臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：後政治的社區動員與共識建構--一個臺北社區文化建構的案例
書刊名：地理學報
作者：林文一／邱淑宜 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Wen-i／Chiu, Shu-yi
出版日期：2014
卷期：72
頁次：頁85-109
主題關鍵詞：社區動員；積極公民；後政治共識；Community activation；Active citizen；Post-political consensus
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:169
  • 點閱點閱:85
動員市民與社區為地方問題的解決和鄰里的復興而共同努力，已經成為全球散播之觀念。這樣觀念通常展現出一種所謂後政治狀況的建構，其企圖超越傳統的對抗認同或階級、黨派的對立，而強調共識之凝聚與建立，並據此動員地方居民、社區團體及專業者來進行地方鄰里的再生。受後政治研究者啟發，本研究企圖以臺北市的一個重要社區運動之後期轉型與效應為主要案例，來檢視社區運動中後政治共識之形塑、轉化與影響。本文企圖指出上述社區動員與共識的建立常常是一種社會教導的過程，在其中，積極參與的民眾之自我認同（self-identity）、社會與文化資本（cultural capital）可能逐漸的被改變，從而成為另一種被教育過的公民。但這樣被教導後之公民（educated citizens）的出現，並非居民彼此間的溝通與協調後的產物，它可能造成一種社會的分裂。並且對於文化保存、社區營造等語彙與觀念的學習與使用，也讓這些積極的公民，可能更認同或依賴於特定專業者之論述與指引。積極參與的公民可能發現他們越來越不像他們鄰居，相對也越來越難和他們的鄰居溝通，或擁有相同語彙，在此狀況下，他們似乎成為孤立於「社區」之外的「積極公民」（active citizen）。
Activating citizens and communities to work together to deal with their local problems or neighborhood renewal has been a pervasive concept worldwide. This concept generally represents an archetypal post-political construct that seeks to transcend narrowly defined class interests or party struggles. It is expected to enable local residents, community groups and professionals to confront collective problems in a consensus-driven way. Inspired by the arguments of certain commentators regarding post-political conditions, this study seeks to examine the formation, transformation and impacts of the consensus developed in the process of a critical community movement in Taipei. It demonstrates that community mobilization and consensus-building usually refers a process of importing 'reasonable' or 'legitimated' discourse according to the instructions of local scholars or professionals to educate local residents. In this process, the residents are educated and transformed into 'active citizens' with more socio-cultural capital and professional knowledge to exercise the imported consensus, rather than developing the 'active' involvement of and communication with broad communities. This causes educated citizens and their 'community' to have more difficulty developing a common language and social network with which they can communicate with their neighbours. Consequently, they may become more estranged from their neighbours, and more isolated from their 'communities'.
期刊論文
1.臺北市萬華社區大學(2011)。甘蔗公園一劫又一劫。艋舺傳奇，26，4-7。  延伸查詢new window
2.無相頌(20031200)。國營事業土地利用之另類思考--以萬華大理街公園用地變更案為例。土地問題研究季刊，2(4)=8，36-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.鐘麗娜(2009)。都市計畫變更與容積移轉之財產權保障分析--以臺北市萬華區大理街附近地區各田部計畫案為例。經社法制論叢，43，59-88。  延伸查詢new window
4.Curran, W.(2010)。In defense of old industrial spaces: Manufacturing, creativity and innovation in Williamsburg, Brooklyn。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research，34(4)，871-885。  new window
5.Dalby, S.、F. Mackenzie(1997)。Reconceptualising local community: Environment, identity and threat。Area，29(2)，99-108。  new window
6.Doel, M.、Hubbard, P.(2002)。Taking world cities literally: Marketing the city in a global space of flows。Cities，6(3)，351-368。  new window
7.England, M.(2008)。When ‘good neighbors’ go bad: Territorial geographies of neighborhood associations。Environment and Planning A，40(12)，2879-2894。  new window
8.Goodlad, R.、P. Burton、J. Croft.(2005)。Effectiveness at what? The processes and impact of community involvement in area-based initiatives。Environment and Planning C，23(6)，923-938。  new window
9.Huang, Li-ling、Hsu, Jinn-yuh(2011)。From cultural building, economic revitalization to local partnership? The changing nature of community mobilization in Taiwan。International Planning Studies，16(2)，131-150。  new window
10.Imrie, R.、Thomas, H.、Marshall, T.(1995)。Business organisations, local dependence and the politics of urban renewal in Britain。Urban Studies，32(1)，31-47。  new window
11.McClymonta, K.、P. O'Hare(2008)。‘We’re not NIMBYs!’ contrasting local protest groups with idealised conceptions of sustainable communities。Local Environment，13(4)，321-335。  new window
12.McDonald, I.(2005)。Theorising partnerships: Governance, communicative action and sport policy。Journal of Social Policy，34(4)，579-600。  new window
13.Pratt, Andy C.(2010)。Creative cities: Tensions within and between social, cultural and economic development: A critical reading of the UK experience。City, Culture and Society，1(1)，13-20。  new window
14.Raco, M.、W. I. Lin.(2012)。Urban sustainability, conflict management, and the geographies of postpoliticism: A case study of Taipei。Environment and Planning C，30(2)，191-208。  new window
15.Raco, M.、Imrie, R.、Lin, W. I.(2011)。Community governance, critical cosmopolitanism and urban change: Observations from Taipei, Taiwan。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research，35(2)，274-294。  new window
16.Richardson, T.(1996)。Foucauldian discourse: Power and truth in urban and regional policy making。European Planning Studies，4(3)，279-292。  new window
17.Rose, M.(2002)。The seductions of resistance: Power, politics, and a performative style of systems。Environment and Planning D: Society and Space，20(4)，383-400。  new window
18.Swyngedouw, E.(2009)。The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research，33(3)，601-620。  new window
19.Rose, N.(2000)。Community, citizenship, and the third way。American Behavioral Scientist，43(9)，1395-1411。  new window
20.王志弘(20101200)。都市社會運動的顯性文化轉向？1990年代迄今的臺北經驗。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報，16，39-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Krätke, S.(2010)。Creative cities' and the rise of the dealer class: A critique of Richard Florida's approach to urban theory。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research，34(4)，835-853。  new window
22.譚鴻仁、王俊隆(20050500)。鄰避與風險社會：新店安坑掩埋場設置的個案分析。地理研究，42，105-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Delanty, Gerard、De Swaan, Abram(2006)。The Cosmopolitan Imagination: Critical Cosmopolitanism and Social Theory。Journal of Sociology，57(1)，25-47。  new window
24.Putnam, R. D.(1993)。The prosperous community: Social capitaland public life。The American Prospect，13，1-11。  new window
25.丘昌泰(20021200)。從「鄰避情結」到「迎臂效應」--臺灣環保抗爭的問題與出路。政治科學論叢，17，33-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Raco, Mike(2003)。Governmentality, subject-building, and the discourses and practices of devolution in the UK。Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers，28(1)，75-95。  new window
27.王振寰、錢永祥(19950800)。邁向新國家？民粹威權主義的形成與民主問題。臺灣社會研究季刊，20，17-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Imrie, R.、Lees, L.、Raco, M.(2009)。Regenerating London: governance, sustainability and community in a global city。London ; New York：Routledge。  new window
2.Mulgan, G.(1997)。Connexity: How to live in a connected world。London：Chatto and Windus。  new window
3.文建會(2010)。最小的無限大：文建會營造紀實 1994-2010。臺北：文建會。  延伸查詢new window
4.臺北市政府文化局(2011)。臺北市議會第十一屆第一次定期大會：臺北市政府文化局工作報告。臺北：臺北市政府文化局。  延伸查詢new window
5.臺北市政府文化局(2011)。世界設計之都跨領域專家論壇--第四場「文化創意」。臺北：臺北市政府文化局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Allmandinger, Philip(2009)。Planning theory。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
7.Castells, M.(1991)。The power of identity。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
8.Hillier, J.(2002)。Shadows of power: An allegory of prudence in land-use planning。London：Routledge。  new window
9.May, Tim(2001)。Social research: Issues, methods and process。Open University Press。  new window
10.Robinson, J.(2006)。Ordinary city: Between modernity and development。London：Routledge。  new window
11.Stewart, A.(2001)。Theories of Power and Domination。London：Sage。  new window
12.Cruikshank, Barbara(1999)。The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects。Ithaca。  new window
13.Clarke, John、Newman, Janet E.(1997)。The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare。London：Sage。  new window
14.Jessop, B.(2002)。The Future of the Capitalist State。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
15.Castells, M.(2000)。End of millennium。Blackwell。  new window
16.Žižek, Slavoj(1999)。The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology。Verso。  new window
17.Bourdieu, Pierre、Raymond, Gino、Adamson, Matthew、Thompson, John B.(1991)。Language and Symbolic Power。Cambridge, MA：Polity Press。  new window
18.蘇昭英、蔡季勳、行政院文化建設委員會、文化環境基金會(1999)。臺灣社區總體營造的軌跡。臺北：行政院文化建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
19.Giddens, Anthony(1998)。The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy。Oxford：Blackwell publishers Ltd.。  new window
20.Delanty, Gerard(2003)。Community。Routledge。  new window
21.Dean, M.(2010)。Governmentality : power and rule in modern society。Los Angles, Calif.：London：SAGE。  new window
22.Fischer, Frank(2000)。Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge。Durham, NC：Duke University Press。  new window
23.Anderson, Benedict(1991)。Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism。Verso。  new window
24.Mouffe, Chantal(2005)。On the Political。Routledge。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bernstein, A.(2006)。Parameters of legitimation and the environmental future of a Taipei neighborhood。Echoes from the poisoned well: Global memories of environmental injustice。Lexington：Rowman and Littlefield。  new window
2.Mayer, M.(2012)。The “right to the city” in urban social movements。Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city。London：Routledge。  new window
3.Morris, P.(1996)。Community beyond tradition。Detraditionalization。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
4.Newman, J.(2005)。Participative governance and the remaking of the public sphere。Remaking governance: Peoples, politics and the public sphere。Bristol：Policy Press。  new window
5.Rose, N.(2006)。Governing "advanced" liberal democracies。The anthropology of the state: A reader。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
6.Warner, Michael(1992)。The mass public and the mass subject。Habermas and the public sphere。Cambridge：The MIT Press。  new window
7.Fraser, Nancy(1992)。Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy。Habermas and the Public Sphere。MIT Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：961（臺灣：947，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67431360
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上