In this article, my discussion of the concept of "folklore" is based on its legal usage in the intangible cultural heritage categories of the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act in Taiwan. I explore the relations between folklore and nation-state, through the dialogue effectuated by the measures taken by UNESCO in the 1970s and the inception of Taiwan's Cultural Heritage Preservation Act and examine the relevance and limitation of the legal term "folklore." The case studied in this article is the Amis Music Festival, organized by the 'Atolan Amis age groups. I discuss how the Amis people take opportunity of the cultural revival and traditional territory-reclaiming movements to promote the regular participation of public affairs by the age groups during non-festivity periods. In collaboration with the musical management company to stage the music festival, the age groups organize and promote the performances, design and construct the site of event, through which they exhibit the agency of creativity of 'Atolan Amis and become the medium with which the tribe communicates with the external society. I then conduct a dialogue with the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act. I argue that terms like "protection" and "preservation" in the legal system, restrain the development of the indigenous communities' cultural rights and sovereignty. I also demonstrate how the 'Atolan Amis employ the music festival to build a system that safeguards their cultural heritage.