:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中教師參與決定、工作士氣與學校組織效能之研究
作者:郭鴻耀
作者(外文):KUO, HUNG-YAO
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:教育政策與行政學系
指導教授:楊振昇
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2018
主題關鍵詞:國民中學教師參與決定工作士氣學校組織效能junior high school teachersparticipative decision makingemployee moraleschool organization effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
本研究旨在探討國民中學教師參與決定、工作士氣與學校組織效能間之應用情況。以臺灣中部地區公立國民中學(不含完全中學)教師為研究的對象,於民國107年3月採用分層抽樣的方式選出60所三種不同學校規模之國民中學教師進行郵寄問卷調查施測。調查所得資料以描述性統計、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數、皮爾遜積差相關、多元廻歸分析等統計方法,進行分析與討論歸納整理出結論。
本研究獲得以下結論﹕
一、中部地區國民中學教師知覺教師參與決定意願部份整體及各層面表現達中度
表現;實際部份整體及各層面除「總務」屬中低表現,其餘層面達中度表現。
其次在工作士氣整體及各層面表現達中高度表現。最後在學校組織效能整體
及各層面表現達中高度表現。
二、中部地區國民中學教師對於教師參與決定類型各層面知覺程度受到「年齡」、
「現任職務」、「服務總年資」、「服務學校校長性別」、「學校規模」等個人背景
變項之影響而有顯著差異。而對於工作士氣各層面知覺程度受到「年齡」、「學
歷」、「現任職務」、「學校規模」、「學校位置」、「學校區域」等個人背景變項
之影響而有顯著差異。再則對於學校組織效能各層面知覺程度受到「年齡」、
「學歷」、「現任職務」、「學校規模」、「學校位置」、「學校區域」等個人背景變
項之影響而有顯著差異。
三、在相關的部分則為「整體參與決定意願部份」與「整體工作士氣」的相關係
數為.432,屬於中度正相關;「整體參與決定實際部份」與「整體工作士
氣」的相關係數為.386,屬於低度正相關。而「整體參與決定意願部份」與
「整體組織效能」的相關係數為.347,屬於低度正相關;「整體參與決定部
份」與「整體組織效能」的相關係數為.333,屬於低度正相關。最後「整體
工作士氣」與「整體學校組織效能」的相關係數為.791,屬於高度正相關。
四、本研究國中教師參與決定意願、實際部份和工作士氣各層面對學校組織效
能預測力之分析結果如下所述:在國中教師參與決定意願部分,以「整體參
與決定意願部分」最能有效預測學校組織效能,其次為「參與決定意願-教
務層面」;在國中教師參與決定實際部分,以「整體參與決定實際部分」最
能有效預測學校組織效能,其次為「參與決定意願-輔導層面」。而在工作
士氣部分,以「整體工作士氣」最能有效預測學校組織效能,其次為「工作
士氣-需求滿足層面」。
最後,根據上述研究結論提出具體建議,提供教育行政機關、國民中學校長及未來研究者作為參考。
Selecting junior high school teachers as the target audience, the research probes into participative decision-making, employee morale, and school organizational effectiveness. Excluding complete high schools, teachers in 60 public junior high schools in central Taiwan were invited to participate in the research using stratified sampling method in March, 2018. Teachers were from 3 different school sizes, and surveys were done via mailed questionnaires. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Independent-Sample T Test, ANOVA, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation, and Multiple Regression Analysis, listing as follows.
The present resent aims at exploring the interactions of participative decision making, employee morale, and school organization effectiveness. The participants are sampled from teachers in public junior high schools (excluding complete high school). Using stratified sampling, the research invited teachers from 60 junior high schools of three different sizes to participate in the mailed surveys in March 2018. The results are analyzed utilizing descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficients, and multiple regression analyses. Conclusions are as follows:
1. For teachers in junior high schools in central Taiwan, the perception of participative decision-making is in average levels in all aspects. The actual aspect is below average in “general affairs”, and average in the rest. In employee morale and school organization effectiveness, all levels are all above average.
2. The perception for teachers in junior high schools in central Taiwan are significantly
influenced by the following factors: age, current position, service year, the gender of the principal, and school sizes. For employee morale, teachers are influenced in age, academic background, current position, school sizes, school positions, and the school region. For employee morale, teachers are significantly influenced in age, academic background, current position, school sizes, school positions, and the school region.
3. “The overall willingness of participative decision making” and “overall employee
morale” are moderately positively correlated (r =. 432). “The overall deeds of
participative decision making” and “overall employee morale” are lowly positively
correlated (r =. 386). “The overall willingness of participative decision making” and
“overall organization effectiveness” are lowly positively correlated (r =. 347). “The
overall deeds of participative decision making” and “overall organization
effectiveness” are lowly positively correlated (r =. 333). “Overall employee morale”
and “overall school organization effectiveness” are highly positively correlated (r =.
791).
4. The conclusions of the present research show that: “overall willingness of participative decision making”, followed by “overall willingness of participative decision making – academic affairs”, can best predict “school organization effectiveness”; “overall deeds of participative decision making”, followed by “willingness of participative decision making - counseling”, can best predict “deeds of participative decision making”; while in employee morale, “overall employee morale”, followed by “employee morale - needs satisfaction”, can best predict school organization effectiveness.
Based on above conclusions, suggestions are provided for further references for educational administration offices, middle school principals, and future researchers.
參考文獻
一、中文部分
王政彥 (1994)。我國成人教學專業化的努力課題。成人教育,19,14-19。
王誼邦(2000)。提昇體育教師工作士氣之策略。淡江體育(特刊),121-127。
方崇雄譯 (2004)。組織發展與變革。臺北市:華泰文化。
丘昌泰(2002)。「政府改造、組織氣餒與士氣激勵」,人事月刊,35(5),37-44。
江志正(1992)。國民中學組織管理型態與教師工作士氣之關係。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
江志正(2000)。國民小學團體動力、組織學習、學校發展策略與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
江滿堂(2008)。國民小學校長多元領導型態、團體動力、學校組織文化特質與學校效能關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所博士論文未出版,屏東。
江澈(2007)。私立高級中學校長競值領導、教師專業承諾、組織創新與組織績效關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所博士論文,未出版,高雄。
江文政(2016)。嘉義縣市國民小學家長參與與教師工作士氣之研究。國立嘉義大
學教育行政與政策發展研究所碩士論文,嘉義。
李裕寬 (1983)。組織行為學,臺北市:正中書局。
李淑芬 (2002)。臺北市國民小學學生家長參與學校行政決定之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所,臺北市。
吳宗立(1998)。國民中學組織衝突、外在壓力、行政決策與學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
吳宗立 (2000)。學校行政政策。高雄市:麗文。
吳定 (1984)。組織發展理論與技術。臺北市:順達。
吳定(1987)。簡介組織發展理論。自由青年,59(5),51-55。
吳金香 (2000)。學校組織行為與管理。臺北市:五南。
吳秉恩 (1986)。組織行為學,華泰出版社,臺北市。
吳明雄(2010)。國民小學教師知覺校長轉型領導、教師知識管理與學校效能關係之研究。國立臺中教育大學教育系博士論文,未出版,臺中市。
吳明隆 (2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。臺北市:知城數位科技股份有限公司。
吳勁甫(2003)。校長領導與學校效能關係之探討—研究結果的回顧。學校行政雙月刊,27,52-62。
吳勁甫 (2008)。 競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為、學校組織文化與組織效能關係之研究。 國立政治大學教育學系博士論文, 未出版.
吳清山(1988)。國民小學管理模式與學校效能之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
吳清山(1998)。學校校能研究。臺北市:五南。
吳清山(1999)。教育革新與發展。臺北市:師大書苑。
吳清山(2005)。學校效能研究的價值。教育研究集刊,51(2),133-139。
吳清基(1989)。教育與行政。臺北市:師大書苑。
吳清基(1992)。教育行政決策理論與實際問題。臺北市:文景。
吳清基(2007)。品質是價值和尊嚴的起點,專業是精緻和卓越的保證。教師天地,147。
吳璧如(1990)。國民小學組織文化與組織效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
沈進成與王銘傑(2007)。工作士氣對工作績效影響關係之研究—以工作壓力為干擾變項。經營管理論叢,3(1),81-98。
周祝瑛(2003)。誰捉弄了臺灣教改?臺北市:心理。
易丕修 (2001)。九年一貫課程試辦小學組織發展之研究。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
林志成(1991)。動機理論對提振國民中小學教師士氣之啟示。教育研究所集刊,33,115-131。
林海清(1994)。高中教師激勵模式與其工作滿意服務士氣教學效能之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
林偉人(1998)。學校本位組織發展整合模式之研究:以國民小學為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
林婉琪(2000)。國民小學教師士氣與學校效能關係之研究-以臺灣北部地區三縣為例。國立臺北師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
邱侶文(2015)。國民中學校長變革領導角色、校長策略領導能力、學校組織文化
與學校組織效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,高雄。
侯一欣 (2011)。學校課程決策的另一層思考:以教師為主體。教師專業研究期刊創刊號,05-22。
風貞豪、何若湯(2006)。新竹地區高中校長轉型領導與體育教師工作士氣關係之研究。清雲學報,26(1),255-265。
秦夢群(1998)。教育行政─理論部分。臺北市:五南圖書出版公司。
翁國恭(2016)。高雄市國民小學校長知識領導、教師情緒勞務與學校組織效能關
係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,高雄市。
徐芬潔(2014)。臺中市國民小學校長角色實踐與教師工作士氣關係之研究。國立
臺中教育大學教育學系碩士論文,臺中市。
康龍魁、蘇誌誠與過修齊(2009)。學生家長對學校形象期望與滿意度之研究-以臺中縣一所國民小學為例。教育理論與實踐學刊,19,201-228。臺中市:國立臺中教育大學。
曾昭輝(2015)。學校文化、校長領導、家長參與對教師工作士氣影響之研究-以新北市公立國小教師為例。臺北市立大學國民小學教師在職進修公民與社會教學碩士學位班碩士論文,臺北市。
張明輝 (1999)。學校教育與行政革新研究。臺北市;師大書院。
張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。
張苙雲(1986)。組織社會學。臺北市:三民書局。
張鈿富 (2000)。學校行政決定原理與實務。臺北市:五南。
張新基(2008)。國民小學創新經營、組織文化與組織效能關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所博士論文,未出版,屏東市。
張慶勳(1996)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
張德銳 (2000)。我國中小學學校組織變革的新方向。初等教育學刊,8,,279-296。
張潤書(1998)。組織行為與管理。臺北市:五南。
許孝麟(2001)。國民小學教師參與決定與學校效能之研究。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
許嘉純(2009)。競值架構之校長領導效能與教師工作士氣關係之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
郭秋勳(1991)。影響高級職業學校教師參與在職進修教育訓練因素研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
陳明璋(1982)。組織效能及其決定因素之研究。國立政治大學學報,45,117-148。
陳慶瑞(1991)。國民小學校長領導效能之分析與評鑑—以闡述模式為例。國教天地,90,37-44。
陳嘉碩(2013)。國民中學校長華人領導行為、教師工作士氣、教師組織公民行為
關係之研究。國立嘉義大學教育學系博士論文,嘉義縣。
陳清濱(2016)。中部地區國民中學校長文化領導與學校組織效能關係之研究。國
立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系碩士論文,南投縣。
孫瑞霙(2002)。競值架構下領導型態、組織文化與組織效能之研究—以臺灣地區技術學院為例。國立臺北大學企業管理學系博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
溫明麗(1993)。教育參與權之合理探索─以英國教育改革為例。輯於中華民國比較教育學會主編:邁向二十一世紀之教育改革,265-282。臺北市:師大書苑
溫明麗 (2000)。 批判思考教學---哲學之旅, 臺北市: 師大書苑。
黃志豪(2008)。競值架構應用在高雄市國小校長組織變革領導角色與組織效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
黃昆輝(1983)。現階段臺灣省教育行政之檢討與策進。載於郭為藩(主編),當代教育理論與實際(223-246)。臺北市:五南。
黃昆輝(1988)。教育行政與教育問題。臺北市:五南圖書。
黃昆輝(1989)。教育行政學。臺北市,東華書局。
黃哲彬(2004)。創新管理及其對學校行政的應用。學校行政,34,8-20。
黃坤謨(2008)。國民小學校長多元智能領導、教師工作投入與學校效能關係之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
黃姵翎(2015)。退休制度變革對教師工作士氣影響之研究–以屏東縣立國民中學
教師為例。國立屏東大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,屏東市。

黃維揚(2015)。國民小學學校行政倫理實踐與教師工作士氣之相關研究。國立臺
中教育大學教育學系碩士論文,臺中市。
過修齊 (2011)。 競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導效能、學校組織效能與教師工作士氣之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系博士班博士論文,未出版,南投縣。
楊永年 (2010)。組織發展之理論與實務。T&D 飛訊,97,1-25。
楊界雄(2009)。國民小學家長參與班級事務與教師工作士氣關係之研究。國立臺中教育大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
楊振昇(1991)。國民小學教師參與學校行政決定與工作士氣關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
楊振昇(2006)。教育組織變革與學校發展研究。臺北市:五南。
楊國樞(1979)。現代性員工與傳統性員工的環境知覺、工作滿足及工作士氣。載於中國式管理研討會實錄。臺北市:時報。
葉子超(1996)。如何提高教師組織士氣。國立編譯館通訊,9(1),39-42。
蔡明學(2009)。臺灣地區地方教育視導對學校組織效能影響之研究-以績效責任觀點。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
蔡炳坤(2007)。高中校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
蔡進雄(2000)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究。臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
趙志楊(2002)。學校效能研究。刊載於張銀富(主編):學校行政:理論與應用,282-320。臺北市:五南。
廖雪吟(2007)。桃竹苗四縣市國民小學校長教學領導與教師工作士氣之研究。國立新竹教育大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
廖運楨(2002)。臺灣地區公立國民小學教師賦權增能之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立新竹師範學院,新竹市。
廖真筠(2017)。願景領導、組織信任與教師工作士氣之相關研究-以臺北市國民小
學為例。華梵大學工業工程與經營資訊學系碩士論文,新北市。
劉勝榮(2014)。臺中市國民小學教育資源整合與學校組織效能之關係研究。東海
大學教育研究所碩士論文,臺中。
潘文忠(1992)。國民中學組織結構類型與教師士氣關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
潘文章 (1984)。組織發展理論、方法、實務。臺北市;三民。
鄭彩鳳(1996)。競值途徑應用在高中職校長領導角色、學校組織文化與組織效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
鄭彩鳳(2007)。校長競值領導效能研究-理論、指標與衡量。臺北市:高等教育。
鄭福來 (2005)。臺北市國民小學兼任行政職務教師參與行政決定與工作滿意之研究。未出版之碩士論文,臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所,臺北市。
閻海峰、郭毅 (2012)。組織行為學。臺北縣:前程文化。
謝文全 (1991)。教育行政—理論與實務。臺北市:文景。
謝文豪 (2004)。國民中小學學校組織變革之探討-理論與實務。輯於張明輝(編),教育政策與教育格新(頁179-207)。臺北市;心理。
韓楷檉與過修齊(2005)。實施九年一貫課程後國民小學教師生涯自我效能與生涯協助需求相關因素之研究。國民教育研究集刊,13,185-207。臺中市:國立臺中師範學院。
顏志龍 (1999)。軍隊士氣之研究與測量工具之發展。應用心理研究,1,187-228。
顏志龍 (2003)。士氣研究之回顧及其本質之探討。應用心理研究(19),115-136。
顏火龍 (1985)。臺北市國民小學教師參與學校行政決定意願之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
魏名彥 (2003)。國民小學行政組織展之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
嚴靜娜(2001)。國民小學教師工作士氣及其影響因素之研究。國立臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。








































二、外文部分
Addicott, R., McGivern, G., & Ferlie, E. (2006, April). Networks, organizational learning and knowledge management: NHS cancer networks. Public Money and Management, 87 - 94.
Alutto,J.A. & Belasco, J.A. (1972). A Typology for Participation in Organizational Decision Making. Administrative Science Quarterly ,17.
Anderson, R. E. (1983). Finance and effectiveness: A study of college environ-ments. Princeton, NJ:College and University Programs, Princeton University Educational Testing Service. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 373409 ).
Baker, F. B. (1985). The basics of item response theory. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Barnes, J. V., Altimare, E. L., Farrell, P. A., Brown, R. C,, Burnett III, C. R., Gamble, L., & Davis, J. (2009). Creating and sustaining authentic partnerships with community in a systemic model. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 13(4), 15 - 29.
Beardwell, J., & Claydon, J. (2007). Human resource management: A contemporary approach (5th ed.). London, UK: Pearson Education.
Beckett, D. & Hager, P. (2002). Life, Work and Learning: Practice in Post-Modernity (London: Routledge).
Beckhard, R. (1969). Organization development: Strategies and models. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
Bennis, W. (1969). Organizational development: Its nature origins and prospects. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bentley,R.R.,& Rempel,A.M. (1967).Changing teacher morale: Anexperiment in feedback of identified problems of teachers and principals.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED341760)
Best, J.K. ( 1973). Decisional Status and Teacher morale: A Study of the Relationship Between Decisional Condition/Decisional Deviation and Teacher Morale. ED.D dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo,, p.10.
Bland, C. J., Taylor, A. L., Shollen, S. L., Weber-Main, A. M., & Mulcahy, P. A. (2009). Faculty success through mentoring. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Boyd, W. A. (1993). Teacher morale and sense of efficacy as psychosocial variables: Perceptions of social class, occupational status, and occupational prestige. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado.
Bradford, D. L., & Burke W. W. (2005). Reinventing organization development: New approaches to change in organizations. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Bumham, J. C. (2004). The effects of California Content Standard on teacher morale: A study of perceptions, support, and teaching practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, LA Sierra University.
Cameron, K. S. (1986). “Effectiveness as Paradox:Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness”.Management Science,32,(5),539-553.
Cameron, K. S., & Freeman, S. J. (1991). Cultural congruence, strength, and type: Relationships to effectiveness. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development, 5,23-58. London: JAI Press.
Campbell, E., & Lassiter, L. E. (2010). From collaborative ethnography to collaborative pedagogy: Re ections on the other side of Middletown project and community - university research partnerships. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 41(4), 370 - 385.
Campbell, J. P. (1973). Mangerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, Inc.
Caplow, T. (1983). Managing an organization. New York: Holt,Rinhard andWinston.
Carlton, E. L., Whiting, J. B., Bradford, K., Hyjer Dyk, P., & Vail, A. (2009). De ning factors of successful university - community collaborations: An exploration of one healthy marriage project. Family Relations, 58, 28 – 40.
Cheng,Y .C. (1991). Strategies for conceptualizing research on school administration:an effectiveness approach. Education Journal, 19,(1),69-81.
Chin, J. M. C. (2007). Meta-analysis of transformational school leadership effects on school outcomes in Taiwan and the USA. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(2),166-177.
Cyrus, J.A. (1986).The Relationships Between Morale and Perception of Involvement in Decision Making among District of Columbia Public School. Teachers Dissertation Abstracts International,47(05),p.1543.
Daniel,R.W. & Shay,P. (1995). Teachers’ attitudes toward school based decision making. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 391 791)
Davis, G. A.,& Thomas, M. A. (1989). Effective schools and effective teachers. London, England:Allyn &Bacon.
Davis, H. (1977). Human behavior at work organizational behavior (5th ed). NewYork: Mcgraw-Hill.
Dessler, G. (2004). Management: Principles and practices for tomorrow's leaders. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Donald,H. & Donna,S. (1996). School improvement through / university collaboration: the C-SIP model. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ 522 304)
Edmonds, R. R. (1979). Effective school for the urban poor.Educational Leadership,37,15-27.
Erb,T.O. (1981). Middle school research. Selected studies 1981. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 215 422)
Evans, L. (1997).Teacher morale:An individuall perspective. Educational Studies, 18(2), 161-171.
Fowler, D. O. (1996). The relationship of shared decision-making on teacher morale: Implications for middle school administrators. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(6), 2290A.
Fowler , M.B. (1985). The Relationships Bewteen Teachers’Perceived Participation in Education Decision Schools in Targeted Southeastern States. Dissertation Abstracts International , 46(11), P.3204A.
French, W. (1969). Organization development: Objectives, assumptions, and strategies. California Management Review, 12(2),24-28.
French, W. L., &Bell, C. H., Jr. (1995). Organization development-behavioral science interventions for organization development (4th ed.). Engewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
French,W., & Bell, C. Jr (1999). Organizational development: Behavioral science interventions for organization developments. Upper Saddle River,NJ:Prentice-Hall.
French, W. L., Bell, C. H., & Zawacki, R. A. (2005). Organization development and transformation: Managing effective change. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fuller,B.,&Clarke, P. (1994). Raising school effects while ignoring culture ?Local conditions snd the influence of classroom tools, rules and pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 64(1),119-157.
Gilbert, J. (2005). Catching the Knowledge Wave: The Knowledge Society and the Future of Education (Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research).
Glickman, C. D. (1990). Supervision of Instruction.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Green, R.E.,& Etheridge, B. (2001). Collaborating to establish standards and accountability:Lessons learned about systemic change. Journal of Applied Ecology 121(4),821-829.
Griffiths, D. E. (1959). Administrative theory. N.Y.: Appleton-Century-Crofys.
Griffith, J. (2003). School as organizational models: Implications for examining school effectiveness. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1),29-47.
Handerson, G.. (1994). Cultural Diversity in the Workplace: Issues andStrategies, Quorum Books. USA.
Houchard, M. A. (2005). Principal leadership, teacher morale, and student achievement in seven schools in Mitchell County, North Carolina. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, East Tennessee State University.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Education administration:Theory, research,and practice(7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hulpia, H., & Devos, G. (2010). How distributed leadership can make a difference in teachers organizational commitment? A qualitative study. Teaching and teacher education, 26(3), 565-575.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G. & Van Keer, H. (2010). The influence of distributed leadership on organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. Journal of Educational Research, (103), 1, 40-52.
Israel, B. A., Schultz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community- based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173 - 202.
Jefferson, B. (1981). A study of the relationship between teacher morale, elementary school principals’ philosophies of haman nature and teachers’ involvement in eductional decision making. Dissertion Abstracts International, 42(4),111.
Jennings, K.,&Lomas, L. (2003). Implenmenting performance management for headteachers in English secondry school:a case study. Educational Management and Administration,31(4),369-383.
Johnsurd, L. K. (1996). Maintaining morale: A guide to assessing the morale of midlevel administrators and faculty. Washington: College and University Personnel Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 399908).
Jones,R.E. (1997). Teacher participation in decision making-its relationship to staff morale and student achievement.Education,118(1),76-83.
Keely, M. (1984). Impartiality and participant interest theories of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 1-25.
Khan, B. (2005). Managing e-learning strategies: Design, delivery, implementation and evolution. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Klecker,B. & Loadman,W.E. (1996). Exploring the relationship between teacher empowerment and teacher job satisfaction. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 400 254)
Landefeld, T. (2009). Mentoring and diversity: Tips for students and professionals for developing and maintaining a diverse scientific community. New York, NY: Science+Business Media, LLC.
Lantz, P. M., Viruell-Fuentes, E., Israel, B. A., Softley, D., & Guzman, R. (2001). Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnership in Detroit. Journal of Urban Health, 78(3), 495 - 507.
Lashway,L. (1995). The limits of shared decision-making. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 467)
Lawless,D.J. (1979).Organizational behavior: the psychology of effective management. New Jersey : Prentice-Hill.
Leiman , H.I. ( 1961). A Study of Teacher Attitudes and Morale as Related to Participation in Administration . Unpublished doctoral dissertation , New York University , p.138.
Livingstone, D., Mirchandani, K. and Sawchuk, P. H. (eds) (2008). The Future of Lifelong Learning and Work: Critical Perspectives (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers).
Louisville Univ. (1995). Assessing the impact of high school restructuring in Kentucky. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 394 972)
Lucas, M. S. (1999). Adult csreer changer: A development context. Journal of Employment Counseling,36,115-118.
Lumsden, L. (1998). Teacher morale. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 422 601).
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2000). Educational administration: Concepts and practices. Belmont, California: Wadsworth, Inc.
Lytras, M. & Sicilia, M. (2005). ‘The knowledge society: a manifesto for knowledge and learn- ing’, International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 1, 2, 1–11.
Mamman,S.A. (1983). The Participation By Kaduna State Primary School Teachers in Selected Areas of Educational Decision Making. Dissertation Abstracts International,44(06), P.225.
Margulies, N.,& Raia, A. (1978). Conceptual foundations of organizational development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Martins, E. C., & Treblanche, F. (2003). Building organizational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64-74.
Marzano, R. J., Waters, T.,& McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
McBrayer, B.J. (1982). The Effect of The Administrative Behavior of Secondary School Prinicipals on The Participation and Influence of Teachers in School Decision-Making as Perceived By Teachers.Dissertation Abstracts International,43(07)A,p.96.
McGrevin, C.Z. ( 1984).Teacher Participation in The Decision-Making Process and Its Relationship to organizational Commitment and Morale.Georgia:University Microfilms, p.133-145.
McKimm, J., Jollie, C., & Hatter, M. (2007). Mentoring: Theory and practice. Retrieved from http://www.faculty.londondeanery.ac.uk/ e-learning/feedback/files/mentoring_ Theory_ and _practice.pdf
McManus, M. (1996).The need to maintain morale: A morale issue.In V. A. McClelland&V. Varma (Eds.).The needs of teacher.113-123. London:Gloucester.
Mehta, D., Gardia, A., & Rathore, H. C. S. (2010). Teacher participation in the decision-making process: Reality and repercussions in Indian higher education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(5), 659–671. doi: 10.1080=03057921003638171
Michael,L C. K. (1993). Principal’s leadership style, teachers’ morale and school effectiveness: perceptions of teachers in aided secondary school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Hong Kong.
Middlewood, D.,&Bush, T. (2005). Leading and managing people in education. London:Sage.
Northmore, S., & Hart, A. (2011). Sustaining community - university partnerships. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 4, 1 - 11.
Owens, R. G. (2001). Organizational behavior in education:Instructional leadership and school reform. Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
Partin, J. J. (1973). Current perspectives in organizational development. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
Paul,D. M. (1985). Principal Participation in self-Interest Issues and Measures of Organizational Climate. Dissertation Abstracts Internatinal,46(06),p.1470.
Pearlman, S. F. & Bilodeau, R. (1999). Academic - community collaboration in teen pregnancy prevention: New roles for professional psychologists. Professional Psychology, 30(1), 92 - 98.
Phipps, D., & Zanotti, D. (2011). It’s the basement stories, not the belt. Lessons from a community - university knowledge mobilisation collaboration. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 4, 203 - 214.
Podorf, F. M. (1993). The relationship between participatory management and teacher morale at the primary level in selected school districts in the state of New Jersey. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(9), 3072A.
Price, J. (1972). Handbook of organizational measurement. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Rajek,B.(1997).Designing and implementing value focused effectiveness indicators.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 409 957).
Rayner,S.,&Gunter,H . (2005).Rethinking leadership:perspectives on remodeling practice.Educational Review,57(2).
Reardon, S. F,& Raudenbush,S.W. (2009). Assumptions of Value-Added Models for Estimating School Effects. Education Finance and Policy,4(4),492-519.
Redding, J. (1984). Perceptions of Catholic Secondary School Teachers and Principals about Decision Making and The Effect on Teacher Morale.Dissertation Abstracts International,45(07),p.1947.
Reid, K., Hopkins, D., & Holly, P. (1987). Towards the effective school: The problems and some solutions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Remple, A. M., & Bentley, R. R. (1970). Teacher morale: Relationship with se-lected factors. The Journal of Teacher Education, 21(4), 534-539.
Robbins, S. P., & Barnwell, N. (1998). Organizational Theory: Concepts and Cases. Prentice-Hall Australia Pte Ltd, Brookvale.
Roberts, K. (1995). Applying a continuous quality improvement model to assess institutional effectiveness.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED396 804).
Ronald,L.M. (1994). The identification of underlying cultural assumptions an effective school,16-18.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 374 522).
Rowe, J. (2003). The myth of target-setting. Primary Headship,11,2-3.
Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: Research, theory and practice. London:Cassell.
Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness.New York: Pergamon.
Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Silva, H. N. S. (1996). Shared decision-making, teacher morale, and pupil performance in public schools. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(8), 2692A.
Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior: A study of decisionmaking processes in administrative organization. New York:Free Press.
Skelton,I. (1999). Military retention intangibles:esprit, morale and cohesion. Military Review,79,2-7.
Škerlavaj, M., Štemberger, M. I., Škrinjar, R., & Dimovski, V. (2007). Organizational learn- ing culture-the missing link between business process change and organizational performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(2), 346-367.
Smart, J. C. (2003). Organizational effectiveness of 2-year colleges: The centrality of cultural and leadership complexity. Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 673-703.
Smart, J. C., Kun, G. D., & Tierney, W. G. (1997). The roles of institutional cultures and decision approaches in promoting organizational effectiveness in two-yearcolleges. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(3), 256-281.
Smart, J. C.,&St. John, E. P. (1996). Organizational culture and effectiveness in higher education: A test of the “culture type” and “strong culture” hypotheses.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(3), 219-241.
Smith,K.R. (1966). A proposed model for the investigation of teacher morale. Journal of Educational Administrative,4,143-148.
Smith, L. (2003). Independence and collaboration: Why we should decentralize writing centers. The Writing Center Journal, 23(2), 15- 23. Retrieved May 27, 2014, from http://casebuilder.rhet.ualr. edu/wcrp/publications/wcj/wcj23.2/WCJ23.2_Smith.pdf
Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction :Application, Assessment, Cause , and consequence, thousand Oaks.CA:Sage.
Soto-pena,Raul. (1997). The difference between the actual and desired amount of teacher participation in decision-making and its relation to school effectiveness(site based management).[CD-ROM].Abstract From: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item:AAT9731718.
Stavros, J. M., & Hinrichs, G. (2009). Thin book of SOAR: Building strengths based strategy. Bend, OR: Thin Book Publishing.
Surm, J. A. (1989). Relationship between teacher morale and court-mandated school desegregation in Benton Harbor elementary school.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University.
Swanson,J.D. & Finnan,C. (1996). School improvement and action research: two paradigms. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 399 248)
Taylor,D.L. & Tashakkori.A. (1995). Decision participation and school climate as predictors of job satisfaction and teachers’ sense of efficacy. Journal of Experimental Education, 63(3),217-230.
Thomas, D. E. (2000). The meaning of leadership and its relationship to organizational effectiveness:The perspectives of exemplary leaders in education and athletics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA..
Webber, R.W. (1998). The effects consideration and initiating structure exhibited by principles on teacher morale in selected Louisiana secondary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana Tech University.
Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J.,& Krüger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398-425.
Yaeger, T. F., & Sorensen, P. F. (2009). Strategic organization development: Managing change for success. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Young, D. J. (1998). Characteristics of effective rural schools: A longitudinal study of Western Australian high school students. (ERIC Document reproduction service No. ED422141).
Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
Zarestky, J., & Cole, C. S. (2017). Strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results: An emerging approach to organization development. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 29(1).

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE