臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國民中學實習教師教學反省之研究
書刊名：高雄師大學報
作者：吳和堂 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wu, Ho-tang
出版日期：2001
卷期：12
頁次：頁71-91
主題關鍵詞：教學反省；反省層次；反省類型；反省態度；教學反省札記；Reflective teaching；Reflective level；Reflective type；Reflective attitude；Journal writing
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(27) 博士論文(10) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:26
  • 共同引用共同引用:65
  • 點閱點閱:66
　　　　　本研究旨在探討國民中學實習教師教學反省之現況，其研究目的有三:(1)探討目前國中實習教師的教學反省之現況。(2)了解影響國中實習教師的教學反省之因素。(3)提建議，作為師資培育機構培育教學反省能力之參考。 為達成上述目的，本研究採用文件分椷。就樣本方面，請國立高雄師範大學教育學系88級畢業生，八十八學年度在國中實習的教師共29位，撰寫教學反省札記，總共蒐集428篇。 經分析後所得的結論為:(1)反省態度有高度的表現。(2)反省內容多樣化。(3)反省層次以技術理性層次最多。(4)反省類型則行動中反省與行動後反省並用。(5)影響教學反省的重要影響者是學生。
　　　　　 This study was designed to explore the reflective teaching of interns in junior high schools. In order to complete this study, the researcher employed 29 interns graduated in 1999from the Department of Education at National Kaohsiung Normal University to perform journal writing twice a month. Four hundred and twenty-eight journal entries were collected and analyzed. The conclusions are: 1. The participants demonstrated a high degree of reflective attitudes. 2. The reflective contents were diverse. 3. The most of reflective levels were the technical level. 4. The strongest reflective types were the reflection-in-action and the reflection-for-action. 5. The most important influencing factors is the student. According to these conclusions, five suggestions are offered: 1. Interns' should be have a comprehensive mind broad-minded on reflective attitudes. 2. Interns should are about everything in school for its' reflective content. 3. Interns should try to lift their reflective levels. 4. Interns should adopt the reflection-for-action, which is the best approach to solve complicated problems. 5. Interns should have more interaction with students, mentors and colleagues.
期刊論文
1.Hannay, L.、Ross, W.(1986)。Towards a Critical Theory of Reflective Inquiry。Journal of Teacher Education，37(4)，9-15。  new window
2.Borko, H.、Livingston, C.(1989)。Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers。American Educational Research Journal，26(4)，473-498。  new window
3.歐用生(19941000)。做一個有反省能力的教師。研習資訊，11(5)，1-6。  延伸查詢new window
4.林生傳(19901200)。國中教師專業行為之主要參照團體研究。教育學刊，9，左263-292。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Goodman, J.(1989)。Teaching preservice teachers to be reflective。Journal of teacher education，40(3)，60-63。  new window
6.Ross, D. D.(1989)。First step in developing a reflective approach。Journal of Teacher Education，40(2)，22-30。  new window
7.Roth, R. A.(1989)。Preparing the reflective practitioner: Transforming the apprentice through the dialectic。Journal of Teacher Education，40(2)，31-35。  new window
8.Smyth, I. J.(1984)。Teacher as collaborators in clinical supervision: Cooperative learning about teaching。Journal of Teacher Education，36(5)，35-44。  new window
9.Zeichner, Kenneth M.、Liston, Daniel P.(1987)。Teaching student teachers to reflect。Harvard Educational Review，57(1)，23-48。  new window
10.鄭英耀、黃正鵠(19950600)。中等學校教師創造思考、批判思考及其相關因素之研究。教育學刊，11，145-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.高敬文(19901200)。批判的反省與師資培育計畫。初等教育研究，2，35-71。  延伸查詢new window
12.Morrison, K. R. B.(1995)。Dewey, Habermas and reflective practice。Curriculum，16(2)，82-94。  new window
13.Westerman, Delores A.(1991)。Expert and novice teacher decision making。Journal of Teacher Education，42(4)，292-305。  new window
14.Killion, J. P.、Todnem, G. R.(1991)。A process for personal theory building。Educational Leadership，48(6)，14-16。  new window
15.van Manen, M.(1977)。Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical。Curriculum Inquiry，6(3)，205-228。  new window
16.Gipe, Joan P.、Richards, Janet C.(1992)。Reflective thinking and growth in novices' teaching abilities。Journal of Educational Research，86(1)，52-57。  new window
17.吳和堂(19990600)。國中實習教師教學反省的內容與層次之分析。教育學刊，15，143-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Tom, A. R.(1985)。Inquiry into inquiry-oriented teacher education。Journal of Teacher Education，36(5)，35-44。  new window
19.Pultorak, E. G.(1993)。Facilitating Reflective Thought in Novice Teachers。Journal of Teacher Education，44(4)，288-297。  new window
20.吳和堂(1997)。教學省思日誌之簡介。教育文粹，28，41-47。  延伸查詢new window
21.陳美玉(1997)。傳統「壓迫式教學法」的省思與突破。中等教育，48(1)，116-120。  延伸查詢new window
22.Bright, B.(1995)。Professional Values, Citizenship Education, and the Reflective Teacher。Curriculum，16(1)，21-35。  new window
23.Jacko, C. M.、Karmos, A. H.(1977)。The role of significant others during the student teaching experience。Journal of Teacher Education，28(5)，51-55。  new window
會議論文
1.張美玉(1995)。反省思考的教學模式在教育實習課程的應用。八十四學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會，215-265。  延伸查詢new window
2.Denton, J. J.(1983)。Do early field experiences in teacher education provide a meaningful context for acquiring pedagogical knowledge?。Montreal, Canada。  new window
3.鄭明長(1999)。從Vygosky觀點看教師實習制度功能的落實。屏東。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄧景文、賓玉玫、單文經(1999)。實習教師實地經驗的內涵與角色轉變。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.簡紅珠(1999)。教師思考與教學。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.郭玉霞(1995)。準教師思考之個案研究。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
2.李德高(1993)。由教師認知歷程分析教育專業知識在實際教學的應用。花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鍾蔚起(1994)。我國師範大學學生試教經驗及其影響因素之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.劉錫麒(1991)。合作反省思考的數學解題教學模式及其實徵研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Harris, D. G.(1985)。Faculty and Administrative Perception of Post-secondary Occupational technical Staff Development，0。  new window
圖書
1.LaBoskey, V. K.(1994)。Development of reflective practice: A study of pre-service teachers。Teachers College Press。  new window
2.Schön, Donald A.、夏林清、鄭村棋(2004)。反映的實踐者：專業工作者如何在行動中思考。台北：遠流。  延伸查詢new window
3.Osterman, K. F.、Kottkamp, R. B.(1993)。Reflective Practice for Educators: Improving Schooling Through Professional Development。Corwin Press, Inc.。  new window
4.Hullfish, H. G.、Smith, P. G.(1961)。Reflective thinking: the method of education。New York：Dodd, Mead and Company。  new window
5.饒見維(1996)。教師專業發展--理論與實務。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Schön, Donald A.(1987)。Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions。San Francisco, California：Jossey-Bass Inc.。  new window
7.Dewey, John(1910)。How we think。D. C. Heath and Company。  new window
8.Goodman, J.(1991)。Using a method course to promote reflection and inquiry among preservice teachers。Issues and practices in inquiry-oriented teacher education。London, UK。  new window
9.Kemmis, S.(1985)。Action research and the politics of reflection。Reflection: Turning experience into learning。New York, NY。  new window
10.Schon, D.(1991)。The reflective turn: Case studies in and on education practice。The reflective turn: Case studies in and on education practice。NY。  new window
其他
1.Kelly, F. J.，Paper, S. L.(1990)。Development of a written assessment device for determining reflective judgement，0。  new window
2.Wubbels, T.，Korthagen, F. A. J.(1991)。Characteristics of reflective practitioners: Towards an operationalization of the concept of reflection，0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Grimmett, P. P.、MacKinnon, A. M.、Erickson, G. L.、Riecken, T. J.(1990)。Reflective practice in teacher education。Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs。New York, NY：Teachers College Press。  new window
2.王立行、饒見維(1996)。教育專業化與教育實習的實施。教育專業。臺北：師大師苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kitchener, K. S.(1986)。The reflective judgment model: Characteristics, evidence, and measurement。Adult cognitive development: Methods and models。New York：Praeger。  new window
4.Wildman, T. M.、Niles, J. A.、Magliaro, S. G.、McLaughlin, R. A.(1990)。Promoting reflective practice among beginning and experienced teachers。Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs。NY：Teachers College Press。  new window
5.Barell, J.(1991)。Reflective teaching for thoughtfulness。Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking。Alexandria, VA：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
6.Walker, D.、Boud, D.、Keogh, R.(1985)。Promoting reflection in learning: A model。Reflection: Turning experience into learning。London, UK：Kogan Page。  new window
7.Ross, D. D.(1990)。Programmatic Structures for the Preparation of Reflective Teachers。Encouraging Reflective Practice in Education: An Analysis of Issues and Programs。New York, NY：Teachers College Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：422（臺灣：417，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2564847 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68362292
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上