:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:概念構圖在理解式球類教學法之應用
書刊名:中華體育季刊
作者:曹弘源潘義祥 引用關係
出版日期:2011
卷期:25:4=99
頁次:頁774-782
主題關鍵詞:教學策略課程設計
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:218
  • 點閱點閱:67
本研究目的旨在探討概念構圖(concept mapping)如何融入於理解式球類教學法(teaching games for understanding, TGfU)之實務應用。本研究先分析理解式球類教學法與概念構圖之理論基礎,並結合兩種教學法之相對優點,設計完整的教學範例。概念構圖乃是將學習的概念圖像化,透過理解式球類教學法之實施過程,將概念構圖融入教學單元中,可以提高學生對比賽策略與戰術的整體概念,提升學生的學習效果。未來的研究方向,建議能設計融合「理解式球類教學法」與「概念構圖」之實務課程,並實際投入體育教學現場,探討學生的學習動機與成效。
期刊論文
1.徐岳聖、林錚、周建智(20071100)。探究合作學習與概念構圖策略介入桌球課對大學生批判性思考能力與桌球動作技術之影響。北體學報,15,67-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bunker, D.、Thorpe, R.(1982)。A model for the teaching of games in secondary school。Bulletin of Physical Education,18(1),5-8。  new window
3.Kirk, D.、Macdonald, D.(1998)。Situated learning in physical education。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,17(3),376-387。  new window
4.Novak, J. D.(2002)。Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners。Science Education,86(4),548-572。  new window
5.闕月清(20030900)。體育初任教師學科教學知識之研究。體育學報,35,193-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.廖智倩、闕月清(20080600)。中學師生對理解式球類教學實施知覺之探討。臺中教育大學學報. 教育類,22(1),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Novak, Joseph D.(1990)。Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,27(10),937-949。  new window
8.Werner, R、Thorpe, R.、Bunker, D.(1996)。Teaching games for understanding: Evolution of modtl。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,67(1),28-33。  new window
9.Langlois, M. A.(2004)。Using concept mapping to promote coordinated school health programs。Jomal of School Health,74(3),105-107。  new window
10.Hastie, P. A.、Curtner-Smith, M. D.(2006)。Influence of a hybrid sport education: Teaching games for understanding unit on one teacher and his students。Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,11(1),1-27。  new window
11.Harvey, S.、Cushion, C. J.、Wegis, H. M.(2010)。Teaching games for understanding in American high-school soccer: A quantitative data analysis using the game performance assessment instraxnent。Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,15(1),29-54。  new window
12.Peters, J.、Quay, J.(2008)。Skill, strategies, sport, and social responsibility: Reconnecting physical education。Curriculum studies,40(5),601-326。  new window
13.Turner, A. P.、Martinek, T. J.(1999)。An investigation into teaching game for understanding: Effects on skill, knowledge and game play。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,70,286-296。  new window
學位論文
1.林靜萍(2002)。體育師資生學科教學知識之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kozulin, A., Gindis, B. Ageyev, V. S.,、Miller, S. M. Eds..(2003)。Vygotsky ‘s educational theory in cultural context。Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.黃志成、闕月清(2008)。理解式球類教學法。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.周宏室(1995)。Mosston(摩斯登)體育教學光譜的理論與應用。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.Ausubel, David Paul(1968)。Educational Psychology: a cognitive view。New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.。  new window
5.余民寧(19970000)。有意義的學習:概念構圖之研究。臺北:商鼎文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Bunker. D.、Thorpe, R.(1986)。The curriculnni model。Rethinking games teaching 7-10。Loughborough, England。  new window
7.Butler, J. I.、Griffin, L. L.(2010)。TGfU movement in an international context。More Teaching Games for Understanding moving globally 3-12。Champaign, IL。  new window
8.Mitchell, S.、Osin, J.(2010)。Teaching games for understanding。Standards-based physical education curriculum。Sudbury, Massachusetts。  new window
圖書論文
1.Sweeney, M.、Everitt, A.、Carifio, J.(2003)。Teaching games for understanding: A Paradigm shift for undergraduate students。Teaching games for understanding in physical education and sport: An international perspective。Reston, VA:National Association of Sport and Physical Education。  new window
2.Novak, J. D.、Gowin, D. B.(1984)。Concept mapping for meaningful learning。Learning how to learn。NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE