:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我用身體寫政治:2004年320到520抗爭事件
書刊名:臺灣社會研究季刊
作者:楊祖珺
作者(外文):Yang, Tsu-chuen
出版日期:2007
卷期:67
頁次:頁39-104
主題關鍵詞:2004年320到520抗爭事件身體身體樣態身體部署非國家政治非國家政治的身體部署Incident of the protest from March 20 to May 20, 2004BodyModes of the bodyDispositif of the bodyA-statist politicsA-statist dispositif of the body
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:292
  • 點閱點閱:39
本文從中華民國第十一屆總統選舉後持續兩整個月的「2004年320到520抗爭事件」的行動脈絡中,辨識出四種曾經浮現在抗爭場域的抗爭主體的身體樣態──「逃離國家規馴的身體樣態」、「眾聲喧嘩的嘉年華身體樣態」、「父親扮演的身體樣態」、以及「執著強求的身體樣態」,用以備望那一段曾經呼喚出至少有五十萬台灣人民,積極使用著她(他)們的身體,針對2004年總統大選前 「民進黨式台灣主體性論述」的國家主義認同政治及其實作的技術操作及效應,進行著想要言說卻不知如何言說、想要飛躍卻不知如何破格的抗爭身體樣態呈現後的歷史記憶。此外,本文也將「非國家政治的身體部署」當作一個解放概念,理述在「多重的生命形式」的扣連以及身體部署的創造性動力下所建構出來「非國家政治」的思考,是促使多重身體樣態現身在對抗國家政治將人民赤裸裸的生命放置在管理之甕的可能希望。
This paper identifies four key modes of the protesting body during the process of the “Incident of the Protest from March 20 to May 20, 2004” immediately after the campaign of the Election for the 11th-term President and Vice-President of the Republic of China in Taiwan. The modes of the protesting body in this incident are: the “mode of the body escaping from the disciplines of the State”, the “mode of the body in the state of carnival-like heteroglossia”, the “mode of the body in the state of Father- role-playing”, and the “inflexible and demanding mode of the body”. My objective is twofold. First, I intend to present an analysis which can be read as a historical memorandum of the incident. During the incident, there were at least 500,000 Taiwanese people who had protested actively in front of the Presidential Palace of the Republic of China to react against the political influences of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s dogmatic and nationalist identifictory politics and its relevant practices surrounding the construction of Taiwanese subjectivity. During the incident, the momentum of the protest was constrained within the national symbolic orders and nationalist ideologies and was finally eliminated by the national disciplinary power. Second, by identifying the four modes of the protesting body in the incident, this paper encourages the emergence of multiple modes of the body mobilized by the active forces from the state of the “a-statist despositif of the body” in the future whenever the protest aims at pursuing happiness and radical democracy for the people.
期刊論文
1.何春蕤(20020600)。認同的「體」現:打造跨性別。臺灣社會研究,46,1-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.何春蕤(20010300)。自我培力與專業操演:與臺灣性工作者的對話。臺灣社會研究,41,1-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃建宏(2004)。無人稱的政治性。文化研究月報,43。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊祖珺(2007)。踏出對抗國家機器的第一步。人文社會學報(世新大學),8,131-164。  延伸查詢new window
5.Nasser, Hussain、Ptacek, Melissa(2000)。Thresholds: Sovereignty and the Sacred。Law & Society Review,34(2),495-520。  new window
研究報告
1.楊祖珺(2006)。從行動主體的角度看2004年中華民國第十一屆總統大選後「320-520抗爭事件」的發生及影響。0。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林耀秋(2007)。集置與部署,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Deleuze, Gilles、Guattari, Félix、Massumi, Brian(1988)。A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia。Inneapolis:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
2.Agamben, Giorgio、Hardt, Michael(1993)。The Coming Community。University of Minnesota Press。  new window
3.Agamben, Giorgio、Heller-Roazen, Daniel(1998)。Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life。Stanford, Calif:Stanford University Press。  new window
4.Agamben, Giorgio、Binetti, Vincenzo、Casarino, Cesare(2000)。Means without end: Notes on politics。University of Minnesota Press。  new window
5.龔卓軍(20060000)。身體部署:梅洛龐蒂與現象學之後。臺北:心靈工坊。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳光興(20060000)。去帝國:亞洲作為方法。臺北:行人出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Denzin, Norman K.、Lincoln, Yvonna S.(1994)。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Sage。  new window
8.Kvale, Steinar(1996)。Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing。Sage。  new window
9.Terkel, Studs(1975)。Working: People Talk About What They Do All Day and How They Feel About What They Do。Working: People Talk About What They Do All Day and How They Feel About What They Do。New York, NY。  new window
10.(1994)。Analyzing Qualitative Data。Analyzing Qualitative Data。London, UK。  new window
11.陳光興(2000)。德樂茲論傅柯。德樂茲論傅柯。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
12.楊祖珺(2005)。我在凱達格蘭等你-2004年320-520抗爭紀實。我在凱達格蘭等你-2004年320-520抗爭紀實。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Benjamin, Walter、Jephcott, Edmund(1986)。Critique of Violence。Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings。New York:Schocken Books。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE