:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:地方治理與姐妹縣市發展的關係
書刊名:環境與世界
作者:洪富峰 引用關係
作者(外文):Hung, Fu-feng
出版日期:2011
卷期:23
頁次:頁1-17
主題關鍵詞:地方治理姐妹市臺灣縣市政府尺度Local governanceSister cityTaiwan local governmentScale
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:196
  • 點閱點閱:146
在全球與在地的空間尺度辯證之中,都市政府的角色由抑制、管理與支配,越來越偏向協調、整合與駕馭,也就是由統治者轉向治理者;治理者有所謂善治的判準,包括決策的透明程度,政策施行的效度,與問責。台灣作為東亞一個發展掛帥型國家,地方民主制度已經成為日常生活的常態,加上地方政府由中央政府的授權與分權過程,擔負問責的角色日重,就治理的判準而言,儼然成為地方城邦或國家。基此,本文探究台灣25個縣市政府,自1961年至2010年所締結的217組姊妹縣市之間,就其所發展出來的地方外交關係,藉善治的判準,檢視市民社會、企業組織與政府機構之間的結構與能動者,在全球思考與地方行動的尺度階梯跳躍之間,闡明地方政府締結姊妹縣市的策略與象徵意義。
Under the spatial scale dialectics between global and local governments, the role of urban governments has been shifting from resistance, control and manipulation toward negotiation, coordination and management. Therefore, the government is transforming from a commander into a coordinator. There is so called good governance which features characteristics, including transparent decision-making process, utility and accountability. Taiwan, as one of development-oriented countries in East Asia, is known for its local governments, including 7 cities and 18 counties. Empowered by devolution, city/county government plays an active role in terms of economic booster, interurban competition and urban spectacle. This paper explores the municipal foreign diplomatic relationship between 217 sister cities and 25 cities and counties all over Taiwan during 1961 to 2010 in an attempt to investigate the scale jumping of devolution within global and local governance. In addition, this essay attempts to illuminate strategies employed by local governments as well as its symbolic meanings.
期刊論文
1.McGuirk, P. M.(2000)。Power and Policy Networks in Urban Governance: Local Government and Property-led Regeneration in Dublin。Urban Studies,37(4),651-672。  new window
2.方怡文(20050900)。從全球治理探討我國第二軌道外交之機會與限制:一個民主與人權的觀點。新世紀智庫論壇,31,89-111。  延伸查詢new window
3.Jessop, Bob、Sum, Ngai-Ling(2000)。An entrepreneurial city in action: Hong Kong's emerging strategies in and for (Inter) Urban Competition。Urban Studies,37(12),2287-2313。  new window
4.Brenner, N.(1998)。Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales。Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,16,459-481。  new window
5.劉坤億(20020600)。全球治理趨勢下的國家定位與城市發展:治理網絡的解構與重組。行政暨政策學報,34,57-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.廖哲強、蕭崑杉、郭大玄(20100600)。地方治理與制度厚實--古坑華山社區之個案。華岡地理學報,25,53-66。  延伸查詢new window
7.Alger, C. F.(1999)。The future of democracy and global governance depends on widespread public knowledge about local links to the world。Cities,16(3),195-206。  new window
8.Berg, E.、Kuusk, E.(2010)。What makes sovereignty a relative concept? Empirical approaches to international society。Political Geography,29(1),40-49。  new window
9.Clarke, N.(2009)。In what sense spaces of neo-liberalism? The new localism, the new politics of scale, and town twinning。Political Geography,28,496-507。  new window
10.Hewitt, W.(1999)。Municipality and the new internationalism: cautionary notes from Canada。Cities,16(6),435-444。  new window
11.McGuirk, P. M.(2004)。State,strategy,and scale in the competitive city: a neo-Gramscian analysis of the governance of global Sydney。Environmental and Planning A,36,1019-1043。  new window
12.Mcllwaine, C.(1997)。Third-world development: urbanizing for the future。Progress in Human Geography,21(3),406-413。  new window
13.Mcllwaine, C.(1998)。Civil society and development geography。Progress in Human Geography,22(3),415-424。  new window
14.Peck, J.(2002)。Political economies of scale: fast policy, inter-scalar relation, and neo-liberal workfare。Economic Geography,78(3),331-360。  new window
15.Peck, J.(2008)。Remaking laissez-faire。Progress in Human Geography,32(1),3-43。  new window
16.Rutland, T.、Aylett, A.(2008)。The work of policy: actor networks, governmentality, and local action on climate change in Portland, Oregon。Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,26(4),627-646。  new window
17.Zelinsky, W.(1991)。The twinning of the world: sister cities in geographic and historical perspective。Annals of the Association of American Geographers,81(1),1-31。  new window
18.Zhang, L.、Zhao, S. X.(2009)。City branding and the Olympic effect: A case study of Beijing。Cities,26(5),245-254。  new window
圖書
1.簡後聰(1985)。美國對華政策的演變與研析。臺北:大中國圖書。  延伸查詢new window
2.高朗(1994)。中華民國外交關係之演變(1972-1992)。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.高朗(1993)。中華民國外交關係之演變(1972-1992)。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.Held, David、McGrew, Anthony、林祐聖(2005)。治理全球化:權力、權威與全球治理。臺北:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳志奇(1981)。美國對華政策三十年。臺北:中華日報社。  延伸查詢new window
6.石之瑜(1995)。近代中國對外關係新論:政治文化與心理分析。五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳光興(20060000)。去帝國:亞洲作為方法。臺北:行人出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.外交部(1997)。外交年鑑。台北。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊基詮(1999)。台灣關係法二十年。台北。  延伸查詢new window
10.潭立鑄、Coulanges, F.(2005)。古希臘羅馬祭祀、權力和政制研。上海。  延伸查詢new window
11.Hansen, M. H.(2006)。Polis: an introduction to the ancient Greek city-state。  new window
12.Painter, J.(2008)。Geographies of space and power。The SAGE handbook of political geography \\ Cox, K. ; Low, M. ; Robinson, J.。London。  new window
13.Painter, J.(2009)。Governance。The Dictionary of Human Geography [5th edition] \\ Gregory D. (et al edited)。  new window
14.王志弘、徐苔玲、Parker, S.(2007)。爭議的城市::政治、人民與權力。遇見都市:理論與經驗。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.沈旭輝(2010)。香港次主權外交影響臺灣。  延伸查詢new window
2.APCS(2011)。  new window
圖書論文
1.許志雄(199208)。地方自治的觀念與理念。地方自治之研究。臺北:業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE