:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:房客與共生幸福感關係之探討
書刊名:輔仁民生學誌
作者:曹軒瑜楊康臨 引用關係
作者(外文):Tsao, Hsuan-yuYang, Kang-ling
出版日期:2020
卷期:26:1
頁次:頁68-82
主題關鍵詞:共生房客幸福感Co-livingTenantsHomeHappiness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:54
  • 點閱點閱:2
本研究旨在探討共生公寓房客與幸福感之關係。採半結構深度訪談法,受訪者為現年20到30歲,家鄉在雙北以外,因求學或工作等因素而現居或曾居於台北市共生公寓的異鄉人,房客與管家在內共5名受訪者。主要發現如下:一、房客特質大同小異;入住前的預設立場不會影響到入住後的適應心態;皆同意居住時與他人的互動能造就幸福感;並且離開後希望能延續彼此間的關係。二、居於共生公寓具有時效性,這個地方雖有機會被視為「遠方的第二個家」,內部房客也有機會被視為「家人」,但所有人仍會因自我生涯規劃而選擇離開,故這裡只能作為一個中繼站而非永遠的家。本研究根據研究結果提出幾項建議,以供未來有意研究相關議題的人作為參考。
This research aims to explore the relationship between tenants in co-living apartments and happiness. The research used semi-structured in-depth interview method. The interviewees were 20 to 30 years old and all of their hometowns were outside of Taipei and New Taipei city. 5 interviewees lived or used to live in a co-living apartment in Taipei City due to schooling or work. The main findings are as follows: First, the tenants' traits are similar, the default position before check-in will not affect the adaptation mentality after check-in; furthermore all of them agree that the interaction with others during residence can create happiness and all agree to continue the relationship after moved away. Second, living in a co-living apartment is time-sensitive. Although this place may have the opportunity to be regarded as a "second home" and the internal tenants may have the opportunity to be regarded as a "family-like", but no one will still choose to stay for a long time because of their own career planning. Therefore, it can only be used as a short-stay station rather than a permanent home. At last this study makes two suggestions based on the results of the research, for the researcher who is interested in this related topics in the future.
期刊論文
1.林志哲(20140900)。感恩、社會支持及幸福感之研究:中介效果模式之驗證。中華心理衛生學刊,27(3),453-482。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.侯錦雄、宋念謙(19980300)。臺中市黎明住宅社區居民社區意識之研究。建築學報,24,51-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.羅潔伶、蕭偉昌(20150100)。主管領導行為與員工幸福感關係之研究。經營管理論叢,10(1),70-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Kenyon, E.、Heath, S.(2001)。Choosing this life: Narratives of choice amongst house sharers。Housing Studies,16(5),619-638。  new window
5.Ryff, Carol D.、Singer, Burton H.(1998)。The contours of positive human health。Psychological Inquiry,9(1),1-28。  new window
6.李新民(20160100)。幼兒園教師勇氣的測量及其與主觀幸福感之相關研究。樹德科技大學學報,18(1),115-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.McMillan, David W.、Chavis, David M.(1986)。Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory。Journal of Community Psychology,14(1),6-23。  new window
8.陸洛(19980100)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊. 人文及社會科學,8(1),115-137。  延伸查詢new window
9.林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(20050600)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究,3(2),122-136。  延伸查詢new window
10.Heath, S.(2004)。Peer-shared households, quasi-communes and neo-tribes。Current Sociology,52(2),161-179。  new window
學位論文
1.吳健宇(2010)。主觀幸福感量表測量恆等性議題之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
2.張家瑄(2018)。國內共同居住空間之現況發展研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.施建彬(1995)。幸福感來源與相關因素之探討(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.米田智彥、蔡孟婷(2016)。「共享」創新生活:做自己的設計師「遊牧東京」生活實踐。新北市:好優文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Giddens, Anthony(1991)。Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age。New Jersey:Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of Wesleyan University。  new window
其他
1.何哲瑩(20170311)。玖樓的共居實踐--專訪潘信榮,https://radicalhk.com/2017/03/11/9floor/。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Kenyon, E.、Heath, S.(2001)。Young adults and shared household living: achieving independence through the (re)negotiation of peer relationships。Youth, Citizenship and Empowerment。Ashgate Publication。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE