:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:民眾對立法委員選舉之政黨不分區名單的認知與影響:以2008年立法委員選舉為例
書刊名:選舉研究
作者:蕭怡靖 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsiao ,Yi-ching
出版日期:2012
卷期:19:1
頁次:頁33-67
主題關鍵詞:單一選區兩票並立制立法委員選舉封閉式政黨名單投票抉擇Mixed-member majoritarian systemLegislative electionClosed party listVoting Choice
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:506
  • 點閱點閱:114
台灣2008年立法委員選舉,首度採取「單一選區兩票並立制」 (Mixed-member majoritarian system, MMM)。選民同時握有兩張選票,一票投給區域候選人,另一票則是投給政黨。理論上,選民對政黨票的投票抉擇,應該考量各政黨提名名單的良窳,做出最終的投票決定。只是在政黨的實際政治操作,及多數民眾並不瞭解新選制內容的情形下,民眾對主要政黨不分區名單的認知情形如何?能否對名單做出印象偏好?尤其對政黨票的投票抉擇是否具有影響力?本文利用「台灣選舉與民主化調查」在2008年立法委員選舉後,所進行的全國面訪計畫(TEDS2008L)進行分析。結果發現,台灣民眾對主要政黨不分區名單的認知程度並不高,也有近半數民眾對不分區名單不具印象偏好。但即便如此,當民眾對某政黨不分區名單的認知程度提高,或是對某政黨名單有較佳的印象時,即有顯著偏高的機率將票投給該政黨。這顯示,政黨 若提高不分區名單的素質並加強宣傳,將有助爭取民眾的選票支持。
The mixed-member majoritarian system was first adopted in the 2008 legislative election in Taiwan. In accordance with this electoral system, each voter has two ballots to cast at the same time. The first ballot is for the candidates in the single member district, and the second is for the party list, which determines the seats each party receives. Theoretically, voters’ decision on the second ballot depends not only on his or her party identification but also on the quality of party list. Since the two ballots system was recently adopted in 2008, most people are not familiar with the mixed-member majoritarian system. Therefore, this article attempts to examine the voters’ perception of the party list and their preference, and furthermore to assess whether their perception and preference would affect their voting choice on the second ballot. The empirical survey data of TEDS2008L is analyzed in this article to answer these questions. It is found that while most voters can neither recognize the names on the lists of the two major parties nor indicate their preference among the lists. However, voters are significantly more likely to vote for the party list they recognize or prefer. This result indicates that parties should make every endeavor to enhance the quality of the party list in order to receive more votes in this newly adopted electoral system in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.蕭怡靖(20090600)。選制認知與投票參與--2008年立法委員選舉的多層分析。政治學報,47,29-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.劉義周(20051200)。典型的回顧型投票--2005年三合一選舉結果的解析。臺灣民主,2(4),147-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡佳泓(20080300)。Making Sense of Issue Position, Party Image, Party Performanc, and Voting Choice: A Case Study of Taiwan's 2004 Legislative Election。人文及社會科學集刊,20(1),1-24。new window  new window
4.蕭怡靖、游清鑫(20080600)。施政表現與投票抉擇的南北差異--2006年北高市長選舉的探討。臺灣民主季刊,5(2),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王鼎銘(20011100)。The Impacts of Policy Issues on Voting Behavior in Taiwan: A Mixed Logit Approach。選舉研究,8(2),95-123。new window  new window
6.吳東野(19990500)。我國立法院全國不分區委員制度之研究。選舉研究,6(1),143-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Petrocik, John R.(1974)。An Analysis of Intransitivities in the Index of Party Identification。Political Methodology,1(3),31-47。  new window
8.Weisberg, Herbert F.(1980)。A Multidimensional Conceptualization of Party Identification。Political Behavior,2(1),33-60。  new window
9.蕭怡靖、黃紀(20100600)。2008年立委選舉候選人票之分析:選民個體與選區總體的多層模型。臺灣政治學刊,14(1),3-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Huang, Chi、Yu, Ching-hsin、Hsiao, Yi-Ching(2011)。Citizen’s Awareness of the New MMM Electoral System in Taiwan: A Cohort Analysis。Election Studies,1(2),7-43。  new window
11.Karp, Jeffrey A.(2006)。Political Knowledge About Electoral Rules: Comparing Mixed Member Proportional Systems in Germany and New Zealand。Electoral Studies,25(4),714-730。  new window
12.吳重禮、李世宏(20040700)。政府施政表現與選民投票行為:以2002年北高市長選舉為例。理論與政策,17(4)=68,1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.吳重禮、李世宏(20030400)。總統施政表現對於國會選舉影響之初探:以2001年立法委員選舉為例。理論與政策,17(1)=65,27-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Niou, Emerson M. S.、Paolino, Philip(2003)。The Rise of the Opposition Party in Taiwan: Explaining Chen Shui-bian's Victory in the 2000 Presidential Election。Electoral Studies,22(4),721-740。  new window
15.Norris, Pippa(1997)。Choosing Election System: Proportional, Majoritarian and Mixed Systems。International Political Science Review,18(3),297-312。  new window
16.劉嘉薇(20080300)。2005年縣市長選舉選民投票決定之影響因素--臺北縣、臺中市、雲林縣以及高雄縣的分析。臺灣民主季刊,5(1),1-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.林瓊珠(20050500)。臺灣民眾的政治知識:1992-2000年的變動。選舉研究,12(1),147-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.盛杏湲(20020500)。統獨議題與臺灣選民的投票行為:一九九〇年代的分析。選舉研究,9(1),41-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.盛杏湲、陳義彥(20030500)。政治分歧與政黨競爭:二○○一年立法委員選舉的分析。選舉研究,10(1),7-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.楊婉瑩(20071100)。政治參與的性別差異。選舉研究,14(2),53-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.王鼎銘(20030500)。政策認同下的投票效用與選擇:空間投票理論在不同選舉制度間的比較。選舉研究,10(1),171-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.蕭怡靖、黃紀(20111100)。施政表現在不同層級地方選舉中的影響:2009年雲林縣縣長及鄉鎮市長選舉之分析。選舉研究,18(2),59-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Bennett, Stephen Earl(1989)。Trends in American’s Political Information, 1967-1987。American Politics Research,17(4),422-435。  new window
24.Hsieh, John Fun-sheng、Niou, Emerson M. S.(1996)。Salient Issue in Taiwan’s Electoral Politics。Electoral Studies,15(2),219-230。  new window
會議論文
1.Lin, Chang-chih(2008)。單一選區兩票制下的民進黨立委提名制度。南投。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Chu, Yun-han(2009)。2005年至2008年「台灣選舉與民主化調查」四年期研究規劃(III):2008年立法委員選舉面訪案。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Farrell, David M.(2001)。Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction。New York:Palgrave。  new window
2.Nie, Norman H.、Verba, Sidney、Petrocik, John R.(1976)。The Changing American Voter。Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Nie, Norman H.、Junn, Jane、Stehlik-Barry, Kenneth(1996)。Education and Democratic Citizenship in America。University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Fiorina, Morris P.(1981)。Retrospective Voting in American National Elections。Yale University Press。  new window
5.王業立(20110000)。比較選舉制度。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.謝復生(1992)。政黨比例代表制。臺北市:理論與政策雜誌社。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Wolfinger, Raymond E.、Rosenstone, Steven J.(1980)。Who Votes?。New Haven, Connecticut:Yale University Press。  new window
8.Mayhew, David R.(2004)。Congress: The Electoral Connection。Yale University Press。  new window
9.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
10.Burns, Nancy、Schlozman, Kathy Lehman、Verba, Sidney(2001)。The Private Roots of Public Action: Gander, Equality and Political Participation。Cambbridge。  new window
11.Erikson, Robert S., et al.(2001)。Macropartisanship: The Permanent Memory of Partisan Evaluation。Controversies in Voting Behavior [4th ed.] \\ Niemi, Richard G. ; Weisberg, Herbert F. (eds.)。Washington, DC。  new window
12.Lachat, Romain、Sciarini, Pascal(2002)。When Do Election Campaigns Matter, and to Whom? Results from the 1999 Swiss Election Panel Study。Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums \\ Farrell, David M. ; Schmitt-Beck, Rudiger (eds.)。New York。  new window
13.Ruostetsaari, Ilkka、Mattila, Mikko(2002)。Candidate-Centred Campaigns and Their Effects in an Open List System: The Case of Finland。Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums \\ Farrell, David M. ; Schmitt-Beck, Rudiger (eds.)。New York。  new window
14.Schmitt-Beck, Rudiger、Farrell, David M.(2002)。Do Political Campaign Matter? Yes, But It Depends。Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums \\ Farrell, David M. ; Schmitt-Beck, Rudiger (eds.)。New York。  new window
其他
1.Election Study Center of National Chengchi University(2012)。重要政治態度分佈趨勢圖。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Thomassen, J.(1976)。Party identification as a cross-national concept: Its meaning in the Netherlands。Classics in voting behavior。Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE