:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:創造性轉化:藝術創作碩士生之創作學習經驗探究
書刊名:臺灣教育社會學研究
作者:鄧宗聖 引用關係
作者(外文):Deng, Tzong Sheng
出版日期:2017
卷期:17:2
頁次:頁97-140
主題關鍵詞:創造性轉化多模態創作學習藝術創作Creative transformationMultimodalityCreative learningArtistic creation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:243
  • 點閱點閱:11
本研究以臺灣教育脈絡為始、個人心智乃社會產物的前提下,將個人創作學習視為教育創新的途徑。研究者以G. Kress的素養論為基礎,運用多模態溝通觀點,進一步理解,創作者學習者如何描繪實務經驗與意義的轉化。 本研究招募20位藝術創作碩士生,以分組團體(媒體藝術、表演藝術、視覺藝術)進行創作學習的自我敘說,以相似性原則分別從「前備經驗」、「時間醞釀」、「團體心智」與「創造連結」四個面向做討論。研究發現,自我探索特別重要,故能為作品忍受未知的境遇,並善用積極等待的狀態,在意圖中找到作品中的歧義性、聯想與探索的自由度,意圖則交織在表現中,在自我分析中轉化為創作材料。建議未來教育能將創作視為培養獨創性與社會心智的媒介,深度認識自我與世界關係的行動。
Set within the context of Taiwanese education, and based on the premise of individual mentality being a social consequence, this study poses individual creative learning as an approach to educational creativity. Based on Gunther Kress’s theory of literacy, the perspective of multimodality was employed to gain better understanding of how creative learners portray practical experience and recognize meaning in transformation. The study recruited 20 master’s students studying creative arts. They were divided into discussion groups (media arts, performance arts and visual arts), in which they engaged in self-narratives related to creative learning. Then, the similarity principle was used in the paper to identify four dimensions: “preparatory experience,” “the brewing of ideas through time,” “group mentality,” and “creative association”. The research results revealed that self-exploration was particularly important, as was enduring uncertainty in the creative process and making productive use of the positive waiting state. During this phase they were able to find ambiguities in their intent as well as freedom to associate ideas and explore creatively. Their intent is woven into their expression, which is transformed into creative materials during their self-analysis. It is proposed that education in the future should consider the creative act as a medium for cultivating innovation and social mentality, through which one can contemplate at a deeper level and become acquainted with one’s actions arising from one’s relationship with the world.
期刊論文
1.鄧宗聖(20110600)。學生投書中再現之教育問題與學生主體:1993-2009年之聯合報民意論壇。臺灣教育社會學研究,11(1),119-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃筱慧(20080100)。論述之詮釋行動理論中的時間與敘事。哲學與文化,35(1)=404,71-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.鄧宗聖(20130700)。藝術創作:發想與實踐--藝術本位研究的觀點。視覺藝術論壇,8,2-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.夏林清(20080100)。卡榫--拮抗同行的社會學習。哲學與文化,35(1)=404,123-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.劉豐榮(20111200)。藝術中精神性智能與全人發展之觀點及學院藝術教學概念架構。藝術研究期刊,7,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.楊忠斌(20150600)。評析自然美學的爭論及其在美育上的意涵。當代教育研究季刊,23(2),115-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.周淑卿(20090600)。借鏡於藝術的教學--與「藝術創作者/教師」的對話。當代教育研究,17(2),1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.何粵東(20050300)。敘說研究方法論初探。應用心理研究,25,55-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.劉豐榮(20150700)。藝術創造性的迷思與省思及其對藝術創作教與學之啟示。視覺藝術論壇,10,2-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.巴隴鋒(2007)。影視人類學作品影視化初探。樂山師範學院學報,22(7),48-51。  延伸查詢new window
11.Palmer, Richard E.、李惠美(20080200)。《真理與方法》的原始目的以及從狄爾泰、海德格到高達美的哲學詮釋學發展。哲學與文化,35(2)=405,109-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳明莉(2007)。公主追殺令導演安德斯摩根泰勒:十題丹麥動畫導演大哉問。Look電影雜誌,125,38-39。  延伸查詢new window
13.彭懋龍(2007)。亞瑟的奇幻王國:毫髮人的冒險。Look電影雜誌,125,34-45。  延伸查詢new window
14.鄧宗聖(20150700)。臺灣學院藝師在創作指導上教學實踐之歷程分析:從藝術本位觀點立論。課程與教學,18(3),95-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.鄧宗聖(20170100)。創作實務與研究:創造性學習的途徑。藝術評論,32,23-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.賴誠斌、丁興祥(20050300)。自我書寫與生命創化:以蘆荻社大學員蕃薯的故事為例。應用心理研究,25,73-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.劉仲嚴(20100500)。藝術本位研究方法論與方法的議題和前景。藝術教育研究,19,1-23+25-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.何淑靜(2009)。論亞氏倫理學中的Theoria/θεωρια一字之意涵--就中文翻譯與了解來說。第五屆兩岸三地四校南北哲學論壇學術研討會,國立政治大學哲學系主辦 。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.林文瑛(1998)。「理解」的根源--從兒童的世界觀看隱喻式思考 (計畫編號:NSC87-2413-H030-005)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.趙敦華(1996)。維根斯坦。臺北市:生智。  延伸查詢new window
2.Wittgenstein, L.、Anscombe, G. E. M.(1958)。Philosophical Investigations。Oxford:Blackwell。  new window
3.Johnson, A. G.、成令方、林鶴玲、吳嘉苓(2003)。見樹又見林:社會學作為一種生活、實踐與承諾。臺北市:群學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林語堂(1994)。生活的藝術。臺南市:文國。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉思量(1998)。藝術心理學:藝術與創造。臺北市:藝術家。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Tatarkiewicz, W.、劉文譚(2005)。西洋六大美學理念史。臺北市:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
7.Senge, P.、齊若蘭(1995)。第五項修練:共創學習新經驗。臺北市:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.Trigg, R.、黎德星、朱家琳、蘇羿如(2009)。社會科學概論。臺北市:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
9.Eisner, R. W.(1972)。Educating artistic vision。London:Collier-Macmillan。  new window
10.Kress, G.(2003)。Literacies in the new media age。New York:Routledge。  new window
11.Sullivan, Graeme(2005)。Art practice as research: inquiry in the visual arts。Sage。  new window
12.Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark(1980)。Metaphors We Live by。University of Chicago Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.林崇熙(2014)。學問,就是學著發問︰談問題意識與課程發想。課的反身。臺南市:成功大學醫學科技與社會研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.李丁讚(2014)。全球競爭體系下的學術自由與校園民主。課的反身。臺南市:成功大學醫學科技與社會研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Barthes, R.(1994)。The death of the author。Media texts, authors and readers: A reader。Clevedon:Multilingual Matters。  new window
4.鄧宗聖(2016)。創作學習的教育實踐。面對新世代的課程實踐。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
5.Graddol, D.(1994)。The visual accomplishment of factuality。Media texts, authors and readers: A reader。Clevedon:Multilingual Matters。  new window
6.Bowman, J.(1998)。Broadcast television: African American touch create their own vision。Social learning from broadcast television。Cresskill, NJ:Hampton Press。  new window
7.Buckingham, D.(1998)。Doing them harm? Children's conceptions of negative effects of television。Social learning from broadcast television。Cresskill, NJ:Hampton Press。  new window
8.Davey, N.(2006)。Art and theoria。Thinking through art: Reflections on art as research。New York:Routledge。  new window
9.Halliday, M. A. K.(1994)。Spoken and written modes of meaning。Media texts, authors and readers: A reader。Clevedon:Multilingual Matters。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE