:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:閱讀理解成長測驗之編製研究
書刊名:教育心理學報
作者:蘇宜芬 引用關係洪儷瑜 引用關係陳柏熹 引用關係陳心怡
作者(外文):Su, Yi-fenHung, Li-yuChen, Po-hsiChen, Hsin-yi
出版日期:2018
卷期:49:4
頁次:頁557-580
主題關鍵詞:成長曲線能力值國小學生複本測驗閱讀理解Ability valueElementary school studentsEquivalent testGrowth curveReading comprehension
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:89
  • 點閱點閱:178
本研究主要目的為編製適用於小學四、五、六年級學生的多複本閱讀理解測驗,提供一套可瞭解閱讀理解能力發展情形的工具,也可用於閱讀低成就學生的補救教學成效評估,作為介入反應之決定。題目型式為測量文章理解的題組。每套複本都有四個題組,每個題組都有一篇文章及10個閱讀理解題目。四個題組的文章分別是短記敘文、短說明文、長記敘文、長說明文。40道題目中有兩題是不計分的,主要用以確認受試者是否認真作答。每個題組中的題目所測量的閱讀理解成份為字彙觸接、字面理解、摘取大意、及推論理解。在信度考驗方面,四、五、六年級每個複本的Cronbach's α信度及折半信度多 .8以上。在效度方面,以「國民小學閱讀理解篩選測驗版本A」為效標,所測得的效標關聯效度介於 .59~.75之間。本測驗除了提供百分等級常模外,也提供能力值轉換常模,以便於繪出學生的閱讀理解能力成長曲線及計算成長係數。本研究也對於教育應用上的建議與限制提供說明。
The purpose of this study was to develop a set of equivalent tests for reading comprehension progress monitoring for grades four to six. The reading comprehension equivalent tests can also be used as tools for evaluating instructional effects of remedial intervention. In this test, there were six alternate-forms for each grade. Four testlets were included in each alternate-form. Each testlet had one passage and ten test items. The four passages in one alternate-form included one short narrative, one short expository, one long narrative, and one long expository texts. There were 200-300 characters in short passages, and 400-500 characters in long passages. The test items were designed to measure lexical access, literal comprehension, summarization, and inferential comprehension. There were forty items in total in one alternate-form. Regarding reliability, the Cronbach's α coefficients and split-half coefficients of all alternate-forms were mostly above .80. Using "Reading Comprehension Screening Test for Elementary School Students-Version A" as criterion, the criterion validity coefficient were .67 (p < .001), .59 (p < .001), .75 (p < .001) for grades 4, 5, and 6 respectively. In addition, based on the data collected from six time-points in 2011 school year, the growth model analysis revealed that the reading comprehension abilities of the fourth, fifth, and sixth graders increased from the beginning to the end in one school year. In order for teachers to monitor students' progress, this test provided not only the norm of percentile rank, but also the norm of ability value (theta score). Using the ability values between two time-points, a growth coefficient could be calculated. Several suggestions and one limitation for educational application were provided.
期刊論文
1.van den Broek, P.、Fletcher, C. T.、Risden, K.(1993)。Investigations of inference processes in reading: A theoretical and methodological integration。Discourse Processes,16,169-180。  new window
2.Kintsch, W.(1993)。Information accretion and reduction in text processes: inference。Discourse Processes,16,193-202。  new window
3.林寶貴、錡寶香(20000900)。中文閱讀理解測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊,19,79-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.柯華葳(19990700)。閱讀理解困難篩選測驗。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,46(2),1-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Keenan, J. M.、Betjemann, R. S.、Olson, R. K.(2008)。Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension。Scientific Studies of Reading,12(3),281-300。  new window
6.Kameenui, E.、Fuchs, L.、Francis, D.、Good, R. III、OConnor, R.、Simmons, D.、Tindal, G.、Torgesen, J.(2006)。The adequacy of tool for assessing reading competence: A framework and review。Educational Researcher,35(4),4-10。  new window
7.Magliano, J. P.、Graesser, A. C.(1991)。A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text。Poetics,20,193-232。  new window
8.Trabasso, T.、Suh, S.(1993)。Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inference and mental operations in working memory。Discourse Processes,16,3-34。  new window
9.Embretson, S. E.(1991)。A multidimensional latent trait model for measuring learning and change。Psychometrika,56(3),495-515。  new window
10.Hu, Li-tze、Bentler, Peter M.(1999)。Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,6(1),1-55。  new window
會議論文
1.張雅如、蘇宜芬(2003)。國小學童推論理解測驗之編製與研究。中國心理學會第四十二屆年會,輔仁大學心理系主辦 。台北:輔仁大學心理學系。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.柯華葳、詹益綾(2006)。國民小學(二至六年級)閱讀理解篩選測驗。教育部特殊教育小組。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bloom, B.、Englehart, M.、Furst, E.、Hill, W.、Krathwohl, D.(1956)。Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain。Longmans。  new window
3.Snow, Catherine E.、Burns, M. S.、Griffin, P.(1999)。Starting out right: A guide to promoting children's reading success。DC:National Academies Press。  new window
4.Chall, Jeanne S.(1996)。Stages of reading development。Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers。  new window
5.洪儷瑜、陳心怡、陳柏熹、陳秀芬(2014)。詞彙成長測驗指導手冊。臺北:中國行為科學。  延伸查詢new window
6.Taylor, B.、Harris, L. A.、Pearson, P. D.、Garcia, G.(1995)。Reading difficulties: Instruction and assessment。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
7.Pressley, M.、Afflerbach, P.(1995)。Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
8.王木榮、董宜俐(2006)。國民小學閱讀理解測驗。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
9.柯華葳、詹益綾(2006)。國民中學閱讀推理測驗。臺北:教育部特殊教育小組。  延伸查詢new window
10.Gagné, Ellen D.(1985)。The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning。Little, Brown and Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE