臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國會議員生涯類型變遷與民主體制的取向分析--以臺灣第二到第七屆立法院為例
書刊名：東吳政治學報
作者：廖達琪 引用關係
作者(外文)：Liao, Da-chi
出版日期：2010
卷期：28:2
頁次：頁49-96
主題關鍵詞：國會議員生涯類型；民主體制；臺灣；立法院；立法委員；Career models of legislators；Democracy；Taiwan；Legislative Yuan；Legislators
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:58
  • 點閱點閱:103
本文嘗試從國會議員生涯類型結構的變遷，來探看與民主體制取向的對應關係。首先，本文根據既有的理論及經驗研究，歸結出總統制及內閣制二大主要民主體制及中間型「半總統制」的組成邏輯，及相對照各體制下會出現國會議員生涯類型不同的組合趨勢。本文再以台灣為個案，試從經驗面台灣立法院從第二屆(993)降到第七屆(010)歷屆立法委員生涯類型變遷情形，來反思其間組成結構的變化所對應的民主體制取向。本文的主要發現是：台灣立法院長期發展，較是以「專職型」立委為主流，這比較接近「總統制」下的國會議員職涯傾向。最後，本文根據這實證觀察的發現，提出未來台灣修憲或國會改革可思考的方向。
This paper examines the shift and changes in the structure of legislators' career types and studies its relations to the developments of a democracy. First of all, we reviewed existing theories and empirical research to deduce the structural logic behind the two major democratic models, the ”presidential system” and the ”cabinet system”, and that of a third and median model, the ”quasi-presidential system.” Then these are compared with the trend in which legislators' career types appear within each system. This paper uses Taiwan as a case study to examine Taiwanese legislators from the second term (1993) to the seventh term (2010) to see if the shift and change in their career types have reflected on the developmental orientation of the democracy. The main finding of this paper is that in the long-term development of Taiwan's Legislative Yuan, ”career” legislators are the mainstream, and this career type is closer to the legislative career inclinations in a ”presidential system.” Lastly, based on these findings, this paper suggests possible direction for future constitutional amendment or legislative reform in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.廖達琪、許家豪(20020200)。總統擴權現象的探討--一個中西「法治」思想比較的觀點。國家政策論壇，2(2)，29-38。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cox, Gary W.、Rosenbluth, Frances M.、Thies, Micahel F.(2000)。Electoral Rules, Career Ambitions and Party Structure: Comparing Factions in Japan's Upper and Lower Houses。American Journal of Political Science，44(1)，115-122。  new window
3.廖達琪、簡赫琳、張慧芝(20080900)。臺灣剛性憲法的迷思 : 源起、賡續暨其對憲改的影響。人文及社會科學集刊，20(3)，357-395。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.廖達琪(20050600)。「橡皮圖章」如何轉變為「河東獅吼」?--立法院在臺灣民主化過程中的角色轉變之探究 (1950~2000)。人文及社會科學集刊，17(2)，343-391。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Squire, P.(1988)。Member Career Opportunities and the Internal Organization of Legislatures。The Journal of Politics，50(3)，726-744。  new window
6.Berry, William D.、Berkman, Michael B.、Schneiderman, Stuart(2000)。Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries。American Political Science Review，94(4)，859-874。  new window
7.廖達琪(20050900)。「人治」與「法治」遭遇下的菁英角色及憲政發展--臺灣憲政運作之回顧及前瞻(1950-)。臺灣民主季刊，2(3)，33-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.廖達琪(20000900)。總統大選後的憲政反省--制衡機制的建立及運作。理論與政策，14(3)=55，1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Duverger, Maurice(1980)。A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government。European Journal of Political Research，8(2)，165-187。  new window
10.Polsby, Nelson W.(1968)。The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives。American Political Science Review，62(1)，144-168。  new window
11.廖達琪、黃志呈、謝承璋(20060300)。修憲對立法院功能與角色之影響--從表演場到表演場。臺灣民主季刊，3(1)，27-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Abramson, Paul R. et al.(1987)。“Progressive Ambition among United States Senators: 1972-1988.”。The Journal of Politics，49, 1，3-35。  new window
13.Canon, David T. and David J. Sousa.(1992)。“Party System Change and Political Career Structures in the U.S. Congress.”。Legislative Studies Quarterly，XVII, 3，347-363。  new window
14.Dutton, William H.(1975)。“The Political Ambitions of Local Legislators: A Comparative Perspective.”。Polity，7, 4，504-522。  new window
15.Fiorina, Morris.(1977)。“The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It.”。American Political Science Review，71, 1，177-181。  new window
16.Fishel, Jeff.(1971)。“Ambition and the Political Vocation: Congressional Challengers in American Politics.”。The Journal of Politics，33, 1，25-56。  new window
17.Hain, Paul L.(1974)。“Age, Ambitions, and Political Careers: The Middle-Age Crisis.”。The Western Political Quarterly，27, 2，265-274。  new window
18.Hibbing, John R.(1982)。“Voluntary Retirement from the U. S. House of Representatives: Who Quits?”。American Journal of Political Science，26, 3，467-484。  new window
19.Hibbing, John R.(1988)。“Legislative Institutionalization with Illustrations from the British House of Commons.”。American Journal of Political Science，32, 3，681-687。  new window
20.Kim, Hee Min.(1997)。“Rational Choice and Third World Politics: The 1990 Party Merger in South Korea.”。Comparative Politics，30, 1，83-100。  new window
21.King, James D.(2000)。“Changes in Professionalism in U.S. State Legislatures.”。Legislative Studies Quarterly，XXV, 2，327-343。  new window
22.Maestas, Cherie.(2000)。“Professional Legislatures and Ambitious Politicians: Policy Responsiveness of State Institutions.”。Legislative Studies Quarterly，XXV, 4，663-690。  new window
23.Matland, Richard E. and Donley T. Studlar.(2004)。“Determinants of Legislative Turnover: A Cross-National Analysis.”。British Journal of Political Science，34, 1，87-108。  new window
24.Matthews, Donald R.(1984)。“Legislative Recruitment and Legislative Career.”。Legislative Studies Quarterly，IX, 4，547-585。  new window
25.Moncrief, Gary F. et al.(1996)。“Revisiting the State of U. S. State Legislative Research.”。Legislative Studies Quarterly，XXI,3，301-335。  new window
26.Moncrief, Gary F.(1999)。“Recruitment and Rentention in U. S. Legislatures.”。Legislative Studies Quarterly，XXIV,2，173-207。  new window
27.Moore, Michael K. and John R. Hibbing.(1992)。“Is Serving in Congress Fun Again? Voluntary Retirements from the House since the 1970s.”。American Journal of Political Science，36,3，824-828。  new window
28.Park, Jin.(1990)。Political Change in South Korea: The Challenge of the Conservative Alliance。Asian Survey，30(12)，1154-1168。  new window
29.Squire, Peverill.(1988)。“Career Opportunities and Membership Stability in Legislatures。Legislative Studies Quarterly，XIII,1，65-82。  new window
30.Squire, Peverill.(2007)。“Measuring Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.”。State Politics and Policy Quarterly，7，211-27。  new window
31.Woods, Neal D. and Michael Baranowski.(2006)。“Legislative Professionalism and Influence on State Agencies: the Effects of Resources and Careerism.”。Legislative Studies Quarterly，XXXI，4，585-609。  new window
32.廖達琪(2008)。〈議會改革─ 「賦權」與「剝權」 兩條路線的競合〉。台灣本土法學雜誌，104，140-157。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Wu, Yu-Shan(2008)。Study of Semi-Presidentialism: A Holistic Approach。International Conference of Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy，(會議日期: October 17-18)。Taipei：Academia Sinica。  new window
學位論文
1.朱元魁(2008)。〈國會議員之生涯類型研究—以台灣立委第二屆到第六屆為例〉。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.華力進(1980)。政治學。台北：經世書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Rosenbloom, David H.(2000)。Building a Legislative-centered Public Administration: Congress and the Administrative State, 1946-1999。University of Alabama Press。  new window
3.Lijphart, Arend(1998)。Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries。New Haven：Yale University Press。  new window
4.李鴻禧、胡佛(1980)。成長的民主。台北：中國論壇社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Loewenberg, Gerhard、Patterson, Samuel C.(1979)。Comparing Legislatures。Little, Brown and Company。  new window
6.王業立(2006)。比較選舉制度。臺北：五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳新民(2002)。1990~2000年臺灣修憲紀實：十年憲政發展之見證。臺北：學林文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Clubb, Jerome.(1994)。“The Historical Legislative Career.”。Encyclopedia of the American Legislative System 1。New York。  new window
9.Elgie, Robert.(2007)。“What Is Semi-presidentialism and Where Is It Found?”。Semi-presidentialism Outside Europe: A Comparative Study。London。  new window
10.Elgie, Robert and Sophia Moestrup.(2008)。Semi-Presidentialism and Democratization in Central and Eastern Europe。Manchester。  new window
11.Hibbing, John R.(2002)。“Legislative Careers: Why and How We Should Study Them.”。Legislatures。Michigan。  new window
12.Schlesinger, Joseph A.(1966)。Ambition and Politics。Chicago。  new window
13.Williams, Shirley and Edward L. Jr. Lascher.(1993)。Ambition and Beyond: Career Paths of American Politicians。University of California, Berkeley。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：298（臺灣：295，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1520404 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67314505
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上