This paper aims to analyze the structural implication of "behind the mountain ideology" and discuss how this ideology has caused two completely different forms of social and cultural development of Hualien. It will also attempt to show how the conflicts in Hualien harmonize with each another. The analysis, explanation and criticism on this topic put forth the assertion that "behind the mountain ideology" implies a dualistic and oppositional structure of "the edge of civilization" and "the advantage of nature". This structure is further placed into the broader "center-edge" structures of nationalization and globalization, which have been built out of the implementation of imperial power over the past centuries and theoretical practice; it has been determining the historical "behind the mountain" destiny and existence of Hualien. However, in the course of Hualien's social and cultural development, the "anisotropy energy" between "attempt on development" and "insistence on nature" has constantly been disrupted. The possibility of "harmonization" shall be built upon having sensible "public discourse" in the hope of reaching a consensus that not only follows "the advantage of nature" but also allows for adequate development. The social and cultural development of Hualien will therefore be positively characterized and planned.