中文部分
王瓊珠（1992）。國小六年級閱讀障礙兒童與普通兒童閱讀認知能力之比較研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所，台北市。
李玉貴（1998）。國小學童線上閱讀故事體文章之推論類別分析研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所，台北市。
李曉娟（2007）。眼動方法在心理學研究中的現狀及其趨勢[Current Status and Trends in the Analysis of Eye Movements in Psychological Research]。山西大同大學學報（自然科學版）， 23（2），頁 69-71。
李慧慧（2006）。國小閱讀理解困難學生先備知識、詞彙量、工作記憶、推論能力與閱讀理解之關係。國立臺南大學特殊教育學系碩士班，台南市。
林宜真（1998）。閱讀障礙學生與普通學生閱讀理解方式之比較研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系，彰化縣。
林慧芳（2002）。國小六年級低閱讀能力學生工作記憶與推論能力之研究。彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所，彰化縣。
林慧芳（2008）。以“建構論”與“最小量論”試探不同工作記憶廣度學生閱讀推論歷程之表現[The On-Line Inference Processes of the Differences in Working Memory in Students for Constructivism and Minimalism]。新竹教育大學教育學報， 25（2），頁95-128。
邱美秀、林清山（1997）。高中生閱讀兩難故事的工作記憶因果推論歷程研究[Processes of Causal Inferences in Working Memory for Senior High School Students in Reading Dilemma Narratives]。教育心理學報（29），頁259-276。柯華葳（1999）。閱讀理解困難篩選測驗。中國測驗學會測驗年刊， 46（2），頁 1-11。洪蘭（2009）。科學教養與學習。台北：信誼基金會。
范沛瀅（2004）。運用放聲思考法比較國小五年級閱讀理解困難學生與一般學生之推論能力。國立台北師範學院特殊教育學系碩士班，台北市。
翁嘉智（2008）。國小高、低閱讀理解能力學童閱讀理解能力與閱讀理解策略之比較研究。雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士班，雲林縣。
陳明蕾（2003）。文章的因果架構對不同年齡成人讀者理解表徵影響之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所。陳榮華、陳心怡（2007）。101魏氏兒童智力量表第四版。台北市：中國行為科學社。
陸莉、劉鴻香（1994）。修訂畢保德圖畫詞彙測驗。台北市：心理出版社。
曾玉村（2007）。Memory for Narrative Texts: How Do Parts of the Landscape Model Work[故事體文章的記憶研究：景觀模式的運作機制]。中華心理學刊， 49（3），頁 245-269。
曾玉村（2009， June 20）。中文閱讀理解研究文獻回顧與未來研究議題。於「台灣閱讀研究回顧與展望」發表之論文，載於中文閱讀理解研究文獻回顧與未來研究議題。 高雄。
曾守錘、吳華清（2004）。學習不良兒童的工作記憶[Working Memory in Children with Learning Disabilities]。心理科學進展， 12（3），頁 355-362。
程祥微、田小琳（1992）。現代漢語。台北市：書林。
黃秀霜（2006）。中文年級認字量表一指導手冊。台北市：心理出版社。
黃秋華（2011）。兒童代名詞推論的發展研究。國立成功大學教育研究所，台南市。蔡瓊賢（2011）。幼兒園教師早期閱讀教學經驗之探究。中正教育研究， 10（2），頁 141-180。賴孟龍、陳彥樺（2012）。以眼動方法探究幼兒閱讀繪本時的注意力偏好[Examining Preschoolers' Attention during Storybook Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements]。幼兒教保研究（8），頁80-95。蘇宜芬 （2004）。閱讀理解的影響因素及其在教學上的意義。教師天地， 129，頁 21-28。
英文部分
Allen, S. E. M. (2000). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child. Linguistics, 38, 483-521.
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2004). Now you see it, now you don’t : Mediating the mapping between language and the visual world. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 347–386). New York: Psychology Press.
Ariel, M. (1991). The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 443–463.
Arnold, J. E., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2007). Children's use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 527-565.
Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 76(1), B13-B26.
Arnold, J. E., & Lao, S. C. (2007). The role of attention during pronoun comprehension. Paper presented at the the 48th Annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Long Beach.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bowyer-Crane, Claudine, & Snowling, Margaret J. (2005). Assessing Children's Inference Generation: What Do Tests Of Reading Comprehension Measure? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 189.
Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193-209.
Brennan, S. (1995). Centering attention in discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 137–167.
Cain, K, & Oakhill, J. (2003). Reading comprehension difficulties. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of Children's Literacy (pp. 313-338). Dordrecht London: Kluwer Academic.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making and its relation to comprehension failure. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 489–503.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Bryant, P. E. (2000). Investigating the causes of reading comprehension failure: The comprehension-age match design. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 31-40.
Cain, Kate, Oakhill, Jane, & Bryant, Peter. (2004). Children's Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31.
Casteel, M. A., & Simpson, G. B. (1991). Textual coherence and the development of inferential generation skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 14, 116-129.
Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E, Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 331–361.
Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Cloitre, M., & Bever, T.G. (1988). Linguistic anaphors, levels of representation, and discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3(4), 293–322.
Cooper, R. M. . (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84–107.
Evans, M. A., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2005). What children are looking at during shared storybook reading : Evidence from eye movement monitoring. Psychological Science, 16(11), 913-920.
Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins ColIege Publishers.
Garnham, A. (2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Garrod, S., & Sanford, A. (1988). Thematic subjecthood and cognitive constrains on discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 519–534.
Gathercole, S. E., Alloway, T. P., Willis, C., & Adams, A. M. (2006). Working memory in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93(3), 265-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.08.003
Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 430–445.
Givon, T. (1983). Introduction. In T. Givon (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.
Givon, T.(1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 30, 5-55.
Gomme, N. J., & Johnson, C. E. (1997). Pronominal reference in 3-years-olds’ narratives. In E. V. Clark (Ed.), The Proceeding of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 123-132). CSLI: Stanford.
Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 311-347.
Gordon, P. C., & Hendrick, R. (1997). Intuitive knowledge of linguistic coreference. Cognition, 62, 325-370.
Gordon, P. C., & Hendrick, R. (1998). The representation and processing of coreference in discourse. Cognitive Science, 22(4), 389-424.
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 1411–1423.
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Ledoux, K., & Yang, C. L. (1999). Processing of reference and the structure of language: An analysis of complex noun phrases. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(4), 353-379.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
Graesser, A., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
Grosz, B.J., Joshi, A.K., & Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21, 203–226.
Hickmann, M., & Hendriks, H. (1999). Cohesion and anaphora in children’s narratives: a comparison of English, French, German, and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 26(2), 419-452.
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., Roland, F., & Liang, J. (1996). The marking of new information in children’s narratives: a comparison of English, French, German, and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language, 23, 591-619.
Hickmann, M., Kail, M., & Roland, F. (1995). Cohesive anaphoric relations in French children’s narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language, 15, 277-300.
Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2009). Semantic Meaning and Pragmatic Interpretation in 5-Year-Olds: Evidence From Real-Time Spoken Language Comprehension. Developmental Psychology 45(6), 1723–1739.
Inman, T. M., & Dickerson, D. J. (1995). Childrens inferences of causal events during stroy understanding. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156(3), 265-277.
Internation Reading Association & National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1998). Learning to read and write: Developmentally appropriate practices for young children. Reading Teacher, 52(2), 193.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive science, 4, 71-115.
Just, A. M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122-149.
Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
Justice, L. M., Skibbe L., & Canning, A. (2005). Preschoolers, print and storybooks: an observational study using eye movement analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(3), 229-243.
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From Discourse to logic. Introduction to model-theoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kendeou, P., Lynch, J. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M. J., & Kremer, K. E. (2005). Developing Successful Readers: Building Early Comprehension Skills through Television Viewing and Listening. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(2), 91-98.
Kennison, S.M., & Gordon, P.C. (1997). Comprehending referential expressions during reading: Evidence from eye tracking. Discourse Processes, 24, 229–252.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
Kintsch, W. (1993). Information accretion and reduction in text processes: inference. Discourse Processes, 16, 193-202.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
Leppanen, U., Niemi, P., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2004). Development of reading skills among preschool and primary school pupils. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 72- 93.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S, A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Li, C.I. (1985). Participant anaphora in Mandarin Chinese. (PhD), University of Florida, Florida.
Matin, E., Shao, K. C., & Boff, K. R. (1993). Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 372-380.
McKoon, G., Ratcliff, R., & Ward, G. (1993). Syntactic prominence effects on discourse processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 593–607.
McKoon, R., & Ratcliff, G. (1992). Inferences during reading. Psychological Review.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (1997). Assessing reading difficulties: The validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 359–370.
Noordman, L., Vonk, W., & Kempff, H. (1992). Causal inferenæs during the reading of expository texts. Journal of Memoryand Language, 31, 573-590.
Oakhill , J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91-121.
Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1986). Pronoun resolution in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders: effects of memory load and inferential complexity. Language & Speech, 29(1), 25-37.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pyykkönen, P., Matthews, D., & Järvikivi, J. (2010). Three-year-olds are sensitive to semantic prominence during online language comprehension: A visual world study of pronoun resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(1), 115-129.
Richards, E., & Singer, M. (2001). Representation of complex goal structures in narrative comprehension. Discourse Processes, 31(2), 111-135.
Rickheit, G., Schnotz, W., & Strohner, H. (1985). The concept discourse comprehension. . In G. Rickheit & H. Strohner (Eds.), Inferences in text processing. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Rispoli, M. (2005). When children reach beyond their grasp: why some children make pronoun case errors and others don’t. Child language, 32, 93-116.
Schank, R. C. (1976). Conceptual information processing. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Senechal, M. (2006). Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to Grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(1), 59-87.
Singer, M., Graesser, A. C., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Minimal or global inference during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(4), 421-441.
Singer, M., & Ritchot, K. F. M. (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 733-743.
Snow, C., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Song, H., & Fisher, C. (2005). Who’s “she”? Discourse prominence influences preschoolers’ comprehension of pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 29-57.
Song, H., & Fisher, C. (2007). Discourse prominence effects on 2.5-year-old children’s interpretation of pronouns. Language, 117, 1959-1987.
Spenader, J., Smits, E. J., & Hendriks, P. (2009). Coherent discourse solves the pronoun interpretation problem. Child language, 36, 23-52.
Spooner, A. L. R., Baddeley, A. D., & Gathercole, S. E. (2004). Can reading accuracy and comprehension be separated in the Neale analysis of reading ability? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 187-204.
Stevenson, Harold W., Stigler, James W., Lucker, G. William, Lee, Shin-ying, Hsu, Chen-chin, & Kitamura, Seiro. (1982). Reading disabilities: The case of Chinese, Japanese, and English. Child Development, 53(5), 1164-1181.
Suh, S., & Trabasso, T. (1993). Inferences during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 279-300.
Swanson, H. L., & Howell, M. (2001). Working memory, short-term memory, and speech rate as predictors of children's reading performance at different ages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 720-734.
Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007). Eye movements and spoken language processing. In R. P. G. Van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 443-469). Oxford: Elsevier.
Trabasso, T. (1980). On the making of inferences during reading and their comprehension. In J. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research Reviews. Newark, DE: Intemational Reading Association.
Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. Stein & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83-111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence.
Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. Y. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, `6, 3-34.
Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612-630.
Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2), 89-134. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00032-3
Tzeng, Y (2007). Memory of narrative texts: How parts of Landscape model work. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 49, 1-25.
Tzeng, Y., & Chen, M. (2005). Chinese readers’ online detection of causal coherence in narratives. Paper presented at the 113th Annual Convention of American Psychological Association, Washington DC, USA.
van den Broek, P. (1990). The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In G. B. F. d. A. In D. A. Balota, & K. Rayner (Ed.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423-445). New York, N.Y: Academic Press.
van den Broek, P. (2001). The Role of Television Viewing in the Development of Reading Comprehension. http://www.ciera.org/ciera/publications/archive/99-10/04OCT99-58-MSarchive.html: Education Research and Development Centers.
van den Broek, P., Fletcher, C. T., & Risden, K. (1993). Investigations of inference processes in reading: A theoretical and methodological integration. Discourse Processes, 16, 169-180.
van den Broek, P., Lorch, E. P., & Thurlow, R. (1996). Children's and adult's memory for television stories: The role of causal factors, story-grammar categories, and hierarchical level. Child Development, 67(6), 3010-3028.
van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999/2004). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the on-line construction of a memory representation: Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3–32.
Yang, C.L., Gordon, P.C., Hendrick, R., & Wu, J.T. (1999). Comprehension of referring expressions in Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 715-743.
Yeh, C. L., & Chen, Y. C. (2007). Zero anaphora resolution in Chinese with shallow parsing. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing, 17(1), 41-56.