臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：立委選制改變對指定用途補助款分配之影響：第五屆與第六屆的比較
書刊名：東吳政治學報
作者：賴映潔／王宏文 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lai, Ying-chieh／Wang, Hongwung
出版日期：2013
卷期：31:1
頁次：頁53-104
主題關鍵詞：分配政策；指定用途補助款；立委選制改革；城鄉新風貌計畫；赫芬達爾指數；Distributive policy；Earmarks；Legislative electoral system changes；Townscape renaissance project；Herfindahl index
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:201
  • 點閱點閱:97
2005年我國將立法委員選舉制度由「複數選區單記非讓渡 選票制」改為「單一選區制兩票制」，同時重新劃分選區，並確定於2008年選舉第七屆立法委員時開始實施。第六屆立委及政黨領袖在面臨新選制及新選區，並為了最大化其連任機率和最大化政黨席次，他們會如何改變指定用途補助之分配行為是本研究的主要研究目的。本研究以「創造城鄉新風貌計畫」在第五屆及第六屆立委任期內分配至各選區的補助金額為分析對象，從選區個人及政黨選票集中度的角度切入，研究結果顯示選區立委個人選票集中度越高者，該選區所獲得的人均補助款也較多，這可能是因為有立委在該選區較具優勢，因此選民對立委有較高的期待、監督、與課責，使立委爭取肉桶之動機較強，本研究也發現立委個人選票集中度較高的選區，第六屆會比第五屆獲得更多的補助款。此外，選區政黨選票集中度對第五屆立委任期內之補助款分配的影響很小，且不顯著；但對第六屆立委任期內之補助款分配則具有顯著的影響，甚至超越個人選票集中度的影響，這可能是因為政治人物已預期到政黨競爭將是第七屆立委選舉的主要面向，且希望以補助款的分配來鞏固政黨既有的地盤。
Taiwan's new single-district, two vote legislative electoral system replaced the SNTV in 2005, and was first followed in the 7^(th) legislative election in 2008. Based on distributive policy theory, this paper tries to explore how 6^(th) Yuan's legislators and party leaders changed their pork barrel behaviors in order to maximize re-election probabilities and seats when facing the coming electoral rule changes. By analyzing the ”Creating Townscape Renaissance Project” data during the 5^(th) and 6^(th) legislative terms, this study has two major findings. First, the results show that the more concentrated the legislators' personal votes in an electoral district is, the more earmarks it gets. This may be because that when the legislators' votes in an electoral district are more concentrated, there exists a dominant representative, who has greater accountability to voters. As a result, the representative has a stronger motivation to bring the pork home. The results also show that when other things hold constant, legislators' personal vote concentration had more positive impacts on grants in the 6^(th) legislative term than in 5^(th) term. In addition, a party's political power in an electoral district shows much more positive impacts on earmarks distribution in 6^(th) term. This may be because the party competition is anticipated to be the major issue in new electoral system, and thus earmarks were distributed based on a party's dominance.
期刊論文
1.Banks, Jeffrey S.、Kiewiet, D. Roderick(1989)。Explaining Patterns of Candidate Competition in Congressional Elections。American Journal of Political Science，33(4)，997-1015。  new window
2.Cain, Bruce E.(1979)。The House is Not a Home: British MPs in Their Constituencies。Legislative Studies Quarterly，4(4)，501-523。  new window
3.Engstrom, Erik J.、Vanberg, Georg(2010)。Assessing the Allocation of Pork: Evidence From Congressional Earmarks。American Politics Research，38(6)，959-985。  new window
4.Fiorina, Morris P.(1981)。Some Problems in Studying the Effects of Resource Allocation in Congressional Elections。American Journal of Political Science，25(3)，543-567。  new window
5.Hirschman, Albert O.(1964)。The Paternity of an Index。The American Economic Review，54(5)，761-762。  new window
6.Kalseth, Jorid、Jørn Rattsø(1998)。The Political Control of Administrative Spending: The Case of Local Governments in Norway。Economics and Politics，10(1)，63-83。  new window
7.Larcinese, Valention(2006)。Allocating the U.S. Federal Budget to the States: The Impact of the President。Journal of Politics，68(2)，447-456。  new window
8.Lazarus, Jeffrey(2009)。Electoral Vulnerability, and Earmarks in the U.S. House of Representatives。The Journal of Politics，71(3)，1050-1061。  new window
9.Lazarus, Jeffrey(2010)。Giving the People What They Want? The Distribution of Earmarks in the U.S. House of Representatives。American Journal of Political Science，54(2)，338-353。  new window
10.Lowry, Robert C.、Matthew Potoski(2004)。Organized Interests and the Politics of Federal Discretionary Grants。The Journal of Politics，66(2)，513-533。  new window
11.McCurley, Carl、Jeffrey J. Mondak(1995)。Inspected by #1184063113: The Infulence of Incubents’ Competence and Integrity in U.S. House Elections。American Journal of Political Science，39(4)，864-885。  new window
12.Mondak, Jeffrey J.(1995)。Competence, Integrity, and the Electoral Success of Congressional Incumbents。The Journal of Politics，57(4)，1043-1069。  new window
13.Plott, Charles R.(1968)。Some Organizational Influence on Urban Renewal Decision。American Economic Review，58(2)，306-321。  new window
14.Rundquist, Barry S.、John A. Ferejohn(1975)。Observations on a Distributive Theory of Policy Making: Two American Expenditure Programs Compared。Comparative Public Policy: Theories, Methods and Issues，87-108。  new window
15.Scholl, Edward L.(1986)。The Electoral System and Constituency-Oriented Activity in the European Parliament。International Studies Quarterly，30(3)，315-332。  new window
16.Stone, Walter J.、Maisel, L. Sandy(2003)。The Not-So-Simple Calculus of Winning: Potential U.S. House Candidates' Nomination and General Election Prospects。The Journal of Politics，65(4)，951-977。  new window
17.Stroup, Michael D.(1998)。Some Evidence of Congressional Political in DOD Personnel Allocations。Public Choice，94(3)，241-254。  new window
18.Snyder, James M. JR.、Michiko Ueda(2007)。Do Multimember Districts Lead to Free-Riding?。Legislative Studies Quarterly，32(4)，649-679。  new window
19.李俊達(20101100)。總統得票率、地方補助款與行程安排之相關性探討。選舉研究，17(2)，71-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.楊濡嘉(20071012)。立委選舉逼近 城鄉風貌補助淪為綁樁小金庫。聯合報，A16。  延伸查詢new window
21.羅清俊(20001200)。政策利益分配的型態：最小獲勝聯盟？還是通通有獎？。政治科學論叢，13，201-232。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Lee, Frances E.(2003)。Geographical Politics in the U.S. House of Representatives: Coalition Building and Distribution of Benefits。American Journal of Political Science，47(4)，714-728。  new window
23.Ames, Barry(1995)。Electoral Rules, Constituency Pressure, and Pork Barrel: Bases of Voting in the Brazilian Congress。The Journal of Politics，57(2)，324-343。  new window
24.羅清俊(20081200)。小規模立法委員選區的分配政治--選民對於補助利益的期待。臺灣民主季刊，5(4)，47-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Samuels, David J.(2002)。Pork Barreling Is Not Credit Claiming or Advertising: Campaign Finance and the Sources of the Personal Vote in Brazil。The Journal of Politics，64(3)，845-863。  new window
26.羅清俊、謝瑩蒔(20080600)。選區規模與立法委員分配政策提案的關聯性研究：第三、四屆立法院的分析。行政暨政策學報，46，1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Heitshusen, Valerie、Young, Garry、Wood, David M.(2005)。Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom。American Journal of Political Science，49(1)，32-45。  new window
28.Stratmann, Thomas、Baur, Martin(2002)。Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ Across Electoral Systems。American Journal of Political Science，46(3)，506-514。  new window
29.Carey, John M.、Shugart, Matthew Soberg(1995)。Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas。Electoral Studies，14(4)，417-439。  new window
30.Lancaster, Thomas D.、Patterson, W. David(1990)。Comparative Pork Barrel Politics: Perceptions from the West German Bundestag。Comparative Political Studies，22(4)，458-477。  new window
31.羅清俊、廖健良(20090600)。選制改變前選區規模對立委分配政策提案行為的影響。臺灣政治學刊，13(1)，3-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Lancaster, Thomas D.(1986)。Electoral Structures and Pork Barrel Politics。International Political Science Review，7(1)，67-81。  new window
33.Cox, Gary W.、Niou, Emerson M. S.(1994)。Seat Bonuses Under the Single Nontransferable Vote System: Evidence From Japan and Taiwan。Comparative Politics，26(2)，221-236。  new window
34.王靖興(20091200)。立法委員的立法問政與選區服務之分析：2000年政黨輪替前後的持續與變遷。臺灣政治學刊，13(2)，113-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Roberts, Brian E.(1990)。A Dead Senator Tells No Lies: Seniority and the Distribution of Federal Benefits。American Journal of Political Science，34(1)，31-58。  new window
36.盛治仁(20060600)。單一選區兩票制對未來臺灣政黨政治發展之可能影響探討。臺灣民主季刊，3(2)，63-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.盛杏湲(20050900)。選區代表與集體代表：立法委員的代表角色。東吳政治學報，21，1-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Lowi, Theodore J.(1964)。American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory。World Politics，16(4)，677-715。  new window
39.羅清俊(20000300)。猜猜看誰把醃肉帶回家了：補助款利益在縣市分配的分析。人文及社會科學集刊，12(1)，1-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.Batto, Nathan(20010500)。Geographical Voting Bases and the Stability of Candidates' Voter Coalitions (1989-1998)。選舉研究，8(1)，211-251。new window  new window
41.王鼎銘、郭銘峰、黃紀(20080900)。選制轉變過程下杜佛傑心理效應之檢視：從日本眾議院選制變革的經驗來觀察。問題與研究，47(3)，1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.羅清俊、萬榮水(19991100)。選舉與補助款的分配：綁樁？還是平衡地方財政？。選舉研究，6(2)，121-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.Alvarez, R. Michael、Saving, Jason L.(1997)。Deficits, Democrats, and Distributive Benefits: Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel in the 1980s。Political Research Quarterly，50(4)，809-831。  new window
44.Bickers, Kenneth N.、Stein, Robert M.(1996)。The Electoral Dynamics of the Federal Pork Barrel。American Journal of Political Science，40(4)，1300-1326。  new window
45.Stain, Robert M.、Bickers, Kenneth N.(1994)。Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel。The Journal of Politics，56(2)，377-399。  new window
46.黃秀端(20010900)。單一選區與複數選區相對多數制下的選民策略投票。東吳政治學報，13，37-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Hirano, Hiroshi(2005)。National Issues and District Interests: Impact of the 1994 Electoral Reforms on Japanese Voting Behavior(會議日期: 20080901-20080904)。Washington：Washington DC。  new window
2.Sheng, Shing-Yuan(2006)。The Personal Vote-Seeking and the Initiation of Particularistic Benefit Bills in the Taiwanese Legislature。The Legislatures and Parliaments in the 21th Century Conference，(會議日期: 20060708)。Taipei：Soochow University。  new window
3.黃紀、林怡均(2009)。執政黨資源分配的邏輯：2001~2008年的補助款分析。2009年台灣政治學會，(會議日期: 20091122)。新竹市：台灣政治學會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.盛杏湲(2010)。選區、政黨與立法委員的三角關係：選制變遷前後的比較 (計畫編號：NSC 95- 2414-H-004-046-MY3)。  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇彩足(2001)。省政府補助款之政治因素分析 (計畫編號：NSC89- 2414-H-002-026)。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.內政部營建署(2008)。創造台灣城鄉風貌示範計畫第三期計畫核定本。台北：內政部營建署。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅清俊(2009)。重新檢視臺灣分配政策與政治。臺北：揚智出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Fenno, Richard F. Jr.(1978)。Home Style: House Members in their Districts。Little, Brown and Company。  new window
4.Downs, Anthony J.(1957)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。New York：Harper and Row。  new window
5.黃秀端(19940000)。選區服務：立法委員心目中連任之基礎。臺北：唐山。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.內政部戶政司(2011)。門牌查詢系統，http://www.ris.gov.tw/36， 20110630。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部營建署魅力城鄉主題網(2011)。歷年計畫一覽表，http://trp.cpami.gov.tw/ch/Manage_List.aspx?path=204， 20110630。  延伸查詢new window
3.中國國民黨全球資訊網(2011)。人民公僕，http://www.kmt.org.tw/， 20110630。  延伸查詢new window
4.中央選舉委員會網站(2011)。選舉資料庫 2011/06/30。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Anagnoson, J. Theodore(1980)。Politics in the Distribution of Federal Grants: The Case of the Economic Development Administration。Political Benefits。MA：Lexington Books。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：784（臺灣：779，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2000451 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67799738
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上