:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從學術建構到政策實踐:永續臺灣指標的發展歷程及其對制度運作影響
書刊名:都市與計劃
作者:葉俊榮 引用關係施奕任
作者(外文):Yeh, Jiunn-rongShi, Yi-ren
出版日期:2005
卷期:32:2
頁次:頁103-124
主題關鍵詞:永續發展指標制度量能環境典範環境議題Sustainable developmentInstitutional capacity-buildingEnvironmental paradigmEnvironment issues
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(3)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:312
  • 點閱點閱:31
期刊論文
1.Holifield, R.(200103)。Defining environmental justice and environmental racism。Urban Geography,22(1),78-90。  new window
2.Fox, Jonathan(1994)。The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico。World Politics,46(2),151-184。  new window
3.葉俊榮(20030600)。民主轉型與金錢政治的法律因應。國家發展研究,2(2),1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.McFarland, Andrew(1987)。Interest Groups and Theories of Power in America。British Journal of Political Science,17(1),129-147。  new window
5.李永展、何紀芳(1998)。土地資源永續利用指標架構之建立--以中部區域為例。土地經濟年刊,9,73-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Dunlap, R. E.、van Liere, K. D.(1984)。Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality。Social Science Quarterly,65(4),1013-1028。  new window
7.阮國棟、簡慧貞(19950100)。大都會區環境品質永續指標之建立架構。工業污染防治,53=14(1),33-48。  延伸查詢new window
8.Chung-I, M.、Sung-hack, L.(2003)。Weaving through paradoxes: democratization, globalization and environment politics in South Korea。East Asia Review,15(2),43-70。  new window
9.Milbrath, L. W.(1994)。Stumbling blocks to a sustainable society: incoherences in key premises about the way the world works。Futures,26(2),117-124。  new window
10.Wantchekon, L.(2003)。Clientelism and voting behavior。World Politics,55,399-422。  new window
11.Campbell, Scott D.(1996)。Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities? Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development。Journal of the American Planning Association,62(3),296-312。  new window
12.湯京平(20021200)。環境保護與地方政治 : 北高兩市環保官員對於影響執法因素的認知調查。臺灣政治學刊,6,138-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.李公哲(19981100)。永續指標。環境工程會刊,9(4),24-35。  延伸查詢new window
14.Bachrach, P.、Baratz, M. S.(1962)。Two Faces of Power。American Political Science Review,56(4),947-952。  new window
15.王金壽(20040600)。瓦解中的地方派系:以屏東為例。臺灣社會學,7,177-207。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.蕭新煌(19861100)。新環境範型與社會變遷:臺灣民眾環境價值的初探。國立臺灣大學社會學刊,18,81-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Williams, R. W.(1999)。Environmental injustice in America and its politics of scale。Political Geography,18(1),49-73。  new window
會議論文
1.Brusco, V.、Nazareno, M.、Stokes, S. C.(2001)。Clientelism and democracy: an analysis of ecological data from argentina。2001 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association。  new window
研究報告
1.王俊秀、曾文儀(2002)。環境導向的公共安全政策 (計畫編號:NSC90-2621-Z-002-039)。  延伸查詢new window
2.李玲玲、楊育昌(2002)。水資源政策 (計畫編號:NSC90-2621-Z-002-039)。  延伸查詢new window
3.施文眞、高英勛(2002)。貿易政策下的初級產品出口政策 (計畫編號:NSC90-262I-Z-002-039)。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃書禮、葉佳宗(2002)。台灣地區都市發展政策之永續性評量 (計畫編號:NSC90-2621-Z-002-039)。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃書禮、葉佳宗(2003)。永續臺灣評量系統之政策永續性分析--感受性系統模型之運用 (計畫編號:NSC91-2621-Z-002-029)。  延伸查詢new window
6.葉俊榮、江淳芳、陳仲嶙(2002)。公共設施政策之永續性觀察--以工業區、污水下水道與漁港建設為中心 (計畫編號:NSC90-2621-Z-002-039)。  延伸查詢new window
7.葉俊榮、施奕任(2003)。永續臺灣發展指標系統在政策評估中的應用 (計畫編號:NSC91-2621-Z-002-039)。  延伸查詢new window
8.葉俊榮(1999)。永續臺灣的評量系統(第一年度報告) (計畫編號:NSC88-2621-Z-002-026)。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉錦添、楊馥菱(2002)。由永續指標檢討臺灣的石化產業 (計畫編號:NSC90-2621-Z-002-039)。  延伸查詢new window
10.蔡慧敏(2003)。地方永續指標的探討 (計畫編號:NSC91-2621-Z-002-029)。  延伸查詢new window
11.蔡慧敏、楊進富(2002)。海岸管理政策的永續性 (計畫編號:NSC90-2621-Z-002-039)。  延伸查詢new window
12.駱尙廉、林玉韻(2002)。水污染防治政策對台灣水環境永續性的影響 (計畫編號:NSC90-2621-Z-002-039)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Edelman, M. J.(1964)。The symbolic uses of politics。Chicago:University of Illinois Press。  new window
2.蕭新煌、朱雲鵬、林俊全、紀駿傑、劉小如、蔣本基(2003)。永續台灣2011。台北:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Marin, Bernd、Mayntz, Renate(1991)。Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations。Boulder, CO:Westview Press Inc.。  new window
4.龐元勳、錢玉蘭(1998)。台灣永續發展指標系統。台北:環保署。  延伸查詢new window
5.葉俊榮(2002)。環境政策與法律。台北:元照出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.葉俊榮(199711)。環境理性與制度抉擇。台北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.葉俊榮(1999)。全球環境議題--臺灣觀點。台北:巨流出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.葉俊榮(1997)。環境行政的正當法律程序。台北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.OECD(1994)。Enviromental Indicator。Paris:OECD。  new window
10.Pirages, Dennis Clark(1977)。The Sustainable Society。New York:Praeger。  new window
11.Rosenbaum, W. A.(1985)。Enviromental Poliuics and Policy。New York:Congressional Quartely Press。  new window
12.Weber, M.、Gerrh, H. H.、Mills, C. W.(1946)。From Max Weber: Essay in Sociology。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
13.Milbrath, Lester W.(1989)。Envisioning A Sustainable Society: Learning Our Way Out。State University of New York Press。  new window
14.Held, David、McGrew, Anthony G.、Goldblatt, David、Perraton, Jonathan(1999)。Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture。Polity Press。  new window
15.Doyle, T.、McEachern, D.(1998)。Environment and Politics。London:New York:Routledge。  new window
16.Milbrath, L. W.(1984)。Environmentalists: Vanguard for a new society。New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
17.Dahl, Robert Alan(1970)。Modern Political Analysis。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
18.Lukes, Steven Michael(1974)。Power: A Radical View。Macmillan Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.王振寰(1999)。邁向常態化政治:臺灣民主化中統理機制的轉變。兩岸黨國體制與民主發展:哈佛大學東西方學者的對話。臺北:月旦出版社有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Beder, S.(2002)。Agenda setting for environmental protection policies。Green Governance: from Periphery to Power。Christchurch:Lincoln University。  new window
3.Cheng, T. J.(1990)。Political regimes and developmental strategies: South Korea and Taiwan。Manufacturing Miracles: Paths of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
4.Jänicke, M.(1997)。Political system’ s capacity for environmental policy。National Environmental Policies: a Comparative Study of Capacity-Building。Berlin:Springer。  new window
5.Robertson, R.(1995)。Gloca]ization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity。Global Modernities。London:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE