:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:議題中心教學法之結構性爭論模式應用於國小環境教育之研究
書刊名:臺中教育大學學報. 教育類
作者:黃志豪劉惠元
作者(外文):Huang, Chih-haoLiu, Hui-yuen
出版日期:2008
卷期:22:1
頁次:頁21-50
主題關鍵詞:議題中心教學法結構性爭論模式環境議題環境教育態度Issues-centered approachStructured controversy modelEnvironmental issueEnvironmental educationAttitude
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:42
  • 點閱點閱:36
本研究以議題中心教學法之結構性爭論模式進行國小環境教育的教學,目的在探討實施「議題中心教學法之結構性爭論模式」對國小學童環境態度與環境教育學習態度之影響情形,以及探討環境態度與環境教育學習態度之相關性,並了解學生對「議題中心教學法之結構性爭論模式」的評價。 研究者以彰化縣一所國小五年級學生爲研究對象,進行環境議題的教學。研究設計爲準實驗研究法,實驗組採議題中心教學法,控制組採傳統講述教學法。研究工具則使用「環境態度量表」與「環境教育學習態度量表」爲主,將前、後測所得分數加以分析討論,探討議題中心教學法對學童環境態度與環境教育學習態度之影響情形與相關性。另根據學童的小組討論紀錄表、學習省思紀錄表、訪談紀錄、議題中心教學法教學回饋單以及研究者的教學札記等資料,探討學童對於「議題中心教學法」的評價。 本研究所得結果如下: 一、「議題中心教學法之結構性爭論模式」與「傳統講述教學法」均能提升學生的環境態度,但「議題中心教學法之結構性爭論模式」的成效顯著高於「傳統講述教學法」。 二、「議題中心教學法之結構性爭論模式」能提升學生的環境教育學習態度,但「傳統講述教學法」卻不能提升學生的環境教育學習態度。此外,「議題中心教學法之結構性爭論模式」的成效顯著高於「傳統講述教學法」。 三、「環境態度」與「環境教育學習態度」之間有正相關存在。環境態度越佳,環境教育學習態度也越佳。 四、學生在「環境教育採用議題中心教學法之結構性爭論模式的教學方式」、「進行議題中心教學法之結構性爭論模式的過程」、「對於課程中所討論的議題喜歡程度」等方面均有正面的評價。 最後,研究者根據過程與結果,提出未來教師從事教學與研究上的建議,作爲日後以議題中心教學法之結構性爭論模式進行環境教育教學及後續研究之參考。
This study was a research of the structured controversy model in issues-centered approaches applied to environmental education in the elementary school. The purpose of this study was to discuss some influences of applying the issues-centered approach to the students' environmental attitude and learning attitude, to discuss the relationship between environmental attitude and learning attitude, and to understand some comments of students about issues-centered approaches. The researcher selected subjects from fifth-grade students of elementary school in Changhua. The researcher practiced the instruction about environmental issues. The researching design was nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design. The experimental group practiced the issues-centered approach, and the control group practiced the didactic instruction. The researching approach included "The Environmental Attitude Scale" and "The Learning Attitude Scale toward Environmental Education" which was adapted by the researcher. Then The researcher analyzed and discussed results of the pre-test and post-test scales to understand that how the issues-centered approach effected students' environmental attitude and learning attitude. Besides, the researcher used students' discussion records, learning records, interview records, questionnaire toward the issues-centered approach, and the teacher's observation-reflection records to understand some comments of students about issues-centered approaches. The results were as follows: (1) Both of the issues-centered approach and the didactic instruction could promote students' environmental attitude, but effects of the issues-centered approach were better than those of the didactic instruction. (2) The issues-centered approach could promote students' learning attitude, but the didactic instruction couldn't. Besides, effects of the issues-centered approach were better than those of the didactic instruction. (3) The relationship between environmental attitude and learning attitude was a positive correlation. The better environmental attitude were, the better learning attitude were. (4) Students had higher appraisals of "the teaching method by applying issues-centered approaches to environmental education", "the process in issues-centered instructions", "the degree that students were pleased with issues". Finally, the researcher gave some suggestions about instructions and future researches according to the study. The researcher hoped them to be references when teachers applied issues-centered approaches to environmental education in the future.
期刊論文
1.劉美玲、王佩蓮(20030700)。以繪本為媒介進行環境議題教學之研究。環境教育學刊,2,93-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Byrnes, J. P.、Torney-Purta, J. V.(1995)。Native Theories And Decision Making As Part Of Higher Order Thinking In Social Studies。Theory and Research in Social Education,23(3),260-277。  new window
3.Chilcoat, G. W.、Ligon, J. A.(2000)。Issues-Centered Instruction in the Elementary Social Studies Classroom。Theory and Research in Social Education,28(2),220-272。  new window
4.Evans, R. W.(1998)。Teaching social issues through a discipline-based curriculum。Social Studies Review,38(1),70-76。  new window
5.Ochoa-Becker, A. S.、Morton, M. L.、Autry, S. J.、Johnstad, S.、Merrill, D.(2001)。A search for decision making in three elementary classrooms: A pilot study。Theory and Research in Social Education,29(2),261-289。  new window
6.Iozzi,Louis A.、余興全(19901000)。環境教育研究的啟示:環境教育和情意教育。環境教育季刊,8,25-32。  延伸查詢new window
7.曾正茂(19900700)。我國環境教育之推動與展望。環境教育季刊,7,16-24。  延伸查詢new window
8.Kohlmeier, J.、O'Brien, J.(2004)。A Web-based, Issues Centered Assignment for Teacher Education and High School Students。Journal of Social Studies Research,28(1),3-15。  new window
9.Rossi, J. A.、Pace, C. M.(1998)。Issues-Centered Instruction With Low Achieving. High School Students: The Dilemmas Of Two Teachers。Theory and Research in Social Education,26(3),380-409。  new window
10.石雅玫(20010100)。花蓮地區國小教師議題中心教學信念及多元文化議題調查之研究。課程與教學,4(1),129-154+170。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Iozzi, Louis A.、余興全(19900700)。環境教育研究的啟示:環境教育和情意教育。環境教育季刊,7,8-15。  延伸查詢new window
12.張秀雄(20031000)。議題中心課程模式在九年一貫課程「社會學習領域」的應用。公民訓育學報,14,15-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Ramsey, J. M.、Hungerford, H. R.、Volk, T.(1989)。A technique for analyzing environmental issues。Journal of Environmental Education,21(1),26-30。  new window
14.汪靜明(20000900)。學校環境教育的理念與原理。環境教育季刊,43,18-34。  延伸查詢new window
15.石雅玫(20020400)。議題中心教學法的理論基礎及實施模式。教育研究資訊,10(2),145-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.董秀蘭(19980800)。議題中心教學法在國中法治教育課程的應用--結構性爭論模式的實例。人文及社會學科教學通訊,9(2)=50,53-64。  延伸查詢new window
17.劉美慧(19980600)。議題中心教學法的理論與實際。花蓮師院學報,8,173-199。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.黃朝恩(19951000)。環境議題分析與教學。環境教育季刊,27,20-33。  延伸查詢new window
19.Hines, Jody M.、Hungerford, Harold R.、Tomera, Audrey N.(1987)。Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis。The Journal of Environmental Education,18(2),1-8。  new window
研究報告
1.廖添富、劉美慧、董秀蘭(1999)。議題中心教學對高中學生公民參與態度影響之實驗研究 (計畫編號:NSC88-2413-H-003-021)。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖添富、劉美慧、董秀蘭(1998)。議題中心教學對國中學生公民參與態度影響之實驗研究 (計畫編號:NSC87-2413-H-003-020)。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.毛群欽(2003)。大高雄地區國中小學生環境態度與水污染概念之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.潘志忠(2002)。議題中心教學法對國小學生批判思考能力影響之實驗研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院,花蓮縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃慧貞(2006)。應用STS理念教學將環境教育議題融入國小自然與生活科技之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立台中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.涂馥麗(2005)。議題中心教學法對國小學生批判思考能力的影響--以議題取向的藝術人文課程為例(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳建儒(2004)。台灣偶像劇弔詭價值觀分析及國小學童實施議題中心教學法之探討(碩士論文)。臺南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳銀筑(2002)。議題中心教學法對國小學生政治態度影響之實驗研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.Liu, M.(1995)。Teachers' perspectives toward the issues-centered instructional approach: A study of Taipei senior high school civics teachers(博士論文)。University of Minnesota。  new window
8.王貴春(2000)。STS教學與國小學生創造力及學習態度之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
9.蔡擇文(2003)。國小五年級自然科融入STS教學對學生學習態度、批判思考與科技創造力之影響(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.謝佩靜(2000)。國小學童生態平衡概念與環境態度之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃朝凱(2003)。國民小學學童知覺班級氣氛、學習態度與創造傾向之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.石雅玫(2000)。花蓮地區國小教師議題中心教學信念及多元文化議題調查之研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
13.呂慧娟(2002)。台北市國中公民與道德科教師對議題中心教學信念之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
14.溫春琳(2002)。議題中心教學法在國中公民與道德科的行動研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
15.鍾敏龍(2002)。國小社會科以爭論性議題中心的批判思考教學之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
16.官淑如(1997)。綜合高中學生學習態度及其相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
17.歐莓芋(2004)。遊戲教學應用於國小環境教育之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林寶山(1980)。教學論。臺北市:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
2.Johnson, D. S.、Johnson, R. T.、Smith, K. A.(1991)。Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom。Edina, MN:Interaction Book Company。  new window
3.張春興、林清山(1990)。教育心理學。臺北市:東華。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊冠政、國立編譯館(1997)。環境教育。明文。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Avery, P. G.、Sullivan, J. L.、Smith, E. S.、Sandell, S.(1996)。Issues-centered approaches to teaching civics and government。Handbook on teaching social issues。Washington, DC:National Council for the Social Studies。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE