:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:程顥、程頤「以理為性」的「理一分殊」思想及方法論
書刊名:逢甲人文社會學報
作者:劉昌佳
作者(外文):Liu, Chang-chia
出版日期:2006
卷期:12
頁次:頁169-201
主題關鍵詞:程顥程頤以理為性理一分殊方法論Cheng HaoCheng YiYi-li-wei-singLi-yi-fen-shuMethodology
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1763
  • 點閱點閱:32
程顥、程頤稱宇宙的本體為「理」,這個本體是實存性的實有,宇宙萬物都是由這個本體所創生。至於人的本性,程頤明確提出「性即理也,所謂理,性是也。」這樣的說法,可以推論出:性=理,也就是用「理」去界定「性」的範疇與內涵,所以說二程是「以理為性」。這樣的理與性,有總體義,有分殊義。總體義的理與性,是指宇宙的本體;分殊義的性,則是指人物所稟受的本體,而這個分殊的本體,也即是總體的本體。 因為分殊的本體即是宇宙的本體,所以,人本身便涵蘊有這個本體,而心是人的主宰,所以程顥認為,人只須當處認取自身的本體,不須向外追尋,所以說「只心便是天」。價值落在現象界,由此再往前推,就可以得出:即事物即是天理,所以說「灑掃應對,形而上者在焉」。 在宇宙本體與個別本體的整個理論系統,二程是用「理一分殊」的方式開展出來的,其中的理,是指宇宙的本體,分殊則是指個別的本體。而二程所主張「以理為性」的理,正是指宇宙的本體;性,雖然有總體義和分殊義,這裡的「性」,側重在指個別的本體,也就是「理一分殊」中的「分殊」。 綜上所論,二程在宇宙的本體和人的心性的所有理論,都是以「以理為性」為核心思想,再以「理一分殊」的思想及方法所架構出來的。
Cheng, Hao and Cheng, Yi called the noumenon of the universe “Li.” This noumenon is substantially existing, and all God’s creation is created from this noumenon. As for the nature of human beings, Cheng, Hao proposed “Sing-ji-li-ye, suo-wei-li, sing-shih-ye” clearly. From this kind of statement, I can infer that “Sing” is equal to “Li. ” That is, using “Li” to define the connotation and category of “Sing.” Therefore, I can say that refers to two Mr. Chengs’ “Yi-li-wei-sing.” “Li” and “Sing” of this kind have overall meanings and individual meanings. “Li” and “Sing” of overall meanings indicate the noumenon of the universe; “Sing” of individual meanings mean the noumenon people and objects are endowed with. The individual noumenon is also the overall noumenon. Because the individual noumenon is also the noumenon of the universe, a person contains the noumenon himself/herself. The mind is the master of a person. Therefore, Cheng, Hao thought a person has to recognize the noumenon of himself/herself only, and does not have to search it outside. Because of “Jhih-sin-bian-shih-tian,” the value fulfills on the phenomenon circles. Then I can infer that things are the justice of nature. Hence, “The etiquette of daily life has metaphysics in itself.” Two Mr. Chengs developed the entire theoretic systems of the universe noumenon and the individual noumenon with “Li-yi-fen-shu.” “Li” means the noumenon of the universe, and “Fen-shu” signifies the individual noumenon. “Li” of “Yi-li-wei-sing” the two Mr. Chengs advocated is exactly the noumenon of the universe. Although “Sing” has the overall meaning and the individual meaning, “Sing” here lays special emphasis on the individual noumenon, namely “Fen-shu” of “Li-yi-fen-shu.” To sum up, all of the two Mr. Chengs’ theories on the noumenon of the universe and the nature of the human beings take “Yi-li-wei-sing” to be the core thought. The theories then were constructed with the thought and method of “Li-yi-fen-shu.”
期刊論文
1.劉昌佳(2005)。〈張載「理一分殊」的天道性命觀〉。《彰化師大國文學誌》,11 期,頁 27-62。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉昌佳(2006)。〈周敦頤對《太極圖》的「順化」說與「逆化」說〉。《興大人文學報》,36 期,頁 363-404。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.[英]李約瑟撰、陳立夫主(1974)。《中國之科學與文明》。台北:台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳寅恪(200107)。金明館叢稿。北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
3.李日章(198610)。程顥、程頤。台北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.張載(198112)。張載集。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.莊周、郭慶藩、王孝魚(1982)。莊子集釋。臺北:木鐸出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃宗羲、全祖望、王梓材、黃百家(1975)。宋元學案。臺北:河洛圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.王弼、韓康伯、孔穎達(1982)。周易注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.王弼、樓宇烈(1981)。老子、周易王弼注校釋。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.徐洪興(2000)。曠世大儒--二程。石家莊:河北人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.牟宗三(1981)。心體與性體。台北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳來(2004)。宋明理學。上海:華東師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.程顥、程頤(1982)。二程集。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.蒙培元(1998)。理學範疇系統。北京:北京人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.錢穆(1984)。宋明理學概述。台北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.朱熹、陳俊明(2000)。朱子文集。臺北:財團法人德富文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
16.唐君毅(1984)。中國哲學原論・原性篇。台北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.吳汝鈞(1998)。中國佛學的現代詮釋。文津。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.張岱年(1992)。中國哲學大綱。藍燈文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.侯外廬、邱漢生、張豈之(1997)。宋明理學史。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.黃慶萱(1995)。周易縱橫談。臺北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.周敦頤、陳克明(1990)。周敦頤集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
22.馮友蘭(1991)。中國哲學史新編。藍燈文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
23.勞思光(1980)。新編中國哲學史。友聯。  延伸查詢new window
24.牟宗三(1983)。中國哲學十九講:中國哲學之簡述及其所涵蘊之問題。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
25.李澤厚(1996)。中國古代思想史論。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.《六祖大師法寶壇經》。《大正藏》。  延伸查詢new window
27.[北涼]曇無讖譯。《大般涅槃經》。《大正藏》。  延伸查詢new window
28.[宋]朱熹(1980)。《上蔡語錄》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
29.[宋]朱熹(1986)。《朱子語類》。《景印文淵閣四庫全書》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
30.[宋]楊時。《龜山集》。《景印文淵閣四庫全書》。  延伸查詢new window
31.[宋]蔡沈(1963)。《書經集注》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
32.[後秦]鳩摩羅什。《妙法蓮華經》。《大正藏》。  延伸查詢new window
33.程德祥等、[英]葛瑞漢著(2001)。《中國的兩位哲學家:二程兄弟的新儒學》。鄭州。  延伸查詢new window
34.[唐]孔穎達。《尚書正義》。《十三經注疏》。  延伸查詢new window
35.唐君毅(1979)。《中國哲學原論.原教篇》。香港:台北。  延伸查詢new window
36.陳鼓應(1981)。《老子今注今譯及評介》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
37.葉秀山(2002)。《中西智慧的貫通——葉秀山中國哲學文化論集》。南京。  延伸查詢new window
38.盧連章(2001)。《程顥程頤評傳》。南京。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE