:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:居家托育服務中心關鍵評量指標與服務品質提升之研究
書刊名:幼兒教保研究期刊
作者:葉郁菁黃秋華 引用關係
作者(外文):Yeh, Yu-chingHuang, Chiu-hua
出版日期:2018
卷期:20
頁次:頁33-57
主題關鍵詞:居家托育服務品質管理評量指標績效評估Family childcare servicesQuality managementEvaluation indicatorsPerformance evaluation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:85
  • 點閱點閱:10
本研究以2017 年衛生福利部社會及家庭署對全國63家居家托育服務中心的評鑑結果為資料,分析影響評鑑分數的關鍵評量指標,以及承接單位屬性、城鄉差異、和專業人員穩定度與評鑑分數的相關與差異。研究結果發現,影響評鑑的關鍵評量指標,行政管理項目包含:補助經費執行率、落實並維護個人資料安全、專職人員人事穩定、督導機制確實落實、專職人員進修研習、建立申訴管道與妥適的處理。專業服務項目包含:訪視輔導員依照規定訪視輔導並確認托育環境安全、危機或特殊個案輔導及處遇、訪視輔導員具備兒童保護專業知能並能覺察和評估危機個案、托育人員家訪和例訪等相關紀錄完整並完成批閱、多元化宣導模式與管道、確實落實執行媒合機制,檢討原因並提出改善機制。研究結果也發現,承接居家托育服務中心的母機構不論是全國性財團法人、地方性社團或大專校院,其評鑑成績並無差異;且居家托育服務中心所在區域為都會地區或偏鄉地區,均不會造成評鑑成績有落差。最後,影響居家托育服務品質的重要關鍵為專職人員的穩定度,對評鑑結果有顯著的影響。
The aims of this study is to explore the key performance indicators of the family childcare service agencies based upon 63 assessment results of the childcare services agencies in 2017. Also this study indicated the correlations between the assessment scores and the following independent factors including the stability of professional staffs, locations of the agencies, and the institutional characteristics. The results showed that the key performance indicators including: the practicing rate of funding, security of personal data, stability of professional staffs, inspections system, in-service training of the staffs, appealing system and treatment of argument cases, the inspectors visited the childcare minders in a regular base and made sure the safety of childcare environment, treatment of emergent cases or children with special needs, the inspectors were equipped with child protecting professional knowledge and evaluated the necessary actions taken to assist the high-risk cases, the inspectors filled in the records, multiple advocating models, proper match between childcare minders and the parents, continuing performance management to resolve the problems. Another important finding was that the assessment scores were not correlated with the institutional characteristics or their locations. However, the stability of professional staffs achieved significantly related with the assessment results.
期刊論文
1.Dowsett, C. J.、Huston, A. C.、Imes, A. E.、Gennetian, L.(2008)。Structural and process features in three types of child care for children from high and low income families。Early Childhood Research Quarterly,23(1),69-93。  new window
2.蔡延治(19980500)。保母技術士檢定簡介。就業與訓練,16(3),21-24。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kano, N.(1993)。A Perspective on Quality Activities in American Firms。California Management Review,35(3),12-31。  new window
4.Early, D. M.、Bryant, D. M.、Pianta, R. C.、Clifford, R. M.、Burchinal, M. R.、Ritchie, S.(2006)。Are teachers' education, major, and credentials related to classroom quality and children's academic gains in pre-kindergarten?。Early Childhood Research Quarterly,21(2),174-195。  new window
5.吳清山、林天祐(19941200)。全面品質管理及其在教育上的應用。初等教育學刊,3,1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Li-Grining, C. P.、Coley, R. L.(2006)。Child care experiences in low-income communities: Developmental quality and maternal views。Early Childhood Research Quarterly,21,125-141。  new window
7.段慧瑩(20110100)。居家式托育品質評估工具及其相關研究探討。輔仁社會研究,1,209-241。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.蕭奕志、陳漢陽(20041200)。全面品質管理在提昇學校品質之應用策略。中華技術學院學報,31,29-37。  延伸查詢new window
9.Bassok, D.、Fitzpatrick, M.、Greenberg, E.、Loeb, S.(2016)。Within-and between-sector quality differences in early childhood education。Child Development,87(5),1627-1645。  new window
10.Huber, L. K.(2003)。Knowing Children and Building Relationships with Families: A Strategy for Improving Conferences。Early Childhood Education Journal,31,75-77。  new window
11.Ma, X.、Shen, J.、Kavanaugh, A.、Lu, X.、Brandi, K.、Goodman, J.、Till, L.、Watson, G.(2011)。Effects of quality improvement system for child care centers。Journal of Research in Childhood Education,25,399-414。  new window
12.Pianta, R. C.(2007)。Preschool is school, sometimes。Education Next,7(1),44-49。  new window
13.Weiland, C.(2016)。Launching Preschool 2.0: A road map to high-quality public programs at scale。Behavioral Science & Policy,2(1),37-46。  new window
14.王淑英、孫嫚薇(20031200)。托育照顧政策中的國家角色。國家政策季刊,2(4),147-174。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.傅仰止、章英華、杜素豪、廖培珊(2016)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫:第七期第一次調查計畫執行報告 (計畫編號:MOST 104-2420-H-001-005-SS3)。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.戴智啟(2007)。行政機關國會聯絡人工作績效評估指標建構之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.李慧娟(1989)。家庭保母訓練方案之評估研究--以臺北家庭扶助中心鄰里托兒服務方案為例(碩士論文)。中國文化大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.社會及家庭署(2014)。居家式托育服務登記制度常見問答集,https://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/Pages/VDetail.aspx?nodeid=516&pid=3233。  延伸查詢new window
2.National Center on Child Care Quality Improvement(2015)。QRIS standards, levels, and rating systems,https://qrisguide.acf.hhs.gov/files/QRIS_Levels_Rating.pdf。  new window
3.Zaslow, M.,Tout, K.(2014)。Reviewing and Clarifying Goals, Outcomes and levels of implementation: Toward the Next Generation of Quality Rating and Improvement Systems(QRIS),Washington, DC:Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation:Administration for Children and Families:U.S. Department of Health and Human Services。,https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/qris_conceptual_framework.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bassok, D.、Loeb, S.(2015)。Early childhood and the achievement gap。Handbook of research in education finance and policy。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE