:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:競選期間選民對候選人評價的變化:以2012年臺灣總統選舉為例
書刊名:選舉研究
作者:蕭怡靖 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsiao, Yi-ching
出版日期:2017
卷期:24:2
頁次:頁1-38
主題關鍵詞:政治競選候選人評價政黨認同Political campaignCandidate evaluationParty identification
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:195
  • 點閱點閱:42
期刊論文
1.蕭怡靖(20090500)。「臺灣選舉與民主化調查」之政黨認同測量的探討。選舉研究,16(1),67-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Abramowitz, Alan I.、Saunders, Kyle L.(2008)。Is Polarization a Myth?。The Journal of Politics,70(2),542-555。  new window
3.陳文學、羅清俊(20120900)。影響臺灣民眾重分配政策偏好的因素。人文及社會科學集刊,24(3),367-397。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.劉正山(20091100)。2008年總統大選競選期間政黨支持者選擇性接觸媒體傾向的分析。選舉研究,16(2),51-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭夙芬(20140300)。候選人因素與投票抉擇--以2012年臺灣總統選舉為例。臺灣民主季刊,11(1),103-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Johnston, Richard、Brady, Henry E.(2002)。The Rolling Cross-section Design。Electoral Studies,21(2),283-295。  new window
7.黃秀端(20051200)。候選人形象、候選人情感溫度計、與總統選民投票行為。臺灣民主季刊,2(4),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Page, Benjamin I.、Jones, Calvin C.(1979)。Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote。American Political Science Review,73(4),1071-1089。  new window
9.Peterson, Dane K.、Pitz, Gordon F.(1988)。Confidence, Uncertainty, and the Use of Information。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,14(1),85-92。  new window
10.張傳賢(20141100)。利己或利他:民眾於2012年總統選舉中重分配議題的立場。選舉研究,21(2),43-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.莊文忠、徐明莉、黃東益、李仲彬(20170400)。政黨認同如何影響民衆對政府清廉的評價。東吳政治學報,35(1),93-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.盛杏湲(20101100)。臺灣選民政黨認同的穩定與變遷:定群追蹤資料的應用。選舉研究,17(2),1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.湯晏甄、蔡宗漢、張傳賢(20170600)。政黨認同對於政治知識的動機性推理影響。臺灣政治學刊,21(1),157-217。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Alford, John R.、Hatemi, Peter K.、Hibbing, John R.、Martin, Nicholas G.、Eaves, Lindon J.(2011)。The Politics of Mate Choice。Journal of Politics,73(2),362-379。  new window
15.Arceneaux, Kevin(2006)。Do Campaigns Help Voters Learn? A Cross-National Analysis。British Journal of Political Science,36(1),159-173。  new window
16.Andersen, Robert、Tilley, James、Heath, Anthony F.(2005)。Political Knowledge and Enlightened Preference: Party Choice through the Electoral Cycle。British Journal of Political Science,35(2),285-302。  new window
17.Andersen, Robert(2003)。Do Newspapers Enlighten Preferences? Personal Ideology, Party Choice, and the Electoral Cycle: The United Kingdom, 1992-1997。Canadian Journal of Political Science,36(3),601-619。  new window
18.Enns, Peter K.、Richman, Brian(2013)。Presidential Campaigns and the Fundamentals Reconsidered。The Journal of Politics,75(3),803-820。  new window
19.Claassen, Ryan L.(2011)。Political Awareness and Electoral Campaigns: Maximum Effects for Minimum Citizens?。Political Behavior,33(2),203-223。  new window
20.Hillygus, D. Sunshine、Jackman, Simon(2003)。Voter Decision Making in Election 2000: Campaign Effects, Partisan Activation, and the Clinton Legacy。American Journal of Political Science,47(4),583-596。  new window
21.Grant, J. Tobin、Mockabee, Stephen T.、Monson, J. Quin(2010)。Campaign Effects on the Accessibility of Party Identification。Political Research Quarterly,63(4),811-821。  new window
22.Gelman, Andrew、King, Gary(1993)。Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?。British Journal of Political Science,23(4),409-451。  new window
23.Iyengar, Shanto、Sood, Gaurav、Lelkes, Yphtach(2012)。Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization。The Public Opinion Quarterly,76(3),405-431。  new window
24.Iyengar, Shanto、Westwood, Sean J.(2015)。Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization。American Journal of Political Science,59(3),690-707。  new window
25.Mendelsohn, Matthew(1996)。The Media and Interpersonal Communications: The Priming of Issues, Leader, and Party Identification。Journal of Politics,58(1),112-125。  new window
26.McGhee, Eric、Sides, John(2011)。Do Campaigns Drive Partisan Turnout。Political Behavior,33(2),313-333。  new window
27.Lenz, Gabriel S.(2009)。Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis。American Journal of Political Science,53(4),821-837。  new window
28.Yu, Eric Chen-hua、Huang, Chi、Hsiao, Yi-ching(2015)。Who Wants Checks and Balances? Endogeneity of the Balancing Perspective。Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research,2(3),196-227。  new window
29.王嵩音(20061200)。網路使用與選舉參與之研究--以2004年立法委員選舉為例。臺灣民主季刊,3(4),71-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.翁秀琪、孫秀蕙(19941100)。選民的媒介使用行為及其政治知識、政黨偏好與投票行為之間的關聯--兼論臺灣媒體壟斷對政治認知與行為之影響。選舉研究,1(2),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.孫秀蕙(19950500)。比較臺灣省選民傳統媒體與新媒體的使用對政治行為的影響--以民國83年臺灣省長選舉為例。選舉研究,2(1),93-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.盛治仁(20001100)。總統選舉預測探討--以情感溫度計預測未表態選民的應用。選舉研究,7(2),75-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.鄭夙芬、陳陸輝、劉嘉薇(20050600)。2004年總統選舉中的候選人因素。臺灣民主季刊,2(2),31-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.吳親恩、林奕孜(20121100)。經濟投票與總統選舉:效度與內生問題的分析。臺灣政治學刊,16(2),175-232。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Brambor, Thomas、Clark, William Roberts、Golder, Matt(2006)。Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses。Political Analysis,14(1),63-82。  new window
36.彭芸(20000500)。2000年總統大選的媒介使用、選舉參與及投票對象。選舉研究,7(1),21-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.張傳賢(20121100)。政黨認同、負面資訊的競爭與選民投票抉擇:2010年五都選舉的實證研究。選舉研究,19(2),37-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.莊淑媚、洪永泰(20111100)。特定政黨不認同:臺灣地區民意調查中關於政黨認同的新測量工具。選舉研究,18(2),1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Yu, Eric Chen-hua(2008)。Dynamic of Partisanship, National Identity, and Issue Cleavages in the DPP Era。The Conference on Democratic Consolidation in Taiwan。  new window
研究報告
1.朱雲漢(2012)。2009年至2012年「選舉與民主化調查」三年期研究規劃(3/3):2012年總統與立法委員選舉面訪案(TEDS2012) (計畫編號:NSC 100-2420-H-002-030)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃紀(2011)。因果推論:分析方法之探討及其對混合選制中「污染效果」之應用研究 (計畫編號:NSC 99-2410-H-004-036-MY3)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃紀(2012)。2009年至2012年「台灣選舉與民主化調查」三年期研究規劃(3/3):民國101年總統與立法委員選舉電訪案(TEDS2012-T) (計畫編號:NSC 100-2420-H-002-030)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.游清鑫(2011)。臺灣民眾立法委員新選舉制度知識之研究 (計畫編號:NSC 100-2410-H-004-090-MY2)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lewis-Beck, Michael S.、Jacoby, William G.、Norpoth, Helmut、Weisberg, Herbert F.(2008)。The American Voter Revisited。Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press。  new window
2.Downs, Anthony(1957)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。Harper & Brothers。  new window
3.Dalton, Russell J.、Wattenberg, Martin P.(2002)。Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Miller, Warren E.、Shanks, J. Merrill(1996)。The New American Voter。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Lazarsfeld, Paul F.、Berelson, Bernard、Gaudet, Hazel(1944)。The People's Choice。Columbia University Press。  new window
6.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.Huber, Gregory,Malhotra, Neil(2012)。Political Sorting in Social Relationships: Evidence from an Online Dating Community,https://huber.research.yale.edu/materials/38_paper.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Abramowitz, Alan I.(2011)。The 2008 Election: Polarization Continues。Controversies in Voting Behavior。CQ Press。  new window
2.Hetherington, Marc J.(2011)。Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization (Updated)。Controversies in Voting Behavior。Washington, DC:CQ Press。  new window
3.Kimball, David C.、Gross, Cassie A.(2007)。The Growing Polarization of American Voters。The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties。Rowman & Littlefield。  new window
4.Niemi, Richard G.、Weisberg, Herbert F.(1993)。How Meaningful Is Party Identification?。Classics in Voting Behavior。Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly Inc.。  new window
5.Popkin, Samuel L.(1995)。Information Shortcuts and the Reasoning Voter。Information, Participation, and Choice: An Economic Theory of Democracy in Perspective。University of Michigan Press。  new window
6.Brady, Henry E.、Johnston, Richard(2006)。The Rolling Cross-Section and Causal Attribution。Capturing Campaign Effects。Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press。  new window
7.Kenski, Kate(2006)。Research Design Concepts for Understanding the Rolling Cross-Section Approach。Capturing Campaign Dynamics: The National Annenberg Election Survey。Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press。  new window
8.Jamieson, Kathleen H.、Kenski, Kate(2006)。Why the National Annenberg Election Study?。Capturing Campaign Dynamics: The National Annenberg Election Survey。Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press。  new window
9.Lachat, Romain、Sciarini, Pascal(2002)。When Do Election Campaigns Matter, and to Whom? Results from the 1999 Swiss Election Panel Study。Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums。New York:Routledge Press。  new window
10.Kotler, Philip、Kotler, Neil(1999)。Political Marketing: Generating Effective Candidates, Campaigns, and Causes。Handbook of Political Marketing。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
11.Kenski, Kate(2006)。Visualizing Data across the Campaign。Capturing Campaign Dynamics: The National Annenberg Election Survey。Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press。  new window
12.Kenski, Kate(2006)。The Rolling Cross-Section Design。Capturing Campaign Dynamics: The National Annenberg Election Survey。Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press。  new window
13.Niemi, Richard G.、Weisberg, Herbert F.(1993)。What Determines the Voter?。Controversies in Voting Behavior。Washington, DC:A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc.。  new window
14.Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger、Farrell, David M.(2002)。Studying Political Campaigns and Their Effects。Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums。New York:Routledge Press。  new window
15.Ruostetsaari, Ilkka、Mattila, Mikko(2002)。Candidate-Centred Campaigns and Their Effects in an Open List System: The Case of Finland。Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums。New York:Routledge Press。  new window
16.Romer, Daniel(2006)。Linear and Logistic Regression Models for Cross-Sectional Analysis。Capturing Campaign Dynamics: The National Annenberg Election Survey。Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press。  new window
17.Popescu, Marina、Tóka, Gábor(2002)。Campaign Effects and Media Monopoly: The 1994 and 1998 Parliamentary Elections in Hungary。Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums。New York:Routledge Press。  new window
18.Yu, Ching-hsin(2017)。Parties, Partisans, and Independents in Taiwan?。The Taiwan Voter。Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press。  new window
19.Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger、Farrell, David M.(2002)。Do Political Campaign Matter? Yes, But It Depends。Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums。New York:Routledge Press。  new window
20.Tajfel, Henri、Turner, John C.(1986)。The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior。Psychology of Intergroup Relations。Nelson-Hall。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE