:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:眼見為真--戰後臺灣婦女驗孕史(1945~1990s)
書刊名:女學學誌:婦女與性別研究
作者:吳燕秋
作者(外文):Wu, Yan-chiou
出版日期:2014
卷期:35
頁次:頁1-52
主題關鍵詞:驗孕家用驗孕劑產檢月經規則術墮胎Pregnancy testingHome pregnancy testPrenatal checkupMenstrual regulationAbortion
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:151
  • 點閱點閱:60
本研究擬從婦女的驗孕觀、驗孕技術之發展引進與應用,及技術背後的性別意涵等方面入手,說明戰後婦女如何成為積極的驗孕者,以及家用驗孕劑引進台灣後呈現的性別政治。本文發現戰後婦女的教育程度、生育自主性、產檢意識和消費能力均提升,並與醫普知識的傳播及產檢、驗孕技術之改善等因素交互作用,促成了驗孕觀的改變。戰後到1990年代晚期,婦女多從身體反應確認懷孕。雖然仍有人基於不同理由去醫院診所驗孕,但對打算正常生產、無特殊需求的婦女,驗孕是不必要的選項與家庭支出。1990年代晚期,婦女教育程度提升,益加仰賴衛教書籍和醫學權威,消費能力也提高,對於驗孕的態度已與先前不同。1 0 年代晚期,家用驗孕劑市場日益興盛,其普及使婦女提早進入醫療體系,加速生產的醫療化。在醫師叮嚀和媒體宣傳下,重複檢驗及驗後找醫師確認成為婦女驗孕的金科玉律。檢驗結果中「可見」「客觀」的陽性標記與胚胎影像,成為最具說服力的懷孕依據。過早驗孕也使婦女更早陷入懷孕的焦慮與流產的傷感中。方便婦女使用的家用驗孕劑,並未挑戰傳統性別規範下的使用腳本。社會認可的驗孕者仍以符合婚姻規範、為求傳宗接代的婦女為主,未婚、未成年女性則易被貼上性污名。
This research explores how women became active users of pregnancy tests in Taiwan from 1945 to the 1990s. Women’s attitudes toward pregnancy testing were influenced and changed by many factors, including education, reproductive rights, consumption capacity, popular medical knowledge, and the technologies of prenatal checking and pregnancy testing. In the early period after WWII, most women judged for themselves whether they were pregnant based on bodily changes, without any extra testing. In the late 1 0s, because of their higher educational level and greater consumption capacity, women trusted medical authorities and popular medical books more, and were willing to spend more money on prenatal care. Moreover, the ease and convenience of pregnancy tests and the need for prenatal checkups pushed women to take tests in order to confirm pregnancy early. Since the late 1990s, the market for home pregnancy tests has thrived, and such testing has gotten women into hospitals earlier than ever before. However, women who took tests too early became aware of miscarriages, which often happen early in pregnancy, and were saddened at the pregnancy loss even when it occurred earlier than bodily changes. That is, without the pregnancy tests, they would not have been aware of those pregnancies, and so, would not have been saddened by their termination. Due to not trusting women’s ability to administer the pregnancy test, doctors and the media persuaded women to take tests repeatedly, which resulted in women overspending on pregnancy tests, or visiting doctors afterwards. Instead of pregnancy tests, doctors used screening technologies to see inside the female body, to prove the existence of the fetus convincingly. ‘Seeing is believing’ became the golden rule for women, and thus women’s perception of their bodies lost its former priority role in creating awareness of their pregnancy.
期刊論文
1.池田敏雄(19620600)。臺北市萬華之生育習俗。臺北文獻,1,96-100。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳燕秋(20120600)。避「罪」之道?從月經規則術引進看1970年代臺灣墮胎史。臺灣社會研究,87,103-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李貞德(20131200)。臺灣生理衛生教育中的性、生殖與性別(1945-1968)。近代中國婦女史研究,22,65-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.阮正雄(1997)。恩師徐千田教授與學生的互動。中華民國婦產科醫學會會刊雜誌,9,17。  延伸查詢new window
5.姜濟模(1997)。敬告臺灣醫界朋友。臺灣醫界,40(3),92。  延伸查詢new window
6.柯滄銘(198711)。我懷孕了嗎?簡介三種驗孕方法。嬰兒與母親,133,42-44。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳福民(1997)。臺灣婦產科百年史系列:國防醫學院篇。中華民國婦產科醫學會會訊,12,19-24。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊吉銓(198906)。驗孕懷孕知多少。媽媽寶寶,28,37-39。  延伸查詢new window
9.解光輝、李幸懋(19930900)。快速免疫分析法在驗孕試劑上的應用。生物技術醫藥產業報導,2(4),14-20。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉燦榮(19860500)。利用各種胎盤性腺激素驗孕法原理概述。當代醫學,13(5)=151,33-38。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉志鴻(1990)。與婦產科醫師對談--談懷孕。健康世界,171,39-40。  延伸查詢new window
12.(1948)。New test for pregnancy utilizes common frogs。The Science News-Letter,53(9),135。  new window
13.Bell, J. L.(1969)。Comparative study of immunological tests for pregnancy diagnosis。Journal of Clinical Pathology,22(1),79-83。  new window
14.Browner, C.(1980)。The management of early pregnancy: Colombian folk concepts of fertility control。Social Science and Medicine,14B,25-32。  new window
15.Fortney, Judith A.、Miller, Eva R.、Kessel, Elton(1977)。Competing risks of unnecessary procedures and complications。Studies of Family Planning,8(10),257-262。  new window
16.Garden, N. R.、Miller, H.、Durant, J. A.(1963)。Serological pregnancy test using latex particles: An assessment of its reliability and convenience。The British Medical Journal,2(5355),480-483。  new window
17.Goldsmith, S.(1974)。Early abortion in a family planning clinic。Family Planning Perspectives,6(2),119-122。  new window
18.Hodgson, J. E.(1977)。A reassessment of menstrual regulation。Studies in Family Planning,8(10),264-265。  new window
19.Leavitt, S. A.(2006)。"A private little revolution": The home pregnancy test in American culture。Bulletin of the History of Medicine,80(2),317-345。  new window
20.Martins, S. M.、Howells, B. P.(1951)。Clinical evaluation of the colostrum skin test for pregnancy。Annals of Western Medicine and Surgery,5(6),558-560。  new window
21.梅生(19511200)。六十分鐘的懷孕試驗。衛生雜誌,3(10)=34,11。  延伸查詢new window
22.Tone, A.(2012)。Medicalizing reproduction: The pill and home pregnancy tests。Journal of Sex Research,49(4),319-327。  new window
23.吳嘉苓(20000700)。醫療專業、性別與國家:臺灣助產士興衰的社會學分析。臺灣社會學研究,4,191-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.游鑑明(19930600)。日據時期臺灣的產婆。近代中國婦女史研究,1,49-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.王秀雲(20091200)。太太醫學:臺灣婦女醫學寶鑑(1950s~2000s)初探。臺灣社會研究季刊,76,119-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Hsiung, P.(1994)。More or less: Culture and medical factors behind marital fertility in late imperial China。The IUSSP/IRCJS Workshop on Abortion, Infanticide and Neglect in Population History: Japan in Asian Comparative Perspective,(會議日期: 1994/10/20-10/21)。Kyoto, Japan。  new window
學位論文
1.陳家萱(2007)。不再「傻傻的」孕婦:戰後以來台灣產前檢查醫療化的發展與影響(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.王映媚(2008)。影像的故事:懷孕婦女經歷婦產科超音波的經驗與性別意涵(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳燕秋(2009)。「拿掉」與「毋生」(m-sinn)--戰後台灣婦女墮胎史(1945-1984)(博士論文)。國立清華大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.高玉馨(2010)。從使用者角度看醫用超音波及其影像在臺灣婦產科的發展(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.葉仰哲(1999)。由普司通案分析我國專利制度之法律課題(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.北京市中醫學校(1980)。醫宗金鑑婦科心法要訣白話解。北京:人民衛生出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳謙(1981)。醫宗金鑒。臺北:新文豐。  延伸查詢new window
3.李棟明(1995)。臺灣地區早期家庭計畫發展誌詳。臺北:臺灣省家庭計畫研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃思誠(2005)。臺灣婦產科的舵手--魏炳炎。臺北:臺大婦產科同門會。  延伸查詢new window
5.秋葉豊一。正規妊娠分娩及び產褥。  延伸查詢new window
6.Baillargeon, D.(2004)。Un Québec en mal d'enfants. La médicalisation de la maternité, 1910-1970。Montréal:Éditions du remue-ménage。  new window
7.Wilson, W. D.(2009)。Babies for the nation: The medicalization of motherhood in Quebec, 1910-1970。Waterloo:Wilfrid Laurier University Press。  new window
8.Guharaj, P. V.(2003)。Forensic medicine。Hyderabad:Orient Longman Pvt. Limited。  new window
9.Kevles, Bettyann Holtzmann(1997)。Naked to the bone: Medical imaging in the twentieth century。New Brunswick:Rutgers University Press。  new window
10.楊玉齡(2000)。露骨:X射線檔案。臺北:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
11.Moscucci, O.(1990)。The science of women: Gynecology and gender in England 1800-1929。Cambridge:New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.傅大為(20050000)。亞細亞的新身體:性別、醫療與近代臺灣。臺北:群學。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Wu, Yi-li(2010)。Reproducing women: Medicine, metaphor, and childbirth in late imperial China。Oakland:Berkeley:University of California Press:University of California Press。  new window
14.陳庵君、林秀禎(2004)。台灣婦產科的播種者--陳庵君回憶錄。台北:望春風文化。  延伸查詢new window
15.李貞德(20080000)。女人的中國醫療史:漢唐之間的健康照顧與性別。臺北:三民。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.周凱(1961)。廈門志。臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Anne(20100118)。傳統禁忌/懷孕不想說。  延伸查詢new window
2.Samue, Little(20061028)。小澤元年大事紀之一出生,http://blog.roodo.com/samuel0826/archives/2377850.html, 2014/04/17。  new window
3.丁萬鳴(19970219)。驗孕卡仿冒爭議,波及政府機關。  延伸查詢new window
4.于模珉(19901019)。驗孕,自己來。  延伸查詢new window
5.元慶(19630730)。最新驗孕器--能在半小時內驗出妳是否已經懷孕?。  延伸查詢new window
6.(19790411)。榮總發現驗孕新法。  延伸查詢new window
7.(19850702)。三大醫院將引進最新驗孕法受孕五天即可測知。  延伸查詢new window
8.(19681013)。判定早期懷孕免費贈送藥品。  延伸查詢new window
9.(19681109)。檢驗懷孕免費贈藥。  延伸查詢new window
10.(19840625)。婦女驗孕方法更新排卵十天即可知曉旅加學人李吉祐引進研究成果可在家中自行測量經濟又方便。  延伸查詢new window
11.(19780713)。催經針就是安胎針對堕胎根本沒作用。  延伸查詢new window
12.(19851225)。月經過期原因多催經不能治根本。  延伸查詢new window
13.(19550316)。醫師誤人子嗣竟將胎兒當作瘤醫醫師說道理待法官明斷。  延伸查詢new window
14.(19550505)。鄭萬鐘見色起淫心乘機強姦房東少女珠胎暗結老母詢問始知隱情同姓不婚將是一場糊塗官司。  延伸查詢new window
15.江妙瑩(19930801)。驗孕卡,受孕婦女福音只要滴尿液在藥劑上馬上可之懷孕與否。  延伸查詢new window
16.李元慶(19551228)。最新驗孕法。  延伸查詢new window
17.(19600819)。測定驗孕新法。  延伸查詢new window
18.林靜靜(19910802)。在家驗孕,不必等一個月驗孕劑越來越靈敏,新產品在經期未到前即可測知。  延伸查詢new window
19.柯滄銘(19870820)。盡早得知「喜訊」。  延伸查詢new window
20.(200805)。南臺灣第一個合格醫檢師吳義男,http://kcginfo.kcg.gov.tw/Publish--Content.aspx?n=3D7C9BFC4F86BF4A&sms=FB76FlE6517A12DC&s=6BCC09E897B9677E&chapt=l131&sort=l, 2015/03/03。  new window
21.張文(19990816)。天天都是墮胎日放縱青春Y世代。  延伸查詢new window
22.許正雄(19900907)。胡天胡地自稱皇帝轉世假藉一貫道名義亂搞。  延伸查詢new window
23.商工日報(19550708)。少婦有喜懶梳粧庸醫誤人亂打針胎兒無辜天折腹中被控過失吃了官司。  延伸查詢new window
24.郭姿均(19990830)。不孕婦求子每月挨10針標會賣房子。  延伸查詢new window
25.陳昭雯(19970419)。也是品管會流的,怎麼安也留不住。  延伸查詢new window
26.陳能瑾(19880504)。催經針懷孕堕胎注射徒勞無功。  延伸查詢new window
27.傅伯寧(19900117)。小心使用驗孕試劑。  延伸查詢new window
28.華英惠,丁萬鳴(19970715)。廠商指美企圖獨吞我試劑市場仿冒試劑業者反控標準局認定「舉發不成立」經部要求重審。  延伸查詢new window
29.黃瑜琪(20001003)。白冰冰再借種苦熬孕味盼光輝10月有喜訊。  延伸查詢new window
30.(19681109)。美贈驗孕藥,免收成本費。  延伸查詢new window
31.(19851012)。抗體懷孕試劑藥商引進行銷。  延伸查詢new window
32.楊力明(19860704)。神明說我有身了。  延伸查詢new window
33.賈秀(19650606)。皮膚驗孕法。  延伸查詢new window
34.漁陽(19890917)。驗孕,自己來!?。  延伸查詢new window
35.蔡鋒博(19990707)。RU486將使九月墮胎潮複雜化。  延伸查詢new window
36.鄭毅(20000224)。情人節效應驗孕劑大賣。  延伸查詢new window
37.曉蓮(19810806)。流產記。  延伸查詢new window
38.(19520522)。德生婦產科醫院廣告。  延伸查詢new window
39.(19571023)。肚皮起伏官司停歇虛虛實實吵吵鬧閙。  延伸查詢new window
40.(19670330)。只要一滴滴便知肚子裏臺大採免疫學驗孕法三分鐘可知有喜沒喜。  延伸查詢new window
41.(19681230)。驗孕新法用唾液判別。  延伸查詢new window
42.蘇峰毅(20100409)。蘇小妞成長日記:確認懷孕篇,http://blog.xuite.net/parfUm2/twblog/107551150, 2015/03/02。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Layne, L. L.(2010)。Why the home pregnancy test isn't the feminist technology it's cracked up to be and how to make it better。Feminist technology。Urbana:Chicago:Springfield:University of Illinois Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE