:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高中職教師參與在職進修現況及實施成效研究
書刊名:明道學術論壇
作者:張如柏郭秋勳 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Zu-poKuo, Chu-hsun
出版日期:2005
卷期:1:1
頁次:頁75-91
主題關鍵詞:高中職教師在職進修參與態度實施成效Senior high school teacherIn-service trainingEffectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:195
  • 點閱點閱:15
本文旨在探討高中職教師參與在職進修之現況與實施成效。本研究採問卷調查法進行研究,先進行中外文獻評析建構理論基礎,再據以編製調查問卷進行實證研究。研究對象抽取台灣中部地區公私立高中職學校74所進行問卷調查;總共收回有效問卷626份,回收率爲87.7%。研究資料以描述統計法及因子變異數分析法進行統計分析,獲得下述重要研究發現。高中職教師在職進修現況依重要件排列:1.最受歡迎進修方式爲:校內研習、校外研習、參觀與考察;2.進修內容玉點偏重於:課程教材發展;3.校外研習進修學分/學位之偏好地點:以師範校院爲主,人學校院爲輔;4.教師研究著述呈現方式:以研討會爲主,次爲雜誌期刊。再者,教師參與在職進修寶施成效依其偏好順序爲:1.參觀、考察、進修學分/學位;2.在職進修能有效提升教師效能;其主要貢獻爲:回饋教學、輔導、行政工作。最後,本研究建議高中職教師:1.應積極主動參與任職進修;2.進而宜加強同僚合作或小親共同從事研究與著作;本研究亦建議教育行政主管機關:1.宜依教師需求規劃在職進修,增加「校外研習活動」、「進修學分或學位」、「參觀或考察」機會;2.宜透過獎勵措施,鼓勵教師加強同僚合作或小組共同研究著作;3.宜妥適安排在職進修時段,最好利用課餘時間,以免影響教師正常教學;4.宜建立完善的教師在職進修體制、提供充分在職進修機會,設法減輕教師教學負擔,以利教師參與進修;5.宜從敘獎、年終考核、實施教師分級制度、聘任等建立制度,激勵教師在職進修;6宜建立「受益者付費」的教師在職進修制度。
The purpose of this study was to explore the current situations and perform effectiveness of in-service training that was perceived by senior high school teachers (SHST) in central Taiwan. A self-administered questionnaire survey was sent to 626 randomly selected SHST in central Taiwan. The descriptive statistical method and one-way ANOVA were used to test the research hypotheses. Major findings of this study are as follows: 1. School-based workshops are the most common way of training, while SHST attend off-school training and on-site visits; 2, SHST tend to participate in training during the school days, while SHST thought that the most appropriate time for training on weekends or vacation. And the content of training is mainly focused on the development of curriculum and instructional materials; 3. the workshops and on-site visits often take place at senior high schools. The credit-and degree-oriented training is most frequently held at normal universities, while SHST prefer to attend off-school training at regular universities; 4. SHST prefer to present their research projects on conventions and/or to publish their papers at journal articles. The effectiveness of in-service training of SHST is as follows: 1. SHST perceived that on-site visits and credit- or degree-oriented courses are the most effective ways of training; 2. SI-IST perceived that the in-service training could upgrade their instructional competence, counseling/guidance skills, and/or administrative abilities effectively.
期刊論文
1.Yung, Benny H. W.(2002)。Same assessment, different practice: professional consciousness as a determinant of teachers' practice in a school-based assessment scheme。Assessment in Education,9(1),97-117。  new window
2.Anita, F.、Lars, O. D.(1996)。Conceptions of mentoring: An empirical study of conceptions of mentoring during the School-based Teacher Education。Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education,12(6),627-641。  new window
3.Fullan, M.、Bertani, A.、Quinn, J.(2004)。New lesson for district wide reform。Educational Leadership,61(7),42-46。  new window
4.Fountain, C. A.、Evans, D. B.(1994)。Beyond shares rhetoric: A collaborative change model for integrating preservice and in-service Urban educational delivery systems。Journal of Teacher Education,45(3),218-227。  new window
5.Judith, R.(1998)。Building learning into the teaching job。Journal of Educational Leadership,2,70-74。  new window
6.Russ, Q.、Scott, F. M.、Walter, G. M.(2001)。The relationship of teacher satisfaction to perceptions of school organization, teacher empowerment, work conditions, and community status。Journal of Education,112(2),206-216。  new window
7.Giorgio, C.、Franco, Z.、Pietro, B.(2002)。Student motivation: An experience of in-service education as a context for profession development of teachers。Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education,18,273-288。  new window
8.朱則剛(19960600)。建構主義知識論對教學與教學研究的意義。教育研究,49,39-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張靜嚳(19951200)。何謂建構主義?。建構與教學,3,1+4。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.蔡明昌(2000)。中學教師在職進修學習成效相關因素之研究。88學年度師範學院教育學術論文,教育部中等教育司主辦 。  延伸查詢new window
2.顏慶祥(1998)。多元化師資培育之實習輔導教師制度的挑戰與展望。87學年度教育學術研討會,教育部(主辦) (會議日期: 1998/11/26-11/27)。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭重吉(1997)。中學數理教師在職進修課程設計之行動研究。行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.蔡培村、王政彥、蔡清華、鄭彩鳳、梁瑞安、孫國華、黃玉幸(1996)。中等學校教師在職進修內涵與進修體系規劃研究。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蔡明昌(1999)。中學教師繼續專業教育學習成效及其相關因素之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Sheehy, E. J.(2001)。Student teacher mentoring program: Teacher training for information literacy in the classroom(博士論文)。State University of New York,Albany, NY。  new window
3.Wiese, P. P.(2001)。Traditional Multicultural Storytelling: Effects of In-service Teacher Training Program on Attitudes of Selected Kindergarten Through Fifth Grade Teachers in a Suburban Texas Independent School District(博士論文)。Texas A and M University。  new window
4.梁坤明(1999)。台北縣國民小學教師專業發展態度、活動型式與實施成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭秋勳(1991)。影響高級職業學校教師參與在職進修教育訓練因素研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.劉秀琴(1998)。影響高職農科教師在職進修意願因素之探討(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳政憲(2001)。台中縣國小教師參與學校本位專業發展之態度、現況與成效知覺研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
8.周燦德(1985)。我國高職教師在職進修教育之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.彭麗琦(2000)。學校本位教師進修之研究--以發展生活科課程方案為例(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
10.林煌(2001)。我國中小學教師終身進修制度之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.彭仁晃(2000)。國民小學實施學校本位教師進修現況及其成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.何福田(1992)。面對當前教育。台北:正昇。  延伸查詢new window
2.林清江(1993)。教育社會學新論。台北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bliss, L. L.(2001)。Attitudinal responses to teacher professional development for the effective integration of educational technology in K-5 curriculum: Findings from a descriptive research study of elementary teachers。Oklahoma State University。  new window
4.Dreyer, J. M.(2001)。Teacher training for outcomes-based education in South Africa。University of South Africa。  new window
5.Hayes, J. G.(2001)。An evaluation of Teton science school journeys' place-based education program as effective environmental education teacher training。Utah State University。  new window
6.Knop, M. L.(2001)。The impact of teacher training on the attitudes toward, knowledge of, and implementation of instructional modifications for children with disabilities: An expanded qualitative review。University of Houston。  new window
7.Ossont, D. M.(2001)。The relationship between teacher professional engagement levels and their ratings of preservice preparation program quality: A post hoc multiple regression analysis。Auburn University。  new window
8.Randazzo, M.、Beverly, A.(2001)。Exploring the effect of collegial study groups on the transfer of professional development training to classroom implementation。Lehigh University。  new window
9.Vestal, M, A.(2001)。How teacher training in conflict resolution and peace education influences attitudes, interactions and relationships in Head Start centers。Nova Southeastern University。  new window
10.Ye, R.(2000)。The effect of teacher characteristics, beliefs, relations with students, and in-service education on student science achievement。Tech University。  new window
11.王文科(2002)。課程與教學論。台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.教育部(1994)。師資培育法。臺北:教育部法規會。  延伸查詢new window
13.教育部(1996)。高級中等以下學校及幼稚園教師在職進修辦法。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
14.Joyce, B. R.、Showers, B.(1988)。Student achievement through staff development White Plains。N.Y.:Longman。  new window
15.教育部(1996)。教師進修研究獎勵辦法。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
16.吳清基(19950000)。教師與進修。臺北市:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Rubin, L.(1978)。The In-Service Education of Teachers: Trends, Processes, and Prescriptions。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon, Inc.。  new window
18.謝文全(1993)。教育行政--理論與實務。臺北:文景出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.饒見維(1996)。教師專業發展--理論與實務。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.Sergiovanni, Thomas J.(1995)。The principalship: A reflective practice perspective。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
21.高強華(19960000)。師資培育問題研究。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Boyd, B.(1993)。Transforming teacher staff development(ED 362943)。  new window
2.Lee, Y. S.(2000)。Teacher development in Korea: School-based autonomous supervisors' as a critical method(EJ 617190)。  new window
3.McRobbie, J.(2000)。Career-long teacher development: Policies that make sense knowledge brief(ED 454165)。  new window
4.Merrita, H.(1980)。Application of adult learning principles in a teacher center that's making a difference(ED 198130)。  new window
5.Renwick, M.(1994)。Teacher development in state secondary schools: Apilot study(ED 374105)。  new window
6.Smith, B.,Trika, M.(1996)。Professional development for teacher leaders: Promoting program ownership and increase success(ED 436744)。  new window
7.Washington, K. R.(1993)。Teacher initiated staff development: What do principals and teachers think?(EJ 472569)。  new window
其他
1.教育部(1999)。健全師資培育與教師進修制度中程計畫,台北:教育部中等教育司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.黃富順(1997)。從大學成人教育的發展論我國師範學院推廣教育的功能的發展。進修教育的挑戰與展望。臺北:師大師苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Edward, R. D.、Maiy, K. D.(1999)。Teacher educators and teachers: The needs for excellence and spunk。The role of the University in the preparation of teachers。London:Falmer Press。  new window
3.Gray, S.(1999)。No standards or new standards? The future of teacher certification。The role of the university in the preparation of teachers。London:Falmer Press。  new window
4.Hargreaves, A.、Fullan, M.(1992)。Teacher development and educational change。Understanding Teacher Development。New York:Teacher College Press。  new window
5.Bridges, D.(1993)。School-based teacher education。Developing teachers professionally: Reflections for initial and in-service trainers。London:Routledge。  new window
6.Trotter, A.、Ellison, L.(1997)。Understanding competence and competency。School leadership for the 21st century: A competency and knowledge approach。Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE