:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:由馮少墟學說論晚明關學的轉折
書刊名:國文學報
作者:侯潔之 引用關係
作者(外文):Hou, Chieh-chih
出版日期:2008
卷期:43
頁次:頁109-142
主題關鍵詞:馮從吾馮少墟關學本體未發功夫朱王調和Feng Cong-wuFeng Shao-xuGuan theoryPrincipal bodyUndeveloped gong fu
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1665
  • 點閱點閱:53
關學傳衍至少墟,處處可見調和朱、王的軌跡與關、洛學交會的激盪。其思維所反映的關學轉折表現在三方面:朱、王的調和與本體功夫關係的衡定、關學禮制的深化與價值的回歸、洛學功夫的吸納與內容的轉化。簡賅之,少墟將朱、王調和的關鍵,歸諸於本體與功夫的融會,因此他將功夫納入本體,構成以本體活動義為理論基準的的學術體系,試圖兼取二家之長,以互相救正,並重整空疏玄蕩的理學亂象。鎔鑄在關學傳續中,一方面將相沿的禮教傳統,由禮節形式的探討,轉向價值意義的溯源;一方面在關、洛學交會的前導下,吸納洛學道南一脈的未發功夫,作為立體的根柢。然而,隨著本體詮釋重心的轉移,闡發面向亦有所轉化,表現在偏顯寂感一如的生生理體、側重發與未發通貫義的闡釋、將誠意視為由未發通貫發用的關鍵三方面,皆可見有別於洛學的推進痕跡。
When Guan theoryl was passed to Shao-xu one can see the trace of mind learning and interchange of Guan and Luo schools. The reflected transformation of thinking of Guan school are expressed in three aspect: stimulation of mind learning and evaluation of principal body gong fu, deepening of Guan theory and returning of values, absorption of Luo school gong fu and transformation of contents. In brief, Shao-xu believed the defects of Wang school is the natural opposition of principal body and gong fu. Therefore, he included gong fu into principal body to establish the academic system based on theory standard of principal body activities meanings in attempt to readjust the chaos of corruption of mind learning through blending of the relation of the two. In passing Guan theory, Rong-zhu turned to value meanings and origin from discussion of courtesy forms of the tradition of etiquette on the one hand and, under guidance of interchange of Guan and Luo theory, absorbed the undeveloped gong fu of Daonan Division of Luo school as the foundation of establishment. However, with switch of principal body interpretation emphasis, elucidation is also changed to be expressed in the physical body in loneliness with emphasis on developed and undeveloped interpretation of meanings. The three aspects of sincerity as the key of undeveloped penetration are different from the promotion of Luo theory.
期刊論文
1.劉學智(2002)。馮從吾與關學學風。中國哲學史,3,73-79。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳有能(1998)。陳俊民教授與關學論爭。中國文哲研究通訊,8(1),135-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳有能(2002)。馮從吾論功夫。彰化師大文學院學報,1。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.馮從吾。關學編。北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.高攀龍(1987)。高子遺書。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.王夫之、楊堅(1998)。船山全書。長沙:嶽麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
4.顧憲成、馮從吾(1975)。小心齋劄記。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.李顒、陳俊民(1996)。二曲集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.朱熹、黎靖德、王星賢(1986)。朱子語類。文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.張載(2004)。張載集。臺北:漢京文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳鼎(1983)。東林列傳。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳俊民(19900000)。張載哲學與關學學派。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.牟宗三(1999)。心體與性體。正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.張廷玉(1975)。明史。鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.王守仁、吳光、錢明、董平、姚延福(1997)。王陽明全集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.陸九淵、鍾哲(1980)。陸九淵集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(明)馮從吾。馮少墟集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(宋)李侗(1984)。李延平集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(明)劉宗周(2007)。劉宗周全集,浙江。  延伸查詢new window
4.(清)黃宗羲(1987)。黃宗羲全集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(元)托克托。宋史,北京。  延伸查詢new window
6.(明)顧憲成。涇皋藏稿,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.(宋)楊時(1993)。楊時集,福建。  延伸查詢new window
8.(宋)羅從彥(1984)。羅豫章先生文集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.(清)舒其紳。西安府志,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE