:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:伴侶暴力關係之新觀點
書刊名:臺灣性學學刊
作者:莊佩芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Chuang, Siraya Pei-fen
出版日期:2014
卷期:20:1
頁次:頁55-82
主題關鍵詞:伴侶關係系統與能量互動夏威夷療法家庭暴力家庭暴力處遇Couple's relationshipSystemic and energetic interactionsHo'oponopono therapyDomestic violenceTreatment of domestic violence
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:316
  • 點閱點閱:157
臺灣的家庭暴力(後稱家暴)問題從過去的不甚重視至近年來相關研究輩出,不僅在受暴婦女的議題研究方面有很大的進步外,並開始將視野放在家暴加害者的相關研究,以不同角度切入,使家暴議題不再是一個陌生領域。然而,目前的研究方向多傾向於將加害者或受害者分開討論。本研究希望先檢視目前家暴與加害者理論及相關文獻,再將家族與婚姻治療領域中的系統互動與能量互動概念運用於伴侶暴力關係中,藉此重新提出伴侶家暴處遇有別於先前加害者與受害者處遇的新觀點。家暴議題並非單方面研究被害者或加害者,而是需要回到整體能量互動,或是以生命的角度來看待,用更寬廣或更高的視野來面對所需處理的家暴事件。除此之外,文中也提出東方與西方哲學對於家暴處遇可能的差異性,建議家暴處遇應同時參考西方哲學與東方思想,採取「西方哲學為體,東方思想為質」的融合性作法。其中也將與東方思想相近的「夏威夷療法」一個人需要為任何處境負起百分之百責任的觀點融入本文家暴處遇之新東方哲學觀點中。
Domestic violence has only recently been addressed in Taiwan, as researchers and therapists have been making progress in women victims. Previous research explored abusers, while more recent research is addressing those who have been abused. This article applies a theory drawn from the field of the marriage and family therapy (MFT) looking at both victims and abusers within the family unit. The systemic interaction or energy interaction drawn from MFT can bring a new look on couple's violent behaviors. This new perspective explores violent interactions in a holistic manner avoiding falling into the duality of the couple's relationship such as "who is right," or "who is wrong." Instead, it is about the patterns of interactions between couples. Suggestions are made on how to use a higher position based on system/energy interaction and life perspective. It is important to treat domestic violence as a turning point for anyone who is involved in the violence. Like "crisis" in Chinese culture, this perspective contains crisis and also the meaning of opportunity. Moreover, eastern and western philosophies are addressed about new treatment plans and are incorporated. The therapy method from Hawaii, Ho'oponopono, is part of the discussion. It is based on one hundred percent responsibility, which means taking responsibility for everyone's actions within the family, not only for one's actions. This therapy also focuses on the problem from within; to change our reality means to change within one's self.
期刊論文
1.陳若琳(2005)。解構新世代的家人關係。杏陵天地,14(5),4-6。  延伸查詢new window
2.李雅琪(2007)。家庭暴力加害者參與認知輔導團後行為改變之探索研究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,3(1),57-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Grant, P. R.(1982)。The influence of stereotypes in impression formation: A reply to Locksley, Hepburn, and Ortiz。Social Psychology Quarterly,45(4),274-276。  new window
4.Hare-Mustin, T. T.(1978)。A feminist approach to family therapy。Family Process,17,181-194。  new window
5.Howell, M. J.(1988)。Husbands who harm: Predicting spousal violence by men。Journal of Family Violence,3(1),15-27。  new window
6.Pagelow, M. D.(1992)。Adult victims of domestic violence battered women。Journal of Interpersonal Violence,7(1),87-120。  new window
7.陳怡青、李維庭、張紀薇、李美珍(2013)。婚姻暴力加害者處遇成效評估研究初探。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,8(2),17-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.李郁文(20010600)。對家庭暴力防治應有的基本認識與反省。社區發展季刊,94,268-276。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.葉肅科(20010600)。家庭暴力理論觀點與防治策略。社區發展季刊,94,289-305。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.劉可屏(19870000)。虐妻問題。輔仁學誌. 法管理學院之部,19,375-391。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉惠琴(20030300)。夫妻衝突調適歷程的測量。中華心理衛生學刊,16(1),23-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.林佩瑾(19970900)。臺灣地區反婚姻暴力行動之研究。社區發展季刊,79,58-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.潘淑滿(20030500)。婚姻暴力的性別政治。女學學誌,15,195-253。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.林明傑(20000600)。美加婚姻暴力犯之治療方案與技術暨其危險評估之探討。社區發展季刊,90,197-215。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳若璋(19920600)。臺灣婚姻暴力高危險因子之探討。國立臺灣大學社會學刊,21,123-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳秉華、林佩儀、洪莉竹(2003)。婚暴受害婦女的諮商模式的初步建構。性別、暴力與權力研討會。高雄市:高雄師範大學性別教育研究所。39-59。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.王佩玲、王志中(2005)。婚姻暴力加害者處遇模式成效評估之研究 (計畫編號:PG9403-0368094000000AU6910)。台北市:台灣社會政策學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.林慧芬(2002)。婚姻暴力施暴者處預理論及模式探討。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.許維倫(1997)。遭受婚姻暴力婦女因應方式之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝宏林(2010)。家庭暴力加害人處遇成效意涵之研究(博士論文)。東海大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳玉美(2012)。修行:一段靈性成長的敘事之旅(碩士論文)。國立台東大學,台東市。  延伸查詢new window
4.邱芷君(2012)。看見:一段愛與被愛的自我敘說(碩士論文)。國立台東大學,台東市。  延伸查詢new window
5.許皓雅(2010)。又性別又國別:台越親密關係暴力探討--台籍男性家暴相對人之敘說(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳姿君(2012)。網網相連--與百分之二相遇(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.褚杏子(2000)。婚姻暴力下女性被害者之研究--以女性主義觀點出發(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.王美懿(2009)。身為家庭暴力加害人處遇計畫的「加害人」--一個解釋性互動論的研究(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳高德(2003)。台灣婚姻暴力之男性加害人(碩士論文)。臺北醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.洪宗言(2008)。諮商師對家暴加害人抗拒行為之理解(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.張歆祐(2006)。男同志伴侶關係發展歷程之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳婷蕙(1997)。婚姻暴力中受虐婦女對脫離受虐關係的因應行為之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃一秀(2000)。婚姻暴力之受虐婦女求助歷程之探討(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
14.湯琇雅(1993)。婚姻暴力中婦女受虐狀況與其因應過程之初探(碩士論文)。東吳大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
15.鄧純芳(2000)。藍鬍子現身--揭開加害人面具的婚姻暴力加害人處遇計畫(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
16.吳柳嬌(2005)。婚姻暴力的成因與處遇之研究(博士論文)。國立中山大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mills, L. G.(2008)。Violent partners: A breakthrough plan for ending the cycle of abuse。NY:Basic Books。  new window
2.陳若璋(1997)。家庭暴力防治與輔導手冊。臺北:張老師文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.林明傑、黃志中(2003)。他們怎麼了?家庭暴力加害人的評估與輔導。嘉義市:濤石出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Goldenberg, I.(1996)。Family therapy: An Review。Monterey, CA:Brooks/Cole。  new window
5.Brown Jr., T.(2007)。追蹤師的足跡:追蹤師2。台北市:野人。  延伸查詢new window
6.Cury, A.(2011)。兜售夢想的先知。台北市:圓神。  延伸查詢new window
7.Cury, A.(2012)。做自己的心靈後衛。台北市:圓神。  延伸查詢new window
8.Hew Len, Ihaleakala、櫻庭雅文、劉滌昭(2012)。荷歐波諾波諾的幸福奇蹟。方智。  延伸查詢new window
9.Becvar, D. S.(1996)。Family therapy: A systemic integration。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
10.Gelles, R. J.(1993)。Curret controversies on family violence。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
11.Healey, K.(1998)。Batterer intervention: Program approaches and criminal justice strategies。Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Justice。  new window
12.Watzlawick, P.(1962)。Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes。New York, NY:Norton & Company。  new window
13.周瑞宏(2006)。識透生命真相:從生命的本質徹底解套。台北市:和氣大愛文化事業。  延伸查詢new window
14.Barnett, Ola W.、Miller-Perrin, Cindy L.、Perrin, Robin D.(1997)。Family violence across the life-span: An introduction。Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE。  new window
15.陳若璋(1994)。兒童青少年性虐待治療與輔導。台北市:張老師文化。  延伸查詢new window
16.Johnson, M. P.(2008)。A Typology of Domestic Violence: Intimate Terrorism, Violent Resistance, and Situational Couple Violence。Northeastern University Press。  new window
17.Dobash, R. E.、Dobash, R. P.(1979)。Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy。New York:Free Press。  new window
18.Gelles, Richard J.、Cornell, Claire Pedrick、劉秀娟(1996)。家庭暴力。臺北市:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.Strong, B.、Devault, C.、Sayad, B.、Cohen, T.(1992)。The Marriage and Family Experience。West Publishing Company。  new window
20.Mills, L. G.、黃煜文(2004)。錯的是我們不是我:家暴的動力關係。臺北:商周。  延伸查詢new window
21.黃富源(20000000)。警察與女性被害人:警察系統回應的被害者學觀察。臺北:新迪文化有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.周月清(19950000)。婚姻暴力:理論分析與社會工作處置。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.成蒂(2004)。終結婚姻暴力:加害人處遇與諮商。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.柯麗評、王珮玲、張錦麗(2005)。家庭暴力:理論政策與實務。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
25.李姿佳、呂欣潔、杜思誠、林昱君、溫筱雯、黃心怡、陳淑玫、彭治鏐(2012)。衣櫃中的傷痕:同志伴侶親密暴力自助手冊。臺北:財團法人現代婦女教育基金會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.李宜靜(2001)。婚姻暴力加害者心理經驗之研究,http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22089NKNU0464020%22.&searchmode=basic。  new window
2.周瑞宏(2007)。靈光點化,不做輪迴客,http://www.hochi.org.tw/hochi/epaper.nsf/ByPublishTime?openview。  延伸查詢new window
3.勵馨基金會(2005)。台灣男人家暴觀,http://forum.yam.org.tw/bongchhi/old/light/light189-1.htm。  延伸查詢new window
4.Cater, L. S.(2009)。Batterer intervention: Doing the work and measuring the progress-A report on the December 2009 experts roundtable,http://www.futureswithoutviolence.org/userfiles/file/Children_and_Families/Batterer%20Intervention%20Meeting%20Report.pdf。  new window
5.Vernon, M.(2011)。Carl Jung, part 2: A troubled relationship with Freud-and the Nazis: On the 50th anniversary of Jung’s death it is time to put accusations of him collaborating with the Nazis to rest,http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2011/jun/06/carl-jung-freud-nazi。  new window
6.Wong, P. T. P.(2010)。A positive psychology perspective of feminist anti-violence movement,http://www.drpaulwong.com/a-positive-psychology-perspective-of-feminist-anti-violence-movement/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Davis, L. V.(1995)。Domestic violence。Encyclopedia of social work。Washington, DC:NASW Pres。  new window
2.Hazlewood, L.(2007)。Systems consideration in working with court-ordered domestic violence offenders。Family interventions in domestic violence: A handbook of gender-inclusive theory and treatment。New York, NY:Springe。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE