:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:時間、勞動與生態--原住民族財產權的核心論題
書刊名:清華科技法律與政策論叢
作者:黃居正 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Chu Cheng
出版日期:2005
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁5-47
主題關鍵詞:時間勞動生態原住民族市民法財產權TimeLabourEcologyAboriginal peopleCivil lawProperty
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:429
  • 點閱點閱:120
由於原住民社群語言的表述能力受限於國族最終所形成的共同價值,加上市民社會以議會多數決為主結構的權力分配體系,使得關於原住民族權利之法律敘述,本質上就存在用語之(政治)正確性與不同「法系」間的比較或統整的兩個難題。本文試圖藉由對隱藏在市民財產權中的核心議題,包括時間、勞動與生態等規範名詞之意義與價值的再檢視、再詮釋,適當地揭露市民財產規範體系中許多理性假設的謬誤或侷限,用以說明原住民族與市民財產規範實為兩平行體系,以及運用單一解釋系統處理原住民族財產關係的困難,並嘗試探究在召開族群憲法會議重新「合意」,妥善處理「過去之惡」等「硬方法」外,以市民財產體系本身協調平行權利相衝突時的技術,作為兩個體系解決具體財產權爭議支點的可能性。
This article is intending to conceive the property and its collaborating facilities, e.g., the regulation, the authority, and the utility, as an integrated interpretation system, so to reveal and reinterpret the essential elements of such system, namely the concept of time, labour and ecology. With this effort, the applicability of the ideas of civil property are largely re-examined, and its auxiliary facilities would therefore be conceived and measured as a power distribution tool. Then we can oversee the efficiency (and difficulties) of single property system applied in a multi-ethnic society with a broader spectrum of evaluation, which includes the aboriginal meaning of the above essential elements and the overall balance of power between different ethnic groups. And aside from the hard solutions such as amending the constitution through national assembly to rebuild a dual property system, the conventional methods such as usufruct and similar ideas applied by civil property are suggested to resolve the conflict between the aboriginal and civil property.
期刊論文
1.周滄賢(2000)。試析原住民土地立法與其相關問題。律師雜誌,247。  延伸查詢new window
2.林佳陵(2000)。台灣原住民土地之法律研究。律師雜誌,247。  延伸查詢new window
3.Barsh, R. L.(2003)。Pharmacogenomics and Indigenous People: Real Issues and Actors。Int'l & Comp. L.,365。  new window
4.Christie, J.(1996)。Whose Property, Whose Rights?。CULTURAL SURVIVAL,20(2)。  new window
5.Borrows, John、Rotman, Leonard I.(1997)。The Sui Generis Nature of Aboriginal Rights: Does It Make A Difference?。Alberta Law Review,36(1),9-11。  new window
6.Bobroff, K. H.(2001)。Retelling Alloment: Indian Property Rights and the Myth of Common Ownership。Vand. L. Rev.,1559。  new window
7.Ciocchetti, C.(2002)。The Attraction of Historical Entitlements。J. Value INQUERY,59。  new window
8.Epstein, R. A.(1979)。Possession as the Root of Title。Ga. L. Rev.,1221。  new window
9.Gibson, C. C.、Lehoucq, F. E.、Williams, J. T.(2002)。Does Privatization Protect Natural Resources? Property Rights and Forests in Guatemala。SOC. SCI. Q.,206。  new window
10.Gervais, Daniel J.(2002)。The Internationalization of Intellectual Property: New Challenges from the Very Old and the Very New。Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal,12(4),929-990。  new window
11.Fumiss, E.(2001)。Timeline History and Anzac Myth: Settler Narratives of Local History in a North Australian Town。OCEANIA,279。  new window
12.Henderson, J. Y.(1995)。Mikmaw Tenure in Atlantic Canada。Dalhousie L. J.,196。  new window
13.Krall, L.(2002)。Thomas Jefferson rs Agrarian Vision and the Changing Nature of Property。J. ECON. ISSUES,131。  new window
14.Michelman, F. I.(1981)。Property as a Constitutional Right。Wash. & Lee L. Rev,1097。  new window
15.Michelman, F. I.(1967)。Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethic Foundations of Just Compensation Law。HARV. L. REV.,1165。  new window
16.Mead, Aroha(1996)。Te Pareake, Genealogy, Sacredness, and the Commodities Market。Culture Survival,20(2)。  new window
17.Munzer, S. R.(1997)。Human Dignity and Property Rights in Human Body Parts。PROPERTY PROBLEMS: FROM Genes TO PENSION Funds,25。  new window
18.Munzer, S. R.(1993)。Kant and Property Rights in Body Parts。CAN. J. L. & JURISPRUDENCE,319。  new window
19.Radin, M. J.(1849)。Market-Inalienability。Harv. L. Rev.,1849。  new window
20.Nicholls, C.(2002)。Indigenous Australian Art: The Case for Law Reform。FEMINIST Studies,212。  new window
21.Rao, R.(2000)。Property, Privacy and the Human Body。B.U.L. Rev.,359。  new window
22.Thompson, Richard H.(1997)。Ethnic Minorities and the Case for Collective rights。American Anthropologist,786。  new window
23.Simmons, J. A.(1998)。Maker's Rights。J. Ethics,210。  new window
24.Vaver, D.(1987)。Author's Moral Rights - Reform Proposals in Canada: Charter or Barter for Rights of Creators?。Osgoode Hall L. J.,749。  new window
25.Hardin, Garrett(1968)。The tragedy of the commons。Science,162(3859),1243-1248。  new window
26.Munn, Nancy D.(1992)。The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay。Annual Review of Anthropology,21,93-123。  new window
27.Calabresi, Guido、Melamed, A. Douglas(1972)。Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral。Harvard Law Review,85(6),1089-1128。  new window
會議論文
1.吳豪人(2004)。台灣原住民的財產權:市民法與傳統規範的衝突。台灣新憲法國際研討會。台北:群策會。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃居正、廖桂薰(20040514)。原住民遺傳物質之權利歸屬--以財產權理論檢視人類基因多樣性計畫。台灣原住民傳統醫療與生物倫理研習會。  延伸查詢new window
3.藤井志津枝(1999)。探討台灣原住民的土地問題。原住民族權利國際研討會。台北:國立台灣大學法學院。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.王泰升(1997)。原住民的法律地位。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王澤鑑(1992)。民法物權。台北:王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
2.王澤鑑(200107)。侵權行為法。王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
3.台灣省文獻委員會(1977)。日據台初期重要檔案。台中:台灣省文獻會。  延伸查詢new window
4.加藤雅信(2001)。所有権の誕生。東京:三省堂。  延伸查詢new window
5.伊能嘉矩(1918)。理蕃志稿。臺北:臺灣總督府警務局理蕃課。  延伸查詢new window
6.中央研究院民族學研究所(2001)。番族慣習調查報告書「第四卷」鄒族。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
7.施文高(1998)。國際著作權法制析論。台北:施文高。  延伸查詢new window
8.東嘉生、周憲文(1985)。台灣經濟史研究。台北:帕米爾書店。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃居正(2004)。財產法總論。台北:黃居正。  延伸查詢new window
10.臺灣總督府臨時臺灣舊慣調查會、中央研究院民族學研究所(2000)。番族慣習調查報告書「第四卷」鄒族。中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
11.藤井志津枝(2001)。台灣原住民史:政策篇。南投:台灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
12.Boas, R.(1963)。The Mind Of Primitive Man。New York:The Free Press。  new window
13.Culhane, D.(1998)。The Pleasure Of The Crown: Anthropology, Law And First Nations。Burnaby:Talon books。  new window
14.Fischel, W. A.(1995)。Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics, And Politics。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
15.Ead, P.(2000)。Belonging: Australians, Place And Aboriginal Ownership。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.Foucault, M.(1989)。The Order Of Things。London:New York:Routledge。  new window
17.Hegel, G. W. K.、Wood, Allen W.、Nisbet, H. B.(1991)。Elements of the philosophy of right。  new window
18.Haar, C. M.、Liebman, L.(1985)。Property And Law。Boston:Little, Brown and Co.。  new window
19.Locke, J.、Shapiro, L.(2003)。Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration。New Haven:London:Yale University Press。  new window
20.Kymlicka, Will、Miller, David、Ryan, Alan(1995)。Multicultural Citizenship。OXFORD POLITICAL THEORY。  new window
21.Kahn, P. W.(1999)。The Cultural Study Of Law: Reconstructing Legal Scholarship。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
22.Mcdougal, M. S.、Feliciano, F. R.(1961)。Law And Minimum World Public Order。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
23.Radin, M. J.(1996)。Contested Commodities。Harvard University Press。  new window
24.Radin, M. J.(1993)。Reinterpreting Property。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
25.Renfield, R.(1953)。The Primitive World And Its Transformation。Ithaca:Cornell University Press。  new window
26.Schlatter, R.(1951)。Private Property: The History Of An Idea。London:George Allen & Unwin Ltd.。  new window
27.Singer, I. W.(2000)。Entitlement: The Paradoxes Of Property。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
28.Simmons, A. J.(1992)。The Lockean Theory Of Rights。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
29.Underkuffler, L. S.(2002)。The Idea of Property: its meaning and power。Oxford:Oxford Univ. Press。  new window
30.Tylor, E. B.(1891)。Primitive Culture。London。  new window
31.Donigi, Peter(1994)。Indigenous Or Aboriginal Rights To Property: A PApua New Guinea Perspective。Utrecht:International Books。  new window
32.Cronon, W.(1983)。Changes in the land: Indians, colonists, and the ecology of New England。New York:Hill & Wang。  new window
33.矢內原忠雄、周憲文(1985)。日本帝國主義下的台灣。台北:帕米爾書店。  延伸查詢new window
34.張松(1953)。臺灣山地行政要論。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
35.柯志明(20010000)。番頭家:清代臺灣族群政治與熟番地權。臺北市:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.Said, Edward W.(1994)。Culture and Imperialism。Vintage Books。  new window
37.黃應貴(19920000)。東埔社布農人的社會生活。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Fabian, Johannes(1983)。Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object。Columbia University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.布興‧大立(2001)。原住民的人權報告。原住民族人權與自治。台北:前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Anaya, S. J.(1995)。The Capability of International Law to Advance Ethnic or Nationality Rights Claim。The Rights OF MINORITY CULTURES。  new window
3.Debelle, B.(1997)。Aboriginal Customary Law and the Common Law。Indigenous Australians And The Law。Sydney:Cavendish Publishing。  new window
4.Coombe, R. F.(1995)。The Properties of Culture and the Politics of Possessing Identity Native Claims In the Cultural Appropriation Controversy。After Identity。New York:Routledge。  new window
5.Gaspe, D.(1992)。The Mohawk Struggle。BOUNDARIES OF IDENTITY。Toronto:Lester Publishing Ltd.。  new window
6.Johnston, D. M.(2003)。The Quest of the Six Nations Confederacy for Self-Determination。International Law and Indigenous Peoples。  new window
7.Kerzner, I.(1978)。Entrepreneurship, Entitlement and Economic Justice。Reading Nozick。New Jersey:Rowman & Littlefield。  new window
8.McKeough J.、Stewart, A.(1997)。Intellectual property and the Dreaming。Indigenous Australians and the Law。Sydney:Cavendish Publishing。  new window
9.Munzer, S. R.(2002)。Property, Patents, and Genetic Material, in A Companion TO GENETICS。Blackwell Companions to Philosophy。  new window
10.Munzer, S. R.(1990)。A Theory of Property。Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Law。  new window
11.Munzer, S. R.(2001)。Property as Social Relations。New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Renfield, R.(1962)。Human Nature and the Study of Society。The Papers Of Robert Renfield。Chicago。  new window
13.Simmons, A. J.(1994)。Original Acquisition Justifications of Private Property。Property Rights。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.Tully, J.(1994)。Aboriginal Property and Western Theory: Recovering a Middle Ground。PROPERTY RIGHTS。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Tully, I.(2000)。The Struggles for and of Freedom。POLITICAL THEORY AND THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES。  new window
16.黃應貴(19990000)。時間、歷史與實踐:東埔社布農人的例子。時間、歷史與記憶。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE