:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小體育教師課程決定內涵之研究
書刊名:體育學報
作者:陳文長 引用關係李俊杰 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Wen-changLee, Chun-chieh
出版日期:2011
卷期:44:1
頁次:頁113-130
主題關鍵詞:國小體育教師課程決定Physical education teacher in elementary schoolCurriculum decision-making
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:61
  • 點閱點閱:100
國小體育教師課程決定程度,代表著國小體育教師彰權益能的多寡,暨反映國內體育課程決定民主化的指標作用。目的:本研究旨在了解國小體育教師課程決定的內涵程度,更體現國內課程決定的民主化的意義。方法:以臺澎金馬地區各公私立國小教師爲研究母群,採取質量並行的取徑,先針對3名國小體育教師進行參與式觀察與個人深度訪談,再與8名擔任體育科任之教師、組長、主任、及校長進行深度訪談;量化方面透過問卷調查法,採分層隨機抽樣抽取1,000份樣本,約佔全國國小教師人數之0.97%;共回收830份,有效樣本計807份。再以描述統計、單因子多變量變異數分析(one-way MANOVA)與薛費法(Scheffes' mothed)事後比較進行統計。質化方面除配合文件分析,並觀察3名國小體育教師,分別訪談8名國小體育教師、組長與校長。結果:國小體育教師在課程決定內涵整體平均數爲3.51,傾向於經常做決定的情況。各層面以內容的決定爲最高,分組的決定次之,其餘依序爲目標的決定、策略的決定、資源的運用等。不同背景變項國小體育教師課程決定內容之差異考驗,在不同性別、服務年資、專業背景、學歷、擔任職務、任教年級以及參與研習等變項上均有顯著差異存在。結論:國小體育教師普遍體認到「內容的決定」,是體育課程實施的主體,已經能夠體認到應教什麼、爲什麼教、甚至於如何教的意涵。
The extent that the elementary school physical education teachers were able to achieve on curriculum decision-making, more or less, represented to what degree that physical education teacher's rights and interests could be realized. Purpose: this study was to investigate the contents of curriculum decision-making for elementary school physical education teachers and took all elementary school teachers. Methods: Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu areas as the research population. Both quantitative and qualitative methodologies were taken. In quantitative side, we chose to use the questionnaire survey. By Stratified Random Sampling, we got 807 effective samples. Then descriptive statistics, one-way MANOVA, and Scheffe' method were used for post hoc comparison. On the one hand, we qualitatively observed three elementary school physical education teachers; and on the other hand, we also interviewed eight different school teaching manpower, including elementary school physical education teachers, section chiefs, and school principals. Documentary analyses were included, too. Results: The overall mean for elementary school physical education teachers on contents of curriculum decision-making was 3.51, meaning they tended to make decisions from time to time. Whereas taking every perspective into consideration, it showed that the contents decision scores the highest, followed by group's decision, objective decision, strategy decision, and resource application. When testing for variances among different background variables for elementary school physical education teacher deciding curriculum contents, it were sex, years of teaching, professional background, academic background, jobs, grade teaching, and workshops participation that resulted in the existence of significant differences. Conclusion: elementary school physical education teachers in general realized that "the decision of the content" is the main body of sports curriculum implementation, and also comprehended the meanings of what should be taught, why to teach, and even how to teach.
期刊論文
1.譚彩鳳(2006)。校本課程政策透視:中文教師的觀點與實踐。教育曙光,53,57-67。  延伸查詢new window
2.Stroot, S. A.(2001)。Preparing for a professional career in physical education。Teaching Elementary Physicl Education,12(2),6-9。  new window
3.周淑卿(20010700)。課程決定的賦權迷思--集中化與離中化的探討。教育研究集刊,47,91-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.丁念金(2005)。論教師參與課程決策的保障體系。河北師範大學學報,7(5),84-88。  延伸查詢new window
5.李俊杰(2008)。我國國小體育教師課程決定影響因素之探討。臺中技術學院學報,9(2),113-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡清田、雲大維(2007)。影響國小教師鄉土教育課程決定因素之研究。屏東教育大學學報:教育類,29,89-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.譚彩鳳(2010)。教師校本課程決定即其影響因素之研究:香港個案研究。教育研究與發展期刊,6(2),3-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Ennis, C. D.(1994)。Knowledge and beliefs underlying curricular expertise。Quest,46,164-175。  new window
9.Griffey, D. C.、Housner, L. D.(1991)。Differences between experienced and inexperienced teachers' planning decisions, interactions, student engagement and instructional climate。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,62(2),196-204。  new window
10.Hawthore, R. D.(1990)。Analyzing school-based lollabortive curriculum decision making。Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,5(3),279-286。  new window
11.Woods, A. M.、Lynn, S. K.(2001)。Through the years: A longitudinal study on physical education teachers form a research-based preparation program。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,72(3),219-231。  new window
12.Bechtel, P. A.、O'Sullivan, M.(2007)。Enhancers and inhibitors of teacher change among secondary physical educators。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,26(3),221-235。  new window
學位論文
1.洪崇峰(2003)。桃園縣國小體育教師課程決定影響因素之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳文長(2005)。國民小學體育教師教學熱忱、發展趨向、及影響因素之研究(博士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園縣。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.潘義祥(2004)。國民小學健康與體育學習領域教師自我效能、教學承諾與教學實踐及其線性結構關係模式之研究(博士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園縣。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林盛基(2003)。桃園縣國小教師健康與體育學習領域教學態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
5.林興兆(2001)。國小教師九年一貫健康與體育領域課程統整態度之調查研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃秋芳(2003)。體育專家教師與生手教師回饋行為與教學思考之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.王登方(2001)。國中體育教師專業成長需求之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,台中市。  延伸查詢new window
8.王春堎(1999)。彰化縣國小教師對體育課程價值取向暨課程決定之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園市。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃雅瑛(2001)。國小教師課程決定及學校本位課程發展之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
10.李復惠(2002)。台中市國小教師對九年一貫課程「健康與體育領域」健康教學範疇之認知與關注程度研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.戴仁山(2000)。台北縣國小教師體育課任教意願及其影響因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
12.李俊杰(2006)。國民小學體育教師課程決定之研究(博士論文)。國立體育學院。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.黃子騰(2004)。我國科技大學課程決定之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.李明達(2004)。國民小學體育授課教師教學態度與教學效能關係之研究--以台南縣市為例(碩士論文)。臺南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
15.吳妮真(2004)。高中家政教師課程決定歷程之研究。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃清勇(2002)。體育教師對九年一貫課程「健康與體育」學習領域內涵知覺之研究。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
17.Nutravong, R.(2002)。School-based curriculum decision-making: A study of the Thailand reform experment。  new window
圖書
1.甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務--解構理論與重建。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.Jewett, A. E.、Bain, L. L.、Ennis, C. D.(1995)。The curriculum process in physical education。Dubuque, IA。  new window
3.李瑾諭、柳德玉、牛震乾(2002)。課程改革與教師角色轉換。北京:中國人事出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.董洪亮(2004)。教學組織策略與技術。北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.Klein, M. F.(1991)。A conceptural framework for curriculum decision-making。The politics of curriculum decision-making: Issues in centralizing the curriculum。New York。  new window
6.Oberg, A. A.(1991)。Curriculum decision。The international encyclopedia of curriculum。Oxford。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃繼仁(20050000)。許瓦布的課程思想。課程思想。臺北:冠學文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE