:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教師背景與初職位置:中學教師背景特質對取得各類型教職位置的影響
書刊名:臺灣教育社會學研究
作者:紀金山 引用關係
作者(外文):Chi, Chin-shan
出版日期:2005
卷期:5:2
頁次:頁49-83
主題關鍵詞:師資供需勞力市場師資培育教育改革The supply and demand of teacherLabor marketTeacher educationEducation reform
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:259
  • 點閱點閱:66
目前中學教師供過於求的情形,已使得其教職位置的取得愈來愈市場化。本研究藉由各類型中學新制教師特質的分布情形,說明師資培育制度改革後教師背景特質對取得初職位置的影響。本文先以邏輯迴歸分析探討影響私立高職教職取得的背景變項作用,其次以私立高職教職為參照組的多元邏輯迴歸分析,探討影響其他類型教職取得的背景變項作用,結果發現教師背景特質對取得公立學校教職與私立高職教職的影響效果有明顯差異。比較各類背景特質的作用,人力資本變項的影響最為重要,它對於取得私立高職教職位置,有相對性的負向顯著影響;另一方面,它則是影響公立學校教職位置取得的有利變項,其中教師甄試表現、學歷種類和學歷高低的影響最顯著。
Since the new Teacher Education Act in 1994, the oversupply of teacher candidates brings to change the first-teaching-job-getting (FTJG) from traditional embedded approach to a new quasi-market one. This article tries to delineate the effects of the background characteristics of high school teachers on their FTJG. I took the private vocation-high school as a basic group and analyzed the effects of related factors on it with logistic regression. Then I explored the effects of related factors on the others categories through multinomial logit model with private vocation-high school as the reference group. In summary, the entrants’ human capital is not beneficial to the FTJG of the private vocation-high schools. However the effect of human capital is the most important to the FTJG of the public schools, especially according to the performance of the job-seeking test, and the objective variables of education background.
期刊論文
1.蔡瑞明、紀金山、熊瑞梅(20020700)。中等師資供需組織關係形式的建構。教育與社會研究,4,135-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Sakamoto, Arthur、Powers, Daniel A.(1995)。Education and the Dual Labor Market for Japanese Men。American Sociological Review,60(2),222-246。  new window
3.黃毅志(20011000)。臺灣地區多元勞力市場的事業成就之比較分析。國家科學委員會研究彙刊. 人文及社會科學,11(4),356-370。  延伸查詢new window
4.Baron, James N.、Bielby, William T.(1980)。Bringing the Firms Back In: Stratification, Segmentation, and the Organization of Work。American Sociological Review,45(5),737-765。  new window
5.Sorensen, A. B.(1977)。The Structure of Inequality and the Process of Attainment。American Sociological Review,42(6),965-978。  new window
6.陳建志(20020900)。人力資本差異或性別歧視?就業市場性別階層化之探討。人文及社會科學集刊,14(3),363-407。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Lin, Nan、Ensel, Walter M.、Vaughn, John C.(1981)。Social Resources and Strength of Ties: Structural Factors in Occupational Status Attainment。American Sociological Review,46(4),393-405。  new window
8.Rosenbaum, James E.、Bindy, Amy(1997)。Do Employers Really Need More Educated Youth。Sociology of Education,70,68-85。  new window
9.熊瑞梅、黃毅志(19921200)。社會資源與小資本階級。中國社會學刊,16,107-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Rosenbaum, J. E.、Kariya, T.(1989)。From High School to Work: Market and Institutional Mechanisms in Japan。American Journal of Sociology,94(6),1334-1165。  new window
11.黃幸美(19940400)。女性教育與勞動參與的發展、現況與問題。婦女與兩性學刊,5,133-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Mouw, Ted(2003)。Social Capital and Finding a Job: Do Contacts Matter?。American Sociological Review,68(6),868-898。  new window
13.孫清山、黃毅志(19940700)。社會資源、文化資本與地位取得。東海學報.社會科學學院,35,127-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Bian, Yanjie(1997)。Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China。American Sociological Review,62(3),366-385。  new window
15.Schultz, Theodore W.(1961)。Investment in Human Capital。American Economic Review,51(1),1-17。  new window
16.Granovetter, Mark S.(1985)。Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness。American Journal of Sociology,91(3),481-510。  new window
17.Brinton, Mary C.(1988)。The Social-institutional Bases of Gender Stratification: Japan as an Illustrative Case。The American Journal of Sociology,94(2),300-334。  new window
18.Maier, Tony、Settersten, Rick、Rosenbaum, James E.、Kariya, Takehiko(1990)。Market and Network Theories of the Transition from High School to Work: Their Application to Industrialized Societies。Annual Review of Sociology,16,263-299。  new window
19.Rosenbaum, James E.(1996)。Policy Uses of Research on the High School-to-work Transition。Sociology of Education,69(Extra Issue),102-122。  new window
20.DeLuca, Stefanie、Roy, Kevin、Miller, Shazia R.、Rosenbaum, James E.(1999)。Pathways into Work: Short- and Long-term Effects of Personal and Institutional Ties。Sociology of Education,72(3),179-196。  new window
21.Coverdill, J. E.(1998)。Personal Contacts and Post-hire Job Outcomes: Theoretical and Empirical Notes on the Significance of Matching Methods。Research in Social Stratification and Mobility,16,247-269。  new window
圖書
1.紀金山(2002)。師資培育制度變革的社會學分析:朝向組織統理的制度轉型。嘉義縣:南華大學教育社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Granovetter, Mark(1995)。Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Muller, Walter、Shavit, Yossi(1998)。From School to Work: A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations。Oxford, UK:Clarendon Press。  new window
4.Ashton, D.,、Lowe, O.(1991)。Making Their Way: Education, Training and the Labour Market in Canada and Britain。Toronto, Canada:University of Toronto Press。  new window
5.Wright, Erik O.(1979)。Class Structure and Income Determination。Academic Press。  new window
6.王濟川、郭志剛(2003)。Logistic迴歸模型--方法及應用。臺北:五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃毅志(1999)。社會階層、社會網絡與主觀意識:臺灣地區不公平的社會階層體系之延續。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Bourdieu, Pierre(1984)。Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste。Harvard University Press。  new window
9.Blau, Peter Michael、Duncan, Otis Dudley(1967)。The American Occupational Structure。New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
10.林南(2001)。Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.章英華、薛承泰、黃毅志(1996)。教育分流與社會經濟地位:兼論對技職教育改革的政策意涵。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
12.Becker, Gary Stanley(1993)。Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
13.Bowles, Samuel、Gintis, Herbert(1976)。Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life。New York:Basic Books。  new window
14.Brinton, M. C.、Kariya, T.(1998)。Institutional Embeddedness in Japanese Labor Markets。The New Institutionalism in Sociology。CA。  new window
15.Berg, Ivar(1971)。Education and Jobs: The Great Training Robbery。Education and Jobs: The Great Training Robbery。Boston, MA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Muller, W.、Shavit, Y.(1998)。The Institutional Embeddedness of the Stratification Process: A Comparative Study of Qualifications and Occupations in Thirteen Countries。From School to Work: A Comparative Study of Educational Qualification and Occupational Destinations。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.張苙雲、譚康榮(19990000)。形構產業網絡。網絡臺灣:企業的人情關係與經濟理性。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張晉芬(1996)。綿綿此恨,可有絕期?--女性工作困境之剖析。台灣婦女處境白皮書:1995年。台北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kariya, Takehiko(1998)。From High School and College to Work in Japan: Meritocracy through Institutional and Semi-institutional Linkages。From School to Work: A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE