“Chunqiu gongyangzhuan zhushu“ is based on He Xiu ”Gongyang Jiegu”. It thinks ‘violating Confucian classics, explaining wantonly, violating and spreading’ and ‘the mistake of misguiding the reading of the books’ are the two biggest shortcomings which "Gongyang" scholars make while annotating and interpreting Confucian classics. These two disadvantages are also the main factors which cause “Gongyang” theory on the decline. Among them, ‘violating Confucian classics, explaining wantonly, violating and spreading’ refers to the obscurity in the position when interpreting Confucian classics, and ‘the mistake of misguiding the reading of the books’ refers to the mistakes in the way of interpreting the classics. “Chunqiu gongyangzhuan zhushu“ is based on He Xiu ”Gongyang Jiegu”, especially in compliance with the latitude book of "Chunqiu". It thinks that the latitude book can truly reflect the original meaning of Confucius' reforms of system and legislation, and that the book offers true interpretation of "Chunqiu". Therefore, “Chunqiu gongyangzhuan zhushu“ objects to the use of "Zuozhuan" and "Guliang" to annotate "Gongyang" as well as the use of other Confucian classics to interpret "Gongyang". “Chunqiu gongyangzhuan zhushu” shows its strong observance of its school. It guards rigidly the position in "Gongyang" in order to distinguish right from wrong, and expounds and propagates He Xiu and "Chunqiu shuo" to its utmost. However, it fails to get rid of the augury latitude and draws wrong conclusions by false analogy. Moreover, it regards Han dynasty’s Confucian scholars’ position as its own position. It loses the basic spirit of "Gongyang" and makes itself lack positive, realistic meaning after all.