:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從教師專業發展角度看中國大陸公開課的影響與爭議
書刊名:教育學誌
作者:吳振興
作者(外文):Wu, Zhen-xing
出版日期:2019
卷期:42
頁次:頁153-189
主題關鍵詞:公開觀課教師專業發展觀課議課中國大陸Open classTeacher's professional developmentClass viewing and discussionChina Mainland
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:48
  • 點閱點閱:2
研究聚焦教師薪酬與臺灣相近的中國廣東省,用深度訪談的方式,理解、探究公開課與教師專業發展的聯繫以及在操作中的影響與爭議。研究發現中國大陸的公開課提供了專業對話的平臺以及情感支持的氛圍,初步產生專業互助成長的教師文化。但公開課在人選、動機、過程三個方面存在爭議:給予中青年教師成長機會與資深教師專業發展的不利氛圍的爭議;外在利益讓老師主動參加與削弱老師的內在發展動力的爭議;準備過程中老師產生行動研究的專業學習與影響學生的學習成效的爭議。原因為公開課的機制屬於「組織內向」的專業發展方式,隱藏著「教師能力不足」的觀念,讓教師產生壓迫與挫折感。最後對臺灣中小學的「公開觀課與議課」制度給予相關建議。
This study focuses on Guangdong Province which is similar to Taiwan on the treatment of teachers, understands the relationship between the open class and the teacher's professional development deeply,explores the significance and influence of the open class in practice by deep interview. The study found that the open class in mainland China has a great influence and help for the professional development of teachers,especially for the professional development of new teachers. Because the open class provides a platform for colleagues to exchange professional knowledge,learn and reflect,as well as the atmosphere of emotional support,it can promote teachers to precept themselves(advantages and disadvantages)and reflect(teaching behavior, belief, etc.)so as to improve teaching,form a professional community with common purpose and mutual support and form the teacher culture of mutual help and growth in profession initially. At the same time,there are disputes in participants,motivation,preparation and the process of viewing,including the open class provides young and middle-aged teachers more opportunities for professional development and exercise, but causes a disadvantageous atmosphere for the professional development of senior teachers; although the external interests brought by the open class can promote teachers to participate actively,it weakens the inner power of teachers' professional development;in addition, the open class stimulates the teacher to produce a professional study of action research in the process of preparation, it may also have an impact on the effectiveness of the students' learning. The reason why the open class causes disputes is that the mechanism for the open class belongs to the"organization in"mode of teachers' professional development. From the root,the open class mechanism conceals the development concept of "teachers are lack of ability", negative effects on the open class are produced. In the end, the study provides some suggestions for the "public class viewing and class discussion" system in Taiwan's school and the follow-up study.
期刊論文
1.安富海(2013)。公開課問題再審視。中國教育學刊,2013(5),52-55。  延伸查詢new window
2.張毅、丁玉春(2012)。公開課促進職校教師專業發展的調查分析。中國電力教育,2012(29),124-125。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳晶晶(2006)。對公開課價值的思考。福建教育學院學報,2006(11),62-63。  延伸查詢new window
4.方志華、丁一顧(20131000)。日本授業研究的發展與佐藤學學習共同體的批判轉化。課程與教學,16(4),89-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.游秀靜、唐淑華(20150300)。因「被看見」而「能看見」:「學習共同體公開授課」對促進教師專業成長之個案研究。中等教育,66(1),16-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林國凍、吳麗君、趙明仁(20150600)。中國大陸一所名校公開課之探究:專業學習的視角。教育研究與發展期刊,11(2),121-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.胡定榮(2006)。影響優秀教師成長的因素--對特級教師人生經歷的樣本分析。教師教育研究,18(4),65-70。  延伸查詢new window
8.Wilson, Suzanne M.、Berne, Jennifer(1999)。Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development。Review of Research in Education,24(1),173-209。  new window
9.劉世雄(20170600)。臺灣國中教師對共同備課、公開觀課與集體議課的實施目的、關注內容以及專業成長知覺之研究。當代教育研究季刊,25(2),43-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.伍嘉琪、熊治剛(20180600)。教師專業發展實踐方案中專業回饋人員增能之可行途徑。教育行政論壇,10(1),121-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.丁晶晶(2015)。改革完善中小學教師職稱制度。中國人力資源社會保障,2015(10),28-30。  延伸查詢new window
12.王軼普(2018)。公開課的話語資源、情感資源與考評資源分佈--兼論公開課異化問題的解決。教育理論與實踐,38(5),42-44。  延伸查詢new window
13.王曉紅(2018)。淺談公開課的實踐偏離與回歸。西北成人教育學院學報,3(2),63-67。  延伸查詢new window
14.余文森(2006)。公開課再認識。江西教育,2006(Z2),1。  延伸查詢new window
15.何江燕(2006)。評優課,只為“評優”?。江蘇教育,2006(18),1。  延伸查詢new window
16.朱曉民(2008)。公開課與教師專業發展關係的調查研究。課程.教材.教法,2008(5),83-86。  延伸查詢new window
17.吳麗君(20170100)。「公開課」需要更細緻的規畫與配套。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(1),123-125。  延伸查詢new window
18.呂慧玲、李連梅(2015)。“磨”出來的精彩--記山東省優質課一等獎“鳥”一節的磨課過程。生物學通報,2015(7),56-59。  延伸查詢new window
19.宋立華(2011)。追尋公開課中失落的道德。教育理論與實踐,2011(17),43-44。  延伸查詢new window
20.李廷洲、金晨、金志峰(2018)。中小學教師職稱改革成效如何?--基於多元評估理論的政策評估研究。教育發展研究,2018(18),17-23。  延伸查詢new window
21.李振峰、王在勇、李玲(2011)。公開課本真的回歸與建構。中國教育學刊,2011(1),50-53。  延伸查詢new window
22.杜鵑、王海軍(2007)。公開課呼喚走出偏見與歧視。學校管理,2007(1),34-35。  延伸查詢new window
23.肖川(2007)。公開課與常規課。教育科學研究,2007(1),58-63。  延伸查詢new window
24.周文紅(2012)。初探初中歷史有效課堂教學對公開課《漢通西域和絲綢之路》“磨”課有感。中學教學參考,2012(6),49。  延伸查詢new window
25.林香吟、朱美瑰(2018)。推動教師專業成長落實十二年國教新課綱--以高雄市立瑞祥高中為例。臺灣教育,710,91-98。  延伸查詢new window
26.張玉強(2017)。好課多“磨”--以一次市級公開課的“磨”課為例。中學地理教學參考,2017(7),41-42。  延伸查詢new window
27.張天明(2014)。公開課審美的迷失與回歸。中國教育學刊,2014(4),69-72。  延伸查詢new window
28.高慧斌(2016)。中小學教師職稱制度改革特徵與現狀分析。教師教育研究,2016(6),25-31。  延伸查詢new window
29.馬勇軍、徐靜竹(2008)。公開課中影響教師專業發展的內在因素研究--對三節公開課形成過程的比較。課程.教材.教法,28(12),70-75。  延伸查詢new window
30.張輝(2010)。磨課“磨”出了什麼--從一線教師的視角看“磨課”之利。中小學教師培訓,2010(6),45-49。  延伸查詢new window
31.張生斌(2011)。有關“磨課”的冷思考。新課程研究,2011(10),28-33。  延伸查詢new window
32.陳幸仁(20120500)。以微觀政治觀點探討教師專業發展評鑑之推動。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(7),14-16。  延伸查詢new window
33.張澤芳(2014)。中小學教師職稱制度改革探究。教學月刊,2014(7),26-29。  延伸查詢new window
34.張澤芳(2014)。我國中小學教師職稱制度改革探討。考試週刊,2014(52),16-18。  延伸查詢new window
35.陳旭(2006)。“公開課”的價值認識與開發。教育科學論壇,2006(1),44-46。  延伸查詢new window
36.楊瑤(2012)。“集體磨課”,一種新型校本教研模式。課程教材教學研究(中教研究),2012(Z5),49-50。  延伸查詢new window
37.葉佩君(20150100)。教師專業發展評鑑與公開觀課之我見。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(1),191。  延伸查詢new window
38.路躍(20170000)。“同課再構”式公開課:生態取向視閾下初任教師專業發展的有效途徑。中國教育學刊,2017(S2),86-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.劉延川(2006)。將“公開課”徹底埋葬。當代教育科學,2006(17),58-60。  延伸查詢new window
40.劉英霞(2018)。“喧嘩”過後的公開課弊病探析及策略研究--以小學語文教學為例。福建教育學院學報,2018(2),58-60。  延伸查詢new window
41.潘希武(2014)。中小學教師職稱改革的重新定位。基礎教育,11(2),93-98。  延伸查詢new window
42.余憲澤(2017)。實施“粵教雲”工程,助推區域教育均衡發展。中國教育資訊化,2017(19),67-71。  延伸查詢new window
43.操太聖、盧乃桂(2006)。學校變革進程中的教師壓力管理。教育發展研究,2006(11),34-38。  延伸查詢new window
44.戴清(2015)。公開課對小學教師專業發展影響的調查分析。上海教育科研,2015(1),56-61。  延伸查詢new window
45.韓國海(2011)。中小學公開課的歷史沿革及其思考。課程.教材.教法,2011(9),17-22。  延伸查詢new window
46.魏志強、楊克瑞(2018)。中小學教師職級制可行性思考。上海教育科研,2018(9),59-62。  延伸查詢new window
47.蘇培園(2016)。以磨課為抓手,建設學校教研文化。福建基礎教育研究,2016(6),18-19。  延伸查詢new window
48.Haep, A.、Behnke, K.、Steins, G.(2016)。Classroom observation as an instrument for school development: School principals' perspectives on its relevance and problems。Studies In Educational Evaluation,49,1-6。  new window
49.de Lima, Jorge Ávila、Silva, Maria João Tavares(2018)。Resistance to classroom observation in the context of teacher evaluation: Teachers' and department heads' experiences and perspectives。Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability,30(1),7-26。  new window
50.Ceven, J. Ann(2016)。Learning from one's own teaching: New science teachers analyzing their practice through classroom observation cycles。Journal Of Research In Science Teaching,53(3),473-501。  new window
51.Han, X.、Paine, L.(2010)。Teaching Mathematics as Deliberate Practice through Public Lessons。The Elementary School Journal,110(4),519-541。  new window
52.Ni Shuilleabhain, A.、Seery, A.(2018)。Enacting curriculum reform through lesson study: a case study of mathematics teacher learning。Professional Development In Education,44(2),222-236。  new window
53.盧乃桂(20010000)。教育改革潮中的教師和教師發展。基礎教育學報,10(2)/11(1),73-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
54.Lee, J. F. K.(2008)。A Hong Kong case of lesson study--Benefits and concerns。Teaching and Teacher Education,24(5),1115-1124。  new window
研究報告
1.Cunha, N.、Bruns, B.、Costa, L.(2017)。Through the Looking Glass: Can Classroom Observation and Coaching Improve Teacher Performance in Brazil?。Washington, DC:World Bank。  new window
學位論文
1.于曉靜(2008)。公開課在數學教師專業發展中作用的個案研究(碩士論文)。首都師範大學,北京市。  延伸查詢new window
2.馬順林(2008)。初任教師教學能力發展狀況及其影響因素研究(碩士論文)。華東師範大學,上海市。  延伸查詢new window
3.張誠(2012)。我國中小學公開課的類型研究(碩士論文)。華東師範大學,上海市。  延伸查詢new window
4.張梅梅(2013)。教師日常行動的社會學研究--以中學“市級教學比賽”人員選拔事件為例(碩士論文)。陝西師範大學,陝西省西安市。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳昊(2014)。公開課中教師表演的質性研究(碩士論文)。西南大學,重慶市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.操太聖、盧乃桂(2007)。伙伴協作與教師賦權--教師專業發展新視角。北京:教育科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fullan, M.、Hargreaves, A.、黃錦樟、葉建源(2000)。學校與改革--人本主義的傾向。稻田。  延伸查詢new window
3.Evans, R.(1996)。The human side of school change: Reform, resistance, and the real-life problems of innovation。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
4.教育部(2017)。教育部辦理十二年國教課綱--教師公開授課與教學精進研習手冊。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.佐藤学、黃郁倫、鐘啟泉(2012)。學習的革命:從教室出發的改變。臺北:天下。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳俊憲(20130000)。教師專業發展:評鑑、社群與議題。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.吳宛縈(20161026)。把教室大門關起來!臺中市開放教師得拒觀課,https://www.nownews.com/news/20161026/2284488。  延伸查詢new window
2.胡智榮(20130407)。中國教育資源不平衡,貧富差距被逐步擴大,http://business.sohu.com/20130407/n371857620.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
3.林良齊(20180706)。全教會:觀課非評鑑 教師不用「教學表演」,https://udn.com/news/story/7266/3238609。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Maxwell, J.(2002)。Understanding and validity in qualitative research。The qualitative researcher's companion。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE