臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：你讀到什麼科學？--科學新聞閱讀回憶診斷工具發展與評析
書刊名：教育科學研究期刊
作者：黃俊儒
作者(外文)：Huang, Chun-ju
出版日期：2015
卷期：60:2
頁次：頁139-166
主題關鍵詞：科學新聞；閱讀回憶；閱讀回憶診斷；Science news；Reading memory；Reading diagnosis
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:75
  • 點閱點閱:23
近代社會中的科技發展變化快速，若要持續地關心這些正在發生的科學相關議題，科學 新聞文本就扮演一個重要的媒介角色。在眾多的科學新聞當中，「科學編譯新聞」是國內引進 「科學新知」的最主要媒介，並且同時融合了科學的「說明文」及「故事文」兩種文類，是 一個十分特殊及重要的科學知識文本。一般民眾如何對這類新聞文本進行閱讀與回憶，甚至 足以影響科技社會的發展與成熟。本研究透過科學新聞閱讀回憶診斷工具的發展，經由自由 回想及問題晤談的方法，探討大學生在閱讀科學編譯新聞時的閱讀回憶量、類型及相關的影 響因素。研究結果發現，主題興趣是影響閱讀者掌握相關科學訊息的最主要因素，而閱讀者 對於科學新聞的文本結構掌握地愈完整，愈有助於科學知識的吸收及整體意義的掌握。
In the current technological society, science news is a crucial mediator between people and developing science and technology. Among the various types of science news, compiled science news is the main source from which the latest scientific information from abroad is introduced. Compiled science news, which combines narrative and expository texts, is a unique type of scientific information. Because scientific information is increasingly prevalent, the manner in which people read and remember science news can affect the development and maturity of a technological society. This study explored students’ reading memory and style as well as the factors influencing reading by applying a developed diagnostic tool in combination with free recall tasks and interviews. The results revealed that the motivation of interest is the main factor affecting student monitoring of science news. When readers maintain more complete textual structures in their mind, they can more efficiently master the scientific knowledge and grasp complete concepts from the compiled science news.
期刊論文
1.Wellington, J.(1991)。Newspaper Science, School Science: Friends or Enemies?。International Journal of Science Education，13(4)，363-372。  new window
2.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20080800)。「科學家發明了什麼？！」--解析學生對於科學新聞中的科技產物意象。科學教育學刊，16(4)，415-438。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.楊文金(1994)。生活世界與科學教育。科學教育，167，2-16。  延伸查詢new window
4.Yore, L. D.、Bisanz, G. L.、Hand, B. M.(2003)。Examining the Literacy Component of Science Literacy: 25 Years of Language Arts and Science Research。International Journal of Science Education，25(6)，689-725。  new window
5.Norris, S. P.、Phillips, L. M.、Korpan, C. A.(2003)。University students' interpretation of media reports of science and its relationship to background knowledge, interest, and reading difficulty。Public Understanding of Science，12(2)，123-145。  new window
6.Dimopoulos, K.、Koulaidis, V.(2002)。The socio-epistemic constitution of science and technology in the Greek press: An analysis of its presentation。Public Understanding of Science，11(3)，225-241。  new window
7.Graesser, A. C.、Hemphill, D.(1991)。Question answering in the context of scientific mechanisms。Journal of Memory and Language，30(2)，186-209。  new window
8.Huang, Chun-Ju(2014)。Double media distortions for science communication--An analysis of "compiled science news" transforming in Taiwan。Asian Journal of Communication，24(2)，128-141。  new window
9.Unsworth, L.(1999)。Developing critical understanding of the specialized language of school science and history texts: A functional grammatical perspective。Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy，42(7)，508-521。  new window
10.Wartenberg, C.、Holmqvist, K.(2005)。Daily newspaper layout--Designers' predictions of readers' visual behaviour-A case study。Lund University Cognitive Studies，126，1-11。  new window
11.Zimmerman, C.、Bisanz, G. L.、Bisanz, J.、Klein, J. S.、Klein, P.(2001)。Science at the supermarket: A comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts' advice to readers, and what students want to know。Public Understanding of Science，10(1)，37-58。  new window
12.張文強(19970700)。閱聽人與新聞閱讀--閱聽人概念的轉變。新聞學研究，55，291-310。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.楊文金、陳世文(20080300)。科學漢語與科學英語論述特質的比較--以「觀念物理」文本為例。師大學報. 科學教育類，53(1)，113-137。  延伸查詢new window
14.顏若映(1993)。先前知識在閱讀理解上之認知研究。教育與心理研究，16，385-412。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20101000)。在科學與媒體的接壤中所開展之科學傳播研究：從科技社會公民的角色及需求出發。新聞學研究，105，127-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Graesser, A. C.、Millis, K. K.、Zwaan, R. A.(1997)。Discourse comprehension。Annual Review of Psychology，48(1)，163-189。  new window
17.Osborne, R. J.、Wittrock, M. C.(1983)。Learning science: A generative process。Science Education，67(4)，489-508。  new window
18.DeBoer, G. E.(2000)。Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，37(6)，582-601。  new window
19.Graesser, A. C.、Singer, M.、Trabasso, T.(1994)。Constructing Inferences during Narrative Text Comprehension。Psychological Review，101(3)，371-395。  new window
20.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20060100)。科學新聞文本的論述層次及結構分佈：構思另個科學傳播的起點。新聞學研究，86，135-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.黃俊儒(20080200)。構思科技社會中的即時學習：以學生及專家對於科學新聞文本之理解差異為例。科學教育學刊，16(1)，105-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Norris, S. P.、Phillips, L. M.(2003)。How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy。Science Education，87(2)，224-240。  new window
學位論文
1.林俊智(2003)。以系統功能語言學觀點探討不同課文結構對科學文章的理解--以溫度與熱為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.李哲迪(2006)。高中物理教科書與學生關於力的話語與合法化的語言策略(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.翁育誠(2004)。以蘊含序列與詞彙密度兩種結構探討科學課文結構與閱讀理解的關係--以溫度與熱為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Unsworth, L.(2001)。Teaching Multiliteracies Across the Curriculum。Open University Press。  new window
2.Mcginn, Robert E.(1991)。Science, Technology, and Society。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
3.李國秀(2000)。科學的社會視角。合肥：安徽人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.de Kerckhove, Derrick(1995)。The Skin of Culture: Investigating the New Electronic Reality。Toronto, Ontario：Somerville House。  new window
5.Britton, B. K.、Graesser, A. C.(1996)。Models of understanding text。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.Garcia, M. R.、Stark, P.(1991)。Eyes on the news。St. Petersburg, FL：The Poynter Institute。  new window
7.Webster, A.(1991)。Science, technology and society。London：Macmillan。  new window
8.Millar, R.、Osborne, J. F.(1998)。Beyond 2000: Science education for the future。London：King's College London School of Education。  new window
9.Lemke, Jay L.(1990)。Talking science: Language, learning, and values。Ablex。  new window
10.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
11.Mullis, I. V. S.、Martin, M. O.、Kennedy, A. M.、Foy, P.(2007)。PIRLS 2006 international Report: IEA's Progress in International Reading Literacy Study in Primary Schools in 40 Countries。Chestnut Hill, MA：TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College。  new window
12.Kintsch, Walter(1974)。The representation of meaning in memory。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
13.OECD(2007)。PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow's world: Volume 1--Analysis。Paris：OECD。  new window
14.Kennedy, G.、Moen, D. R.、Ranly, D.(1993)。Beyond the Inverted Pyramid: Effective Writing for Newspapers, Magazines and Specialized Publications。New York, NY：St. Martin's Press。  new window
其他
1.魏國金(20100831)。蘋果基因圖譜科學家破解。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Goldman, S. R.、Bisanz, G. L.(2002)。Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: Implications for understanding and learning processes。The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Aikenhead, G. S.(1990)。Scientific/ Technological Literacy, Critical Reasoning, and Classroom Practice。Foundations of Literacy Policy in Canada。Calgary：Detselig。  new window
3.Kameenui, E. J.、Simmons, D. C.(1990)。Designing instructional strategies for teaching reading comprehension: Narrative prose。Designing instructional strategies: The prevention of academic learning problem。Columbus, OH：Merrill。  new window
4.Leon, J. A.、Penalba, G. E.(2002)。Understanding causality and temporal sequence in scientific discourse。The psychology of science text comprehension。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
5.Snow, C. E.、Sweet, A. P.(2003)。Reading for comprehension。Rethinking reading comprehension。New York, NY：The Guilford Press。  new window
6.Solomon, J.(1994)。Group Discussions in the Classroom。Teaching Science。London：Routledge。  new window
7.王文科(2000)。質的研究問題與趨勢。質的研究方法。高雄：麗文。  延伸查詢new window
8.Holmqvist, K.、Holsanova, J.、Barthelson, M.、Lundqvist, D.(2003)。Reading or Scanning? A Study of Newspaper and Net Paper Reading。The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research。Amsterdam, the Netherlands：Elsevier Science。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1261（臺灣：1245，外國：16） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1972506 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67788949
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上