臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣人如何成為澳洲人？跨界認同的傳播互動探究
書刊名：中華傳播學刊
作者：蔡珮 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tsai, Pei
出版日期：2010
卷期：18
頁次：頁193-233
主題關鍵詞：臺灣移民；族群認同；符號互動論；跨界認同；澳洲人；Taiwanese immigrant；Ethnic identity；Symbolic interactionism；Cross-border identity；Australian
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:639
  • 點閱點閱:48
本文探討布里斯本澳籍台裔之越界族群認同，同時也思考從傳播角度可以如何豐富認同研究的多樣性。文中探討了Barth族群邊界論與Mead符號互動論兩者在認同形成過程中所共同關注的社會互動有何差異、互補與不足，Mead的符號互動論經由Hecht認同的傳播理論延伸與修正後，與傳播的關係更為密切，也使得田野觀察中錯綜複雜的互動行為，有了條理化的分析方式。本文發現，從傳播互動角度探究越界認同之過程，需找出Mead理論中連結自我與共同體的「重要象徵符號」如何在互動中產生，其「趨同」與「區異」之特質需同時掌握才能描繪認同同時具備「同一」與「差異」的雙重特性。傳播與認同之關係，並非如Mead符號互動論單向地認為認同是傳播的結果，而是如Hecht指出認同反映傳播，傳播具體表現認同。因此，「重要象徵符號」不只在共同體成員溝通互動時內化為自我認同，同時也外化為傳播的實踐來建構認同。
This article explores how Taiwanese immigrants become Australians, and considers how communication perspectives enrich identity study. The main theoretical frames in this study combine Barth's theory of "ethnic boundary" and Mead's symbolic interactionism, drawing on the strength of each to offset the weakness of the other. By extending and modifying Mead's theory, Hecht's communication theory of identity not only makes further linkage between communication and identity, but also provides clear analysis and presentation for observing complex interaction behaviors. The results show studying cross-border identity from the perspective of symbolic interactionism necessitates discovering how "significant symbols", the key communicative factor to link self with community in Mead's theories, are generated within interaction process. Grasping the twofold characteristic of significant symbols-sameness (generated from the interaction within an ethnic group) and difference (generated from the interaction between ethnic groups), completely describes the dual quality of identity-identical and different. The relationship between communication and identity is not as Mead thought, that identity is the outcomes of communication, but as Hecht pointed out, that identity reflects communication that externalizes identity. Therefore, significant symbols not only internalize into self-identification during interaction among members of a community, they also externalize during communication practices to construct identity.
期刊論文
1.廖珮君、姜蘭虹、徐榮崇(2005)。年輕移民在台灣、澳洲兩地之間的流動原因、適應與自我認同。中國地理學會會刊，35，59-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hecht, M. L.(1993)。2002--A research odyssey: Toward the development of a communication theory of identity。Communication Monographs，60，76-82。  new window
3.Phinney, J. S.(1990)。Ethnic identity in adolescence and adults: Review of research。Psychological Bulletin，108(3)，499-514。  new window
4.Cronk, G.(1973)。Symbolic interactionism: A "left-Meadian" interpretation。Social Theory and Practice，2，313-333。  new window
5.Fisher, A. T.、Sonn, C. C.(2002)。Psychological sense of community in Australia and the challenges of change。Journal of Community Psychology，30(6)，597-609。  new window
6.Gillespie, A.(2005)。G. M. Mead: Theorist of the social act。Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour，35(1)，19-39。  new window
7.Martin, J.(2005)。Perspectival selves in interaction with others: Re-reading G. H. Mead’s social psychology。Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour，35，231-253。  new window
8.Phinney, J. S.(1989)。Stages of ethnic identity development in minority group adolescents。Journal of Early Adolescence，9，34-49。  new window
9.Wiesenfeld, E.(1996)。The concept of “we: A community social psychology myth?。Journal of Community Psychology，24，337-345。  new window
10.Yeh, C. J.、Huang, K.(1996)。The collectivistic nature of ethnic identity development among Asian-American college students。Adolescence，31(123)，645-661。  new window
會議論文
1.施正鋒(2005)。〈評林修澈的《原住民的民族認定》〉。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Fu, M.(2002)。Acculturation, ethnic identity, and family conflict among first and second generation Chinese American(博士論文)。Alliant International University，California。  new window
2.楊智翔(2006)。澳洲台灣年輕移民生活適應與身分認同過程之探討：以墨爾本為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Ruidl, R. A.(1982)。Idiomatic communication behaviors as indicators of acculturation，Seattle。  new window
圖書
1.Cohen, Anthony P.(1992)。The Symbolic Construction of Community。Routledge。  new window
2.Cooley, Charles Horton(1983)。Human nature and the social order。Transaction Publishers。  new window
3.De Fina, A.(2003)。Identity in narrative: A study of immigrant discourse。Amsterdam：John Benjamins。  new window
4.Gilroy, P.(1993)。Small acts: Thoughts on the politics of black cultures。London：Serpent’s Tail。  new window
5.Tian, G.(1999)。Chinese-Canadian, Canadian-Chinese: Coping and adapting in North America。New York：Edwin Mellen Press。  new window
6.Loudon, D. L. and A. J. Della Bitta.(1993)。Consumer behaviour: Concept and application (4th ed.)。New York：McGraw-Hill。  new window
7.Webb, J. R.(1992)。Understanding and designing marketing research。London：Academic Press。  new window
8.Dunn, Robert G.(1998)。Identity crisis: A social critique of postmodernity。Minneapolis, MN：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
9.Hecht, M. L.、Jackson, R. L. II、Ribeau, S. A.(2003)。African American communication: Exploring identity and culture。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
10.Hecht, M. L.、Collier, M. J.、Ribeau, S. A.(1993)。African American communication: Ethnic identity and cultural interpretation。Sage。  new window
11.Cooley, Charles Horton(1909)。Social organization: A study of the larger mind。New York：Charles Scribner's Sons。  new window
12.Dewey, John(1966)。Democracy and education。The Free Press。  new window
13.李威宜(19990000)。新加坡華人游移變異的我群觀：語群、國家社群與族群。臺北：唐山。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Mead, George Herbert、Morris, Charles W.(1934)。Mind, Self and Society。University of Chicago Press。  new window
15.施正鋒(19980000)。族群與民族主義：集體認同的政治分析。臺北：前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.王明珂(19970000)。華夏邊緣：歷史記憶與族群認同。允晨文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.黃源深、陳弘(1994)。《從孤立中走向世界─澳大利亞文化簡論》。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
18.Charon, J. M.(2001)。Symbolic Interactionism: An Introduction, An Interpretation, An Integration。Prentice-Hall。  new window
19.Chu, G. C.(1985)。The changing concept of self in contemporary China。Culture and self:Asian and Western perspectives。New York。  new window
20.Hecht, M. L., Jackson, R. L., II,、Pitts, M. J.(2005)。Culture: Intersections of intergroup and identity theories。Intergroup communication: Multiple perspective。New York。  new window
21.Hecht, M. L., Warren, J. R., Jung, E.,、Krieger, L. J.(2005)。The communication theory of identity: Development, theoretical perspective,and future directions。Theorizing about intercultural communication。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
22.Lee, W.(1994)。Communication about humor as procedural competence in intercultural encounters。Intercultural communication: A reader (7th ed.)。Belmont,CA。  new window
23.Shaskolsky, L.(1970)。The development of sociological theory in America:A sociology of knowledge interpretation。The sociology of sociology。New York。  new window
24.Shibutani, T.(1961)。Society and personality: An interactionist approach to social psychology。Englewood Cliffs, NJ。  new window
25.Solomon, M. R.(1994)。Consumer behaviour: Buying, having and being。Boston, MA：Allyn & Bacon。  new window
圖書論文
1.杜維明(1985)。Selfhood and otherness in Confucian thought。Culture and self: Asian and Western perspectives。New York, NY：Tavistock Publication。  new window
2.Duncombe, Stephen(2002)。Introduction。Cultural Resistance Reader。London：Verso。  new window
3.Hall, S.(1992)。The question of cultural identity。Modernity and Its Futures。Cambridge：Polity。  new window
4.Hall, Stuart(1990)。Cultural Identity and Diaspora。Identity: Community, Culture, Difference。London：Lawrence and Wishart。  new window
5.Hsu, F. L. K.(1985)。The self in cross-cultural perspective。Culture and Self: Asian and Western perspectives。Tavistock。  new window
6.Barth, F.(2000)。Boundaries and Connections。Signifying Identities: Anthropological Perspectives on Boundaries and Contested Values。London：Routledge。  new window
7.Barth, Fredrik(1994)。Enduring and Emerging Issues in the Analysis of Ethnicity。The Anthropology of Ethnicity: Beyond "Ethnic Groups and Boundaries"。Amsterdam：Het Spinhuis Publishers。  new window
8.Barth, F.(1969)。Introduction。Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference。Boston, MA：Little, Brown and Company。  new window
9.Chen, L. J.(2000)。Community formation and Taiwanese immigrant identity。Race, colour and identity in Australia and New Zealand。Sydney：UNSW Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：590（臺灣：580，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67433123
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上