:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:反核或擁核?核廢料儲置場之審議式民主討論與原住民部落發展
書刊名:臺灣原住民族研究季刊
作者:靳菱菱 引用關係
作者(外文):Chin, Ling-ling
出版日期:2012
卷期:5:2
頁次:頁1-39
主題關鍵詞:臺東縣達仁鄉核廢料審議式民主Daren Township in Taitung CountyNuclear wasteDeliberative democracy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:281
  • 點閱點閱:126
「審議式民主」強調被賦權的公民在取得充分知識後,盱衡情勢提出解決社會利益衝突的方案,不但強化政府決策正當性,同時改善公民被動接受資訊、或被隔絕在「專業決策」的過程之外,這項制度彌補了選舉投票無法呈現的多元民意,同時對少數人掌握決策權力亦有深刻的批判。我國在2010年3月曾就台電設置低放射性廢棄物最終處置場候選場址進行公民審議,本文將以此檢視公民審議制度是否強化民主政治的社會階層不平等,以理性為依歸的訴求是否讓文化優勢差異更被強化。本文發現:達仁鄉有相當多數民眾認為:在環境安全無虞、政府承諾給予特定補償金下,並不反對核廢料存放在該鄉。然而地方環保團體、教會主導的反核運動幾乎凌駕支持核廢的聲浪。公民審議委員會最終結論亦表示政府應尊重當地豐富生態,核電的成本不應由少數人承擔,政府應重視原住民族基本法的相關精神。然審議過程當地排灣族人並沒有參與,政府又挾豐厚的行政資源在部落進行政策說服,亟欲脫貧的族人不認為外來者有權力決定其「福祉」,但在綠色能源大行其道的今日,贊成核廢者被污名化,間接被排除在審議的過程外,達仁鄉的個案或可成為思索「審議民主究竟滿足了誰的民主」等議題的起點。
Deliberative Democracy is regarded as a mean to improve the defaults of modern politics. It focuses on the issues concerning the diverse interests of the common good, proposed by well-informed citizens who participate in the decision-making process. This operation is not only reflected in public opinion but also supplements the shortcomings of the parliamentary system. Nantian village belongs to the Paiwan tribe of Taitung County and has been selected as one of the candidate sites for the storage nuclear waste by the Taiwan Power Company. A committee and the Public Television Station (PTS) met with 25 local citizens in March 2010 to deliberate and discuss the issue of storing nuclear waste in the vicinity of Nantian village in Daren Township. A consensus was reached that the government should respect the Indigenous Basic Law and the will of the tribesmen and that the indigenous people of the area should not be exposed to the risks of such a policy. However, most of the local indigenous people would accept the policy if the government promised that the nuclear waste could be stored safely and could provide subsidies to supplement their livelihoods. But this viewpoint has been suppressed and opposed by environmental groups. The supporters of the plan didn't participate in the process of deliberation because they were stigmatized and yielded to the pressure of the green energy groups. Deliberative Democracy couldn't treat diverse interests equally and this has strengthened the biases of the social structure and is not conducive to the disadvantaged indigenous people.
期刊論文
1.黃東益(20060300)。審議日:治理的烏托邦或務實的民主創新工程?。公共行政學報. 政大,18,137-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.靳菱菱(20100600)。族群認同的建構與挑戰:臺灣原住民族正名運動的反思。思與言,48(2),119-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Rowe, Gene、Frewer, Lynn J.(2000)。Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation。Science, Technology & Human Values,25(1),3-29。  new window
4.黃東益(20081200)。審議過後--從行政部門觀點探討公民會議的政策連結。東吳政治學報,26(4),59-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Dahl, Robert Alan(1997)。On Deliberative Democracy: Citizen Panels and Medicare Reform。Dissent,44(3),54-58。  new window
6.Gutmann, Amy(1995)。Civic Education and Social Diversity。Ethics,105,557-579。  new window
7.余致力(20000100)。論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色--黑堡宣言的內涵、定位與啟示。公共行政學報,4,1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林火旺(20050300)。審議民主與公民養成。國立臺灣大學哲學論評,29,99+101+103-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.黃競涓(20080900)。女性主義對審議式民主之支持與批判。臺灣民主季刊,5(3),33-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃東益、李翰林、施佳良(20070300)。「搏感情」或「講道理」?:公共審議中參與者自我轉化機制之探討。東吳政治學報,25(1),39-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.丁家楨(2009)。低放射性廢棄物最終處置設施是台東達仁鄕的起點?還是終點?。核能簡訊,118,4-7。  延伸查詢new window
12.林國明(2007)。審議民主的多元實踐。台灣民主季刊,4(3),191-195。  延伸查詢new window
13.江瑞祥(2006)。審議民主與民主審議。台灣民主季刊,3(3),213-220。  延伸查詢new window
14.靳菱菱(2009)。漁場保育與族群文化發展的兩難:以台東富山漁場及蘭嶼禁漁區爲例。社會與區域發展學報,3(1),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Dryzek, John S、Trucker, Aveizer(2008)。Deliberative Innovation to Different Effect: Consensus Conferences in Demark, France and the United States.。Public Administration Review,68(5),864-876。  new window
16.Fung, Archon.(2005)。Book Review of Deliberative Day, by Bruce Ackerman and James Fishkin.。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,24(2),.472-476。  new window
會議論文
1.范玫芳(2010)。風險溝通與環境公民身份之實踐與挑戰:以低放射性廢棄物最終處置設施選址爭議爲例。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃東益、杜文苓、范玫芳、林子倫(2010)。低放射性廢棄物最終處置議題與公民參與之硏究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gastil, J.、Levine, P.(2005)。The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for. Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.Fay, B.(1976)。Social Theory and Political Practice。New York, NY:Holmes & Meier。  new window
3.黃浩榮(2005)。公共新聞學:審議民主的觀點。台北:巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Dahl, R. A.、Edward, R. T.(1973)。Size and Democracy。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
5.Horkheimer, Max、Adorno, Theodor W.、Cumming, John(1972)。Dialectic of Enlightenment。New York:Herder and Herder, Inc.。  new window
6.Gutmann, Amy、Thompson, Dennis、謝宗學、鄭惠文(2005)。商議民主。臺北:智勝文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.Habermas, Jürgen、McCarthy, Thomas A.(1987)。Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason。Beacon Press。  new window
8.黃瑞祺(2007)。批判社會學。台北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
9.Kymlicka, Will(2001)。Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship。Oxford University Press。  new window
10.陳敦源(20020000)。民主與官僚:新制度論的觀點。臺北:韋伯文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Habermas, Jürgen、Rehg, William(1996)。Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
12.林國明(2005)。公民共識會議:公民參與的的民主實驗-審議式民主公民會議操作手冊。台北。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃瑞祺、陳閔祥(2010)。審議民主與法治國的理想。溝通、批判與實踐:哈伯馬斯八十論集 \\ 黃瑞祺 (主編)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃維明、Dryzek, John S.(2009)。談論式民主:政治、政策與政治學。台北:群學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.張金生(1998)。台東縣達仁鄕鄕誌 [未出版]。  延伸查詢new window
16.靳菱菱(2007)。少數民族的國家意象建構:以布農族爲例。「中國政治學會年會暨學術硏討會」論文。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
17.謝地坤、Habermas, Jurgen(2002)。民主的三種規範模式-關於商議政治的槪念。哈貝瑪斯在華演講集 \\ 中國社會科學院哲學硏究所 (編)。  延伸查詢new window
18.Habermas, Jurgen.(1982)。A Reply to My Critics.。Habermas: Critical Debates \\ John Thomposon ; David Held (eds.)。MA。  new window
19.Habermas, Jurgen(1984)。Theory of Communicative Action 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society。Boston:Beacon。  new window
20.Hendriks, Carolyn M.(2005)。Consensus Conference and Planning Cells: Lay Citizen Deliberations.。The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century \\ John Gastil ; Levine, Peter (eds.)。San Francisco。  new window
其他
1.詹中原(2006)。公共政策問題建構過程中公共性之剖析,http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/CL/095/CL-R-095-027.htm, 2013/10/22。  延伸查詢new window
2.台東縣達仁鄕公所(2008)。台東縣達仁鄕統計要覽。  延伸查詢new window
3.審議民主實務工作坊(2005)。會議實錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Young, Iris Marion(1996)。Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy。Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Elster, Jon(1998)。Deliberation and Constitution Making。Deliberative Democracy。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Hammer, T.(2003)。Introduction。Youth unemployment and social exclusion in Europe: A comparative study。UK:The policy press。  new window
4.Cohen, Joshua(1989)。Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy。The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State。Oxford:Basil Blackwell。  new window
5.Fishkin, James S.、Luskin, Robert C.(1999)。Bringing Deliberation to the Democratic Dialogue。The Poll With A Human Face: The National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE