Kong, C. (2002). Multilevel causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Influence of language of instruction(English compared with Chinses) for Hong Kong students. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 727-763.
McLeod, D. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In G. Douglas (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning( pp. 575–596). Reston, VA: Author.
Merz, A. (2009). Teaching for mathematical dispositions as well as for understanding: The difference between reacting to and advocating for dispositional learning. Journal of Educational Thought, 43(1), 65-78.
Nation Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Nation Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Nation Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Princuples and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Research Council (2004). How students learn mathematics in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nolen, S. B., &; Haladyna, T. M. (1990). Personal and environmental influences on students’ beliefs and effective study strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 116–130. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(90)90011-O
Pajares, R., &; Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124–139.
Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., &; Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A disposition theory of thinking. Merrill-parker Quarterly, 39(1), 1-21.
Pezdek, K., Berry, T., &; Renno, P. A. (2002). Children’s mathematics achievement: The role of parents’ perceptions and their involvement in homework. Journal of Educational Psychology , 94(4), 771-777. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.4.771
Phillips, D. C. (2000). An opinionated account of the constructivist landscape. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions of controversial issues (pp. 1–16). Chicago, IL: NSSE.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16, 13-20.
Ritchhart, R. (2002). Intellectual character: What it is, why it matters, how to get it. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Paticipatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, &; A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultutal studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Camdridge: Camdridge University Press.
Royster, D. C., Harris, M. K., &; Schopes, N. (1999). Dispositions of college mathematics students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 30(3), 317-333. doi:10.1080/002073999287851.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 338–355.
Schoenfeld, A.H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Slavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice(2nd ed.) . Boston, MA: Allyn &; Bacon.
Snow, R. E., Corno, L., &; Jackson, D. N., Ⅲ. (1996). Individual differences in affective and conative functions. In D. C. Berliner &; R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 243-308). New York, NY: Simon &; Schuster.
Suh, J., Graham, S., Ferrarone, T., Kopeinig, G., &; Bertholet, B. (2011). Develop persistent and flexible problem solvers with a growth mindset. In D. J. Braher &; W. R. Speer (Eds.), Motivation and disposition: Pathways to learning mathematics (pp.169-183). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Suinn, R. M., &; Edwards, R. (1982). The measurement of mathematics anxiety: The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale for Adolscents-MARS-A. Journals of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 576-580.
Thomas, A., &; Chess, S. (1986). The New York longitudinal study: From infancy to early sdult life. In R. Plomin &; J. Dunn (Eds.), The study of temperament: Changes,continuities, and challenges (pp. 39-52). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tocci, C. M., &; Engelhard, G. (1991). Achievement, parental support, and gender difference in attitudes towards mathematics. Journals of Educational Research , 84, 280-286.
Trautwein, U., KÖller, O., Schmitz, B., &; Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 26–50. doi:10.1006/c
eps.2001.1084
Venezky, R. L. (1991). The development of literacy in the industrialized nations of the west. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, &; P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 46-47). New York, NY: Longman.
Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., Lasure, S., Van Vaerenbergh, G., Bogaerts, H., &; Ratinckx, E.(1999). Learning to solve mathematical application problems: A design experiment with fifth graders. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(3), 195-229. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0103_2
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.