:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:探索性別差距的不同型態--以臺灣選民政黨認同為例
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:楊婉瑩 引用關係劉嘉薇 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Wan-yingLiu, Jia-wei
出版日期:2006
卷期:23
頁次:頁115-156
主題關鍵詞:性別差距政黨認同女性主義社會結構Gender gapParty identificationFeminismSocial structure
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:302
  • 點閱點閱:67
本文回顧性別差距的理論發展,檢視在不同時期,女性主義對於行為研究所提出的挑戰下,如何引導出不同的性別差距的研究途徑、解釋與研究結果。其次,本文由回顧政黨認同的性別差距相關實證研究中,提出性別為何與如何影響選民政黨認同,進一步探討性別對於政黨認同的不同影響途徑。本文並透過分析2004年立法委員選舉台灣選舉與民主化調查(TEDS 2004L B卷)資料,提供一較為完整的政黨認同的性別差距的研究與解釋方式。整體而言,本文採取具有性別觀點(gender-sensitive)的研究取向,不同於早期性別盲(gender-blindness)的假設,將性別差異的意義簡化為傳統性別角色的反映;也不同於性別包容性(gender-inclusive)的傳統途徑,將性別視為控制變項忽略了性別的獨特性影響;而是重新看到性別差異背後複雜的因果關係,並進而引導了實證研究以不同的分析模式來揭露其中不同的因果路徑。具體而言,本文探討性別對政黨認同的影響,如何受到性別與社會結構之間的組合關係與條件關係的影響。
This paper first review the theoretical development of gender gap, to examine how challenges by feminist theory to empirical study has led to different research approaches and explanations toward gender gap. Secondly, through reviewing the empirical studies on gender gap, this paper proposes why and how gender affects voters’ party identification. And, by analyzing 2004 TEDS data, the authors would like to provide a more comprehensive explanation on how gender gap influences party identification. As a whole, this study adopts a gender-sensitive theoretical approach that differs from the gender-blindness approach which takes gender differences as the reflection of the traditional gender role. It also differs from the gender-inclusiveness approach that takes gender as a control variable without looking into its independent influence. By adopting the gender-sensitive approach, we rediscover the complicated causal relationship behind gender gap, which leads to different ways in processing data to reveal and clarify the different causal mechanisms. By comparing the whole sample with the gender-specific sample, this study found the influence of gender on PID was affected by its composition and conditional relation with social structure factors. By composition effect, it means that the different PID between women and men was caused by their different social positions. By conditional effect, it means that women and men are affected by different social structure and issue position, which explained the difference of their party identification composition. The differences between gender on the respective PID was not only that men and women identified with different parties, but also how issue attitude and conditions in social structure affect their respective PIDs.
期刊論文
1.Shapiro, Robert、Mahajan, Harprett(1986)。Gender Difference in Policy Preference: A Summary of Trends from the 1960’s to the 1980’s。Public Opinion Quarterly,50(1),47-55。  new window
2.Patterson, Dennis、Nishikawa, Misa(2002)。Political Interest or Interest in Politics? Gender and Party Support in Postwar Japan。Women and Politics,24(2),1-34。  new window
3.Erickson, Lynda、O'Neill, Brenda(2002)。The Gender Gap and Changing Woman Voter in Canada。International Political Science Review,23(4),373-392。  new window
4.Studlar, Donley T.、McAllister, Ian、Hayes, Bernadette(1998)。Explaining the Gender Gap in Voting: A Cross-national Analysis。Social Science Quarterly,79(4),779-798。  new window
5.Welch, Susan(1977)。Women as Political Animals: A Test of Some Explanations for Male-Female Political Participation Differences。American Journal of Political Science,21,711-730。  new window
6.Van der Ros, Janneke(1987)。Participation Behavior: Presentation of a New Model。Political Psychology,8(1),95-123。  new window
7.Pateman, Carole(1980)。The Disorder of Women's: Women, Love and the Sense of Justice。Ethics,91,20-34。  new window
8.Norris, Pippa(1996)。Mobilizing the Women's vote: the Gender-generation Gap in Voting Behavior。Parliamentary Affairs,49,333-342。  new window
9.Howell, Susan E.、Day, Christine L.(2000)。Complexities of the Gender Gap。Journal of Politics,62(3),858-874。  new window
10.Brennan, Teresa、Pateman, Carole(1979)。Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth: Women and the Origins of Liberalism。Political Studies,27,183-200。  new window
11.Bourque, Susan、Grossholtz, Jean(1974)。Political an Unnatural Practices: Political Science Looks at Female Participation。Politics and Society,4,115-166。  new window
12.劉義周(19941200)。政治態度的性別差異:男女有別或男女不平等?。政治學報,23,133-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Welch, Susan、Hibbing, John(1992)。Financial Conditions, Gender, and Voting in American Elections。Journal of Politics,54,197-213。  new window
14.Smith, Tom W.(1984)。The Polls: Gender and Attitudes toward Violence。Public Opinion Quarterly,48(1),384-396。  new window
15.May, A. Mari、Stephenson, Kurt(1994)。Women and Great Retrenchment: The Political Economy of Gender in the 1980s。Journal of Economic Issues,28,533-542。  new window
16.Mansbridge, Jane J.(1985)。Myth and Reality: The ERA and the Gender Gap in the 1980 Election。Public Opinion Quarterly,49(2),164-178。  new window
17.Manza, Jeff、Brooks, Clem(1998)。The Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections: When? Why? Implications?。American Journal of Sociology,103(5),1235-1266。  new window
18.Kaufmann, Karen M.、Petrocik, John(1999)。The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Source of Gender Gap。American Journal of Political Science,43(3),864-887。  new window
19.Frankovic, Kathleen A.(1982)。Sex and Politics-New Alignment, Old Issues。PS: Political Science & Politics,15(3),439-448。  new window
20.Fite, David、Genest, Marc、Wilcox, Clyde(1990)。Gender Difference in Foreign Policy Attitudes: A Longitudinal Analysis。American Politics Quarterly,18(4),492-512。  new window
21.DeVaus, David、McAllister, Ian(1989)。The Changing Politics of Women: Gender and Political Alignment in 11 Nations。European Journal of Political Research,17(3),241-262。  new window
22.Conover, Pamela Johnston、Sapiro, Virginia(1993)。Gender, Feminist Consciousness, and War。American Journal of Political Science,37(4),1079-1099。  new window
23.Conover, Pamela Johnston(1988)。Feminists and the Gender Gap。Journal of Politics,50(4),985-1010。  new window
24.Cook, Elizabeth Adell、Wilcox, Clyde(1991)。Feminism and the Gender Gap: A Second Look。Journal of Politics,53(4),1111-1122。  new window
25.Chaney, Carol K.、Alvarez, R. Michael、Nagler, John(1998)。Explaining the Gender Gap in the U. S. Presidential Elections, 1980-1992。Political Research Quarterly,51(2),311-340。  new window
26.Bennett, Linda L. M.、Bennett, Stephen Earl(1989)。Enduring Gender Difference in Political Interest: The Impact of Socialization and Political Dispositions。American Politics Quarterly,17,105-122。  new window
27.陳陸輝(20001100)。臺灣選民政黨認同的持續與變遷。選舉研究,7(2),109-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.吳乃德(19990700)。家庭社會化和意識型態:臺灣選民政黨認同的世代差異。臺灣社會學研究,3,53-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Dietz, Mary G.(1985)。Citizenship with a Feminist Face: The Problem with Maternal Thinking。Political Theory,13(1),19-37。  new window
30.劉義周(19940500)。臺灣選民政黨形象的世代差異。選舉研究,1(1),53-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.黃秀端(19960100)。政治知識之認知與性別差異。東吳政治學報,5,27-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.黃秀端、趙湘瓊(19961000)。臺灣婦女近十年來政治態度的變遷--民國七十二年至八十一年。問題與研究,35(10),71-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.盛杏湲(20020500)。統獨議題與臺灣選民的投票行為:一九九〇年代的分析。選舉研究,9(1),41-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.陳陸輝(20031200)。政治信任、施政表現與民眾對臺灣民主的展望。臺灣政治學刊,7(2),149-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.翁秀琪、孫秀蕙(19950700)。性別政治?--從民國八十二年臺灣地區縣、市長選舉看性別、傳播與政治行為。新聞學研究,51,87-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.徐火炎(2003)。台灣政治轉型中的政治疏離。《2002年台灣選舉與民主化調查》國際學術研討會。台北:政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.游清鑫、蕭怡靖(2003)。臺灣民眾政黨認同的持續與變遷。「世局變動中的臺灣政治」學術研討會。臺北:東吳大學政治學系。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mueller, Carol M.(1988)。The Politics of the Gender Gap: The Social Construction of Political Influence。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
2.Beckwith, Karen(1986)。American Women and Political Participation: The Impact of Work, Generations, and Feminism。New York:Greenwood。  new window
3.Lane, Robert E.(1959)。Political Life。New York:The Free Press。  new window
4.Ferguson, Kathy E.(1984)。The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy。Philadelphia, PA:Temple University Press。  new window
5.Cook, Elizabeth A.、Jelen, Ted G.、Wilcox, Clyde(1992)。Between Two Absolutes: Public Opinion and the Politics of Abortion。Boulder Co.:Westview。  new window
6.Baxer, Sandra、Lansing, Majorie(1980)。Women and Politics: The Invisible Majority。Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan。  new window
7.Okin, Susan Moller(1979)。Women in Western Political Thought。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
8.Almond, Gabriel A.、Verba, Sidney(1963)。The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
9.Ruddick, S.(1989)。Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace。Boston:Beacon。  new window
10.Chodorow, Nancy J.(1978)。The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender。University of California Press。  new window
11.Gilligan, Carol(1982)。In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development。Harvard University Press。  new window
12.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Jaguette, Jane S.(1974)。[Women in Politics] Introduction。Women in Politics。New York:Wiley。  new window
2.Carroll, Susan J.、Zerilli, Linda M. G.(1988)。Women's Autonomy and the Gender Gap: 1980-1982。The Politics of the Gender Gap: The Social Political Influence。Beverly Hills:Sage。  new window
3.Bonk, Kathy(1988)。The Selling of the 'Gender Gap': The Role of Organized Feminism。The Politics of the Gender Gap: The Social Construction of Political Influence。Newbury Park:Sage。  new window
4.Piven, Fox F.(1985)。Women and the State: Ideology, Power, and the Welfare State。Gender and the Life Course。New York:Aldine de。  new window
5.Norris, Pippa(2003)。The Gender Gap: Old Challenges, New Approach。Women and American Politics。London:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Miller, Arthur(1988)。Gender and the Vote: 1984。The Politics of the Gender Gap: The Social Construction of Political Influence。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
7.Erie, Steve P.、Rein, Martin(1988)。Women and the Welfare State。The Politics of the Gender Gap。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE