:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:河陰之變新探:以尒朱榮為中心的討論
書刊名:國立政治大學歷史學報
作者:胡勝源
作者(外文):Hu, Sheng-yuan
出版日期:2012
卷期:38
頁次:頁1-50
主題關鍵詞:魏晉南北朝河陰之變尒朱榮Wei Jin Southern and Northern DynastiesHe Yin incidentEr-Ju Rong
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:154
  • 點閱點閱:101
南宋以來的傳統史學重視夷夏之別,多半將北魏孝文帝漢化改革視為河陰之變的起因,並以尒朱榮的胡人背景,論定其政治傾向。本文嘗試回到北宋史學的脈絡,以尒朱榮為中心,考察他與孝明帝、孝莊帝的關係、他對孝文帝一系的重視,重新探討河陰之變的起因與影響。河陰之變的起因方面:本文分析了尒朱榮、元子攸與孝明帝的關係,認為尒朱榮與元子攸皆屬忠於孝明帝的帝黨,才能順利合作推翻胡太后的統治。河陰之變發於費穆對尒朱榮的獻策,本文以為費穆、禁軍對漢化政策不滿的可能性並不高,推測費穆是因追求功成名就才出此策略。學界大多將尒朱氏與六鎮鎮民歸於同類,本文則將之分為尒朱氏、六鎮豪強、六鎮下層鎮民。本文認為,尒朱氏與六鎮豪強不屬於同一類人,他們會合作鎮壓反漢化的六鎮之亂,是因共同的「擁魏」立場;這也反映在他們所擁立的皇帝皆與孝文帝有密切的關係上。河陰之變的影響方面:本文認為河陰之變讓尒朱榮欲立功補過,成就了一番功業,然而遷都之舉讓孝莊帝聯想到董卓前鑑,顯赫功業又讓孝莊帝芒刺在背,最終使孝莊帝對尒朱榮痛下殺手。河陰之變中,尒朱榮放棄篡位,開啟了北魏前所未有的「主弱臣強」體制,讓他與孝莊帝的衝突不斷。尒朱榮死後,高歡與宇文泰皆沿襲此一體制,形成東西魏政治的根本架構。
In regards to the Southern Sung Dynasty, traditional historians have placed a heavy emphasis upon the Yi-Xia distinction; the distinction between Han Chinese and other ethnic groups. Most consider the Sinicization of Emperor Xiaowen in Northern Wei as the root cause of the He Yin Incident. The Hu ethnic background of Er-Ju Rong is often cited as the foundation of his political inclinations. This study attempts to go back to the context of Northern Sung history and reinvestigate the causes and influences of the He Yin Incident. To do this, the author will focus on Er-Ju Rong's relationships with Emperor Xiaoming and Emperor Xiaozhuang, and his high regard of Emperor Xiaowen's lineage.In regards to the causes of the He Yin Incident, this study will analyze the relationships between Er-Ju Rong, Yuan Zi-You, and Emperor Xiaoming. The study suggests that both Er Ju-Rong and Yuan Zi-You are loyal to Emperor Xiaoming, which enabled them to cooperate in overthrowing the rule of the Great Empress Hu. The He Yin Incident started as a strategic suggestion from Fei Mu to Er-Ju Rong. This study ascertains that the possibility of aversion towards the Sinicization policy by Fei Mu and the Imperial Guards is unlikely. It is theorized that Fei Mu proposed this suggestion due to his thirst for power and fame. Most of the historical community classified the Er-Ju family as being in the same vein as the people of the six cities. In this study they are classified as the Er-Ju Family, the powerful elites of the six cities, and the common people of the six cities in lower social classes. The Er-Ju family does not belong to the same class of people as the powerful ones of the six cities. They joined forces during the oppression of the anti-sinicization rebellion in the six cities only because of their common support of the Wei Dynasty. This is reflected in the close ties which between the emperors who enjoyed their support.In relation to the influences of the He Yin Incident, this study states that the He Yin Incident made Er-ju Rong desirous of making contributions to amend his crimes, which led to his great achievements. But the issue of moving the capital reminded Emperor Xiaozhuang of the examples set by Dong Zhuo, while at the same time his enormous fame in war made emperor Xiaozhuang uneasy of his presence. This finally led to Emperor Xiaozhuang's decision to kill Er-Ju Rong. During the He Yin Incident, Er-Ju Rong passed over the opportunity to take the throne for himself, which created an unprecedented system of "weak master, strong subject" and was the cause of continuous confrontations between him and Emperor Xiaozhuang. After Er-Ju Rong's death, both Gao Huan and Yu-Wen Tai inherited this system, which became the fundamental structure of politics in the Eastern and Western Wei Dynasties.
期刊論文
1.陳爽(2007)。河陰之變考論。中國社會科學院歷史研究所學刊,2007(4),309-344。  延伸查詢new window
2.何德章(200109)。北魏末帝位異動與東西魏的政治走向。魏晉南北朝隋唐史資料,18。  延伸查詢new window
3.王延武(2003)。北魏末的文化模式與爾朱榮的敗亡。中南民族大學學報(人文社會科學版),2003(6)。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳識仁(2009)。《洛陽伽藍記》與北朝史學。中國中古社會與國家史料典籍研讀會。臺北縣板橋市:稻鄉出版社。267-296。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.胡勝源(2005)。東魏北齊的政治與文化問題新探(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.王愛玲(2006)。尒朱氏與北魏政治(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.周一良(1998)。周一良集。瀋陽:遼寧教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.班固(1960)。漢書。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊衒之、周祖謨(2000)。洛陽伽藍記校釋。上海:上海書店。  延伸查詢new window
4.唐長儒(2011)。山居存稿。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳寅恪(2001)。唐代政治史述論稿。北京:生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
6.窪添慶文(2003)。魏晉南北朝官僚制研究。東京:汲古書院。  延伸查詢new window
7.李百藥(1972)。北齊書。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳寅恪、萬繩楠(1995)。陳寅恪魏晉南北朝史講演錄。臺北:雲龍出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.趙翼、王樹民(2001)。廿二史劄記校證。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.范曄(1964)。後漢書。臺北:新陸書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.葉適(1977)。習學記言序目。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.司馬光、胡三省、標點資治通鑑小組(1956)。資治通鑑。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.呂思勉(1969)。兩晉南北朝史。臺北:臺灣開明書店。  延伸查詢new window
14.王夫之(19850200)。讀通鑑論。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳寅恪(2001)。金明館叢稿初編。生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
16.魏收(1974)。魏書。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.谷川道雄、李濟滄(2004)。隋唐帝國形成史論。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.令狐德棻(1971)。周書。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
19.陳寅恪(2001)。隋唐制度淵源略論稿.唐代政治史述論稿。北京:生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
20.李延壽(1974)。北史。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.司馬遷(1959)。史記。  延伸查詢new window
2.小島典子(2001)。北魏末期の爾朱栄。  延伸查詢new window
3.宋大川、夏連保(1991)。北魏河陰之變述論。  延伸查詢new window
4.李文才、王婷琳(2007)。爾朱氏興衰的政治與文化考察。  延伸查詢new window
5.長部悦弘(2010)。北魏孝荘帝代爾朱氏軍閥集団再論(3)王都—覇府体制を焦点にして。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳少(1983)。試論北魏「河陰之變」。  延伸查詢new window
7.唐長孺(2011)。唐書兵制箋正(外二種)。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃修明(1990)。論爾朱氏軍事集團。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭欽仁等(2000)。魏晉南北朝史。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭建民(2008)。爾朱集團和北魏末期的政局。  延伸查詢new window
11.蘇小華(2005)。試論爾朱氏集團的興亡。  延伸查詢new window
12.饒宗頤(1996)。中國歷史上之正統論。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE