:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:應用人格測驗於文官考選之可行性分析
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:李俊達 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Chun-ta
出版日期:2015
卷期:21:4
頁次:頁49-69
主題關鍵詞:人格測驗文官考試院五大人格因素模式Personality testCivil serviceExamination YuanBig five factor model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:36
目前我國政府的人才甄選方法,仍以測量工作知識的紙筆測驗,做為主要甄選方法。針對紙筆測驗不足的問題,部分研究建議可在既有的甄選或培訓方式中加上人格測驗。本文主要討論人格測驗在文官考選的發展,包括從理論層面探討人格測驗的應用與限制,並在實務層面以英國快速升遷考試為例,說明人格測驗的應用方式。同時,彙整與分析考試院研議應用人格測驗的發展現況。本文研議,若考選階段納入人格測驗,可考慮做為篩選的工具,並與兩階段考試配合施行,以降低考生的考試成本以及考試院的閱卷成本。至於在一般文官或高階文官之培訓與升遷,人格測驗的結果可做為參考依據。整體而言,未來在應用人格測驗時,必須建立在測驗「什麼」的前提之上,倘若測驗的「標的」並非特質、而是狀態的話,訴諸人力資源發展應為更加適切之途徑。
The recruitment and selection methods for civil service in Taiwan are primarily written tests which focus on the examinees’ competence at work. Some existing researches advise to add personality tests to enhance the efficiency during the process of selection or training for civil service. This paper discusses the limits to applications of personality test and takes UK Civil Service Fast Stream (CSFS) as an example to analyze how personality test applied to the procedure of examination, additionally, introduces the development status of personality test which executed by Examination Yuan. This paper advises that personality test can serve as a selection tool when two-stage testing was implemented for saving cost of the whole examination. Relatively, the result of personality tests would be a worthwhile reference for training and promotion for civil service personnel. However, it must be confirmed in advance that whether the target of personality test is a trait or a state. A state is a transient characteristic that can change over time. If we plan to define a specific state of civil service through personality test, the test results should be relevant to human resource development.
期刊論文
1.郭昱瑩、蘇文信(20080400)。全球化下考試制度研析:兼論美、英、日、韓經驗。考銓季刊,54,54-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.彭錦鵬(20050900)。從英美等國文官制度發展探討我國考試制度改進方向。國家菁英,1(3),35-61。  延伸查詢new window
3.高永光(20130700)。公務人員考試與核心職能測驗分析。國家菁英,9(2)=34,1-22。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉慧娥(20130700)。英國政府快速升遷制度之介紹及分析:我國人才甄選可參考借鏡之處。國家菁英,9(2)=34,163-209。  延伸查詢new window
5.高振翔(2005)。各國公務人員考試制度之比較研究。考選週刊,1046,3。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳皎眉、胡悅倫、洪光宗(20101200)。人格測驗在國家選才上之使用與發展。國家菁英,6(4)=24,1-12。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳皎眉、黃富源、孫旻暐、李睿杰(20110300)。論心理測驗與國家考試。國家菁英,7(1)=25,15-31。  延伸查詢new window
8.彭錦鵬(20090300)。考選制度的觀念革新--以簡併考試類科及考試及格人員地方歷練為例。國家菁英,5(1),49-67。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭夙珍、林邦傑(20091200)。心理測驗納入國家考試之可行性探討。國家菁英,5(4),73-84。  延伸查詢new window
10.Barrett, Gerald V.、Depinet, Robert L.(1991)。A reconsideration of testing for competence rather than for intelligence。American Psychologist,46(10),1012-1024。  new window
11.Salgado, J. F.(1999)。Personnel selection methods。International review of industrial and organizational psychology,14,1-54。  new window
12.Guion, R. M.、Gottier, R. F.(1966)。Validity of personality measures in personnel selection。Personnel Psychology,18(2),135-164。  new window
13.Hough, L. M.、Oswald, F. L.(2000)。Personnel selection: Looking toward the future-remembering the past。Annual Review of Psychology,51,631-664。  new window
14.Schmitt, N.、Gooding, R. Z.、Noe, R. A.、Kirsch, M.(1984)。Meta-analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics。Personnel Psychology,37(3),407-422。  new window
15.Barrick, Murray R.、Mount, Michael K.、Judge, Timothy A.(2001)。Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next?。International Journal of Selection and Assessment,9(1/2),9-30。  new window
16.Tett, Robert P.、Jackson, Douglas N.、Rothstein, Michell(1991)。Personality Measures as Predictors of Job performance: A Meta-Analytic Review。Personnel Psychology,44(4),703-742。  new window
17.吳宗憲(20120900)。臺南市政府文官公共服務動機與工作滿意、工作努力意願之實證研究--以個人/組織配適度作為調節變項。公共行政學報,43,91-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.彭錦鵬(20100300)。公務人員考選制度的變革與未來展望。國家菁英,6(1)=21,17-40。  延伸查詢new window
19.Barrick, Murray R.、Mount, Michael K.(1991)。The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis。Personnel Psychology,44(1),1-26。  new window
20.McCrae, Robert R.、John, Oliver P.(1992)。An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications。Journal of Personality,60(2),175-215。  new window
會議論文
1.McFarland, L. A.、Wiechmann, D.、Chandler, C. W.(200104)。Using appropriateness fit to identify faking on a personality test。The Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology conference。San Diego, CA。  new window
研究報告
1.胡悅倫、孫擯如、莊俊儒(2011)。人格測驗在國家選才及培訓任用之運用與發展。  延伸查詢new window
2.胡悅倫、孫蒨如、莊俊儒(2012)。高階文官人格測驗量表之研發與運用。  延伸查詢new window
3.胡悅倫、莊俊儒(2010)。公務人員培訓運用人格測驗評量機制之研發。  延伸查詢new window
4.彭錦鵬、劉坤億(2009)。我國公務人力資源改革方向之研究。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Beraardin, J. H.、Bownas, D. A.(1985)。Personality assessment in organizations。New York:Praeger。  new window
2.Cabinet Office(2005)。Fast Stream in-service: A guide for applicants。London:Cabinet Office。  new window
3.Murphy, K. R.、Davidshofer, C. O.(2001)。Psychological testing: Principles and Applications。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education, Inc。  new window
4.Hodgetts, R. M.(1991)。Organizational behavior: Theory and practice。New York:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
5.張潤書(1998)。行政學。臺北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭生玉(2004)。教育測驗與評量。精華。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.王俊卿,黃明昌(2009)。英國、法國高級文官考選制度參訪報告,臺北:考選部。  延伸查詢new window
2.李選(2013)。考試院第11屆第225次會議紀錄,http://www.exam.gov.tw/cp.asp?xltem=17585&ctNode=411&mp=1。  new window
3.高永光(2011)。考試院第11屆第121次會議紀錄,http://www.exam.gov.tw/cp.asp?xItem=13216&ctNode=411&mp=2。  new window
4.高明見(2013)。考試院第11屆第225次會議紀錄,http://www.exam.gov.tw/cp.asp?xItem=17585&ctNode=411&mp=1。  new window
5.陳皎眉(2013)。考試院第11屆第225次會議紀錄,http://www.exam.gov.tw/cp.asp?xItem=17585&ctNode=411&mp=l。  new window
6.楊久瑩(2010)。國考擬增人格測驗沒通過不任用,http://www.public.com.tw/prog/lia/HotNews/newsListShow/2354.html。  延伸查詢new window
7.葉素萍(2012)。國考擬納人格測驗 試委憂冒進,https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%9C%8B%E8%80%83%E6%93%AC%E7%B4%8D%E4%BA%BA%E6%A0%BC%E6%B8%AC%E9%A9%97-%E8%A9%A6%E5%A7%94%E6%86%82%E5%86%92%E9%80%B2-085016543.html。  new window
8.趙麗雲(2013)。考試院第11屆第225次會議紀錄,http://www.exam.gov.tw/cp.asp?xltem=17585&ctNode=411&mp=l。  new window
9.歐育誠(2013)。考試院第11屆第225次會議紀錄,http://www.exam.gov.tw/cp.asp?xltem=17585&ctNode=411&mp=l。  new window
10.蔡式淵(2013)。考試院第11屆第225次會議紀錄,http://www.exam.gov.tw/cp.asp?xItem=l7585&ctNode=411&mp=1。  new window
11.蔡良文(2011)。考試院第11屆第121次會議紀錄,http://www.exam.gov.tw/cp.asp?xItem=13216&ctNode=411&mp=2。  new window
12.Briault, S.。Applying to the Civil Service,http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/shared/shared_careers/pdf/Misc-Applying_to_the _Civil_Service_Fast_Stream.pdf。  new window
13.Careers & Employability Service(2013)。Aptitude &personality (psychometric) practice tests,http://www.mmu.ac.uk/careers/students-and-graduates/resources/guides/aptitude-personality-practice-tests.pdf。  new window
14.Careers and Employability Centre, Glasgow Caledonian University(2011)。Careers Service guide to psychometric tests explained,http://www.gcu.ac.Uk/media/gcalwebv2/caec/PsychometricTestExplained2011.pdf。  new window
15.Civil Service Fast Stream(2014)。What is FSAC,http://faststream.civilservice.gov.uk/media/l 65393/111387-csfs-fsac-a4.pdf。  new window
16.Civil Service Fast Stream(2014)。Visitors' guide to the Fast Stream Assessment Centre,https://candidate.faststream.gov.uk/faststream2014/cqtmaps/Downloads/VisitorGuideToFSAC.pdf。  new window
17.Civil Service Fast Stream(2014)。A step-by-step-guide to your application,http://faststream.civilservice.gov.uk/application-process/application-process/。  new window
18.Civil Service Human Resource(2013)。Civil service competency framework 2012-2017,http://resources.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Civil-Service-Competency-Framework-Feb2013.pdf。  new window
19.Job Test Prep(2014)。Civil Service Assessment Centre Exercises and Interview Preparation,http://www.jobtestprep.co.uk/civilservice#i\nterview-questions。  new window
20.Psychometric Success(2014)。Introduction to personality tests,http://www.psychometric-success.com/personality-tests/personality-tests-introd uction.htm。  new window
21.White, E.(2006)。Personality tests aim to stop “fakers” : Some say tool's accuracy could be improved to make misrepresentations harder,http://www.wsj.com/articles/SBl16277960977814145。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 書評:神的職業vs.人的工作:為什麼公共服務動機很重要?[Perry, James L.,«Managing Organiaztion to Sustain Passion for Public Service»(管理組織以保持對公共服務的熱情)(Cambridge University Press,,2021)]
2. 公共服務動機、人格特質及情緒智力隱性職能量表導入政府機關可行性分析
3. 2018年公務人員年金改革對我國文官態度之影響
4. 國考分發與類科對資淺公務人員轉調傾向之影響:公共服務動機為調節變項
5. 析探初任高考公務人員的工作責任、工作生活平衡及人際關係滿意度之影響
6. 公務人員基礎訓練能有效鑑別出高度公共服務動機的公務人員嗎?TGBS-Ⅲ調查資料的檢視
7. 公務人員為何沉默?公部門權力距離與員工沉默行為對工作滿意度之影響
8. 「合得來」重要嗎?公務人員個人組織配適度對工作滿意度之影響
9. 公務人員「單位離職傾向」之影響因素分析
10. 情緒智力對工作滿意度之影響:公共服務動機的中介效果與調節效果
11. 動保文官同情疲勞現象、成因、影響及因應策略之思辨
12. 繁文縟節如何影響公共服務動機?2011年臺灣文官調查資料之分析
13. 公共服務動機:回顧、反思與未來方向
14. 書評:觀察政府菁英[1.R. A. W. Rhodes, P.'t. Hart and M. Noordegraaf eds., «Observing Government Elites» (觀察政府菁英) (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2007) 2.R. A. W. Rhodes, «Everyday Life in British Government» (英國政府中的日常生活) (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2011)]
15. 逆境商數與心理擁有感之研究:臺灣省政府個案分析
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE