:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:重釋《牡丹亭記題詞》
書刊名:淡江中文學報
作者:李思涯
作者(外文):Li, Si-ya
出版日期:2008
卷期:18
頁次:頁255-276
主題關鍵詞:湯顯祖牡丹亭記題詞「情」與「理」Tang XianzuPreface of peony pavilionQing and Li
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:53
  • 點閱點閱:113
《牡丹亭記題詞》是解讀《牡丹亭》的關鍵,但幾乎沒有人完整地解讀過這篇題詞。本文通過整體解讀《題詞》、重釋其中的「情」、「理」關係,發現《題詞》的結構嚴密不可分,湯顯祖在《題詞》中展現了他對「情」與「理」關係的形而上思考。湯顯祖試圖以「情」作為超越性的東西,來替代「理」而通天下。《題詞》的結構也和《牡丹亭》的結構相對應。湯顯祖在《牡丹亭》中做了兩個轉變,將「有情人」的「有無」問題轉變為一個杜麗娘的「真假」問題,將「夢中之情,何必非真」之夢中的「情」真轉變成了現實中「杜麗娘」是真是假的問題。在這些轉變中,杜麗娘才成了「情」的象徵。
How to interpret Tang Xianzu's own Preface of Peony Pavilion, or Mudan ting Ji Tici (《牡丹亭記題詞》), is the key to read Peony Pavilion. Scholars usually took a part of Tici to illustrate their views, however, no one explained the whole text before. By analyzing the whole text and reinterpreting the relation of qing (情) and li (理), this paper discovers that the Tici has a well-organized system, through which Tang Xianzu presented his metaphysical thought about the relation of qing and li. With qing, Tang Xianzu tried to take the place of li, and he considered that qing could also be transcendent and universal. Du Liniang could die and then come to life because of her youqing (有情) and zhenqing (真情), and furthermore, qing must be acknowledged by people in the society before it could be universal. The structure of Tici is corresponding to that of the play. In it, there are two transformations. The topic of Du Liniang's youqing was transformed into a topic of true of false, or zhen jia (真假) and the topic of qing in dream (夢中之情) was transformed into a topic of real or fake Du Liniang in society. Finally, through these transformations, Du became a symbol of qing.
期刊論文
1.戴璉璋(20061200)。湯顯祖與羅汝芳。中國文哲研究通訊,16(4)=64,245-260。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.鄒元江(2002)。湯顯祖以情抗「理」是宋明理學之「理」嗎?─達觀「接引」湯顯祖的一段公案芻議。中州學刊,2。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.江西省文學藝術研究所(1984)。湯顯祖研究論文集。北京=Beijing。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.鄭培凱(1996)。湯顯祖與晚明文化。臺北:允晨文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.徐朔方(1958)。湯顯祖年譜。湯顯祖年譜。北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.釋真可。紫柏老人集。  延伸查詢new window
4.華瑋(2005)。湯顯祖與牡丹亭。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。  延伸查詢new window
5.錢穆(1953)。宋明理學概述。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.湯顯祖、徐朔方(1962)。湯顯祖集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.中國社會科學院文學研究所中國文學史編寫組(1962)。中國文學史。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.黎靖德、王星賢(1987)。新校標點朱子語類。臺北:華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.毛效同(1986)。湯顯祖研究資料彙編。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.羅汝芳、曹胤儒(1960)。盱壇直詮。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃宗羲(1990)。明儒學案。北京:中國書店。  延伸查詢new window
12.王守仁、吳光、錢明、董平、姚延福(1992)。王陽明全集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.湯顯祖、徐朔方(1982)。湯顯祖詩文集。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.干寶、汪紹楹(1979)。搜神記。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.葉長海(2005)。理有情無說湯翁。湯顯祖與牡丹亭。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(明)湯顯祖(1999)。湯顯祖全集,北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.(晉)陶潛(1981)。搜神後記,北京。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE